A Sort of Conscience: The Wakefields

A Sort of Conscience: The Wakefields

by Philip Temple

NOOK Book(eBook)

$23.99 $39.99 Save 40% Current price is $23.99, Original price is $39.99. You Save 40%.
View All Available Formats & Editions

Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now
LEND ME® See Details

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781775580096
Publisher: Auckland University Press
Publication date: 01/01/2003
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: NOOK Book
Pages: 592
File size: 2 MB

About the Author

Philip Temple is the author of Central and The Last True Explorer.

Read an Excerpt

A Sort of Conscience

The Wakefields


By Philip Temple

Auckland University Press

Copyright © 2002 Philip Temple
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-77558-009-6



CHAPTER 1

The Matriarch and Her Sons


In early October 1791, seventeen-year-old Edward Wakefield returned to his parental home in Tottenham village, an hour's coach ride north of London, and announced, 'Mother, I am married!' Priscilla Wakefield's reaction is not known but may have been only lightly admonishing, given the long-suffering equanimity of her Quaker disposition and the precocity of recent Wakefield marriages. Her own had been contracted with Edward senior when both were only 20, in 1771; his father had married at 21. Her daughter Isabella caused no grief, but Priscilla's amiable patience was to be battered and tried her entire long life by the unexpected conjugal announcements of her sons and grandsons as they pursued a 'fine irregular genius for marriage' that was finally suppressed only by trial and imprisonment.

Edward had taken up with Susannah Crush, the 'bastard daughter of Robert Crush and Mary Galifant'; Crush was a yeoman farmer of Felstead in Essex. Edward described Susan as 'The most beautiful woman I have ever known'. With a cascade of golden hair and 'a soft angelic beauty ... she was a model for a sculptor'. Gentle, unsophisticated and undemanding, Susan was not a woman of family and brought Edward no land or cash. Physical attraction, and his 'ardent and enthusiastic disposition', seem to have been the motives behind the marriage of the tall, good-looking teenager to a woman seven years his elder.

The connubial and domestic arrangements of Edward and Susan during the first years of their marriage are not recorded, but nearly two years elapsed before their first child, Catherine Gurney, was born in the parish of St Olaves, Old Jewry, City of London on 17 July 1793. Almost another three years passed before Priscilla noted in her journal on 20 March 1796, 'Susan has a boy in London', who was to be named Edward Gibbon. As she entered middle age, the tensions and stresses of coping with the demands and deficiencies of her growing extended family inform most entries in the journal that Priscilla kept for 20 years. 'A plan inagitation for fixing Daniel [son] at Cowes. I fear his stability is scarcely equal to a situation so distant from the advice and counsel of friends' (13 February). A few months later: 'Drank tea with my Father who rapidly declines into the vale of years [70]. Age and infancy demand the attention of all closely connected' (10 April).

Priscilla's husband Edward (EW) 'was a man the interest of whose fortune left him by his father was £3000 a year and his commercial and banking concern rated him as a man of the very first consequence ... it must have had its weight with her parents and I suppose with herself.' But EW had not inherited his father's skills and luck in business and banking. 'She bore his unexpected failure like a heroine and it has procured for her great respect ever since ...'.

The family suffered from recurring financial problems, a direct practical burden for Priscilla and the chronic prompt for many of her sons' and grandsons' actions in future years. She found solace, fortitude and life purpose in an enduring Quaker faith inherited from both her mother Catherine, granddaughter of Robert Barclay of Ure, the seventeenth-century Quaker apologist (and progenitor of the famous banking family), and from her father, Daniel Bell. After their marriage at the meeting house in Tottenham High Road, her parents had made a home at nearby Stamford Hill, 70 acres bordering the River Lea where a wharf and warehouse served Bell's lifelong coal business. By 1796, Priscilla saw it as 'Once the place of all my domestic joys, but now, alas! almost stript of all' (22 July). As her widowed father neared the end of his life, she wrote on 25 July, 'Could but age feel the advantage of continuing agreeable: what a delightful task to alleviate its miseries, as it is, it is an incumbent duty.'

Priscilla Wakefield's Quakerism was actively and pragmatically philanthropic. She was no admirer of orthodoxy. At a Friends' meeting she 'mixed with numbers of those who think that extreme plainness of habit and address is essential to rectitude. I admire the simplicity of their manners, and the purity of their morals, but do they not sometimes deviate into mere formality and uniformity of habit?' (6 September 1796).

Priscilla had been brought up in an environment less restricted than that of many Quaker families. Daniel had been fond of shooting, riding and fox-hunting, which were not at all compatible with Quaker practice since Friends were adjured 'not to distress the creatures of God for our amusement'. Priscilla was said to be 'fond of general society and some worldly amusements': in December 1796, she went to London and 'saw Macbeth. Delighted with the combined talent of Mrs Siddons and Kemble.' But her piety and sense of propriety intervened as she added, 'Why are these amusements polluted by dreadful intermixture of vice and profaneness.'

'Her whole life was a devotion to benevolence!' said her brother Jonathan. Already, in 1791, Priscilla's determined kindness had established at Tottenham a charity for lying-in women. This was supported by annual subscriptions for which 'one hundred and twenty poor married women are upon the average annually relieved with the use of linen during their confinement, and small donations of money'. In 1792 she organised the funding of a School of Industry where up to 66 girls could be taught reading, writing, sewing, knitting and some arithmetic. The girls were encouraged to enter domestic service and a guinea was paid each on completion of every three years' continuous work as servants.

Priscilla's good works were unremitting: winter soup kitchens, a meeting to put a stop to the dangers of chimney sweeping, a manufactory to encourage spinning in the parish. But her most enduring philanthropic achievement was the introduction of savings banks. The concept was not new. Savings banks had been set up in Germany in the middle of the eighteenth century and later promoted by Jeremy Bentham, the Utilitarian, and Arthur Young, the agricultural reformer, of whom young Edward Wakefield was an enthusiastic disciple. But a bank in Britain first took practical shape as one of the functions of a Friendly Society for women and children that Priscilla Wakefield helped to establish at Tottenham in October 1798. Its objects included a fund for loans, 'to prevent the use of pawnbrokers' shops', and a bank for the savings of the poor.

Initially, the Friendly Society bank operated only to encourage children to save, without the benefit of interest. As an agent of Providence and a representative of the Christian 'kingdom within', Priscilla's moral purposes were clear: 'It habituates the children to industry, frugality, and foresight; and, by introducing them to notice, it teaches them the value of character and of the esteem of those who, by the dispensation of Providence, are placed above them'.Priscilla's charitable labours would never challenge the existing social and political order; she was a member of a non-conforming Quaker movement which, by the 1790s, 'had prospered too much. ... their hostility to State and authority had diminished to formal symbols'. Its continuing tradition of dissent 'gave more to the social conscience of the middle class than to the popular movement' for social and political reform.

In 1804 the children's fund was converted into the Charitable Bank, taking interest-earning deposits from adults, too. It was overseen by six wealthy trustees, 'each responsible to the amount of 100 pounds for the repayment of principal and interest'. Priscilla and her son Edward persisted in a campaign to have savings banks more widely established under government guarantee. Edward's association with the Secretary of the Treasury in 1817 helped at last in the passing of a savings bank act that procured government security for the deposits of trustees and managers. Security for all depositors – as savings banks spread throughout Britain – had to wait for Gladstone's reforms 40 years later. (A proposed statue of Priscilla in Tottenham, to memorialise her as the savings bank founder, never eventuated.)

Priscilla's Quaker philanthropy in aid of women and the poor was a late expression of what Pope called the 'strong benevolence of soul' that had gathered strength throughout the Georgian age. Her lying-in charity was one of the fruits of the medical reforms that saw more than 100 new hospitals and dispensaries established during the eighteenth century; her school was set up through the new Sunday Schools movement. Charity was the watchword of the new Puritans and Evangelists, and saw its most famous expression in William Wilberforce's campaign to end the slave trade. 'What pleasure it is,' Priscilla wrote, 'to confer happiness.'

While charity and moral improvement lubricated middle-class consciences of the time, ideas of political and class reform were locked up during the generation-long military struggle with Revolutionary France and Napoleon. Republicanism, democracy and deism, those dangerous doctrines of the American and French Revolutions, stirred the working classes and were rigorously suppressed by the state. Tom Paine, advocating deism, republicanism, the abolition of slavery and the emancipation of women, had his seminal work, The Rights of Man (1791), banned and was forced to flee England when indicted for treason.

The friend and feminist counterpart of Paine was that so-called 'hyena in petticoats', Mary Wollstonecraft. Her 1792 book, Vindication of the Rights of Women, scandalised English society with its calls for sexual emancipation and equality of opportunity for women. With no political rights or access to power, Wollstonecraft did not need to be indicted for treason. The ridicule and contempt of the male establishment and the wave of disapproval and condemnation from the middle-class members of her own gender were censure enough.

Priscilla Wakefield's commentary on Mary Wollstonecraft soon after her premature death in 1798 reveals how religious conviction and social conformity always informed her own best intentions. Because originality of Wollstonecraft's genius 'was not curbed by any regular cultivation, her faculties were left to expand by their own force'. Although this 'probably contributed to leave her free from the usual fetters of prejudice', it also 'deprived her of the inestimable benefit of an early impression of religious principles' so that she 'deviated from those wholesome necessary restraints which the doctrines of revealed religion impose upon natural inclinations, when they lead beyond those limits which the good order of society and individual happiness require ...'. Priscilla considered that 'A national energetic education, suited to the different ranks', would offer women 'the sure tho' gradual emancipation from the sensual chains with which they are now so frequently manacled'. For Priscilla there was an 'inestimable advantage to be derived from general improvement ... the communication of useful knowledge to all ranks of people as the best security for orderly conduct and obedience to lawful authority'.

Priscilla's own dissertation on women appeared that same year. In Reflections on the Present Condition of the Female Sex she advocated a more rational system of training girls with regard to their physical development, recommending games, outdoor recreation, cold baths and the discarding of stays. A college should be established to educate girls as governesses and teachers of art and science, and she recommended that girls dependent on their 'own exertions' could take up useful trades and even engage in farming 'without detriment to their place in life and chances of matrimony'; women of position could undertake the inspection of workhouses. Women, Priscilla pointed out, were excluded from many trades and occupations for which they were at least as well equipped as men, and they were grossly underpaid. To change this state of affairs she called 'loudly upon women of rank ... to employ women only ... procure female instructors for their children ... frequent no shops that are not served by women. ... they should reward them as liberally as they do the men who have hitherto supplanted them. Let it be considered a common cause to give them every possible advantage.'

This early feminist cry for equality was muffled by her conviction that 'nature and reason' had decreed a husband's role to be the 'one head or chief in every family'. Self-sufficiency in a wider range of employments and a healthier style of upbringing would make women better wives and mothers, and more useful members of society, and give them the skills to maintain themselves if, for whatever reason, they found themselves without the support of a male's income. Priscilla reasoned from hard experience. Her conviction that upper-class mothers should educate their children, not governesses, stemmed from the example of her 'most excellent of mothers, to whose incessant care and admirable example I owe the foundation of any merit I may possess'.

Philanthropy based on an abiding nonconformist faith and a belief in self-improvement and in the subordinating proprieties of class and gender were to prove powerful influences in the dominating role Priscilla played in the education of her grandchildren. Her educative ideas found an even wider market in a series of sixteen instructional books for children which she began to produce in 1794. Five dealt with natural history; the others, employing different narrative techniques, were designed to convey the kind of useful knowledge from which the children of the growing middle class might benefit.

A
Family Tour
through the
British Empire
containing some account of its
Manufactures, Natural and Artificial Curiosities
History and Antiquities
interspersed with
Biographical Anecdotes.
Particularly adapted to the
Amusement and Instruction of
YOUTH


was first published in 1804. Her 'British Empire' consisted of England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales.

In Priscilla's tour of this empire, widowed (but financially secure) Mrs Middle-ton of Richmond determines one fine morning in May that her children will not waste their summer holidays again at Brighton, a place 'too well adapted to form habits of idleness and trifling'. Instead they will make a journey throughout the kingdom for their health and improvement. 'Imprint it on your memories, that we do not travel for the amusement of the moment, but for the sake of collecting useful knowledge.'

'"That will suit my taste completely," said Arthur, who was just fourteen; "novelty delights me; and when I am a man, I will travel all over the world." "A rambling spirit," replied his mother, "differs much from the laudable curiosity of surveying proper objects."' Told through a general narrative style as well as the children's letters and journals, Priscilla's Family Tour was a considerable best-seller, going through fifteen editions.

The Middleton family are the protagonists of most of her travel books. In Excursions in North America, Arthur travels to enlarge his education (1806); to augment his completed university education in The Traveller in Africa (1814), and to forget his troubles and sorrows as The Traveller in Asia (1817). The absence of a husband and father in her tales reinforces Priscilla's belief in the precedence of a mother's role in the education of her children and represents, perhaps, something of an unattainable personal Utopia.


(Continues...)

Excerpted from A Sort of Conscience by Philip Temple. Copyright © 2002 Philip Temple. Excerpted by permission of Auckland University Press.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Table of Contents

Contents

Title Page,
Introduction,
Part One: This Mottled World, 1791–1827,
1 The Matriarch and Her Sons,
2 Ten Years Too Early,
3 The Best Boy in the World,
4 It Might Make One in Love with Death,
5 By Hook or By Crook,
6 To Pick the Father's Pocket,
Part Two: Forward, Forward Let Us Range, 1828–1839,
7 This Black Place,
8 A Castle in the Air,
9 Life as Propaganda,
10 A Long and Sore Trial,
11 Down the Ringing Grooves of Change,
12 Strangers to their Family,
13 The Ingenious Projector,
14 'I would die in your service',
15 Possess Yourselves of the Soil,
Part Three: War to the Knife, 1839–1848,
16 'They would extort the masts out of the ship',
17 'I am half a missionary myself',
18 Hobson's Choice,
19 Nursed in Blood,
20 Cui Bono?,
21 Utu Postponed,
22 The New Zealand War,
23 'He is but cold earth',
24 A Highly Excitable Temperament,
Part Four: A Suicide of the Affections, 1849–1879,
25 Flying With a Broken Wing,
26 A Slice of England,
27 Noodles,
28 Dead to the Past,
29 'That Old Giant Spider',
30 Dead to the Future,
Epilogue,
Extended Notes,
Acknowledgements,
Bibliography,
Index,
Plates,
About this Book,
About the Author,
Copyright,

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews