The primary aim of this study is to dissolve the mind-body problem. It shows how the ‘problem’separates into two distinct sets of issues, concerning ontology on the one hand, and explanation on the other, and argues that explanation – whether or not human behaviour can be explained in physical terms – is the more crucial.
The author contends that a functionalist methodology in psychology and neurophysiology will prove adequate to explain human behaviour. Defence of this thesis requires: an examination of the mental/physical dichotomy, and its rejection in favour of a distinction between psychological and physical terms; a description and discussion of functionalism in psychology and neurophysiology, showing how the notorious problem of the necessary intensionality of psychological terms may be circumvented; an examination of the role of computer simulation in psycho-physical research; and an explanation of how the phenomena of sentience fit the functional framework.
The book concludes that the thesis presented is in all essentials that of Aristotle; Aristotle had no ‘mind-body problem’, and were it not for a subsequent over-obsession with Cartesian scepticism, we need not have had one either.
|Publisher:||Taylor & Francis|
|Product dimensions:||5.50(w) x 8.50(h) x (d)|
Table of Contents
1. Relations and Relata 2. Intensionality and Irreducibility 3. Psychology and ‘Psychology’ 4. Psychology and Practice 5. Robots and Research 6. Sensations and Sentience 7. Mind Undermined