Modern philosophy finds it difficult to give a satisfactory picture of the place of minds in the world. In Mind and World, one of the most distinguished philosophers writing today offers his diagnosis of this difficulty and points to a cure.
|Publisher:||Harvard University Press|
|Sold by:||Barnes & Noble|
|File size:||796 KB|
About the Author
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
John McDowell's writing has been characterized as "dense." Having read several of his other papers, I do not think this is a totally unfair charge. The opposite needs to be said of Mind and World: it is refreshingly accessible. This book weaves rigorous argumentation with historical stage-setting effortlessly. Unfortunately, to fully appreciate some of McDowell's points, it requires a substantial background in philosophy, although I do not think that such a background is necessary to grasp the main argument of the book (the philosophers that McDowell grapples with most explicitly are Donald Davidson, Kant, and Gareth Evans, although I think that a perusal of 20th century analytic philosophy is sufficient). I say "unfortunately" because I think that anyone who has ever worried about how we could square our conception of ourselves as rational, free, and meaningful beings with a scientific conception of the world as constituted by arational, deterministic, and meaningless particles and forces, needs to read this book. McDowell seeks to alleviate this anxiety, not by offering a constructive account of minds and the world, but by disabusing us of some assumptions we have understandably adopted in light of the hard-won intellectual advances made by modern science. Whether or not his diagnosis of our situation is correct is something that has, and will be, debated for some time. That said, I do not think it is contentious to say that his argument is careful and compelling and that the book should be read by anyone studying or planning to study the philosophy of science, mind, and even ethics.