The volatile Middle East is the site of vast resources, profound passions, frequent crises, and long-standing conflicts, as well as a major source of international tensions and a key site of direct US intervention.
Two of the most astute analysts of this part of the world are Noam Chomsky, the preeminent critic of U.S, foreign policy, and Gilbert Achcar, a leading specialist of the Middle East who lived in that region for many years. In their new book, Chomsky and Achcar bring a keen understanding of the internal dynamics of the Middle East and of the role of the United States, taking up all the key questions of interest to concerned citizens, including such topics as terrorism, fundamentalism, conspiracies, oil, democracy, self-determination, anti-Semitism, and anti-Arab racism, as well as the war in Afghanistan, the invasion and occupation of Iraq, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the sources of U.S. foreign policy. This book provides the best readable introduction for all who wish to understand the complex issues related to the Middle East from a perspective dedicated to peace and justice.
|Publisher:||Taylor & Francis|
|Edition description:||New Edition|
|Product dimensions:||6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x 1.13(d)|
Table of Contents
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
This fascinating book records Noam Chomsky and Gilbert Achcar¿s talks in January 2006. They are astoundingly well-informed and full of good ideas for reducing the dangers of war. They discuss terrorism, fundamentalism 'especially in Saudi Arabia', the sources of US Middle Eastern policy 'particularly oil', the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq, and the Israel-Palestine conflict. Achcar points out that the Bush-Blair claim that they must now stay in Iraq because, having invaded, `we have the responsibility¿, is like the vile rule in some societies that a man who rapes an unmarried woman must marry her. They cite the US military commander in Iraq who admits that the presence of US troops `fuels the insurgency¿. They note that most people in Baghdad believe that the USA¿s chief aim is to `rob Iraq¿s oil¿ and they note that most Americans think that the USA should get out of Iraq. Chomsky and Achcar point out that the EU gives the Israeli state economic privileges and they suggest that the EU should desist until Israel stops building new illegal settlements and the illegal Separation Wall. They agree that an academic boycott of Israel is a bad idea, but worse, it is a divisive diversion from academic unions¿ main job, to defend their members¿ wages and conditions. Chomsky observes that in October 2003, Iran suspended its nuclear enrichment programme in order to reach a general agreement. The EU said that it would provide `firm commitments on security issues¿, but it reneged when the USA refused to join the talks. In January 2006, Iran offered to suspend its nuclear programme again the EU rejected this offer too. Achcar observes, ¿There¿s a general trend at the level of the mainstream media to praise those ruling politicians who rule without consulting the polls that is deemed a great virtue. But behind it is the very elitist idea, also embedded in the very concept of `representative democracy¿, that, once elected, a representative is free to do whatever he or she wants, even against the unanimous will of his or her constituency.¿ So the Labour government opposes the will of the British people over the attack on Iraq, the EU, the Private Finance Initiative, immigration, breaking up Britain, etc., etc. But are we really surprised that capitalist states do not represent the people?
This book offers a great dialogue concerning the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestinians by two knowledgeable figures with a moderator/interviewer. It goes into a depth and analysis rarely encountered in popular publications on current affairs, leaving its readers walk away with a clearer understanding of volatile events in the Mideast. Additionally, sources are thoroughly documented, which again, is a much needed and welcome change from the norm in such an opinion-driven genre.