The Man in the High Castle (Tie-In)

The Man in the High Castle (Tie-In)

by Philip K. Dick

Paperback(Media Tie)

$14.74 $14.99 Save 2% Current price is $14.74, Original price is $14.99. You Save 2%.
View All Available Formats & Editions
Eligible for FREE SHIPPING
  • Want it by Thursday, October 25?   Order by 12:00 PM Eastern and choose Expedited Shipping at checkout.
    Same Day shipping in Manhattan. 
    See Details


The Man in the High Castle (Tie-In) by Philip K. Dick

Now an Amazon Original series
Winner of the Hugo Award
“The single most resonant and carefully imagined book of Dick’s career”—New York Times
It’s America in 1962. Slavery is legal once again. The few Jews who still survive hide under assumed names. In San Francisco, the I Ching is as common as the Yellow Pages. All because some twenty years earlier the United States lost a war—and is now occupied by Nazi Germany and Japan.
This harrowing, Hugo Award–winning novel is the work that established Philip K. Dick as an innovator in science fiction while breaking the barrier between science fiction and the serious novel of ideas. In it Dick offers a haunting vision of history as a nightmare from which it may just be possible to wake.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781328849861
Publisher: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Publication date: 02/28/2017
Edition description: Media Tie
Pages: 288
Sales rank: 636,076
Product dimensions: 5.20(w) x 7.90(h) x 0.90(d)

About the Author

Over a writing career that spanned three decades, PHILIP K. DICK (1928–1982) published 36 science fiction novels and 121 short stories in which he explored the essence of what makes man human and the dangers of centralized power. Toward the end of his life, his work turned toward deeply personal, metaphysical questions concerning the nature of God. Eleven novels and short stories have been adapted to film, notably Blade Runner (based on Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?), Total Recall,Minority Report, and A Scanner Darkly. The recipient of critical acclaim and numerous awards throughout his career, Dick was inducted into the Science Fiction Hall of Fame in 2005, and in 2007 the Library of America published a selection of his novels in three volumes. His work has been translated into more than twenty-five languages.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

The Man in the High Castle 3.7 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 123 reviews.
Guest More than 1 year ago
I don't like alternate history stories, dating back, I think, to when I was a kid and I read those stupid 'What If...' issues published by Marvel Comics. (You know, 'What If Peter Parker hadn't been bitten by the radioactive spider...,''What If Daredevil wasn't blind...,''What If Wolverine shaved his sideburns...,' etc.) The Man in the High Castle, however, was excellent, setting the bar for the genre. The premise is intriguing: suppose an assassination attempt had claimed the life of FDR during his first term as president. As a result, America never fully recovered from the Great Depression, and was unable to arm herself sufficiently to turn the tide of WWII. As a result, the Axis powers were victorious, and occupied a divided United States after the war. Dick ties together his diverse cast of characters with a common fascination with 'The Grasshopper Lies Heavy,' an alternative history book that suggests the Allies would have won the war had FDR lived. Dick's central theme through most of his work has always been the nature of reality and perception, and this book is no exception. This is not a book to skim through for the major plot points -- the plot is actually the least compelling reason to read it. Savor the meditative and philosophical prose instead, and enjoy one of the genre's finest authors in his prime.
tickleishpickle More than 1 year ago
There are books out there that don't just challenge the reader, there are books that change the reader. The man in the high castle, by philip k dick is one of those books. This book, like all of dick's writing, is revolutionary. It is challenging. It is completely and utterly bizzare. It is unique, difficult, simple, readable, entertaining, schizophrenic and so much more than any set of adjectives can covey. This book is not about the plot. It's about what the plot means. The plot, like all of dick's novels, is cohesive and interesting and detailed. It is fully realized and detailed; it is completely authentic. In this world, the axis wins WW 2. The world that results is a world where Japan and Germany have divided the world in two, with the United States serving the role of Germany after our version of WW2. Japan dominates the west coast while Germany lords over the east. Apparently the heartland of America had nothing to offer to either side. Jokes aside (especially bad jokes), this novel is an utterly amazing and philosophical exploration of the impact of morality on each and every choice. It uses the chaos of the plot to accentuate the moral decisions made by each character. In fact the chaos of the world this novel takes place in works as a sort of synecdoche for each person and each person's choices. The whole world is difficult, and each event impacts a web of other events. The world and it's events mirror each individual person, they stand in the place of each individual person. The plot unfolds through the narration of five people, ranging in importance from a low level worker to an important German politician. Each person makes choices, and each choice has a moral consequence. read the full review at
theactuallisakim More than 1 year ago
I'm pretty shocked by some of the negative reviews here. The word that controls most of these reviews is 'boring,' which is odd. I suppose for a generation unable to watch a film that doesn't have an explosion of some sort within the first minute of the movie, a book like this might seem boring (then again, maybe we should be happy that Generation No Attention Span even bothered to pick up a book in the first place!) This is one of the books PKD is best known for. With good reason. For those of you who didn't "get" what PKD's point was, he is simply asking you to question everything you are told about who the winners and losers in a war are. I think the end of this book is one of the most chilling, disturbing conclusions I have ever read. Literally gave me goosebumps. Then again, I can focus on something for more than three minutes at a time, so maybe, in this day and age, I'm some sort of freak!
Tunguz More than 1 year ago
Philip K. Dick is a master of unconventional sci-fi and fantasy genre, and those qualities are clearly exhibited in this work. It is set in 1960s America in a world in which Germany and Japan have won the World War II. US and the rest of the world are divided between those two superpowers, and we follow lives of several ordinary Americans who try to adjust themselves to this reality. The characters in the novel are fully developed in a manner that we've come to expect from Dick's later novels. Their personal struggles are intertwined with the new geopolitical power plays. The title of the novel refers to the sobriquet for Hawthorne Abendsen, a fictional writer of the book "The Grasshopper Lies Heavy" which forms a story-within-a-story and a sort of MacGuffin for this novel. This fictional book will also be at the center of the denouement of this novel, and may provide the clue for what this novel was all about. The Man in the High Castle is another brilliant and thought provoking novel. It is an engrossing and fun read as well, and a true classic of science fiction.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Truth to tell, I read this after watching the TV series in the hopes of clearing up some questions. Turns out the book and the series are quite different. Same characters, same locations (mostly, anyway), same basic themes. But different plot lines and character types. Book was great. That much is certain. Series based on the book, just OK.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Great book! Not too many books actually make you think anymore. This is classic Dick, a throughly original and deeply philosophical novel that makes you question what or whodetermines fate. I feel more enlightened having read this.
MyklSkeleton More than 1 year ago
I really like Philip K Dick but for some reason I had never read this one. I finally picked it up and am glad I did. It's a memorable story with some crazy characters but it's more grounded than some of his other work. I liked the incorporation of the I, Ching and Asian culture in general. My main problem with it was there didn't seem to much of a plot for quite some time. But I can deal with that and go along for the ride. The other thing that some people might not like is that it ends right before things wrap-up. This is typical of Dick and I've come to accept that but it makes your really wish there was a sequel. Overall though, a great book.
Guest More than 1 year ago
The first time I read this book I didn't really think it was that great. I liked it but I was a little bit confused by it, and I didn't think it measured up to other works by Dick like Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? However, I recently re-read it after recieving it as a birthday present, and I must say that it makes much more sense the second time through. I noticed glimpses of Dick's genius that had slipped by me before and finally understood everything that was going on. Not only is the premise extremely interesting, but I also like how it doesn't just get bogged down in the geo-political implications of an Axis victory, but deals more with actual people who live in this strange and different world. At times shocking at others just silly it is a great read that doesn't really require too much thinking, but rather provokes thought on the part of the reader.
Guest More than 1 year ago
In 1938 (or there about, there was an attempt to kill FDR during his run for re-election), what if he *had* been killed? Only Philip K. Dick (who won the Hugo Award for SF that year for this novel) could answer this question in so intriguing a way. (A short film called 'The High Castle' was made based on it). Enjoy!
Countmonster More than 1 year ago
I picked this nook book up because I just watched the Amazon pilot based on the book. It's just as fantastic as I remember it to be, the pilot was pretty good too. PKD has a beautiful zen paranoia in his writing. Pretty much everything by him deals with trust, or lack of. No one knows what anyone else is ever thinking, and they are always trying to assume it is something negative. Neurosis abounds in PKD novels and it's beautiful and wrenching all at once. TMITHC is no different than his other works in that regard. But this book has always been kind of special to me because it's an incredible, open ended alternate history book. Don't get hung up if you're only used to his futuristic dystopian sci-fi, this is just as good, if not better than a lot of his other stories.
elmyra on LibraryThing 7 days ago
Alternative history centred around another alternative history. Frightening thought experiment, and another reminder that it's always the winner who writes history.
selfnoise on LibraryThing 13 days ago
A dystopic alternate history, mixed with metaphysics. Extremely effective and disturbing. It will stay with you for a long time.
ejp1082 on LibraryThing 13 days ago
I cannot sing the praises of this book highly enough - this is surely Philip K. Dick's best work. The novel, on the face of it, is a dystopian vision of an alternate history where the Axis powers won World War II. It's frighteningly real, the world that PKD paints is full of complex characters and believable relationships, it falls into none of the ridiculous traps that often accompany the portrayal of Nazis in science fiction (in fact, the Nazis play a very small role in the novel overall).Of course, in true PKD style, this isn't just an alternate history story; its full of metaphysical philosophy and the author challenges our own view of what reality is. The book is a window, through which we can gain a glimpse at this frightening dystopia - but the characters spend just as much time peering back at us, into our world, wondering what history would be like had events unfolded differently.I think of all the novels I've read in the last several years, this is the one that made the most impact on me and stuck with me the longest. Altogether, this is an incredibly difficult book to describe or do justice in a review: If you're a fan of Philip K. Dick, or even if you're not, this one won't disappoint you.
suffe on LibraryThing 14 days ago
Many people seem to categorise this as science fiction. I fail to see why. With the exception of very minor things that are mentioned only in the passing, this is more of a social critique from a writer that is, perhaps, best known for his sci-fi work, not a sci-fi work in itself.It is, however, an interesting look into the post-WW2 world with the twist that the Axis won instead of the Allies. If you're expecting a suspense novel, stay clear. If you are on the lookout for something that takes an interesting view on what could have happened and are willing to let go of your demands for a bombastic plot line*, this is for you.In a way, it doesn't even have a plot line so much as several small sub-plots.
Anonymous 4 months ago
I hate to admit that I had to seriously analyze the ending to the story to grasp what was actually happening. So much build up and character development; deliberately anticlimactic. This novel challenged my abstract thinking. It's still feels unfinished, which is hard to live with.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Never read any of his novels before but have thoroughlu enjoyed many of them as movies. Usually I will do the novel first then end up saying "Oh they strayed so far from the movie and just ruined it!" But The Man in the High Castle was so disappointing to me because so little effort was given to development of characters, and "the Man" himself seemed such a small character in the plot. Tagomi was nearly more important than he! I just felt lost in the ramblings amongst all the oracle stuff, etc. It really only got interesting when we followed Julianna.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
From what I have read of his work, this was the most strange to me. I enjoyed it thoroughly, but will have to read it again to fully grasp it.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Really not my cup of tea. I read the book because of all the 4 and 5 stars. I'm happy so many of you enjoyed the book. I found the character development lacking and tedious. The characters were just mediocre at best. I'm quite happy that it was a short read. It took more than 3/4 of the book to start becoming interesting which led to a quite dull ending.
JimRGill2012 More than 1 year ago
As a reader who is not an aficionado of speculative fiction or alternative historical fiction, this novel left me rather perplexed. Having read Robert Harris’ “Fatherland” a number of years ago (and having enjoyed it) and spurred by the popularity of the Amazon TV series inspired by Dick’s novel, I dove in. Set in an alternate post-WWII America that has been divided by the victorious Japanese and Nazis, the narrative focuses on five or six characters whose stories never quite coalesce; the fragmented narrative structure in itself is not necessarily a flaw (plenty of good novels feature fragmented narratives), but in Dick’s novel, it definitely creates a lack of coherence that ultimately enervates the novel. More than half the book is devoted to exposition, but the payoff—which doesn’t really emerge until the final three chapters or so, once again in very fragmented fashion—feels uncertain and anticlimactic. Complicating matters is a novel within the novel, an alternate history that presumes the Allies had won the war but is itself different from the actual historical record (e.g., FDR did not serve four terms as President). Excerpts from this novel, called “The Grasshopper Lies Heavy,” along with the “I Ching,” which every character seems to consult for guidance, appear throughout the story, yet again these elements fail to add any sort of coherence to the narrative. Perhaps my lack of expertise in this genre handicaps my appreciation of this novel (which did, after all, win the Hugo Award), but I was, in the end, disappointed.
ryanseanoreilly More than 1 year ago
A story of subtle nuances containing picturesque fables that compound reality in philosophic deep strokes. This story is told from seven different points of view which include the unlikely characters of: a judo instructor; an antique dealer; a publisher; and a craftsman. Not what you would expect from a story about an alternate history where the axis powers (Japan and Germany) win World War II and divide up pieces of the world. Most refreshing, was PKD’s choice of setting the story in a timeline after World War II. He establishes a plot just far enough along that the main historical players are still walking around in the background, which roots the story into the reader’s subconscious. Yet, the world has moved on from active conflict. The tale centers around a society that is getting on with things. A drawback for this is that he’s not giving you much action like you might normally get in an alternate history centered around World War II. That said, there is always some violence lurking in the background (on the other side of reality or the other side of a door). The story is full of gamesmanship, surreptitious politics and cultural conflicts. However, as noted by other reviewers, this is mostly in the inner monologues of the Point-of-View, characters, which proves fascinating as the characters continually strategize and second guess their ways through the surrounding clash of cultures. This book felt very different when compared to some of the other works by PKD I have read (not many). The prose felt the tightest and most polished I’ve seen from him. That said, PKD seemed to make a purposeful, stylistic choice when building out the voice for the individual characters and he wrote many of them in a staccato, broken-type of prose when monologuing their internal thoughts. This gave the sentences an “alien-like” feel and threw off the reading a bit, but was not too distracting. The distinction between thoughts and dialog also served as a continual reminder to the reader that the current reality is not the same reality that they themselves inhabit. In typical PKD fashion there is a never-ending stripping away of reality’s onion skin layers. Behind everything going on, someone or some thing is driving the currents of life in different directions. The characters, at times, all feel lost and flailing among the forces around them—but then again—don’t we all have these moments? To find order and meaning, many of the characters turn to an ancient Chinese divination book that acts as an oracle. The randomizing patterns in this tome make reference to philosophical expositions which can put a certain “lens” on current events or things to come. Yet, as with most fortunetelling, interpretation is everything. PKD does manage to find a way to use this device in a masterful and unconventional way and tie many of the plot points together. The denouement is simply bursting with all the existential genius which this author is famous for. Just a great picture of how much, seemingly unrelated things can affect other things. Podcast: If you enjoy my review (or this topic) this book and the movie based on it were further discussed/debated in a lively discussion on my podcast: "No Deodorant In Outer Space". The podcast is available on iTunes, Tune-In Radio, Stitcher, Google Play Music, YouTube or our website.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Definitely visionary to the brain and reading. Great book, don't want to spoil anything other than saying its a must read. But, it does get a little confusing because it shows many conflicts from many people at the same time. Just reread certain passages if lost.
kplivermore More than 1 year ago
Great TV series from a boring book. I have been enjoying the Amazon series, and decided to read the book while waiting for season 2. The series is only very loosely based on the characters and plot. The book is more deep character musings about life and culture, and leans heavily on the I Ching to supposedly drive what little plot there is. The ending was very disappointing. Maybe there was supposed to be a sequel to explore the alternate universe premise?
Larry46 More than 1 year ago
I love alternate History; But this was Dull and Boring;
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
The Amazon miniseries captivated me, can't wait to read the book!