Radical Remission: Surviving Cancer Against All Odds

Radical Remission: Surviving Cancer Against All Odds

NOOK Book(eBook)

View All Available Formats & Editions
Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
Want a NOOK ? Explore Now

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

Radical Remission: Surviving Cancer Against All Odds 3.8 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 4 reviews.
Minstral More than 1 year ago
I am a cancer patient married to a psychotherapist who is integrative (let's see what there is out there that can help the patient.) I appreciate Kelly's approach because she puts a bright light on what's out there and then pretty much leaves it up the the reader to decide what's best for them. I also appreciate her case studies that  high light the disconnect that occurs all too often between what the patient may intuit is best and what a decades old treatment template, no matter how dangerous or apparently not applicable dictates ought to be done. I've written my family and close friends and recommended the buy the book as a must have antidote to their dangerously stressful lives.
Martha4 More than 1 year ago
This is such an inspiring book! Thank you for gathering these ideas into a book so we all may benefit!!! It rings true, and has changed my life! I don't have cancer, but several family members have, and I am actively working on prevention. My body and mind already feel better after changing several things in my life because of this book.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I enjoyed the book and thought it very helpful. I'm re-reading it now and may read it more times. The methods used should also be helpful for any physical ailments.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
While I fully agree with the theory that a good attitude can help any human through any difficult situation; this  book is very misleading.  There is no true study; rather anecdotal conjecture written by someone who clearly doesn't understand the medical condition.  Truly dangerous to people in need of hope.  While it might offer hopeful thought, I question the "research" and legitimacy of the interviewees used to create these hypotheses.  I can't believe a doctoral degree was rewarded to this very incomplete and insufficient "study."     Nor can I understand how this has  gained any legitimate credibility.  Dangerous.