Only Child: Writers on the Singular Joys and Solitary Sorrows of Growing Up Solo

Only Child: Writers on the Singular Joys and Solitary Sorrows of Growing Up Solo

by Deborah Siegel, Daphne Uviller

NOOK Book(eBook)

View All Available Formats & Editions

Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780307409997
Publisher: Crown/Archetype
Publication date: 02/26/2008
Sold by: Random House
Format: NOOK Book
Pages: 272
File size: 417 KB

About the Author

DEBORAH SIEGEL is the author of Sisterhood, Interrupted: From Radical Women to Grrls Gone Wild. She has written for Psychology Today and The Progressive and is a founding editor of The Scholar & Feminist Online.

DAPHNE UVILLER is a former editor and current contributing writer to Time Out New York. She has been published in the Washington Post, the New York Times, Newsday, The Forward, Allure, and Self. Both editors are only children.

From the Hardcover edition.

Read an Excerpt

Postcards to Myself
Peter Terzian

When I was in second grade, I brought home books from my elementary-school library with titles like Fair Is Our Land and Beyond New England Thresholds. These books had glossy pictures of colonial towns with sheep grazing in the commons and forts where cannons were fired on the hour. I pleaded to be taken to these places, to monuments, writers' homes, battlefields, and living-history museums. I planned prospective itineraries on road maps and selected appropriately priced motels from our AAA Guide. I had no brothers and sisters whose wishes needed to be taken into account. How could my parents refuse?

We were a family of four: my mother, my father, me, and my mother's mother, who moved in with us not long after I was born. I grew up thinking of my grandmother as a sort of surrogate sibling. I was her only grandson, and she doted on me, pouring my cereal each morning and picking up my toys every evening. When I came home from school, we would sit together on the lumpy couch in the den and watch children's public television shows. But my mother and father didn't invite my grandmother to join us on our vacations, and she didn't ask to come along. Perhaps there was a silent understanding that travel allowed my parents and me to revert temporarily to our original, two-generational state. We became a family of three.

On the road, I would sit alone in the back of the car, surrounded by pillows and books and stuffed animals. There was no one to fight with, no one to draw an invisible do-not-cross line down the middle of the seat with, no one to play billboard lotto with. Still, I didn't miss having a sibling. My parents were up front, taking turns behind the wheel and reading the newspaper. We all looked out the windows at the passing landscape. I read out loud descriptions of the attractions we'd soon be seeing, from brochures that I had written away for months in advance. I rode in a bubble of contentment, happy to be away from my school and our street and our small domestic worries. Still, I counted the hours until our arrival- how long it would take to check in to our hotel, how long before we came across a souvenir stand, how long before I spotted a rack of postcards.

I bought my first postcards- on our first family vacation, a long weekend in Washington, D.C. It was 1975, and I was feverish with the American Bicentennial. Every morning, I stood at the living-room window and recited the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag in our next-door neighbor's yard. I sang patriotic songs around the house and wore a plastic tricornered hat at the dinner table. I helped my parents pick out wallpaper for my bedroom- a pattern of colonial cartography. It was my greatest wish to visit the District of Columbia. I wanted to see the marble of the Capitol building shining like polished teeth. I wanted to walk the Mall.

My parents were only too happy to grant this wish. My mother was a childhood bookworm. My father was a second-generation Armenian-American who grew up with other children of immigrants. English-language books were scarce in his early life, and his parents placed little value on education. His father told him that he should take up a trade. But the GI Bill allowed my father to go to college, and he became a high-school math teacher. His great hope was that his son would be a scholar. And now, here I was, begging for a trip that most kids my age would have thought perilously close to schoolwork.

We drove to Washington, a seven-hour trip from our home in upstate New York. At the Jefferson Memorial, we admired the statue of the president. I read aloud the inscriptions on the walls, excerpts of his letters and writings; some of these passages I already knew by heart. My father's face showed boundless pride as I precociously sounded out the long words: tyranny . . . inalienable . . . providence . . .

I was to be rewarded. Taking me by the hand, my father led me down a staircase to a souvenir shop in the basement. There he brought me to a white pegboard display, with rows of little wire racks that held thick stacks of small, brilliantly colored pictures. These were postcards, my father explained. Did I want any, to keep as mementos?

I wanted many, and I wanted them badly. Together we picked out about a dozen: the district's rotundas and pillared porticoes; the Washington Monument, that alien-looking obelisk; cherry blossoms surrounding the Tidal Basin; aerial views of the green-and-white city. One card was a grid of about twenty miniature scenes, a postcard like a quilt of smaller postcards. (This was soon to become my most cherished specimen.) My father handed a dollar- all this for a single dollar!- to the kindly white-haired woman behind the counter. I clasped the bag of postcards for the rest of the day until it was wrinkled and fuzzy with the sweat from my hands.

Back at the hotel, I fingered the scalloped edges of these cards; they were shaped like rectangular pieces of lace. Each had a white bar across the bottom that identified in elegant script the subject of the picture. The skies were deep blue, bluer than any real sky, with cottony clouds. The buildings and monuments sparkled. The places in these photographs were like none I had ever seen. I wanted to enter these pictures, where everything was perfect. I imagined living inside a postcard.

When we returned home a few days later, I showed the postcards to my grandmother. She gave me a clear plastic shoe box, embossed with a pattern of daisies and topped with a butter-yellow lid, to store them in. I placed the box on a shelf above my desk and admired the cards through the transparent flowers. There were too few postcards for such a long box; they fell over any time I moved it. It was clear to me that I needed to fill the box.

Over time my collection grew steadily. One spring, we took a trip to Florida, to Walt Disney World and south to Miami, with stops at roadside attractions in between. In gift shops, I skipped over postcards of bikinied women on generic-looking beaches and found parrots and pyramids of rapturous water-skiers. We spent a long weekend in Boston, following the Freedom Trail in a pelting rainstorm that inverted our umbrellas, my accumulating packets of postcards sheltered deep under my layers of coat and sweater. We trekked across the state to Niagara Falls, the banks thick with honky-tonk shops and wax museums that I found wildly alluring.

My parents were supportive of my new habit. Postcard hoarding was inexpensive and educational; what was there to object to? My collecting impulse was abetted by my grandmother, who belonged to a local senior-citizens group. The seniors went on "mystery trips" every few months. I was fascinated by the idea of older people boarding a bus for a day's excursion, not knowing where they were going until they were on the highway, when the group organizer would announce their destination. These places never sounded very exciting- a large shopping mall on the outskirts of a run-down city, an old-fashioned general store that sold jam and wicker items. But when my grandmother returned in the evening, she always had two or three additions for my postcard box.

I fiddled with my cards obsessively. I would bring the box out to the front porch and sit on a folding lawn chair, flipping through them. I would count them, then count them again. My father gave me a set of index-card dividers, which I used to separate them into geographic categories. I was a child; naturally, I wanted to play with my postcards. But I knew that the neighborhood kids my age didn't play like this. No one else had this sort of toy.

I decided to write on one. The blank spaces on the backs beckoned. I turned over the best one, the multipictured card from Washington. Who could I write to? I couldn't think of anyone; I would write to myself. "Dear Peter," I began. Then I paused- I had nothing to say. I put the card back, ashamed. I had marred my prized possession. Later, I would wince whenever I came across the childish scrawl.

Sometimes I glimpsed the difference between my world- my solitude, my unique live-in grandparent, my idiosyncratic obsessions- and the other world, the world of nuclear families, of brothers and sisters. Next door to us lived Josh and Jenny, twins two years older than me, who lived in a house of shared toys and board games. I wondered, Did the whole family play these games together after dinner, like they did on Saturday morning television commercials? I tried to cajole my family into sitting down to Monopoly or Clue. But my grandmother couldn't understand the rules, or my father would grow restless. "I don't like board games," he would say with a grin, relishing the coming pun. "They bore me."

One day I heard the twins talking about how they were going to make paper masks that evening with their parents in preparation for a church youth-group event. I thought longingly about the mask-making all afternoon. When it grew dark I pulled a book of craft projects from my bookcase and crossed the lawn between the two houses. Jenny answered the bell. "I have this book, it might have instructions for how to make masks," I explained. "We don't need it," she said. I put one foot up on the doorjamb, as if to inch my way into the house. "What are you doing?" she asked icily. She closed the door in my face, pushing me back onto the porch.

I came to realize there were things I could do outside the house and things I could only do inside. Outside, I tried to join other kids in made-up games of War and Spaceship, making machine-gun and siren sounds. Inside, I quietly tended my postcards like a garden.

This division, unfortunately, wasn't always so neat. I knew, for example, that I couldn't bring my postcard box to school. But for a while, I would stash a few cards into a large blue zippered pencil case. I didn't dare take them out; rather, when I was in need of comfort in the middle of class, I would pretend that I needed a new or different pencil, and peek in the bag at the hidden image.

When I turned ten, my parents and I took a monthlong trip to California. My collection nearly doubled. So many new attractions: giant trees! Cable cars! My father's second cousin, a pistachio farmer outside of Fresno, invited us to stay at his ranch for a month; he and his wife and their two daughters, who were a few years my senior, traveled with us up and down the state. Kristi and Katrina were at first curious about my interest. They even began picking out cards here and there for themselves. But as the weeks went by and the long hours in the family's VW van wore everyone down, my obsession became an annoyance. I would spot a display of postcards on the sidewalk outside a cheap souvenir store and bring the clan to a halt while I squeaked the revolving rack around, hunting for fresh Kodachrome. My cousins blew at their bangs and tapped the toes of their clogs to dramatize their impatience.

Later that year, when we moved to a new neighborhood, I refused to pack my postcards with my toys and books. Instead, I sat in the cab of the moving truck on the way to the new house with my shoe box in my lap. I had a new favorite card that I proudly displayed through the transparent front of the box. The words "Greetings from the Golden State" were emblazoned over a triptych of the Sacramento Statehouse, the Golden Gate Bridge, and Half Dome.

That fall, as I entered junior high school, I grieved over our California trip. I tried desperately to recapture it. In English class, I wrote a poem about horseback riding in Yosemite. ("The horse_/_clopped_/_on the beaten path_/_far behind_/_the tour group.") At home, I decided to compose my life's story. The first chapter was a day-by-day recounting of our month in California. ("We drove along the Pismo state beach for about twenty minutes. We had dinner at McDonald's. I had a banana shake. The next day we checked out of our motel.") I started a second chapter that began with my birth and proceeded chronologically from there, but I quickly lost interest. The non-California periods of my life didn't seem so exciting anymore.

My parents bought a small business that took up much of their time. We didn't go on many vacations anymore. I was growing older and fitting into my new body awkwardly. My feet hurt, my posture was bad, my rear end stuck out. I didn't know what clothes to wear. My glasses, Coke-bottle lenses in aviator frames, were usually covered in dust and dandruff. I was confused about music. The junior-high-school walls were tattooed in blue pen with strange logos- Zoso, AC/DC. I only knew that these had something to do with devilish bands led by hairy men.

I became a walking target for jocks and burnouts. I was afraid to use the boys' room. I wished I had an older sibling, a sister with long straight hair, who would tell me what clothes to buy and what music to listen to. She would miraculously swoop in to fend off any would-be tormentors.

But what if I had a sister who became a jock or a burnout herself? What if she joined the ranks of my tormentors? I imagined an additional presence in our small suburban home, another person's voice and smells; long hair in the sink. She would be all-seeing, all-knowing. And I would be self-conscious about playing with postcards in front of her. She might make fun of them. Worse, she might tell my classmates about them.

I entertained a more horrific thought: She might actually like my postcards and want to play with them herself. What if she mishandled them? Or left them out in the backyard? Or got peanut butter on them?

I grew increasingly nostalgic for past trips. I longed to be elsewhere, far from home and school, secure with my parents, seeing new sights, breathing different air. We weren't traveling, but I searched for more postcards. At the stationery store in the mall, I'd buy cards of our city and the minor points of interest nearby: a bridge just outside of town, named after a Polish Revolutionary War general, on the highway to the Canadian border; bicyclists in a dull-looking park by the river; the large plaster dog, a local landmark, on the roof of an old hi-fi factory.

From the Hardcover edition.

What People are Saying About This

Vanessa Grigoriadis

So what if only kids are sometimes coddled, spoiled, and a little lonelier than other kids? If the stories in this volume are any indication, they turn out great -- sophisticated, sensitive, funny people, who used their extra time as only children to become very wise.

Deborah Carr

As a family sociologist (and a proud sister to four siblings), I'm fascinated by the ways that brothers and sisters shape our identities. They may annoy and infuriate us, but they also provide an important set of eyes and ears to help us remember and make sense of our pasts. Only children have never had that second set of eyes, ears, and memories -- until now. Only Child gives us an often amusing, occasionally heartbreaking, and always fascinating glimpse into the secret lives of only children. I can't think of a team better than Deborah Siegel and Daphne Uviller to provide editorial inspiration to their newly formed "family" of renowned only-child writers. Both Deborah and Daphne are superb writers, insightful social analysts, and -- most importantly -- "singletons" themselves. This one-of-a-kind collection of personal testimonies is a "must read" for only children and anyone who has ever known (or wishes they could be!) an only child. (Professor of Sociology, Rutgers University and University of Wisconsin-Madison)

John Burnham Schwartz

I hope my brother will forgive me when I say, with all honesty, that I wish I was an only so that I could have been included in this fascinating, entertaining, and groundbreaking book. Only Child is a work whose conception is as intelligent, witty, and wise as its authors. It is a terrific and timely anthology. (Author of Bicycle Days, Claire Marvel, and Reservation Road)

Kaja Perina

In a culture that obsesses over every conceivable determinant of identity, from marital status to soft drink preference, a person's "singleton" status often goes unexamined. We ponder, needle, and envy "onlys," woefully unable to articulate whether and how their childhood circumstances contributed to who they are. Finally, it seems, 21 acclaimed writers have taken on that challenging task. These essays promise to entertain -- and answer -- questions asked by every generation of parents and children; questions that today's children will soon be asking in record numbers. I eagerly await the publication of Only Child. (Editor-in-Chief, Psychology Today)


An Interview with Deborah Siegel and Daphne Uviller

Q: Twenty-one writers who are only children: Did you discover anything you all have in common?

A: We have "I'm King of the World" tattooed on the bottom of our feet. No, seriously, we learned from our contributors that we do all have a couple of things in common. We had intensely close friendships, and somewhere along the way, most of us learned to turn friends into family. Many of us were also very good, of course, at being alone. We related easily at young ages to adults (which is a subtler way of bragging that we were all prematurely poised). And as we wrote these essays, we grappled with the question of whether we've become who we are because we're onlies, or whether we would have turned out the same if we'd grown up with siblings.

Q: In other words, you couldn't do a control group!

A: Exactly.

Q: Did your friends want to become your family?

A: Well, no, not always. Rebecca Walker writes a beautiful essay about her painful encounters with the limitations of that alchemy. In contrast, though, Daphne Uviller conjures up a feckless sister who pales in comparison to her fiercely loyal friends. Also, many writers reflect in their essays that only children are uncommonly generous: we're not in the habit of defending our property against thieving siblings, so sharing is a natural instinct. Which makes us excellent friends and roommates.

Q: Did contributors like or hate being an only?

A: The essays fell into both those camps. Writers in the first category, like John Hodgman, Lynn Harris, Amy Richards, and Janice Nimura, relished onliness wholeheartedly and thrived as the sole recipients of their parents' time, attention, money, and love. Others, like Sarah Towers, Alissa Quart, and Ted Rose, found themselves struggling constantly against a loneliness that frequently overshadowed the benefits.

Q: Is loneliness the only downside to being an only?

A: Kathryn Harrison writes eloquently about the fickleness of memory: if you've got no one to hold you in check, what's to keep you from re-inventing your past? Or, by the same token, who can help you make sense of your parents' eccentricities, help distinguish the normal from the abnormal within your family?

Q: Don't a lot of the advantages you mentioned -- the love, the attention, the money -- add up to a lot of smothering?

A: For some people, sometimes, yes. Deborah Siegel writes about how she struggled, even as an adult, to do grownup things for herself, like handling finances. Lynn Harris was sending her laundry home even after college. On the other hand, they had peaceful, joyful homes with a singular kind of support system that a sibling, to some degree, would haveshaken up or diluted -- but then again, maybe that fear in itself is a very "only child" sentiment.

Q: Well, then, aren't the advantages offset later in life by the burdens of caring for aging parents by yourself?

A: There's no question that being an only comes with enormous burdens. You're the confidant, the caretaker, and the undertaker. The pressure not to fail, or even to be subpar -- in your career, in your marriage, as a producer of grandchildren -- is intense. But to say that those pressures offset all the benefits is to favor one half of life over the other. Think of all the people who, as children, fought with their siblings or were estranged, only to rediscover each other as adults, just in time to share the burden of aging parents. Is their adulthood more valuable to them than their childhood?

Q: You sound like you're defending onliness.

A: That would be Daphne. She loved it when she thought about it at all -- which was rare until Deborah brought up the idea for the book. Deborah wasn't all that content to be an only. Both of us were onlies by default, not design, but for Deborah, somehow, the disappointment transmitted. Her mom remembers returning home after fertility surgery, to be asked by Deborah, "Mommy, aren't I enough?"

Q: So how did you manage to do a book together?

A: Contrary to stereotype, we played fabulously together. Only children can be very, very good at collaboration!

Q: What about other relationships? Some people think it would be tough to be married to an only, that you all expect to be the center of attention.

A: Surprisingly, self-centeredness wasn't the problem. The problem was geometry. Lynn Harris, Deborah Siegel, Judith Thurman, and others bemoan the difficulties of reshaping a triangle into a rectangle -- adding a spouse to your tight trio. For Lynn, this meant writing a new name under "emergency contact" and feeling like a traitor. For Deborah, it meant surprise and frustration when her ex-husband didn't want to be the son her parents never had. The security that Sara Reistad-Long was accustomed to became a crippling "love was great, but loyalty was paramount" attitude towards relationships, and found herself turning to alcohol when her parents made no secret of their hatred for her live-in boyfriend.

Q: A lot of your readers are going to be parents looking for advice on whether they'll ruin their child by not giving her or him a sibling. Can you give them an answer?

A: The third section, "A Sib for Junior?" addresses that quandary. First of all, both John Hodgman and Amy Richards refer to "deprivation" as depriving their multiple children of the joy of being an only. But while all our writers had varied experiences, there does seem to be one truth that emerges. Kids whose parents weren't sure they wanted to have kids at all and chose to have a single child as a hedged bet -- "one is close to none," says one writer -- seemed to be unhappier as onlies than kids whose parents wholeheartedly embraced the kid scene.

Q: So if you're going to be an unkid-friendly parent, should you have more than one kid to give them an ally?

A: As weird as that sounds, yes, perhaps. It seems the loneliest kids were the ones who were completely ensconced in an all-adult world, with parents who didn't want a noisy house full of their child's noisy, messy friends. But childhood isn't the only part of being an only. We hope, by addressing four different life phases, to challenge that insistent focus and inspire parents and others to reflect on lifelong implications. After all, not a single one of these "only child" writers are actually children!

Q: The fourth section of Only Child, essentially on eldercare, can't have too many up sides.

A: What, you mean Betty Rollin's conclusion, when she herself had breast cancer: "I knew I couldn't die"? Okay, there's a little pressure there when your parents become infirm. And with so many more onlies in the country, you'll inevitably have onlies marrying each other; in that case, whose ailing parents get priority? But then you have people like Teller (the silent half of the magic team Penn and Teller), who manage it with the grace, humor, and sleight of hand of, well, of a magician. There can be a pride of ownership in being the one who sees your devoted parents through to the end. Alysia Abbott writes about that too, as the only child of a single father who was dying of AIDS.

Q: You mentioned "so many more onlies in this country." How many is that?

A: There are an estimated 15 million only children in the US, and a recent cover story in Time magazine suggested that one-third of Americans starting families now will have only one child. In Manhattan alone -- the "OC" capital -- over 30 percent of all families are single-child families, compared to a national average of around 20 percent. It's interesting that over the past 20 years, the percentage of women nationwide who have one child has more than doubled, from 10 percent to 23 percent. The reasons for that are many, but the biggest ones are late pregnancy and the fact that it's more expensive than ever to raise a child to age 18. And it's not just happening in the US. Birth rates are falling in Western Europe and Canada too. In Europe, the average family size is estimated at 1.4 kids.

Q: Do you think the country will be a different place when all these onlies coming into the world now grow up?

A: A Harvard professor, Vanessa Fong, recently came out with a study of the first generation of children born under China's one-child policy, who are now reaching adulthood. In Only Hope, Fong finds that these onlies, explicitly raised to be competitive in the global, capitalist world, are now harshly criticized for being "unable to adjust" when they crack under the pressure. Their parents worry that they will not have enough support in their old age, and older people in general feel the singletons (the new PC term, by the way) are spoiled and feel overly entitled-the old "Little Emperor syndrome" complaint. But, if our contributors are any indication, singletons here in the US don't feel any more entitled that your average kid -- we live in a very kid-centered culture. It is true, though, that with less extended family, the sandwich generation in our country may find itself even more sandwiched, and with resources even more strained than they already are. Really, the people most affected by the increase in onlies are the mothers.

Q: How so?

A: Linda Hirshman just wrote a book in which she actually tells women that if they want to stay in the labor force (which she feels they should), they should have a child, just not two. We're not sure that's the solution to the work-life crunch so many parents feel today, but feminism has allowed women to feel more comfortable having only one.

Q: How did you find your contributors? Do you have only-dar?

A: That would have made our job a lot easier! Aside from reaching out to acquaintances, we thought about writers whose work we admired and tried to guess from their writing whether they were onlies.

Q: Doesn't that require, gasp, stereotyping?

A: Not exactly. We thought about whose stories, whose characters made it seem like their creators were onlies. For example, John Updike's protagonists in all the Rabbit novels are onlies, so we asked him.

Q: But Updike's not in here.

A: No. He politely declined, saying he had already explored the subject in his fiction. (The point is that we were right!) We hit upon Kathryn Harrison because we recalled her memoir, The Kiss, and it seemed that there couldn't have been room for a sibling anywhere in that dark story. Other contributors were found by word of mouth and in spite of a lot of bad leads. We e-mailed Michael Chabon because a mutual friend was certain he was an only. He very sweetly informed us that he was one of six. Whoops.

Q: So come on, admit it, aren't you guys just a little bit spoiled?

A: Vanessa Grigoriadis, in a 2004 New York magazine cover article on only children (she's an only herself), says simply, "[T]here are no set limits on what a parent will give an only child, no pressure from other siblings to split things up. It's not spoiling, it's"

Q: Is there anything else you'd like us to know about onlyness, or only-tude?

A: Yes. Only Child is not just for onlies, or people close to them. Even though our criteria for contributors was that they be sibling-free, they ultimately invoked onlyness as a prism though which to examine the human experience. As one contributor asks, isn't the only child simply the most exaggerated version of all of us, navigating life alone?

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews