The Philosophical Breakfast Club: Four Remarkable Friends Who Transformed Science and Changed the World

The Philosophical Breakfast Club: Four Remarkable Friends Who Transformed Science and Changed the World

by Laura J. Snyder


View All Available Formats & Editions
Choose Expedited Shipping at checkout for guaranteed delivery by Wednesday, February 27

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780767930499
Publisher: Crown/Archetype
Publication date: 01/17/2012
Edition description: Reprint
Pages: 456
Sales rank: 1,277,141
Product dimensions: 5.10(w) x 7.90(h) x 1.10(d)

About the Author

An expert on Victorian science and culture, Fulbright scholar Laura J. Snyder was the president of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science from 2009-2010.  She is professor of philosophy at St. John's University and the author of Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society.

Read an Excerpt



They were digging the canal the year William Whewell was born. The Lancaster Canal would wend its way from Preston, in the south, where the Ribble River reached into the Irish Sea, up past Garstang, an arm of the canal dipping again into the sea at Glasson, before winding through Lancaster and heading north to Kendal, at the edge of the Lake District. In 1794, at the height of the Industrial Revolution, manufacturing and engineering ruled Britain, and both were present at the great work of building this canal.

Whewell would grow up surrounded by the canal works and the great waterway itself, impressed with these monuments to the immense powers of human invention and technology. Later he would come to see himself as an engineer of Science, plotting the course of a mighty body, just as the canal's engineer, John Rennie, had planned the path of a mighty waterway. This child of the Industrial Revolution would one day initiate a Scientific Revolution that would change the world.

The story of the canal begins in 1772, when a group of Lancaster merchants came together with the idea of constructing a new waterway that would connect with the Leeds and Liverpool Canal, near Wigan, and proceed northward through Preston and Lancaster to Kendal. Work on canals had been going on for some decades, ever since 1755-61, when the Sankey Brook in Lancashire had been turned into a canal for bringing cheap coal to Liverpool; after that, an age of canal building was begun, powered by the industrialists who wanted cheap means of transporting their goods from factories to markets.

In recent times the port of Lancaster had been one of the busiest in Britain. Even today, many fine Georgian buildings stand in the port area, constructed during its heyday in the mid-eighteenth century. But by the last third of the century, trade to the port had been suffering from the silting-up of the Lune estuary, which led from the Irish Sea three miles inland to Lancaster. The newer, larger ships could not make it through the river up to the port.

Lancaster was a major manufacturer of linen textiles, mostly sailcloth. The firms producing the heavy canvas were owned by "flaxmen," suppliers of flax, who transformed themselves into manufacturers by fitting up rooms with heavy sailcloth looms and facilities for warp-winding and starching. If shipping ceased in Lancaster, so would the sailcloth trade. Merchants in Lancaster glanced enviously at their counterparts in Liverpool, who were thriving-in great part because of the success of the Leeds-and- Liverpool Canal.1

The Lancastrians first approached James Brindley, who had designed the famous Bridgewater Canal, which brought coal to Manchester from the Duke of Bridgewater's collieries at Worsley. The first of the great canals, the Bridgewater was an engineering wonder, with its fingers reaching deep into the mine at Worsley, its aqueduct over the Irwell River carrying barges high in the sky, and its destination in Manchester: a tunnel leading the coal right into the center of the city. Ill health forced Brindley to pass the Lancaster job along to his son-in-law, Robert Whitworth. Debates over Whitworth's plans, and those of his successors, dragged on for almost twenty years.2

Finally, in 1791, impatient merchants and rattled traders petitioned Mayor Edward Suart for a public meeting to decide once and for all whether a link with the Leeds and Liverpool Canal would be pursued. At that meeting, a resolution was passed approving the building of a canal. John Rennie-renowned for fitting out corn mills, for his drainage works in the fens, for building waterworks, docks, and harbors-was asked to submit a plan. His survey differed from the earlier ones by proposing to cross the deep Ribble Valley with a tramway rather than with the canal itself, so the canal would be cut in two sections, north from Preston and south from Clayton, connected by a long bridge passing over the valley. Only the southern part of the Lancaster Canal would connect by water with the Leeds-to- Liverpool waterway. But Lancaster would have its connection to the sea, at nearby Glasson. An act of Parliament was obtained to authorize the new navigation, and work on the canal began late in 1792.

Less than two years later, William Whewell came into the world: on May 24, a birthday he would share with the young princess Victoria when she was born twenty-five years later. As a baby and young boy he was sickly; his parents secretly worried over him, especially when they lost two other infant sons soon afterwards. But he would grow up to be a tall, strapping man, one whose physical vigor became, to many, a symbol of his intellectual strengths.

His parents were John and Elizabeth Whewell, who lived on Brock Street in Lancaster, a short distance to the west of the canal works. Both John and Elizabeth were twenty-five when they married; William arrived a scant nine months later. John Whewell was a house carpenter and joiner with a workshop employing one or two journeymen. The business built houses, including the door frames and window frames, repaired fences, and possibly constructed cabinets as well. His people had come to Lancaster from Bolton, farther north in Lancashire, half a century before.3 John Whewell was admitted by all to be a man of great sense.

Elizabeth Whewell was of the old Lancaster family of Bennisons. An intelligent and cultured woman, Elizabeth published her poems in the Lancaster Gazette, the first local newspaper; she bestowed upon her son a love of reading and writing poetry that he never lost. Elizabeth died in 1807, when William was thirteen. He lost his father in 1816, soon before receiving his fellowship at Trinity College. William would also lose three brothers: not only the two who died in infancy, but also a third, John, with whom William was close. Born in 1803, John died when he was eight years old, soon after William left home for Cambridge. From the letters William sent John from school, it is apparent that John, too, was a boy of uncommon abilities; in what would be his last year he was already writing poetry judged quite fine by William, who nevertheless cautioned him, "I would not have you write so much as to neglect reading." Already a teacher at heart, William suggested to John that he study history and parts of natural philosophy, as they were "not above your comprehension."4 William had three sisters. One, Elizabeth, died in 1821; in later life he corresponded frequently with his remaining sisters, Martha and Ann, though they did not see each other often.

No images of William's parents remain, as is to be expected in this time before photography was invented; only the wealthy or important had portraits made. But we can infer from the numerous engravings, paintings, and photographs of William that his father, like William, was tall and vigorous, and that both parents were handsome. Surely they were pleased with their firstborn, who undoubtedly learned quickly; though, if later personality is any indicator, he was a strong-willed toddler who always wanted to have his way.

During William's early years Lancaster was overtaken by hundreds of "navvies"-a name originating from a shortening of "navigators"-who descended on the market village from all over England and Ireland to dig the new canal. (The canal workers would give their nautical name to the hordes later brought in to build the railways, even though the railway workers no longer had anything to do with the sea.) These were hard-drinking men with rough ways, frightening to many, tolerated because of the difficult and often dangerous work they alone were willing to do. First, the ground had to be dug out with pickaxes and spades, and carried away by barrows; when lucky, the navvies had horses to help with the pulling. Then the layers of sedimentary rock beneath the soil had to be blasted with gunpowder, often unpredictable in its force. When the deep channel was finally dug out, the most tedious part of the work began: lining the canal with "puddle," a type of clay kneaded with water. The puddle was spread throughout the dug channel, and then pounded down tight. Sometimes local farmers allowed the navvies to drive their cattle up and down the canal. But often the navvies themselves agonizingly tramped over the puddle, back and forth, for weeks, usually barefooted.

To a young boy the scene would have been almost irresistible: the sound of the gunpowder blasting, the men swearing, the horses complaining; the smell of the earth, the dung, the sweat, the smoke; checking every day to see how much progress had been made-how much deeper was the channel, how much longer the circuit. As William grew, he would often marvel at the ingenuity and engineering skill that had been required to build the bridges linking roads on either side of the canal, so that the waterway could be crossed by foot or with a horse and carriage, and the aqueducts designed to carry barges traveling on the canal over rivers and streams; in the case of the giant Lune Aqueduct, boats were carried sixty-two feet in the air, on a conduit six hundred feet long, traversed by huge pillars supporting five semicircular arches.

There were other changes in Lancaster, no less telling of the times than the new canal. Soon after William was born, a prison was built inside Lancaster Castle for "those who were charged with the crime of poverty," as a contemporary visitor put it: a debtors' prison.5 In those days of war with France, slow trade, and high food prices brought on by bad harvests, many families suffered, and it was easy for a man to find himself in debt merely by trying to feed his children. Other, more dangerous felons were put in the new prison as well. The castle's use as a prison, as well as the courts that were housed within it (which sentenced more people to be hanged than any other court outside London) was also meat for the imagination of a young boy, as well as a warning of what could happen to a man who fell on hard times.

The modern age-with its technological triumphs and its economic tribulations-was present all around William. Yet his future seemed destined to follow a pattern set over centuries: just like any boy of his circumstances for hundreds of years, he was to continue in his father's trade, and take over his business. Instead, his future swerved off course, in a way no one could have imagined.

At first, William was sent to the "Blue School" in Lancaster. Blue Schools were charity schools set up in the eighteenth century to educate the children of the working classes; the name referred to the blue uniforms the students often wore. His parents wanted him to know how to read and write, and do sums, and the education at the Blue School was provided for free. He attended school in the mornings and worked with his father in the afternoons. On Sundays, after church, he read the Bible and poetry with his mother. Soon he would leave school to work with his father full-time. William enjoyed carpentry, and had a flair for it, and he did not chafe against this plan.

William's destiny changed one day in late 1808 or early 1809.6 He was helping his father repair the rail fence separating the backyards of the Owen family and the Reverend Joseph Rowley, the parish curate and headmaster of the local grammar school. William would later become close friends with Richard Owen, ten years his junior, the future comparative anatomist (the one who coined the term dinosaur), and it is Owen's recollections of that day that preserve the occasion.

"Between noon and two p.m. we left school for dinner, and Mr. Rowley found Whewell's son in the garden, his father having gone to his dinner," Owen remembered years later. "He entered into a conversation with the boy, who was_._._._about to be apprenticed to his father, and was struck with his replies to questions as to what he had learnt, and especially in regard to his arithmetic." When William's father returned, Mr. Rowley told him his opinion of the boy's superior abilities, and proposed that he should leave the Blue School and go to the grammar school, which was not free and so was generally reserved for boys from more-prosperous families. Rowley also hinted at the greater opportunities this would offer the young boy.

John Whewell was, understandably, worried about losing William for the carpentry business: "He knows more about parts of my business now than I do, and has a special turn for it," he protested. (This is how Owen described his response. In Whewell's Lancaster accent, it would have sounded more like this: "Worrall eye do wit'owt 'em? 'Es reet gradely wit' a hommer," or, "What will I do without him? He's really very good with a hammer.")7 But out of deference to the clergyman, he agreed to think it over. Mr. Rowley added that he would supply the boy with books, and waive all the fees. John Whewell consented; William went to the grammar school. Forty years later, William said of Rowley that "he was the one main cause of my being sent to college, and of all my subsequent success."8

William's move to the grammar school was, as might be imagined, difficult. He was by then a tall, ungainly lad, and because he was behind the others in nearly all subjects, he was put in a class with the younger boys. But the rate at which he mastered both English and Latin grammar was "a marvel." Before the first year was out, William had moved up into the class of boys his age. His proficiency in and excitement about the subjects did not endear him to the others; the headmaster, seeing how quickly William completed the lessons, gave all the boys more work to do. In the tradition of schoolboys of all time, they threatened him: "Now, Whewell, if you say more than twenty lines of Virgil today, we'll wallop you!"

But that was easier said than done. Whewell was good with his fists, and not afraid to use them. In later years he would be known for his tough physicality, which masked an inner insecurity about his humble origins. As Owen recalled, "I have seen him, with his back to the churchyard wall, flooring first one, then another, of the 'walloppers,' and at last public opinion in the school interposed. 'Any two of you may take Whewell in a fair stand-up fight, but we won't have more at him at once.' After the fate of the first pair, a second was not found willingly."9

One day in the summer of 1809, Mr. Rowley sent William over to the Bridge Inn, between Lancaster and Kendal, to meet an acquaintance of his-Mr. Hudson, a fellow and tutor of Trinity College-in order to determine what chances of success William would have at Cambridge. We can only imagine the trepidation the fifteen-year-old would feel on making the short journey, knowing as he did how his fate hinged on its outcome. Hudson quizzed the boy on his mathematics, telling him at the end of the meeting, "You'll do; you'll be among the first six wranglers," that is, one of the graduating students with the highest scores on the honors examination.

Attending Cambridge had been the plan all along; there was no point to William's getting the grammar school education if he were going to work as a carpenter afterwards. Graduating with honors from Cambridge would give him the opportunity to try for a fellowship, which would support him in an extremely comfortable manner, with little labor, as long as he remained unmarried. If he decided to have a family, he could hope for a position as a parish curate, perhaps combined with one of the few professorships available to married men.

From the Hardcover edition.

Table of Contents

Prologue: Inventing the Scientist 1

1 Waterworks 9

2 Philosophical Breakfasts 19

3 Experimental Lives 44

4 Mechanical Toys 73

5 Dismal Science 94

6 The Great Battle 128

7 Mapping the World 158

8 A Divine Programmer 189

9 Sciences of Shadow and Light 221

10 Angels and Fairies 248

11 New Worlds 278

12 Nature Decoded 312

13 Endings 343

Epilogue: A New Horizon 360

Acknowledgments 369

Notes 372

Bibliography 412

Illustration Credits 429

Index 430

What People are Saying About This

From the Publisher

"Philosopher and science historian Snyder (St. John's Univ.) has written an impressive biography of four Victorian polymaths: William Whewell, Charles Babbage, John Herschel, and Richard Jones. Their individual achievements are remarkable.... The men's entangled lives and work make engaging and informative reading."

"Snyder succeeds famously in evoking the excitement, variety and wide-open sense of possibility of the scientific life in nineteenth-century Britain."
American Scientist

"Smoothly and meticulously tells this complicated story of intellectual revolution and triumph in Victorian England... provides much interesting social and historic detail."
The Providence Journal

"This fine book is as wide-ranging and anecdotal, as excited and exciting, as those long-ago Sunday morning conversations at Cambridge.  To me her book is an example of popular intellectual history at its near best.  What’s more, The Philosophical Breakfast Club forms a natural successor to Jenny Uglow’s The Lunar Men (which focuses on 18th-century chemist Joseph Priestley, inventors James Watt and Josiah Wedgwood, and polymath Erasmus Darwin), and Richard Holmes’s The Age of Wonder."
—The Washington Post

"The scientific method and the respect accorded science seem so obvious now that it is hard to believe it could be any other way. Yet the conversion from what science is and what it was is a fascinating story, one told with considerable charm by Laura J. Snyder in The Philosophical Breakfast Club." Washington Times

"Laura J. Snyder deftly recreates this age of marvels through the lives of four remarkable Victorian men. In doing so, she tells a greater tale of the rise of science as a formal discipline, and the triumph of evidence-based methods of inductive reason...Much of the delight of Ms. Snyder's telling lies in her eye for details...a sure-footed guide to the mores and foibles of 19th-century Britain...The members of the Philosophical Breakfast Club left behind some lavish gifts. This volume offers them up delightfully."
—The Economist

“Fulbright scholar and historian Laura J. Snyder plunges confidently and stylishly...Snyder engagingly stakes out an era beginning with science as a hobby of vicars and the wealthy to its evolution as the engine of imperial growth.”
Newark Star-Ledger 
Geeks, scientists, intellectuals will leap for joy at Laura J. Snyder's book, which tells the tale of four Victorian men of Science.”
The Daily

"This is an excellent book about the history and status of science in 19th century England. If you enjoy the history of science, this book stands a good chance of being the best one in that genre to come out this year."
—Tyler Cowen,

“Ms. Snyder, a scholar of Victorian science and culture at St. John's University in New York, shows a full command of the scientific, social and cultural dimensions of the age. In Ms. Snyder's telling, the lives and ideas of these men come across as fit for “Masterpiece Theater.””
—Wall Street Journal
Snyder “leaves the reader with an inspiring sense of just how influential these men were in shaping our world and laying the foundation for major science and technological changes. The call to action is clear: bring the arts and the sciences
 back to the breakfast table and raise a mug of ale in memory of the four Victorian scientists who changed the world.”

A “masterful portrait of science in the 19th Century.”
New Scientist
“A philosopher of science, Snyder writes with the depth of a scholar and the beauty of a novelist."
—Science News

"If wonder and humanity do return to science, wonderful biographical works such as Snyder’s Philosophical Breakfast Club will no doubt have played a part.
The Philosophical Breakfast Club is an intellectual banquet, recounting myriad thought-provoking scientific discoveries, and sufficiently detailed to convey the kind of environment these men lived in and how they dramatically changed science for the better. Snyder’s extensive bibliography attests to the painstaking effort she put into this work, and the result is an entertaining and enlightening journey through the Victorian age filled with scores of interesting scientists besides the Philosophical Breakfast Club, many of whom, given their contributions to science and human life, deserve their own biographies."
—The Objective Standard

"Smoothly and meticulously tells this complicated story of intellectual revolution and triumph in Victorian England... provides much interesting social and historic detail."
—The Providence Journal

“The author's extensive research, wonderful writing, and passion for lifelong learning all serve to awaken the reader's inner spirit of discovery.”

"Engrossing...Packed with good stories and anecdotes, as well as with good science and history."
Book News

“Each of the four figures is a worthy subject in his own right, and by combining their stories Snyder provides the right balance of biography and science. It also allows Snyder to discuss a wide range of scientific developments that are sufficiently modern to appeal to today’s readers.”
—Publishers Weekly

"A striking account of how a few bold individuals catalyzed profound social change."

“Snyder captures not only the scientific ambitions of the foursome, but also the dynamics of their youthful friendship.”
The Chronicle of Higher Education

"An accessible and engaging read on the origins of Victorian science, its personalities, and the cultural contribution made by these four men, this will appeal to readers interested in Victorian science, biographies, astronomy, chemistry, the religion vs. science debate, Darwin, computers, and a smorgasbord of related sciences."
Library Journal

“The author skillfully weaves together the lives of her four principals with the science of their day.”
Kirkus Reviews

"Snyder paints a vivid picture of a revolution in scientific thought….Its portrayal of a world and time much different from our own is remarkable, and Snyder spares no expense in immersing the reader into the world that produced these natural philosophers."
Fully Booked (Philippines)

"It is too easy to think that ‘science’ is what happens now, that modernity and scientific thought are inseparable. Yet as Laura Snyder so brilliantly shows in this riveting picture of the first heroic age, the nineteenth century saw the invention of the computer, of electrical impulses, the harnessing of the power of steam – the birth of railways, statistics and technology. In ‘The Philosophical Breakfast Club’ she draws an endearing – almost domestic – picture of four scientific titans, and shows how – through their very ‘clubbability’ – they created the scientific basis on which the modern world stands."
–Judith Flanders, author of
Inside the Victorian Home

"The four busy geniuses who inhabit Laura Snyder’s wonderfully engaging book did not invent friendship or science, but by combining those pastimes in their "philosophical breakfasts," they managed to invent much else, from the very word "scientist" to versions of the computer and the camera." 
—Joyce E. Chaplin, James Duncan Phillips Professor of History, Harvard University

"By tracing the careers of the four members of the Philosophical Breakfast Club, Laura Snyder has found a wonderful way not just to tell the great stories of 19th-century science, but to bring them vividly to life."
–Tom Standage, author of A History of the World in 6 Glasses

"In this elegantly written book, Snyder has brought to life four of the most important British scientists of the first half of the nineteenth century…[She] tracks the intertwined lives of these four figures—their loves, their personal successes, and their devastating failures—while casting light on every facet of British science during their lifetime…Snyder relies on sound scholarship without losing sight of what makes these men so fascinating."
—Bernard Lightman, Professor of Humanities and Director, Institute of Science and Technology Studies, York University

"Who would not want to be invited to breakfast with the young philosophers and scientists that Laura Snyder portrays so vividly and with searching imagination? Charles Babbage, William Whewell, John Herschel, and Richard Jones, even as students at Cambridge, plotted the reform of science, which in the early nineteenth century hardly existed in the British universities.  As they attained intellectual and institutional power, they continued their efforts, often working through elite social networks.  At exquisite dinner parties, for instance, Babbage would demonstrate his new invention, the analytical engine, a forerunner of the modern computer, and therewith beguile the young Charles Darwin just back from his Beagle voyage.  Science and the personalities who created it spring to life in Snyder’s compelling biographical depictions."
—Robert J. Richards, Morris Fishbein Professor of the History of Science, University of Chicago

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

The Philosophical Breakfast Club: Four Remarkable Friends Who Transformed Science and Changed the World 4 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 10 reviews.
leopardiNJ More than 1 year ago
Although the book does contain some analyses of specific threads of inventiveness (for example, in the development of photography) Laura Snyder's The Philosophical Breakfast Club aims somewhat higher - at uncovering those individuals responsible for the paradigm shift between the deductive "natural philosophy" of intellectual dilatants and the profession of inductive scientist as we know it today. The book focuses on four members of an informal, early 19th century "Breakfast Club" - William Whewell, Charles Babbage, John Herschel and Richard Jones - who, while undergraduates at Trinity College, Cambridge set out to reform the practice of science at that fundamental level, and who remained lifetime friends despite periods of profound conflict and disappointment. The period from the Enlightenment to the early twentieth century marks a major transition in intellectual practice - the emergence of scientific disciplines and the compartmentalization of science practice; the divorce of religion from science; the growth and maturity of government support for science; the democratization of science; an increasing dependence of science on mathematics; etc., etc. To what extent are the four main characters in this book responsible for that transition? The verdict is mixed. Among the four, Whewell stands out as exemplifying all of the currents that transformed the practice of science during the 19th century. A house carpenter's son, he rose to the highest position of intellectual achievement - Don of Trinity College, Cambridge. It could easily be claimed that Whewell was the last of the breed of universal philosophers in the tradition of DaVinci and Newton - master mathematician, poet, chemist, artist, physicist, moral philosopher, geologist, engineer, etc. Snyder makes a good case for Whewell's responsibility for both the lexicon of modern science (he coined the word scientist, itself) and its philosophy - inductive science in the service of improving all humankind. The case is less strong for the other three members of the Club, although each was a towering intellect. Herschel, son of the astronomer who discovered Uranus, made major contributions to astronomy in his own right. A brilliant chemist as well, Herschel did much to advance the development of photography. The legacy of Charles Babbage, wealthy and mercurial, is inextricably linked to his Difference and Analytical Engines - mechanical computers that, alas, remained little more than drawing-board concepts during his lifetime. Did his ideas really influence the development of the modern digital computer? Not likely. Richard Jones, a Welchman of modest means, was a cleric who, among the four, may have contributed the most to moral development (well after his time) with his writings on political economy. However, even the author of The Philosophical Breakfast Club, admits that his impact during the 19th century was eclipsed by contrary social theories such as those of Ricardo and Marx. The Philosophical Breakfast Club is a very ambitious undertaking - the lifetime accomplishments of even one of the Club's four were prodigious. Laura Snyder is outstandingly successful in bringing the details of 19th-century intellectual development to life while holding all apiece in a cohesive pattern. Richard R. Pardi Environmental Science William Paterson University
mbhweiss More than 1 year ago
In many ways, this book is reminiscent of and a good follow-up to "Calculus Wars". The author does an good job of setting the historical context and of describing the relationship between these four giants of 19th century science. Clearly meant for a general audience, I would have liked a bit more scientific content to illustrate their individual contributions.
Ausonius More than 1 year ago
The scientific methods of two great men of Cambridge University: Isaac Newton and Francis Bacon were re-formulated and re-applied in the 19th Century by four Cambridge students. The four friends were Charles Babbage, William Herschel, Richard Jones and William Whewell. THE PHILOSOPHICAL BREAKFAST CLUB is their story. *** Although the book is long, complex and refers to 25 or 30 distinct objects of science and technology (e.g. optics, meteorology, computing machines, tides, telescopes, etc.) the author's imposed structure, though debatable, is simple and easily stated. Professor Snyder describes five or six key ideas expressed in the principal works of Sir Francis Bacon (1561 - 1626). She then has us imagine Babbage, Herschel, Jones and Whewell discussing those Sunday after Sunday from late 1812 until Spring 1813. They then resolve in a sort of teamwork to apply Bacon's ideas and models to British and European science. The rest of the text details the impressive Baconian achievements of the four friends. *** Bacon's ideas are presented in six pages of Chapter 2, "Philosophical Breakfasts." Bacon's two main sources cited are GREAT INSTAURATION (Renewal) - including the NOVUM ORGANUM (1620) and his "exploration genre" novel NEW ATLANTIS (published 1627). His ideas: "a revolution of thought and action" ... "science should help transform the condition of life" ... "knowledge is power ... meaning that by understanding nature, man would have the power to take control of the natural world in order to bring about improvements necessary for society." *** A fresh start was needed. Aristotle as narrowly understood in the Middle Ages must go. There is more to thinking than analytical reasoning from premises to conclusions. People must learn to think like Bacon: inductively, reasoning from facts to hypotheses and testing theories by their predictive power. Observe the real world. Record data accurately and precisely. Notice instances of light that is not hot. Do not be like the spider that "spins webs out of his own substance." Go, as well, beyond the ant, noted for gathering facts but creating no explanatory theories. Imitate the bee. It collects pollen. It digests pollen. The bee then makes something new: honey. *** Do not consider science and religion to be in opposition. God created two books, the Bible and the works of nature. Read and reverence both books. *** Reward men of science. Do not just give them prizes after they have found a solution (as would one day be done for "longitude calculation"). But give men and women honors, benefits, pensions for research and for simply pledging to try to solve problems. England needs a new kind of scientific institution. Bacon sketched it in NEW ATLANTIS: Solomon's House. In Solomon's House some fellows go forth on voyages to explore. Some review experiments already recorded in books. Some redo the experiments. Some create hypotheses to explain the facts. Others propose theories subject to verification or falsification. *** The rest of the book shows the four friends over the next 60 years "Baconizing" a world already or soon to be teeming with inventions (steam engines, punch-card fed silk looms, steamboats, electricity, telegraph, photography) and theories (evolution of species, natural selection, survival of the fittest, Malthusianism). A grand romp through 19th century science, mathematics and biography. -OOO-
eheinlen on LibraryThing 8 months ago
This book is just brilliant! Not only is it exceptionally well-written, but it is also a wonderful historical narrative on the history of "scientist" and the field surrounding it. It's amazing how much a person or a small group of people can change the course of history. I highly recommend this book.
PhoenixFalls on LibraryThing 8 months ago
I really enjoyed this volume, which serves as a sort of mosaic of science in England in the first two-thirds of the 19th century.Snyder makes four men -- William Whewell, Charles Babbage, John Herschel, and Richard Jones -- the center of her narrative, but does not trace their lives chronologically. Instead, after some brief biographical sketches that bring the reader to the point where the four men were together at Cambridge, she breaks her narrative up by their fields on interest, addressing in turn chemistry, computers, economics, astronomy, the tides, surveying, photography, cryptography, and evolution. She also addresses the development of the scientific method, the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Great Britain's 1851 Great Exhibition, and the conflict (or lack thereof) between the scientists' religious beliefs and scientific discoveries. In keeping with their own view of how science works, ever time she turned to a new field she placed the Club's efforts in context, providing historical background on the field and some anecdotes about the scientists who previously influenced the Breakfast Club and those who were influenced by the Breakfast Club in turn.That strategy is why I call the book a mosaic -- though Snyder keeps the lives and works of Whewell, Babbage, Herschel, and Jones central, the four men are merely entry points to the larger body of scientific exploration and codification in the 19th century England. Snyder does this admirably, capturing the excitement of the time period, when it seemed that all the secrets of the natural world were on the brink of being unlocked.I do have some quibbles. The book is rather myopic, conflating the sciences of England with all science worldwide. The final chapter is quite heavy-handed, with Snyder suddenly devolving into a rant against the separation between science and the humanities (a separation she simply assumes that her readers will agree exists). But overall this book was a great deal of fun: accessible, informative, and vibrant in its depictions of the mood of the age and the characters of the men who drove it.
michaelbartley on LibraryThing 8 months ago
a very good book about the history and philosophy of science. a group of men, now mainly forgotten took science to a modern profession. I liked this book a lot
gconyers on LibraryThing 8 months ago
SummaryThe Philosophical Breakfast Club is a very good history of science book. It is a story about 4 men, William Whewell, John Hershel, Richard Jones, and Charles Babbage, who strived to take science from a field that was merely poked about in to a real professional endeavour. This book outlines their efforts and the culture of the world they lived in, as well as the the scientific accomplishments of the day.Critical AssessmentWhile this is a history book, and it's topic is science, it is not dull or boring. If you're making coffee while reading this book, it is because you want to keep reading long after the sun has set and risen again. Yes, it took me a long time to read this book, but it was because I wanted to read every single word.All in all, this has a very good account of Whewell, Hershel, and Babbage. Jones seems to be rather unimportant to the general scheme of thing since he is only focused on in a noticeably smaller quantity. This is also a great resource for learning about the culture of the Victorian Era that surrounds and influences the birth of science as a field.Final thoughtsWhile reading this book, I was struck by the fact that science has changed a lot over the life of humans in general. Near the end of the book the author notes that none of the members of the Philosophical Breakfast Club wanted there to be a separation of science and humanities that is present today. This shows that while these great men in the past have made great strides to increase the knowledge and presence of science and scientific thinking in the world, but there is still much to be done.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
She sat at a dinner table for two. Her and her boyfriend, but her lover never showed up. Laura stood up and walked out, sighing, upse and angry. She walked down the sidewalk, knowing he wouldn't come. <p>-Straight-
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I assumed when reading the book description and reviews that this was certainly a book for me. I LOVE non-fiction accounts of inventors/geniuses, &amp;c But I found the writing to be extremely dry and the achievements, though ought to have been enough to keep me reading, were not captivating in the author's hands.  Too bad, I am indeed impressed with the subjects, but Ms Snyder does not do them justice. I give it three stars for the topic, not the writing.  
eheinlen More than 1 year ago
This book is just brilliant! Not only is it exceptionally well-written, but it is also a wonderful historical narrative on the history of &quot;scientist&quot; and the field surrounding it. It's amazing how much a person or a small group of people can change the course of history. I highly recommend this book.