The Boundary Stones of Thought: An Essay in the Philosophy of Logic

The Boundary Stones of Thought: An Essay in the Philosophy of Logic

by Ian Rumfitt
The Boundary Stones of Thought: An Essay in the Philosophy of Logic

The Boundary Stones of Thought: An Essay in the Philosophy of Logic

by Ian Rumfitt

Hardcover

$88.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
    Choose Expedited Shipping at checkout for delivery by Thursday, April 4
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

The Boundary Stones of Thought seeks to defend classical logic from a number of attacks of a broadly anti-realist character. Ian Rumfitt is sympathetic to many of the premisses underlying these attacks. Indeed, he regards some of them as effective challenges to certain principles of classical semantics, notably the Principle of Bivalence. He argues, though, that they are ineffective against classical logic itself.

The book starts by considering the general problem of how conflicts over logical laws may be rationally discussed and adjudicated. This leads to a consideration of the nature of logic: Rumfitt identifies the particular features that mark out logical consequence from other consequence relations, and he advances a new argument for the ancient thesis that there is a modal element in the notion of logical consequence. He develops a theory of that modal element in terms of perhaps incomplete possibilities, rather than fully determinate possible worlds. Some prima facie powerful arguments against the validity of certain classical logical laws are then analysed in the light of this account of logic. Throughout, care is taken to separate lines of anti-classical argument that, although distinct, are often run together or confused.

The analysis yields, as by-products, semantic theories for a number of problematical areas of discourse. These areas include our talk about sub-atomic particles, about the infinite, about infinitesimals, about sets, and vague discourse. Rumfitt concludes by defending his stance of accepting classical logic while rejecting Bivalence, against Aristotle's argument that a classical logician is committed to Bivalence. The ultimate aim is to liberate classical logic from the dead hand of classical semantics.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780198733638
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication date: 05/19/2015
Pages: 320
Product dimensions: 6.20(w) x 9.30(h) x 1.10(d)

About the Author

Ian Rumfitt studied philosophy at Balliol College, Oxford and at Princeton University. He has taught the subject at Keele University, the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, University College, Oxford (where he was a Tutorial Fellow for seven years), and at Birkbeck College, London (where he was Professor of Philosophy from 2005 until 2013). He is now Professor of Philosophy at the University of Oxford and a Senior Research Fellow at All Souls College. He has published many articles in philosophical logic, in the philosophy of language, and in metaphysics.

Table of Contents

1. IntroductionPART ONE: THE NATURE OF LOGIC2. Logical laws3. Logical necessityPART TWO: FIVE ATTACKS ON CLASSICAL LOGIC4. The argument of Dummett's 'Truth'5. The verificationist attack on classical logic6. Possibilities7. Challenges from the infinite and from the infinitesimal8. The challenge from vagueness9. On the use of classical logic in set theory10. ConclusionBibliographyIndex
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews