The National Book Award Finalist and New York Times bestseller that became a guide and balm for a country struggling to understand the election of Donald Trump
"A generous but disconcerting look at the Tea Party. . . . This is a smart, respectful and compelling book." — Jason DeParle, The New York Times Book Review
When Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election, a bewildered nation turned to Strangers in Their Own Land to understand what Trump voters were thinking when they cast their ballots. Arlie Hochschild, one of the most influential sociologists of her generation, had spent the preceding five years immersed in the community around Lake Charles, Louisiana, a Tea Party stronghold. As Jedediah Purdy put it in the New Republic , “Hochschild is fascinated by how people make sense of their lives. . . . [Her] attentive, detailed portraits . . . reveal a gulf between Hochchild’s ‘strangers in their own land’ and a new elite.” Already a favorite common read book in communities and on campuses across the country and called “humble and important” by David Brooks and “masterly” by Atul Gawande, Hochschild’s book has been lauded by Noam Chomsky, New Orleans mayor Mitch Landrieu, and countless others.
The paperback edition features a new afterword by the author reflecting on the election of Donald Trump and the other events that have unfolded both in Louisiana and around the country since the hardcover edition was published, and also includes a readers’ group guide at the back of the book.
|Publisher:||New Press, The|
|Edition description:||First Trade Paper Edition|
|Product dimensions:||5.40(w) x 8.20(h) x 1.20(d)|
About the Author
Arlie Russell Hochschild is one of the most influential sociologists of her generation. She is the author of nine books, including The Second Shift , The Time Bind , The Managed Heart , and The Outsourced Self. Three of her books have been named as New York Times Notable Books of the Year and her work appears in sixteen languages. The winner of the Ulysses Medal as well as Guggenheim and Mellon grants, she lives in Berkeley, California.
Table of Contents
Part 1 The Great Paradox
1 Traveling to the Heart 3
2 "One Thing Good" 25
3 The Rememberers 39
4 The Candidates 55
5 The "Least Resistant Personality" 73
Part 2 The Social Terrain
6 Industry: "The Buckle in America's Energy Belt" 85
7 The State: Governing the Market 4,000 Feet Below 99
8 The Pulpit and the Press: "The Topic Doesn't Come Up" 117
Part 3 The Deep Story And The People In It
9 The Deep Story 135
10 The Team Player: Loyalty Above All 153
11 The Worshipper: Invisible Renunciation 169
12 The Cowboy: Stoicism 181
13 The Rebel: A Team Loyalist with a New Cause 193
Part 4 Going National
14 The Fires of History: The 1860s and the 1960s 207
15 Strangers No Longer: The Power of Promise 221
16 "They Say There Are Beautiful Trees" 231
Appendix A The Research 273
Appendix B Politics and Pollution: National Discoveries from ToxMap 277
Appendix C Tact-Checking Common Impressions 281
Reading Group Guide 385
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
I usually don't leave reviews, but this book is a must read. The author takes you through the underlying systems and beliefs that have contributed to the current state of our nation.
Author is a discciplined social scientist who makes a sserious atempt to understand the conservative mind
Now we know where Shirley Jackson found inspiration in American society to write The Lottery. As nice as these people might be, there doesn’t seem to be a way to get past their fact universe to persuade them that there might be a different way. You simply have to outvote them and then through sustained policies that liberals could enact, improve their lives too. I wish their lots in lives could improve soon. But doubling down on the Lottery Society is not going to work. It would be interesting to further develop the contrast made late in the book between Louisiana and Norway, two oil states with similar size landmass and population, but which have completely different societal results. Along with Norway’s wealth and optimism versus Louisiana’s poverty and pessimism, one other obvious contrast is the racial make up: Norway is ~94% white European with probably less than 3% black or brown, while Louisiana is only 65% white and almost 33% black. European societies like Norway are usually disparaged and dismissed by the American right as “Socialism.” In this context, socialism means giving white people’s money to others. If Louisiana was a white as Norway, we might find it looks a lot more like Norway. On the other hand, as we have been seeing from the newly rising European right wing parties, if Norway was as white as Louisiana, we might find that it looks a lot more like Louisiana. Ms. Hochshild makes a lot out of her model of people standing in line while others cut in line, which all of her Lake Charles friends seemed to identify with. It might indeed be a suitable model for those people given their perspective on the world. I think this model translates well beyond Lake Charles, even to here in Upstate, NY. It would have been interesting though if she could have developed it further with them by getting their views on a number of subsequent questions, like: 1. Who set the line arrangements in the first place which had them already in front of some of those they viewed as line cutters? 2. What did you do to deserve your place in the line? 3. Who said that there should only be one line? 4. Who says that you need to stand in the Lake Charles line? You are not going to persuade these people. You could at best billboard the mis-understandings summarized in Appendix C, throughout Red America, so that they could at least see the reality that Fox News keeps hidden from them. Then you need to out vote them.