Painted Horses

Painted Horses

by Malcolm Brooks

Hardcover

$23.40 $26.00 Save 10% Current price is $23.4, Original price is $26. You Save 10%.
View All Available Formats & Editions

Temporarily Out of Stock Online

Eligible for FREE SHIPPING

Overview

Painted Horses by Malcolm Brooks

“Engrossing . . . The best novels are not just written but built—scene by scene, character by character—until a world emerges for readers to fall into. Painted Horses creates several worlds in a seamless and ambitious blend of history, romance, archaeology and nature. . . . Hard to forget.” —Bob Minzesheimer, USA Today (4 out of 4 stars)

In the mid-1950s, America was flush with prosperity and saw an unbroken line of progress clear to the horizon, while the West was still very much wild. In Painted Horses , now in paperback, a dauntless woman travels into that untamed landscape in an adventure that will change her life. Catherine Lemay is a young archaeologist who’s come to Montana with a huge task before her—a canyon “as deep as the devil’s own appetites.” Working ahead of a major dam project, she has one summer to prove nothing of historical value will be lost in the flood. From the moment she arrives, nothing is what she expects. John H is a former mustanger with an intuitive genius for breaking horses. A veteran of the U.S. Army’s last mounted cavalry campaign, he lives a fugitive life, driven by pursuit of one last wild thing. John H inspires Catherine to see beauty in the stark landscape, and her heart opens to more than just the vanished past. Painted Horses sings a love song to the horseman’s vanishing way of life and reminds us that love and ambition, tradition and progress, often make strange bedfellows.

“Extraordinary . . . Surprising and satisfying . . . Brooks has fashioned compelling and sympathetic protagonists. . . . John H—orphan, rail rider, cowboy, World War II veteran, Paris artist, canyon hermit—in particular, has a backstory that is both intimate and sweeping in a way that may remind readers of Michael Ondaatje’s The English Patient. . . . Painted Horses is, after all, one of those big, old-fashioned novels where the mundane and the unlikely coexist.”—Kent Black, Boston Globe

“Malcolm Brooks’ novel has the hard thrill of the West, when it was still a new world, the tenderness of first love and the pain of knowledge. This book is a gripping, compulsively readable page-turner.”—Amy Bloom, author of Away

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780802121646
Publisher: Grove/Atlantic, Inc.
Publication date: 08/05/2014
Pages: 336
Product dimensions: 6.30(w) x 9.10(h) x 1.50(d)

About the Author

Malcolm Brooks was raised in the rural foothills of the California Sierras, where Gold Rush and Native American artifacts still abound. A carpenter by trade, he has lived in Montana for most of two decades. His writing has appeared in Gray’s Sporting Journal , Outside , Sports Afield , and Montana Quarterly , among others. Painted Horses is his first novel.

Interviews

Barnes & Noble Review Interview with Malcolm Brooks

It comes as little surprise to learn that Lonesome Dove is a seminal literary influence in Malcolm Brooks's life. Reading his debut novel, Painted Horses, you'll hear the voice of Larry McMurtry, as well as echoes of Jim Harrison, Wallace Stegner, and that old go-to, Cormac McCarthy. But make no mistake, Malcolm Brooks stands on his own without leaning on the crutches of those other seasoned writers. Painted Horses — a Barnes & Noble Discover Great New Writers selection and a No. 1 Indie Next Pick — is unlike any "western" I've read; it refreshes the genre while nodding back at its roots.

Set in Montana in the mid-1950s, the novel presents us with an American West on the cusp of change. Catherine Lemay is a young archeologist hired to survey a canyon in advance of a major dam project; her job is to make sure nothing of historic value will be lost in the coming flood. The task proves to be more complicated than she thought — especially after she meets John H, a mustanger and a veteran of the U.S. Army's last mounted cavalry campaign, who's been living a fugitive life in the canyon. Together, the two race against time to save the past before it is destroyed by an industry with an eye on the future.

I met Malcolm at a coffee shop in downtown Missoula, Montana, the city he's called home for the past two decades. The dimly lit espresso joint was nearly vacant at midday, but Malcolm and I filled the place with vibrant conversation about horses, sexual politics, and the various jobs he's held over the years, including stints as a writer for an outdoors television show and, primarily, as a carpenter. He explained how he used his time during the winter off-season to write Painted Horses over the course of about ten years. — David Abrams

The Barnes & Noble Review: As a carpenter-slash- novelist, what is your writing schedule like?

Malcolm Brooks: Oh man, I wish I had a set schedule, but I don't. I keep saying I'll get one, but it never happens. I have a really high metabolism — I'm really fidgety and have a hard time sitting still for any length of time, so I end up walking around thinking about stuff all day long. When I sit down and focus on something, I tend to produce in bursts. In carpentry, we typically have these down times between December and March, and so what I'd do every year was sock enough away in my head in order to have this four-month window to just be able to sit there and work lots of ten-hour writing days. I'd take a nap in the middle of it or take the dogs for a walk, but then just keep going. I don't know how sustainable a working method that is, but I've managed to do it so far.

BNR: Were you working on Painted Horses all this time?

MB: I started researching this novel in earnest in 2004, but like most every author I know, I already had three or four other complete novel manuscripts that got shelved. I first thought about becoming a writer in high school when I wrote a straight-up pulp western. Over the years, I tried doing everything from a Larry McMurtry–style coming-of-age novel like The Last Picture Show to wanting to be this black humorist like Vonnegut or McGuane. None of it was really me. Finally, I hit my thirties and I said, "All right, I've been doing this a long, long time. I need to figure out what kind of a writer I am. I need to go big or go home."

BNR: So, after those earlier abandoned novels, what was it that spurred you to start writing this particular book?

MB: The whole springboard for it was the U.S. Army's ad hoc cavalry in World War Two during the Italian campaign. When I was about twenty or so, I was working for my dad's small construction outfit in northern California. We did some remodel work on a place, and the owner was this Army veteran who had nothing better to do than hang out on the job site all day long. I tend to be a guy who sits around birthday parties or wedding receptions talking to old people when nobody else wants to. Over the years, I've heard some pretty amazing stories. Like this client of my father's — we started talking with each other, and he found out I was interested in horses. One day he said, "You know, I was part of the U.S. Army's last mounted cavalry campaign during World War Two in Italy." Even as a kid, I was going, "Wow!" I just sort of tucked it away as an interesting, little-known fact; and then years and years later, when I was trying to find myself as a writer, I untucked that story of his from the back of my head. I decided to write something about that last Army cavalry campaign. I wanted it to be big and epic, but not cheesy.

BNR: So did Painted Horses start off as a war novel?

MB: At first, I didn't quite know what it was going to be. I knew I wanted it to be a big, sweeping love story — so there had to be a female, and there had to be this guy who was in the cavalry, but I also wanted it to be a western. So I started thinking, Okay, what if I use the horse cavalry as his back-story and as subtext, but the actual story is something that's going on now. That will give me a way to explore the past. I got to the point where I wrote a list and asked myself, What are all the things I'm really interested in that haven't been written about before and don't necessarily seem to be of a piece, but how are they of a piece within the weave of my own life? What is it that makes me interested in all these seemingly disparate things? So I wrote this list — the Lascaux caves were one thing, the Basques were another, and then there was my long-standing interest in mustangs and Plains Indians. How I landed on the canyon and the archaeology is completely lost to me at this point because it was ten-plus years ago that I was cooking all this stuff up. Anyway, I had all this stuff I was throwing into the blender. I knew I wanted to have horses in it somehow because they're these totemic, emblematic things that run through the human psyche. You can turn them into a metaphor for all kinds of things. I knew about the mustangs that roam the Pryor Mountains south of Billings, Montana. I knew they were this genetically very distinct band of wild horses, going back to colonial Spanish horses, and I thought, well, that's what I should use as a model because they crossed time in their original form somehow and there's something really magical and mysterious about that. As soon as I started researching the Pryor Mountain herd, I learned they'd been displaced by the Yellowtail Dam built across the Bighorn River in the mid-1960s. I thought, All right, there you go. Let's do something with a dam project and we'll have a female character who is passionate, driven, and accomplished.

BNR: Catherine Lemay is certainly driven as she embarks on this River Basin Survey project, sponsored by the Smithsonian. I'd never heard of these before reading Painted Horses

MB: Neither had I until I'd completed the first draft of the novel.

BNR: Really? That's astonishing to me because it seems like the whole book is centered on the survey.

MB: Well, I knew there was an official policy in place to do archeological surveys, but I could never nail down the actual mechanism, agency, or institution governing them. Much of the initial research for Painted Horses happened in 2004 and 2005, before the Web was totally in flower. A few years later, a general Google search would more readily turn up references to River Basin Surveys, but for quite a while I wrote without fully understanding the historical basis of the basic plot. Eventually, not unlike archaeology, the dots did connect. The thing that tipped me off to the surveys was this rinky-dink little historical society pamphlet from 1962 in which there's a mention of trying to get volunteers in Wyoming to go work on some of these water reclamation archaeological surveys. They mention River Basin Surveys in conjunction with Bighorn Canyon and the Yellowtail Dam. I thought, Okay, that has to be a real thing, so I started to Google around for that, and then found these old, in-house records and publications and was able to get some of those through used bookstores.

BNR: Against this broader political and environmental backdrop, you develop this fascinating relationship between a wounded, taciturn cowboy named John H and the brave, but relatively naïve, Catherine. How did you balance their love story against what you admit is a big, sweeping epic? How do you as a writer keep sight of the comparatively small person against the large canvas of a Western landscape?

MB: I've always been drawn to stories in which the lives of regular people are thrown up against huge historical events — The Unbearable Lightness of Being, for example, or The Last of the Mohicans. The world spins and history unfolds, but the people caught in the gravitational pull of outsized circumstances still have to eat and breathe and yearn and fall in love. I think I tend without really thinking about it to treat the "large canvas" as part of the setting, but focus most of my energy on breathing as much life as I can into the characters. I love writing dialogue, for example, that on the surface doesn't seem to have much to do with plot or crisis. Characterization comes first, I guess. Also, nothing's as dramatic as a really intense love affair, at least to the people involved, even if — or maybe especially if — such a thing unfolds with bombs going off in the background.

BNR: We never learn John H's last name — one character speculates it stands for "horse." Why did you make that choice as a writer?

MB: I wanted him to have an air of eternal mystery, to be a sort of enigmatic yet almost timeless figure. Originally his name was going to be John Henry, as a sort of obvious nod to the folk legend. As I made notes in advance of the actual writing, I kept abbreviating his name to John H, and realized it just had a sort of mysterious ring to it, and that it looked sort of lovely on the page as well.

BNR: Dub Harris, the dam contractor, makes no bones about his intentions and feelings about the canyon as he writes to Catherine in a letter: "By modern reckoning the canyon is a wasteland and I intend to drown it." In literature, it's easy to paint big corporations with a broad brush as greedy and evil, but you manage to put the company building the dam in a gray light — neither completely black nor completely white.

MB: Look, I'm hyper-aware of the fact I wouldn't have the luxury of sitting at a computer working on a novel in an attempt to carve my own destiny, without the instant results of the power outlet or the light switch or the antibiotics I've taken over the years, which in the case of the latter have literally kept me alive to this point. None of that happens in a vacuum. It's pretty unfashionable in literary circles to mention Ayn Rand in a way that isn't predicated on withering contempt, but the fact of the matter is, whatever her excesses or absolutism or chilling implications, she got it right when she said that Nature is less a Rousseauist paradise than it is a seething, amoral, heartless bitch (takes one to know one!), with no care or consideration for the individual. Again, it's a supreme duality — Dub Harris may be a bastard, but he's a damned useful one.

BNR: You mentioned earlier that horses can be malleable as literary symbols. What role do you see the mustangs playing in the novel? Are they a symbol of the dying Old West in the face of post-war industrialism? Or is it something more complex than that?

MB: Partially a symbol of that, but the figure of the horse as a totem in the human consciousness long antedates either the mustang or the American West. To me, the human alliance with the horse parallels the invention of art and symbolic or ritualistic myth — John H. in a sense is a sort of extended metaphor for the presence and importance of the horse as both a real and a mystical vehicle, in an archetypal way.

BNR: I felt like Painted Horses itself is an attempt to reinvent the archetype of the American western. To what degree do you as a writer stand with one foot in the tradition of Larry McMurtry and John Ford but yet write something fresh for modern readers?

MB: Painted Horses certainly has one foot, deliberately, in the western romantic tradition, but also one foot very definitely in something much more expansive. The traditional western was passé nearly as quickly as the trail-drive era of the West itself, which gave us most of its clichés and tropes. But the power of the myth still has enough to currency to keep it alive as a major cultural touchstone, not only here, but also around the world. Interestingly, you cite two examples that, at least to me, parallel my own effort in an operative sense — John Ford and Larry McMurtry both nod to and valorize the romantic tradition on the one hand, while often balancing or subverting it on the other. The Searchers and Lonesome Dove are both major influences on me, just in terms of literary or thematic sensibility. I think my greatest strengths in terms of bending or reinventing the genre are probably that I tend to see the western frontier experience itself as beginning not with Lewis and Clark 200 years ago but with the Bering Land Bridge and the arrival of mammoth hunters 12,000 years ago. In other words, I see it as a chapter in a much older, much more formative human drama. Also, while I'm not a straight-up, iconoclastic revisionist, I think I am a cultural relativist — I don't believe in simplistic morality plays or black hat-white hat cliché:s, but I do accept and even court the spiritual power of myth, including the myth of the West.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

Painted Horses 4.1 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 11 reviews.
Ronrose More than 1 year ago
This is a fantastic first novel. It’s a bit of the classic western, with lots of wild horses and open spaces. Yet it takes us down new trails that lead to unexpected, but exciting places. A young woman archeologist, Catherine LeMay, fresh from university and an opportune find in the war torn rubble that still defines parts of London 10 years after the end of World War LL. Catherine is now headed to the American West. The Smithsonian and a Montana power and light company are sponsoring her to search a remote canyon for archeological finds prior to a major dam construction project. Has she really been chosen for her scientific credits or has she been chosen because she is a young woman in a male dominated profession? A young woman who might be overwhelmed by the immensity of the job and easily manipulated to give the expected report? Catherine will prove as tough in her own way as the weathered cowboy she meets on her first day in Montana. John H. is as wild and weathered as the mustang he rides. He has another side, however, which Catherine discovers. He has turned a life long talent for painting into an homage for the horses he once caught and sold. John H. has a checkered past, but his love of the West and it’s wild horses is as true as his attraction to Catherine. Each will help the other to seek their goals, but there is much to overcome in a world now run by money and power. Book provided for review by Grove Press.
Fonti More than 1 year ago
I started our really engrossed in the story but parts are long winded and other parts don't even sound like the same author is writing it. Over all, it is a good story but does not read smoothly.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
This is a fantastic new release by one of Barnes and Nobles Discover new writers!  There are so many elements to like.  A great story set in the American West.  Though set in the 1950's, many elements are still current when progress meets art and history.  I am not very articulate, but Malcolm Brooks does it very well.  I highly recommend this book to anyone who wants a great story with some grit and meaning.  I didn't want it to end.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
10 stars. One of my top favorite books of all time. Must read!!
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
This novel has a bit of everything: cowboys, war, love, sex, tragedy, archeology, horses, indians, life on the rez, history, sheep, and a good story line. I enjoyed it.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Really enjoyed this story. Loved the characters. Really appreciated the devotion to the horses by one character. I do wish the author would have gone in more depth about the 50s. He did an excellent job when writing about World War 2. I think the female character may have not been totally understood because if you have not lived in the1950s the reader is missing context. Other excellent writers with excellent character development are: Margaret Mayhew, William Jarvis, Judith Lennox, Laurie Graham, Mary Gibson, Sandra Dallas, Lynn Austin, and Duncan Barrett just to name a few. This book deserves an A++++++
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I'm surprised this book was not filtered out by the editors, publisher or even Barnes and Noble. It is amateurish and riddled with so many  writerly mistakes that I found it laughable. It in no way rises to the level of Wallace Stegner, Cormac McMurty or Larry McCarthy.  Before you buy it, read a few test pages. 
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Could have been a much better book if more diligently researched
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I just finished this novel and enjoyed it very much. I found parts difficult to read regarding treatment of the horses, but I liked the main character, John H., and was glad he turned out to be a bit of a here after all. The story is sad, but there is a glimmer of hope at the end that he and Catherine may connect once again. Definitely worth the read.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Ever since I was a little girl, i have always dreamed of riding a horse again. But you know what? As long as this author keeps on writing these books, im still dreaming and keeping my hopes up and i hope that you do the same.