Star-Spangled Men: America's Ten Worst Presidents by Nathan Miller
Just in time for President's Day, an irreverent and provocative look at the "other guys"--the fallible, sometimes farcical presidents whose misdeeds constitute an enlightening lesson in American politics and history.
Nathan Miller is an award-winning journalist and the author of twelve works of history and biography, including Broadside: The Age of Fighting Sail, 1775-1815, FDR: An Intimate History, and War at Sea. He lives in Washington, D.C.
Read an Excerpt
Picking America's best presidents is easy. George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and Franklin D. Roosevelt usually top any list. Theodore Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, and Woodrow Wilson belong among the near greats. But choosing the nation's worst chief executives requires much more thought. Warren G. Harding and Ulysses S. Grant are easy choices. But what about Richard M. Nixon? Except for Watergate and its concomitant crudities, he was not a bad president. Nevertheless, he was the only one forced out of office and for no less than trying to make off with the Constitution. Does Herbert Hoover belong on such a list? How about Jimmy Carter? Ronald Reagan? Or William Jefferson Clinton? The possibilities are almost endless.
Ranking presidents is a popular sport among Americans. Perhaps the first such list appeared back in 1948, when Professor Arthur M. Schlesinger of Harvard asked fifty-five leading historians for their ratings of the nation's chief executives. Nearly a half century later, his son, Arthur Jr., put the same question to thirty-two experts. A startling result of all the polls in between is that those named the best and the worst presidents remained pretty much the same over the years despite the adding of new presidents. The major reshufflings have been in the near-great and average categories.
My selection of the worst presidents is purely subjective. It is not the result of a scientific sampling of historians or leading Americans. I have made my choices based upon a lifetime of reading American history, graduate study, a career in political journalism on the local, state, and national levels, and as a Capitol Hillstaffer, as well aon the fact that they were ranked low on the first Schlesinger list and remain there because hardly anyone knows anything about them.
In point of fact, they are not as bad as they are usually portrayed. Both were vice presidents unexpectedly elevated to the White House by the death of their predecessor. Tyler, a diffident Virginia aristocrat who became president after the death of William Henry Harrison, fought off numerous challenges to his authority as the first "accidental president." He refused to allow Congress to brush him aside and take control of the government. By clever management, he brought about the annexation of Texas and presided over the resolution of a major boundary dispute between Canada and the United States all of which should place him above such nonentities as Benjamin Harrison.
"Honest, commonplace Fillmore," as he was called by historian Allan Nevins, also deserves more respect than he gets. Following the death of Zachary Taylor, he played an important role in the adoption of the Compromise of 1850, which staved off the Civil War by a decade, and dispatched Commodore Matthew C. Perry to open Japan to American trade. My guess is that Fillmore's low reputation is not based upon his presidency but is colored by his decision to run unsuccessfully for president in 1856 on the anti-Catholic, anti-immigrant Know-Nothing ticket. Besides, the name Millard Fillmore seems to generate laughter on its own.
While this book was under way, I was repeatedly asked if I were going to include any contemporary presidents, particularly Reagan or George Bush. Reagan is not included because he came to Washington with two goals to reduce the influence of "gov'ment" and to destroy the "Ev il Empire" and he accomplished both. Whether one approves of the means he used is open to debate. The key to Reagan's success was knowing where he wanted to take the American people and the ability to convince them to follow him. My guess is that his historical reputation, while not high today, will grow in future years in the same manner as that of Dwight D. Eisenhower, who now stands far higher in the ratings than he did only a few years ago.
As for Bush, he barely misses making the worst list. The creation and management of the alliance that won the Gulf War of 1991 saves him, but lacking vision, he was unable to capitalize on this victory to ensure his reelection. Hoover, although the scapegoat for the Great Depression, does not make it either. In reality, he was the victim of the criminal neglect of previous administrations. The last classical liberal to serve in the White House, Hoover was incapable of dealing with the chilling realities of the economic collapse, but so was everyone else except for Franklin Roosevelt. I expect the inclusion of Jimmy Carter among the worst presidents will bring howls of protest based upon his postpresidential career. But there is no hiding that he was a poor president.
One thing that emerges from this book is the truly undistinguished nature of most presidential candidates winners and losers alike. America can survive, and make progress, even with bad presidents. But the country needs and should have good presidents. The American people must find and elect men and women of high moral character, as well as intelligence and experience. Character and conduct are clearly linked, and the personal weaknesses of a president can often turn out to be public liabilities. Teapot Dome, Watergate, and Whitewater all have their roots in the character flaws of Warren Harding, Richard Nixon, and Bill Clinton.
For the most part this book has been excavated from standard sources, but I have put my own spin on what I have found. I expect brickbats and dead cats as a result of some of my selections. But as the English historian J. A. Froud said, "Historical facts are like a child's box of letters. You have only to pick out such letters as you want, to spell any word you want." If you disagree with my choices, get your own box of letters.
CONTENTS AMERICA'S TEN WORST PRESIDENTS (IN THE ORDER OF THEIR WORSTNESS, FROM THE POOR TO THE HORRID) PROLOGUE (IN WHICH THE CRITERIA FOR MAKING THIS LIST ARE DISCUSSED) FOREWORD TO THE TOUCHSTONE EDITION I. Jimmy Carter, who showed that the White House is not the place for on-the-job training II. William Howard Taft, who was so fat he got stuck in a White House bathtub III. Benjamin Harrison, who looked like a medieval gnome and had a handshake like "a wilted petunia" IV. Calvin Coolidge, who was a living embodiment of Woody Allen's observation that "eighty percent of success is showing up" V. Ulysses S. Grant, who proves that old soldiers should fade away rather than go to the White House VI. Andrew Johnson, who declared, "I am right" about Reconstruction but was wrong VII. Franklin Pierce, who said, "There's nothing left...but to get drunk," after being denied renomination and promptly did so VIII. James Buchanan, who was on the government payroll for forty years and never had an original idea IX. Warren Gamaliel Harding, who gave being "in the closet" a new meaning X. Richard Milhous Nixon, who maintained, "I am not a crook!" but was EPILOGUE (In which we consider the two most overrated presidents) Thomas Jefferson and John F. Kennedy NOTES BIBLIOGRAPHY INDEX
America's Call is based on the journal that John Bernhard used to chronicle his trip
to North America during the late 1970s. It is the story of two young friends on a New World walkabout, questing to discover their destinies ...
Could a military coup really happen in the United States? Author and former magazine and
newspaper publisher George Fellows gives readers a wake-up call about why we should not take our democratic freedoms for granted.More than a dozen prominent civil ...
John Denison Baldwin (1809-1883) was an American politician, Congregationalist minister, newspaper editor, and popular anthropological
writer. Baldwin briefly studied law, but graduated with a degree in theology from Yale Divinity School in 1834. He was a member of the Connecticut ...
Praise for BROADSIDESPace the pitching black deck with a sleepless Admiral Nelson the night before
battle bestows eternal rest and peerless immortality upon him; envision with Mahan the storm-tossed and ever-watchful ships-of-the-line that kept England secure from invasion; wonder in ...
By the 1920s, Denver had outgrown its frontier-town beginnings. But for some, life was still
as perilous as the surrounding terrain. The insidious influence of the Ku Klux Klan was reaching its peak, and those who stood in its path ...
Globalization is becoming a strategic imperative for survival and growth.During the past two decades, our
world has become much more interconnected and global. As a direct result of expanded international trade, the continued proliferation of the Internet and e-commerce, social ...
In How the Left Swiftboated America, FOX commentator and bestselling author John Gibson offers the
first comprehensive defense of the Bush presidency against its numerous detractors. In this provocative political work, Gibson explores who was right and who was wrong ...
The Current Controversies series examines today's most important social and political issues; each volume presents
a diverse selection of primary and secondary sources representing all sides of the debate in question.; ; Each anthology is composed of a wide spectrum ...