The Night of the Gun: A Reporter Investigates the Darkest Story of His Life. His Own.

The Night of the Gun: A Reporter Investigates the Darkest Story of His Life. His Own.

by David Carr

Paperback

$17.00
View All Available Formats & Editions
Choose Expedited Shipping at checkout for guaranteed delivery by Friday, January 25

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781416541530
Publisher: Simon & Schuster
Publication date: 06/02/2009
Pages: 400
Sales rank: 180,870
Product dimensions: 5.40(w) x 8.40(h) x 1.00(d)

About the Author

David Carr was a reporter and the “Media Equation” columnist for The New York Times. Previously, he wrote for the Atlantic Monthly and New York magazine and was editor of the Twin Cities Reader in Minneapolis. The author of the acclaimed memoir, The Night of the Gun, he passed away in February 2015.

Read an Excerpt

1

Gun Play

Sure as a gun. — Don Quixote

The voice came from a long distance off, like a far-flung radio signal, all crackle and mystery with just an occasional word coming through. And then it was as if a hill had been crested and the signal locked. The voice was suddenly clear.

"You can get up from this chair, go to treatment, and keep your job. There's a bed waiting for you. Just go," said the editor, a friendly guy, sitting behind the desk. "Or you can refuse and be fired." Friendly but firm.

The static returned, but now he had my attention. I knew about treatment — I had mumbled the slogans, eaten the Jell-O, and worn the paper slippers, twice. I was at the end of my monthlong probation at a business magazine in Minneapolis; it had begun with grave promises to reform, to show up at work like a normal person, and I had almost made it. But the day before, March 17, 1987, was Saint Patrick's Day. Obeisance was required for my shanty Irish heritage. I twisted off the middle of the workday to celebrate my genetic loading with green beer and Jameson Irish whiskey. And cocaine. Lots and lots of coke. There was a van, friends from the office, and a call to some pals, including Tom, a comedian I knew. We decided to attend a small but brave Saint Patrick's Day parade in Hopkins, Minnesota, the suburban town where I grew up.

My mother made the parade happen through sheer force of will. She blew a whistle, and people came. There were no floats, just a bunch of drunk Irish-for-a-days and their kids, yelling and waving banners to unsuspecting locals who set up folding chairs as if there were going to be a real parade. After we walked down Main Street accompanied only by those sad little metal noisemakers, we all filed into the Knights of Columbus hall. The adults did standup drinking while the kids assembled for some entertainment. I told my mom that Tom the comedian had some good material for the kids. He immediately began spraying purple jokes in all directions and was wrestled off the stage by a few nearby adults. I remember telling my mom we were sorry as we left, but I don't remember precisely what happened after that.

I know we did lots of "more." That's what we called coke. We called it more because it was the operative metaphor for the drug. Even if it was the first call of the night, we would say, "You got any more?" because there would always be more — more need, more coke, more calls.

After the Knights of Columbus debacle — it was rendered as a triumph after we got in the van — we went downtown to McCready's, an Irish bar in name only that was kind of a clubhouse for our crowd. We had some more, along with shots of Irish whiskey. We kept calling it "just a wee taste" in honor of the occasion. The shot glasses piled up between trips to the back room for line after line of coke, and at closing time we moved to a house party. Then the dreaded walk home accompanied by the chirping of birds.

That's how it always went, wheeling through bars, selling, cadging, or giving away coke, drinking like a sailor and swearing like a pirate. And then somehow slinking into work as a reporter. Maybe it took a line or two off the bottom of the desk drawer to achieve battle readiness in the morning, but hey, I was there, wasn't I?

On the day I got fired — it would be some time before I worked again — I was on the last vapors of a young career that demonstrated real aptitude. Even as I was getting busy with the coke at night, I was happy to hold the cops and government officials to account in my day job. Getting loaded, acting the fool, seemed like a part of the job description, at least the way I did it. Editors dealt with my idiosyncrasies — covering the city council in a bowling shirt and red visor sunglasses — because I was well sourced in what was essentially a small town and wrote a great deal of copy. I saw my bifurcated existence as the best of both worlds, no worries. But now that mad run seemed to be over. I sat with my hands on the arms of the chair that suddenly seemed wired with very strong current.

There was no time to panic, but the panic came anyway. Holy shit. They are on to me.

The editor prodded me gently for an answer. Treatment or professional unallotment? For an addict the choice between sanity and chaos is sometimes a riddle, but my mind was suddenly epically clear.

"I'm not done yet."

Things moved quickly after that. After a stop at my desk, I went down the elevator and out into a brutally clear morning. Magically, my friend Paul was walking down the street in front of my office building, looking ravaged in a leather coat and sunglasses. He hadn't even beaten the birds home. I told him I had just been fired, which was clinically true but not the whole story. A folk singer of significant talent and many virulent songs about the wages of working for The Man, Paul understood immediately. He had some pills of iffy provenance — neither he nor I knew much about pills — maybe they were muscle relaxers. I ate them.

Freshly, emphatically fired, I was suffused with a rush of sudden liberation. A celebration was in order. I called Donald, my trusty wingman. A pal from college, he was tall, dark, and compliant, a boon companion once he got a couple of pops in him. We had first met at a crappy state college in Wisconsin, where we tucked dozens of capers under our belts. We had been washed down a mountain in the Smokies inside a tent, created a campfire out of four stacked picnic tables at Wolf River, and casually taken out picket fences and toppled mailboxes during road trips all over Wisconsin. Our shared taste for skipping classes in lieu of hikes, Frisbee, and dropping acid during college had been replaced by new frolics once we both moved on to Minneapolis.

We worked restaurant jobs, pouring and downing liquor, spending the ready cash as fast as it came in. "Make some calls!" became the warm-up line for many a night of grand foolishness. We shared friends, money, and, once, a woman named Signe, a worldly cocktail waitress who found herself wanly amused by the two guys tripping on acid one night at closing time at a bar called Moby Dick's. "Let me know when you boys are finished," she said in a bored voice as Donald and I grinned madly at each other from either end of her. We didn't care. He was a painter and photographer when he wasn't getting shit faced. And at a certain point, I became a journalist when I wasn't ingesting all the substances I could get my hands on. We were a fine pair. Now that I had been fired for cause, there was no doubt that Donald would know what to say.

"Fuck 'em," he said when he met me at McCready's to toast my first day between opportunities. The pills had made me a little hinky, but I shook it off with a snort of coke. Nicely prepped, we went to the Cabooze, a Minneapolis blues bar. Details are unclear, but there was some sort of beef inside, and we were asked to leave. Donald complained on the way out that I was always getting us 86'd, and my response included throwing him across the expansive hood of his battered '75 LTD. Seeing the trend, he drove away, leaving me standing with thirty-four cents in my pocket. That detail I remember.

I was pissed: Not about losing my job — they'd be sorry. Not about getting 86'd — that was routine. But my best friend had abandoned me. I was livid, and somebody was going to get it. I walked the few miles back to McCready's to refuel and called Donald at home.

"I'm coming over." Hearing the quiet menace in my voice, he advised me against it; that he had a gun.

"Oh really? Now I'm coming over for sure."

He and his sister Ann Marie had a nice rental on Nicollet Avenue in a rugged neighborhood on the south side of Minneapolis, not far from where I lived. I don't remember how I got there, but I stormed up to the front door — a thick one of wood and glass — and after no one answered, I tried kicking my way in. My right knee started to give way before my sneaker did any damage. Ann Marie, finally giving in to the commotion, came to the door and asked me what I was going to do if I came in.

"I just want to talk to him."

Donald came to the door and, true to his word, had a handgun at his side. With genuine regret on his face, he said he was going to call the cops. I had been in that house dozens of times and knew the phone was in his bedroom. I limped around the corner and put my fist through the window, grabbed the phone, and held it aloft in my bloody arm. "All right, call 'em, motherfucker! Call 'em! Call the goddamn cops!" I felt like Jack Fucking Nicholson. Momentarily impressed, Donald recovered long enough to grab the phone out of my bloody hand and do just that.

When we met again through the glass of the front door, he still had the gun, but his voice was now friendly. "You should leave. They're coming right now." I looked down Nicollet toward Lake Street and saw a fast-moving squad car with the cherries lit, no siren.

I wasn't limping anymore. I had eight blocks to go to my apartment, full tilt all the way. Off the steps, 'round the house, and into the alleys. Several squads were crisscrossing. What the hell did Donald tell them? I thought as I sprinted. I dove behind a Dumpster to avoid one squad coming around the corner, opening up a flap of jeans and skin on my other knee. I had to hit the bushes and be very still as the cops strafed the area with their searchlights, but I made it, scurrying up the back steps to my apartment in a fourplex on Garfield Avenue. I was bleeding, covered in sweat, and suddenly very hungry. I decided to heat up some leftover ribs, turned the oven on high, and left the door of it open so I could smell the ribs when they heated up. And then I passed out on my couch.

Every hangover begins with an inventory. The next morning mine began with my mouth. I had been baking all night, and it was as dry as a two-year-old chicken bone. My head was a small prison, all yelps of pain and alarm, each movement seeming to shift bits of broken glass in my skull. My right arm came into view for inspection, caked in blood, and then I saw it had a few actual pieces of glass still embedded in it. So much for metaphor. My legs both hurt, but in remarkably different ways.

Three quadrants in significant disrepair — that must have been some night, I thought absently. Then I remembered I had jumped my best friend outside a bar. And now that I thought about it, that was before I tried to kick down his door and broke a window in his house. And then I recalled, just for a second, the look of horror and fear on his sister's face, a woman I adored. In fact, I had been such a jerk that my best friend had to point a gun at me to make me go away. Then I remembered I'd lost my job.

It was a daylight waterfall of regret known to all addicts. It can't get worse, but it does. When the bottom arrives, the cold fact of it all, it is always a surprise. Over fiteen years, I had made a seemingly organic journey from pothead to party boy, from knockaround guy to friendless thug. At thirty-one, I was washed out of my profession, morally and physically corrupt, but I still had almost a year left in the Life. I wasn't done yet.

In the pantheon of "worst days of my life," getting fired was right up there, but I don't remember precisely how bad it was. You would think that I would recall getting canned with a great deal of acuity. But it was twenty years ago.

Even if I had amazing recall, and I don't, recollection is often just self-fashioning. Some of it is reflexive, designed to bury truths that cannot be swallowed, but other "memories" are just redemption myths writ small. Personal narrative is not simply opening up a vein and letting the blood flow toward anyone willing to stare. The historical self is created to keep dissonance at bay and render the subject palatable in the present.

But my past does not connect to my present. There was That Guy, a dynamo of hilarity and then misery, and then there is This Guy, the one with a family, a house, and a good job as a reporter and columnist for The New York Times. Connecting the two will take a lot more than typing. The first-date version of my story would suggest that I took a short detour into narcotics, went through an aberrant period of buying, selling, snorting, smoking, and finally shooting cocaine, and once I knocked that off, well, all was well.

The meme of abasement followed by salvation is a durable device in literature, but does it abide the complexity of how things really happened? Everyone is told just as much as he needs to know, including the self. In Notes from Underground, Fyodor Dostoevsky explains that recollection — memory, even — is fungible, and often leaves out unspeakable truths, saying, "Man is bound to lie about himself."

I am not an enthusiastic or adept liar. Even so, can I tell you a true story about the worst day of my life? No. To begin with, it was far from the worst day of my life. And those who were there swear it did not happen the way I recall, on that day and on many others. And if I can't tell a true story about one of the worst days of my life, what about the rest of those days, that life, this story?

Nearly twenty years later, in the summer of 2006, I sat in a two-room shack in Newport, a town outside of the Twin Cities, near the stockyards where Donald now lived and worked at a tree farm. He was still handsome, still a boon companion. We hadn't seen each other in years, but what knit us together — an abiding bond hatched in reckless glory — was in the room with us.

I told him the story about the Night of the Gun. He listened carefully and patiently, taking an occasional swig out of a whiskey bottle and laughing at the funny parts. He said it was all true, except the part about the gun. "I never owned a gun," he said. "I think you might have had it."

This is a story about who had the gun.

Copyright © 2008 by David Carr

What People are Saying About This

From the Publisher

"[A] fierce, self-lacerating tale....writing full of that special journalistic energy that is driven by a combination of reporting and intelligence." —Pete Hamill, The New York Times

"[A] remarkable narrative of redemption...He writes with grace and precision...With grit and a recovering user's candor, Mr. Carr has written an arresting tale..." — Edward Kosner, The Wall Street Journal

"3 stars. It's an odyssey you'll find hard to forget." — Kim Hubbard, People

"The Night of the Gun is about as dark and murky as dark and murky get. And though it is one of the most eloquent accounts of the seduction and snare of addiction, what's gotten lost in the water-cooler discussion about Carr's misadventures — including drug peddling as well as his bout with cancer — is that this book, in its sharp, serrated prose, is a meditation on how memory works (but mostly how it doesn't), a man's obsessive effort to get at his life's true narrative using the skills he's honed as a reporter, the one piece of his life that didn't combust." — George Lynell, L.A. Times

"After years of abuse, the memoir has found its white knight, galloping in to show how a personal story can be engrossing, shocking and true. Mr. Carr's book...practically issues a challenge to thosecurrent reigning kings — David Sedaris, Augusten Burroughs, Ishmael Beah — of the memoir genre: You get a video camera and tape recorder, and retrace the steps of your life. Will your story sound the same?...It adds up to a riveting, improbable story. More important, Mr. Carr has produced a work that stands to revive the excitement and thrill of reading about reporting. It's All the President's Men, but about a dude from Minnesota with a drug habit." — New York Observer Review of Books

"There may be no memoirist who has more skillfully used journalistic tools to reconstruct his own life than New York Times media columnist David Carr in his remarkable and harrowing book, The Night of the Gun....A." —Jennifer Reese, Entertainment Weekly

"The Night of the Gun is in part a writerly exercise in defense and disarmament—memoir in the throes of an existential crisis. But that does not prevent it from being a great read. This is largely because, in using his reporter's chops to investigate his own past, Carr taps the very skills that propelled him to survive. His method, as much as his madness, is the story." —Time

"He never asks for sympathy, but his skill and the way he has told his story deserves respect. The Night of the Gun is an amazingly honest and fascinating memoir." — Myrna Blyth, National Review

"The Night of the Gun, is the fierce, funny, disturbing, brutally honest, and ultimately uplifting story of Carr's decent into a self-inflicted hell and a bumpy return to life. Part investigative page-turner, part redemption song, part meditation on the mercurial nature of memory, The Night of the Gun pulls a besmirched genre out of the gutter, drags it through rehab, and returns it to a respectable place in society. And, if there is any justice, a place on the best-seller list." — Arianna Huffington on Veryshortlist.com

Reading Group Guide

This reading group guide for Night of the Gun includes an introduction, discussion questions, and ideas for enhancing your book club. The suggested questions are intended to help your reading group find new and interesting angles and topics for your discussion. We hope that these ideas will enrich your conversation and increase your enjoyment of the book.

“You remember the story you can live with, not the one that happened.”

In The Night of the Gun, David Carr, a renowned journalist for the New York Times, uses his reporting acuity to construct a memoir of his life: a sordid, harrowing tale of a drug addict attempting to reestablish some sense of his humanity. Through a series of setbacks and mishaps, David transforms from a privileged suburban kid into a hardened crack addict with a criminal record, and ultimately winds up a successful journalist and father of three. However, it isn’t just David telling the story.

Admitting the fickle nature of memory (especially that of a self proclaimed drug-addled maniac), David uses a slew of primary sources—video interviews with friends and family, medical records, newspaper clippings, and photographs—to retrace the lost years of his life, and to reconcile his own recollection of his journey through drugs, cancer, and single fatherhood. Self deprecating and articulate, Carr tracks his own narrative while simultaneously using his loved ones to set the record straight. With wit and candor, Carr retraces his life, and finds that much like the fabled Night of the Gun (a reference to an unclear incident during his most intense drug use), what he remembers and what actually happened are not always one and the same



Questions for Discussion

1. Discuss the nature of memory and the way it transforms throughout the book. Re-read Chapter 53 (“We accessorize the memory with the present tense”) and cite examples throughout the story where memory served as a function for the present, as the remembered event turned out to be much different from what actually occurred. Does it matter who had the gun?

2. Compare and contrast the positive and negative forces in his life—from drug buddies to Fast Eddie to the unnamed New York Times bigwig).
3. How did the use of epigraphs affect the reading of each chaptery? Which do you feel correlated most directly with David’s life?

4. Talk about the nature of illness throughout the book—from his numerous addictions to his unfortunate ailments. Which affliction do you think cause the greatest amount of deterioration in his life? Are his addictions “curable?” Are his cancer and medical complications stronger demons? Are both unavoidable?

5. Whose interview was the most poignant? Marion? Anna? The twins? Which primary sources gave you the clearest picture of David’s past? Was the power in their truthful account, or did it lie within their connection to David?

6. How did you feel about David’s relapse into alcoholism after years of sobriety? What do you think drew him back to alcohol? Did you see it coming? Discuss his description of addiction as a “pirate,” or a “guy doing pushups in the basement, ready to come out at any time.”

7. Do you agree that David was justified in seeking and gaining custody of Erin and Meghan? As you were reading, did you question his motivations? In light of the twins’ interviews at the book’s close, how did the birth of the twins affect his life? Did they save him? Did he save them?

8. Can you cite a single major mistake or poor choice that David made as grounds for his descent? If the instance with the twins in the car is his redemptive, revelatory moment, what are the moments that lead to his downward spiral? Is it just a collection of pratfalls?

9. Discuss David’s romances and trysts. Consider Doolie, Anna, Jill, and any others that he was briefly involved with. Track how David’s love life has evolved since his time as a user. What do you make of his admittance of abuse? How do you feel about his marriage to Jill?

10. In Chapter 49, David states, “If memoir is an attempt to fashion the self through narrative, dreams simply reverse the polarity on the same imperative. The future is even more fungible than the past.” Given that, what do you see for David Carr’s future?


Enhance Your Book Club

1. Visit nightofthegun.com and peruse the pictures, documents and videos that David often references in the book. Do the testimonies and back stories affect you differently when served through different media? Do they enrich the story in the book? Discuss the narrative within the context of the website versus that of the book.

2. Sit at your computer and go through the various photos, videos, and other mementos collected from your life. See if you can map a story through non-literary media alone. Attempt to make a photo sequence of your personal evolution, and share your results.
3. In the same vein, write a brief account of an event in your life, and interview a loved one or someone close to you about that same incident. See how the stories match up, how memory informs itself, and how personal narrative becomes shaped. Are there conflicting ideas of the past between you and the other person? Try it with a few subjects and share your results.
4. Visit http://www.salon.com/books/int/2008/08/08/carr/ and read the review/interview with Carr. Does an interview apart from the book have any effect on the content within? Do other mediums and reportages continue to reframe the story and the “fungible nature of memory?”

5. Read a few similar drug-related memoirs (for example, Augusten Burrough’s Dry and Frey’s much-maligned A Million Little Pieces). How do they compare when held against Night of the Gun? Discuss the different constructions of memoir, their similarities, and their weaknesses/strengths.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

The Night of the Gun: A Reporter Investigates the Darkest Story of His Life. His Own. 4 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 26 reviews.
SherMax More than 1 year ago
David Carr's book offers great insight into a life that went terribly wrong, yet somehow turned out right. He acknowledges that he made a multitude of mistakes and didn't fully remember most of them. Going back to the people in his past and attaining their insight into his life must have been so cathartic for him. I didn't find that he wallowed in self-absorption. I believe his goal was to provide a lesson in what can happen if you have no self-constraint and no will to do the right thing on a daily basis. He came very close to self-destruction, teetering on the brink most of the time. Luckily, his amazing talent and his daughters saved him from a life on skid row. This book is well worth reading as a cautionary tale and, in the end, an ultimate testament to the power of self-determination.
reverends on LibraryThing 5 months ago
Autobiographical tales featuring survivors of drug addiction and substance abuse have always been popular. There is something intriguing about listening as someone describes hitting rock bottom, and then somehow managing to miraculously turn themselves around.Of course, such books are so popular that one must sometimes wonder whether the facts have been embellished for the sole purpose of entertainment. The debacle surrounding A Million Little Pieces alerted the literary community to the dangers behind that. While biographies involve investigations on behalf of the author, autobiographies become suspect, as the possible motivations of the self-diarists make them unreliable witnesses at best.This is where David Carr's book steps away from the rest of the pack. The Night of the Gun almost doesn't qualify as an autobiography. He remembers very little of what actually occurred during his days of drug abuse, and what he does remember is almost wholly unreliable. So, be an investigative reporter, he uses the skills on hand to delve into the mystery that is his own life.This is where Carr's book leaves the others behind. He wanders through the down and out periods of his life with a grim curiosity that never lapses into self-pity or melodrama. He could be writing about somebody else entirely, and in some ways, he is. His style isn't emotionless; one would have to be truly cold and indifferent not to feel something while looking back on some of the things Carr did had had done to him. But there is a slight detachment from the source material that keeps his observations from becoming self-serving or, even worse, self-pitying. He not only makes no excuses for his own actions, he doesn't even understand some of them himself.Carr's book will appeal to fans of similar books, such as Permanent Midnight, but don't expect a carbon copy of the format. If Carr's story doesn't appear to have the obviously uplifting ending or tone that you were expecting, that's because it wasn't meant to be that kind of book. Carr isn't telling us his story so we can learn from his mistakes. He exploring his own painful past, like probing the raw nerve beneath a sore tooth, because he just can't bring himself to leave it behind, at last not without knowing what it all must have appeared from the outside looking in.
LancasterWays on LibraryThing 5 months ago
Based on the stats to the side of this page, I¿d guess that those readers, including myself, who took a dim view of this book are far outnumbered by a generally receptive audience. One could conclude that, on the whole, only those readers who enjoyed the book are likely to take the time to record it in their LibraryThing account and write a review of it. I am anomalous then: not only did I dislike David Carr¿s memoir, The Night of the Gun, but here I am, dutifully warning my fellow readers to shy away from it.Carr is himself something of an anomaly (in reality, if not in ¿type¿): the addict who made good. After spending his twenties and thirties as a coke addict, crackhead and raving psychotic, Carr managed to pull himself together, maintain (for the most part, with recent slip-ups) nearly twenty years clean, raise two daughters and succeed professionally, landing a job at The New York Times. It¿s a story you¿ve seen in a dozen movies, but seems impossible in real life. Musing on his past, Carr decided to investigate it as he would any other story, as a reporter, to learn if it all happened as he remembered it (specifically the eponymous ¿Night of the Gun¿). Carr¿s approach was novel and promising¿by employing journalistic techniques, he quickly learned some disturbing things about his past and who he had once been, and the story becomes, to a degree, the study of the mutability (and transmutability) of memory. Interviews and court documents reveal a narrative that Carr himself had once lived but of which he was now only dimly aware.Sadly, Carr¿s method promises more excitement than it can deliver, and it becomes a gimmick. Yes, he interviews old friends and associates, but the revelations gleaned from those conversations are not as surprising or significant to the readers as they must have been to Carr. Carr¿s discussion of memory is shallow and, given the potential of the topic, ultimately detracts from the book.Carr¿s narrative is at its strongest and most focused as he documents his addiction. When he begins discussing his discovery, the narrative unspools and the story loses its power as Carr waxes treacly, invoking wonder at his daughters, the value of hard work, and the redemptive power of love. It¿s all fine, but it¿s dull, poorly done and self-indulgent. One gets the impression that this began as a story for the Times¿it would have been better had it stayed that way.The Night of the Gun is not all bad. Carr is a talented writer and rarely fails to paint a scene vividly or sketch someone¿s character quickly, and he often employs a good turn of phrase (all skills of the journalist). Carr¿s portrayal of his addiction and descent into (near) madness is incredibly well done. Carr was on the right track with his story¿this is something of interest here for readers¿and his methodology and concerns are intriguing, if underdeveloped. Carr argues that everyone¿s story deserves to be told. I can¿t argue with that, but I think he and I might quibble over the length alloted each narrative.
gkleinman on LibraryThing 5 months ago
Written in reaction to the backlash over "the more fiction than truth" memoirs like A Million Little Pieces, David Carr's Night of The Gun takes a nearly scientific approach to the reporting of a life of addiction and recovery.At the start the book is a fascinating musing on the difference between what actually happened and how we remember it. But the novelty of this device ultimately tires and we are left with a brutal account of an ultimately unsympathetic character who makes it nearly impossible to root for him.Night of The Gun does have it's high points, but most of them come in the first half of the book. The backside of the book is an exercise in endurance with Carr turning his focus to the tragedies of the people around him and an account of him watching his carefully constructed world fall a part.At the end of this little experiment of a book I came away feeling exhausted and unfulfilled. The conclusion I reached was that I'd rather read the mostly true recollections of someone going through he'll than the blow by blow reporting based on the mostly true recollections of others.A Million Little Pieces may be filled with a million little white lies, but I enjoyed that book a million times more than this one. Memoir isn't really pure nonfiction and that's a good thing as a storyteller will always triumph a reporter when it comes to creating a compelling personal stories.
damfino83 on LibraryThing 5 months ago
An almost painfully honest memoir- taking a serious journalistic approach to ones memoir is a great idea. From a serious drug addiction (having your young children waiting in the car in a bad neighborhood while you go inside to buy and use crack) to tracking down stories while high, reading about Carr's attempts to juggle his addiction with family and work before he becomes clean is akin to watching a beautiful, rare train get into a wreck.Very interesting, fast-paced, heart-wrenching at times and hilarious and sweet at others. Carr balances journalistic writing with prose very well, which is a relief when reading about someone on a path of self-destruction being painfully honest about their mistakes. On top of that, I think journalism students would find this book particularly interesting, and his website has further info and recordings of the work he did to put the book together.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
What an incredible story which was incredibly well written. An honest self portrait with the aand all
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Night of the Gun The Night of the Gun an investigative book reporting on the authors own life story is an enthrawling story and triumphant return of a recovering and relapsing addict. David Carr the author of Night of the Gun provides a great perspective into the life of a drug addict. I saw that drug addicts can live normal lives. They snort some cocaine or whatever drug they’re into and mostly stay up all night, go to work and live a normal life with minimal sleep. The only difference between David Carr and other drug addicts is that he works for the New York Times as an investigatvie reporter. David Carr has a very unique writing style and is a page turner throughout the book. The Night of the Gun was amazing, I don’t read books very often and this book was one exception where I read all the way through. David Carr captured my imagination with his silly antics and imaginative creativity. His years as a reporter really show throughout the book, everything was short sweet and to the point. I could see David Carr as a young reporter reshaping the ball of cocaine his friend brought. Many stories gained my full attentivness I was warped into his book. All the suspense and drama was comical in a way. His comedic stand point in the book is like Nick Swardson and his stand up, you could never understand why its funny it just is. On the other side of the realm of enjoyment is anyone who hates a summary of multiple story lines never converging to a single point will hate this book. The book was just a bunch of stories of his heavy addiction problems and junky jokes. This book also contains multiple pictures of David Carr when he was much younger which would be a ending note to someone wanting to read the book. The only great and inspiring piece was his triumphant return and his detox from hard drugs to take care of his twins. Anyone who enjoys stories and funny cases of mistaken highs would love the story. David Carr does a magnificient job of throwing you into a place of discomfort and making it feel ok. This book is definetly for the person who has an active imagination and can visualize every action that is described. It throws you for a curve ball that look like its impossible to hit but David Carr hit it spot on. I could never imagine someone who wouldn’t enjoy this book. David Carr doesn’t have any other books accept Soccer and The Night of the Gun. Yet if you want to read more of his work you should find some of his New York Times articles. He has triumphed through his addiction and has became a great father. David Carr is strong bold and whitty. The Night of the Gun is amazing and anyone who appreciates great writing should rate this a 10/10.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Noticer More than 1 year ago
This book really shows the problems with drugs which is comparable to alcohol. Also shows if you don't stay away from them at any point you can fall back and start using again which will destroy your life as well as your children and spouse. Can't understand the need to even start but guess life is just too boring for some so they seek a thrill.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
L.A.Carlson-writer More than 1 year ago
The Night of the Gun takes the reader on a bumpy road into the life of
a notorious junkie, father, excellent writer and a man who loves the chase of a good relationship with women but can't seem to make it last.
I'm always facinated by references to Minnesota and there are plenty here.
I now understand better what rules an addiction and the difference between
crack and coke. The most touching areas of the book are when he speaks of his kids, his sister and mom who are deceased. But perhaps my
favorite part is on page 334, when Carr talks about memory, fiction and
remembering..indeed something to think about it.