Rutherford B. Hayes: The American Presidents Series: The 19th President, 1877-1881

Rutherford B. Hayes: The American Presidents Series: The 19th President, 1877-1881

NOOK BookFirst Edition (eBook - First Edition)

$7.99
View All Available Formats & Editions
Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
Want a NOOK ? Explore Now

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

Rutherford B. Hayes 2.3 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 7 reviews.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
This biography helpful - simplistic & filled with dates. A decent chronology. Not one of the better volumes in an otherwise excellent series.
dkar3 More than 1 year ago
A rather boring and thin text about R.B. Hayes.  Although Trefousse was supposedly an accomplished writer, this work is quite poor.  Much of the book is terse and disjointed, with occassional  dips into uninteresting details. The reader is left with the sense that much more substance could be said  about Hayes, especially his youth, upbringing, and what made him the person he was.   I struggled to give it 2-stars.
BrokerOne More than 1 year ago
this book covered Hayes life very well
lapd00duke More than 1 year ago
Book was good at the beginning and the end. A little dry in the middle. However, not much out there to choose from if you are looking at this president. I would buy it again if I had to.
pml2 More than 1 year ago
I have read several biographies in this series and so far this is the only one that reads like a chronological list of the events of  his life.  But at the top of Page 55  I was struck by a sentence that made me believe the author had made an error.  A little research confirmed my belief.  In 1871 Hayes  visited  Washington.  He visited the President and had  other meetings.  The author writes: "Unfortunately he missed former Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton, who expressed his regret and his hope to see him next time."   Stanton apparently expressed those regrets from his grave.  Stanton died in 1869, shortly after being appointed to the Supreme Court.     Surely Hayes would have known this and wouldn't have expected to meet with him.  His biographer should have known this also.
Guest More than 1 year ago
Hans Trefousse's treatment of Rutherford B. Hayes falls far short of its potential. The book seems more a recitation of facts from an outline than a historical study. Paragraphs are often composed of short sentences listing either events, travels, or entertainments. Trefousse would have served the reader better to provide an understanding of the man and the period rather than try to list each trip or party. At times the biography seemed to be written by a student rather than an historian. Unable to resist the comparison of the 1876 election to 2000, Trefousse stretched the similarities in the Introduction (e.g. the African-American vote in 2000) and revealed his political biases in the Conclusion. Considering the weakness of his book, he would have done the reader a better service by writting a good historical biography rather than providing political commentary on current events. The editors have failed to maintain the quality that is evident in other books of The American Presidents series. One hopes that the editors take their role as editors seriously and do not consider their job ended with the commissioning of authors.
Guest More than 1 year ago
This short biography focuses too much on how Hayes felt about the events of that time. Additionally, the author's descriptions of the contested election of 1876 with its 'parallels' with the 2000 election are suspect. For example, a quote 'In 1876, as in 2000, the disputed result of the presidential canvass hinged on the question of votes denied to African Americans.' This assertion about the 2000 election is patently false; even the partisan US Civil Rights Commission could find no example of disenfranchised African Americans. The foci on the contest were predominately elderly white areas of Palm Beach and Broward counties. Note also with respect to the Kirkus review above, Hayes was not ousted by the Democrats, but decided to serve only one term prior to his election. He was succeeded by Garfield, a Republican.