The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise And Decline of America's Man-Made Landscape

The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise And Decline of America's Man-Made Landscape

by James Howard Kunstler

Paperback(Reprint)

$16.20 $18.00 Save 10% Current price is $16.2, Original price is $18. You Save 10%.
View All Available Formats & Editions
Choose Expedited Shipping at checkout for guaranteed delivery by Thursday, September 19

Overview

The Geography of Nowhere traces America's evolution from a nation of Main Streets and coherent communities to a land where every place is like no place in particular, where the cities are dead zones and the countryside is a wasteland of cartoon architecture and parking lots.
In elegant and often hilarious prose, Kunstler depicts our nation's evolution from the Pilgrim settlements to the modern auto suburb in all its ghastliness. The Geography of Nowhere tallies up the huge economic, social, and spiritual costs that America is paying for its car-crazed lifestyle. It is also a wake-up call for citizens to reinvent the places where we live and work, to build communities that are once again worthy of our affection. Kunstler proposes that by reviving civic art and civic life, we will rediscover public virtue and a new vision of the common good. "The future will require us to build better places," Kunstler says, "or the future will belong to other people in other societies."

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780671888251
Publisher: Free Press
Publication date: 07/28/1994
Edition description: Reprint
Pages: 304
Sales rank: 385,275
Product dimensions: 5.50(w) x 8.43(h) x 0.80(d)

About the Author

James Howard Kunstler is the author of eight novels. He has worked as a newspaper reporter and an editor for Rolling Stone, and is a frequent contributor to The New York Times Sunday Magazine. He lives in upstate New York.

Read an Excerpt

Chapter 1

SCARY PLACES

There is a marvelous moment in the hit movie Who Framed Roger Rabbit? that sums up our present national predicament very nicely. The story is set in Los Angeles in 1947. The scene is a dreary warehouse, headquarters of the villain, Judge Doom, a cartoon character masquerading as a human being. The hallucinatory plot hinges on Judge Doom's evil scheme to sell off the city's streetcar system and to create just such a futuristic car-crazed society as Americans actually live and work in today.

"It's a construction plan of epic proportions," he intones. "They're calling it [portentous pause] a freeway! Eight lanes of shimmering cement running from here to Pasadena! I see a place where people get on and off the freeway, off and on, off and on, all day and all night....I see a street of gas stations, inexpensive motels, restaurants that serve rapidly prepared food, tire salons, automobile dealerships, and wonderful, wonderful billboards as far as the eye can see. My god, it'll be beautiful!"

In short order, Judge Doom is unmasked for the nonhuman scoundrel he is, dissolved by a blast of caustic chemical, and flushed into the Los Angeles sewer system, while the rest of the cute little cartoon creatures hippity-hop happily into the artificial sunset.

"That lamebrain freeway idea could only be cooked up by a 'toon," comments the movie's gumshoe hero, Eddie Valiant, afterward.

The audience sadly knows better. In the real world, Judge Doom's vision has prevailed and we are stuck with it. Yet the movie's central metaphor -- that our civilization has been undone by an evil cartoon ethos -- could not be more pertinent, for more and more we appear to be a nation of overfed clowns living in a hostile cartoon environment.

Thirty years ago, Lewis Mumford said of post-World II development, "the end product is an encapsulated life, spent more and more either in a motor car or within the cabin of darkness before a television set." The whole wicked, sprawling, megalopolitan mess, he gloomily predicted, would completely demoralize mankind and lead to nuclear holocaust.

It hasn't come to that, but what Mumford deplored was just the beginning of a process that, instead of blowing up the world, has nearly wrecked the human habitat in America. Ever-busy, ever-building, ever-in-motion, ever-throwing-out the old for the new, we have hardly paused to think about what we are so busy building, and what we have thrown away. Meanwhile, the everyday landscape becomes more nightmarish and unmanageable each year. For many, the word development itself has become a dirty word.

Eighty percent of everything ever built in America has been built in the last fifty years, and most of it is depressing, brutal, ugly, unhealthy, and spiritually degrading -- the jive-plastic commuter tract home wastelands, the Potemkin village shopping plazas with their vast parking lagoons, the Lego-block hotel complexes, the "gourmet mansardic" junk-food joints, the Orwellian office "parks" featuring buildings sheathed in the same reflective glass as the sunglasses worn by chaingang guards, the particle-board garden apartments rising up in every meadow and cornfield, the freeway loops around every big and little city with their clusters of discount merchandise marts, the whole destructive, wasteful, toxic, agoraphobia-inducing spectacle that politicians proudly call "growth."

The newspaper headlines may shout about global warming, extinctions of living species, the devastation of rain forests, and other worldwide catastrophes, but Americans evince a striking complacency when it comes to their everyday environment and the growing calamity that it represents.

I had a hunch that many other people find their surroundings as distressing as I do my own, yet I sensed too that they lack the vocabulary to understand what is wrong with the places they ought to know best. That is why I wrote this book.

The sentimental view of anything is apt to be ridiculous, but I feel that I have been unusually sensitive to the issue of place since I was a little boy. Before I was old enough to vote, I had lived in a classic postwar suburb, in the nation's greatest city, and in several classic small towns, and along the way I acquired strong impressions about each of these places.

One September day in 1954 my father and mother and I drove twenty miles east out of New York City in our Studebaker on the Northern State Parkway to meet the movers at our new house "in the country," as my mother would refer forever to any place where you cannot walk out your front door and hail a taxi. Until that time, Long Island had been one of the most beautiful places in the United States, and our house was one small reason it would not remain that way much longer.

It was in a "development" called Northwood. The name had only a casual relation to geography. Indeed, it was north of many things -- the parkway, the land of Dixie, the Tropic of Capricorn -- but the wood part was spurious since the tract occupied a set of former farm fields, and among the spanking new houses not a tree stood over ten feet tall or as thick around as my father's thumb. The houses, with a few exceptions, were identical boxy split-levels, clad in asphalt shingles of various colors, with two windows above a gaping garage door, affording the facades an aspect of slack-jawed cretinism. Our house was an exception. The developers, I'm told, had started out with different models before they settled on the split-levels, which were absolutely the latest thing and sold like hotcakes.

Our house was a ranch clad in natural cedar shingles. It had a front porch too narrow to put furniture on and shutters that didn't close or conform to the dimensions of the windows. It sported no other decorative elaborations beside an iron carriage lamp on the front lawn that was intended to evoke ye olde post road days, or something like that. What it lacked in exterior grandeur, it made up in comfort inside. The three bedrooms were ample. We had baths galore for a family of three, a kitchen loaded with electric wonders, wall-to-wall carpeting throughout, and a real fireplace in the living room. The place cost about $25,000.

Our quarter-acre lot lay at the edge of the development. Behind our treeless back yard stood what appeared to my six-year-old eyes to be an endless forest like the wilderness where Davey Crockett slew bears. In fact, it was the 480-acre estate of Clarence Hungerford Mackay, president and major stockholder of the Postal Telegraph Cable Company -- the precursor of Western Union. Mackay was long gone by the 1950s, his heirs and assigns scattered to the winds, and "Harbor Hill," as his property had been named, was in a sad state of abandonment and decay. It took me and my little friends some time to penetrate its glades and dells, for there was much news on the airwaves that fall about the exploits of George Metesky, New York City's "Mad Bomber," and we had a notion that the old estate was his hideout.

A lacework of gravel carriage drives overgrown by dogwood and rhododendron criss-crossed the property. At its heart stood the old mansion. I don't recall its style -- Shingle? Queen Anne? Railroad Romanesque ? But it was much larger than any Northwood house. Juvenile delinquents had lit fires inside, and not necessarily in the fireplaces. Yet for its shattered glass, musty odors, and bird droppings, the mansion projected tremendous charm and mystery. Even in ruin, it felt much more authentic than our own snug, carpeted homes, and I know we regarded it as a sort of sacred place, as palpably a place apart from our familiar world. We certainly spent a lot of time there.

One week in the spring of 1956, the bulldozers appeared in the great woods behind our house. Soon they had dug a storm sump the size of Lake Ronkonkoma back there, a big ocher gash surrounded by chainlink fencing. In the months that followed, the trees crashed down, the mansion was demolished, new houses went up, and Clarence Hungerford Mackay's 480 acres was turned into another development called -- what else? -- Country Estates!

A year later my parents landed in divorce court, and I moved into Manhattan with my mother. On the whole I did not like the city at first. My mother enrolled me in an organized after-school play group to keep me out of trouble. Our group made its headquarters in a little meadow near the Ramble in Central Park where we played softball and "kick the can." Unlike the wilderness of Clarence Mackay's estate, the park seemed cluttered with bothersome adults, strolling lovers, nannies pushing prams, winos -- everyone but George Metesky. By and by, I made city friends. We played in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, because it was a block away from my elementary school at 82nd and Madison. This was in the days before art became just another form of show biz, and on weekday afternoons the great halls of the Met were practically deserted. My other chief recreation was throwing objects off the terrace of a friend's fifteenth-story penthouse apartment -- snowballs, water balloons, cantaloupes -- but the less said about this the better.

Summers I was sent away to a boys' camp in New Hampshire, where I got my first glimpse of what real American towns were like. From age twelve up, we were trucked one night a week into the town of Lebanon (pop. 8000) where we had the choice of attending a teen street dance or going to see a movie at the old opera house. There was a third, unofficial, option, which was to just wander around town.

Lebanon had a traditional New England layout. A two-acre square occupied the center of town. Within it stood a bandshell and a great many towering elms. Around the square stood various civic buildings of agreeable scale -- the library, the town hall, the opera house -- whose dignified facades lent Lebanon an aura of stability and consequence. At the west end of the square lay a commercial district of narrow shoplined streets wending downhill to a mill district. Here I bought fishing lures and the latest baseball magazines.

Off the square's east end stood the town's best residential streets, lined with substantial-looking houses mainly of nineteenth-century vintage. They were set rather close together, and lacked front lawns, but they seemed the better for that. Instead, the capacious porches nearly met the sidewalks. Big trees lined the streets and their branches made a graceful canopy over it like the vaults inside a church. In the soft purple twilight with the porch lamps glowing, and the sights and sounds of family life within, these quiet residential streets made quite an impression on me.

I was charmed and amazed to discover that life could be physically arranged the way it was in Lebanon, New Hampshire. As I thought about it, I realized that a town like Lebanon was what a place like Northwood could only pretend to be: that Northwood, lacking any center, lacking any shops or public buildings, lacking places of work or of play, lacking anything except the treeless streets of nearly identical houses set on the useless front lawns, was in some essential way a mockery of what Lebanon really was.

As a teenager I visited my old suburban chums back on Long Island from time to time and I did not envy their lot in life. By puberty, they had entered a kind of coma. There was so little for them to do in Northwood, and hardly any worthwhile destination reachable by bike or foot, for now all the surrounding territory was composed of similar one-dimensional housing developments punctuated at intervals by equally boring shopping plazas. Since they had no public gathering places, teens congregated in furtive little holes -- bedrooms and basements -- to smoke pot and imitate the rock and roll bands who played on the radio. Otherwise, teen life there was reduced to waiting for that transforming moment of becoming a licensed driver.

The state college I went off to in 1966 was located in a small town of 5000 in remote western New York state. To a city kid, Brockport was deeply provincial, the kind of place where the best restaurant served red wine on the rocks. Yet I enjoyed it hugely. At a time when small towns all over America were dying, little Brockport remained relatively robust. Its little Main Street had a full complement of shops, eating places, and, of course, drinking establishments, for this was back in the days when eighteen-year-olds could buy liquor. There was an old single-screen movie theater downtown with an Art Deco facade and a marquee edged in neon lights.

The reason for the town's healthy condition was obvious: the college. It furnished jobs and a huge volume of customers for Main Street's businesses. It gave the place some intellectual life -- totally absent in neighboring burgs where all the lesser institutions of culture had been replaced by television. The students enlivened the town by their sheer numbers. Many of them had come from boring one-dimensional suburbs like Northwood, and they appreciated what life in a real town had to offer. It was scaled to people, not cars. It had the variety that comes from a mixed-use community. Its amenities lay close at hand. It offered ready access to genuine countryside, mostly farms and apple orchards.

We loved our off-campus apartments in the nineteenth-century houses on tree-lined streets or above the shops in the business blocks downtown. We loved rubbing elbows on the streets, meeting friends as we walked or biked to class. We loved the peace and quiet of a small town at night. The campus itself -- a miserable island of androidal modernistic brick boxes set in an ocean of parking -- was quite secondary to the experience of life in the town.

I suppose that my experiences in suburb, city, and town left me biased in favor of town life -- at least insofar as what America had to offer in my time. That bias is probably apparent in the chapters ahead. But all places in America suffered terribly from the way we chose to arrange things in our postwar world. Cities, towns, and countryside were ravaged equally, as were the lesser orders of things within them-neighborhoods, buildings, streets, farms -- and there is scant refuge from the disorders that ensued.

The process of destruction that is the subject of this book is so poorly understood that there are few words to even describe it. Suburbia. Sprawl. Overdevelopment. Conurbation (Mumford's term). Megalopolis. A professor at Penn State dubbed it the "galactic metropolis." It is where most American children grow up. It is where most economic activity takes place. Indeed, I will make the argument that this process of destruction, and the realm that it spawned, largely became our economy. Much of it occupies what was until recently rural land -- destroying, incidentally, such age-old social arrangements as the distinction between city life and country life. To me, it is a landscape of scary places, the geography of nowhere, that has simply ceased to be a credible human habitat. This book is an attempt to discover how and why it happened, and what we might do about it.

Copyright © 1993 by James Howard Kunstler

Table of Contents


CONTENTS

Chapter

One SCARY PLACES

Two AMERICAN SPACE

Three LIFE ON THE GRIDIRON

Four EDEN UPDATED

Five YESTERDAY'S TOMORROW

Six JOYRIDE

Seven THE EVIL EMPIRE

Eight HOW TO MESS UP A TOWN

Nine A PLACE CALLED HOME

Ten THE LOSS OF COMMUNITY

Eleven THREE CITIES

Twelve CAPITALS OF UNREALITY

Thirteen BETTER PLACES

NOTES

BIBLIOGRAPHY

INDEX

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise And Decline of America's Man-Made Landscape 4.4 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 19 reviews.
EsmeV More than 1 year ago
If you want to understand how suburban sprawl became THE living arrangement in America and why it is one without a future, read this book. Kunstler writes vividly and with passion. He helps us understand why our physical environment is so depressing and inhumane, how it came to pass, and what we can do to fix it (hint: build walkable communities). He identifies clearly what's wrong and gives us a language to talk about it (the "nature band-aids" around wide avenues and highways).
grovesteen on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
The author belabors his point a little but this was a worthwhile read overall. It opened my mind to some things I had never thought about before, namely, how the car has completely changed the landscape of our country and ruined our sense of community because of the fact that towns are not designed for people, but for cars. This book should be referred to if ever I need to make a decision about moving to another city.
mrminjares on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
A surprisingly dense book that reviews the history of American architecture and town planning in an attempt to explain how our cities were transformed from people-centric to car-centric places. Kuntsler is a very smooth and articulate writer with a witty style I like. He shows amazing predictive ability in this book, written in 1993. He calls out the importance of global warming, the death of Detroit and GM, and the invasion of countries to secure our supply of petroleum. I learned a lot of new and interesting facts in this bookr. For example, Henry Ford built a small village near Detroit and populated it with the old homes of famous inventors like the Wright Brothers and Thomas Edison in an attempt to re-create the small town experience that his automobiles were in the process of destroying. Walt Disney did the same with Disneyland. I also learned about the Bauhaus movement, which was an attempt to simplify architecture, but instead served to strip the life and style out of American buildings. There is lots to chew on in this book, and I will certainly be reminded of Kuntsler's perspective every time I see a parking lot.
creativreaders on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I've read some of his other books; in addition to being a prescient writer, he succinctly captured thoughts and feelings I'd been ruminating on for years but somehow couldn't express. Looking forward to reading his latest, and would love to see him in lecture.
rakerman on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
This is an informative and entertaining book about the disaster that has been modernism and urban planning, driving the construction of unlivable urban spaces, driving the citizens out to the suburbs, where their lives are all about... driving.As is often typical of American books, it looks primarily within the US, with a section on how good urban planning was "rediscovered" in dusty tomes. It would seem to me that surely they could have looked (and surely they must have?) at living European models, but this aspect receives little attention. In fairness a lot of the action on the Eurocity rejuvenation front has been post-2000, and this book is from 1993. Nevertheless, Europeans have been building and living in functional cities for thousands of years, while Americans have been constructing large cities for a fraction of that time, generously a hundred and fifty years. Surely a region with 20 times the city-building experience deserves a fair bit of attention?I also think Kunstler was a bit too credulous about the promise of "new urbanism", but again in fairness it was one of the few hopeful models he had to look to.Throughout the book he talks about the importance of place, and how our relationship to our built environment shapes our entire civilisation.Overall a prescient and compelling book about how the US ended up massively allocating funds to build cheap, ugly buildings and highways as part of a suburban society that depends on everyone driving everywhere in cars fueled by cheap gas... and the doom that is coming due to peak oil making this lifestyle totally unsustainable.
montano on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
One of my favorite books. Mr.Kunstler reminds me of the cranky, old guy on your block who yells at kids to get off his lawn but that doesn't mean he's wrong about how crappy modern architecture is. His observation of "parking lagoons" haunts me to this day. A very accessible book on urbanism, architecture and its effects on us.
yapete on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
If you have been wondering why every major intersection in every American - suburb looks the same and why there always more strip-malls - just when you think there were already enough, this is the book for you. A history of how the American (sub-)urban landscape has become as bad as it is. Highly recommended.
derekstaff on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
A very well written critique of the current conventional settlement patterns (ie, suburbanization and sprawl). Kunstler makes a argument about the social problems sprawl spawns. Kunstler's writing is a bit harsh, and relies a little too much on anecdotal data (such as his use of Disneyland's Main Street U.S.A. as evidence), but the overall picture is rather compelling. He also points out potential alternatives to suburbanization and modern alternatives already in practice (such as the town of Seaside Florida).
carrieprice78 on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I do believe that James Howard Kunstler may be a bit of an alarmist, but one cannot deny that he brings up very thoughtful points in this book. It made me observe my world a little differently, from the buildings I see every day to the infrastructure on which I rely, to my complete inability (and everyone else's as well) to do without an automobile in this crazy, silly little world we call ours. Of course, there are many people to blame for this mess we've created, most of them long dead, and therefore excused from punishment. On the other hand, the mess just tumbles along in the name of profit and growth. I was assigned chapters from this book for a college course on Cities and Suburbs. I've always meant to read it in entirety and I'm glad I did. I remember reading an article of Kunstler's (an excerpt from a book, actually) from The Long Emergency, which is no less uplifting. If only we could reverse time's hand by about 200 years, perhaps we'd have an entirely different place to observe. Then again, maybe not."Growth for growth's sake is the ideology of a cancer cell." - Edward Abbey
jckurth on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
This book changed my opinion of cities. A must-read
Devil_llama on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
The author presents a picture of the urban landscape as a homogenous, unchanging blur, with cities running into each other and virtually unrecognizable. I think this is a bit of a stretch, though he does make a good case that there has been a standardization of the landscape occurring over the past half century. Mostly, he just takes his thesis too far.
jaygheiser on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
Fascinating book. Got the lead to it from the Crunchy Cons book. Essential concept is that people form no bonds to their community when its houses and layout are unloveable. Zoning laws are counterproductive. We are perversely creating living spaces that do not support the community we crave. People form loyalty to their job, and move with it, because their community is unlovable, providing no significant reason to stay.
NoLongerAtEase on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
First of all, it's important to note that Kunstler's book is best characterized as a polemic and should be read as such. It's angry, sarcastic, and spiteful but in a way that manages to retain a sense of humor and a sense of the tragic. The reason it's important to view the Geography of Nowhere as a polemic is this: many of Kunstler's points are not particularly well argued for. That's not to say there isn't interesting and insightful commentary within the book, but rather that most of the broader claims of the book presuppose a shared aesthetic and economic sensibility between author and reader. If you're not already inclined towards sheer disgust at the sight of a housing development, Kunstler is not going to convince you that you ought to be. If you are so adamant about property rights that you are willing to sacrifice every vestige of community in order to allow the building of anything anywhere, you'll be similarly unconvinced. However, for those who are already a bit sickened and perplexed by the Sprawlscape affecting our nation Kunstler offers an explanation and a diagnosis. His first question is "How did we end up here?" He begins with the Massachusetts Bay Colony in order to answer this question, and from there gives us a brief survey of the building and architectural trends that have developed since. What emerges is this: although the suburbs we are now familiar with first began to develop alongside railway and trolley lines, it was not until government, business, and the planning industry combined forces after WW2 that things really took a turn for the worst. This is a familiar narrative and using it Kunstler goes on the describe the process by which we came to create a society and an economy scaled for cars rather than humans. I don't think there is anything particularity objectionable about the broad narrative, even if its become hackneyed. What I found most interesting were some of his specific cases in which zoning laws literally forced asinine construction. This is something I was mildly aware of, but the examples Kunstler cites really helped to bring the point home. By creating nearly uniform sets of zoning regulations for communities big and small, urban and rural we've chosen convenience and perceived safety over any sort of contact with reality. I do worry a bit about the some of Kunstler's broad conclusions. For example, it's just not obvious to me that living in one dimensional office park to mall to tract home communities is necessarily BADfor us. It's a lifestyle I find terribly unappealing, but I wonder whether or not it's really as psychologically damaging as Kunstler would have us believe. Are all the dramatics about "spiritual suffocation" and lives of "quiet desperation" any more true of today's gated communities than the similar but probably false claims made about the residents of Winesburg, Ohio? For my part, I'm loathe to paint my cultural and aesthetic adversaries as folks that subconsciously desire to trade in their lives for mine. I also wonder how Kunstler might justify the claims he makes about disengagement from civic activities as a direct result of suburbanization. What he says fits all my preconceptions, but he doesn't bring any hard data to the table when he makes such claims.Finally, all criticism aside, for a book written in the early 90s The Geography of Nowhere is remarkably prescient. Kunstler is flat out correct that we cannot keep building communities focused around cars, because it won't be long before we literally cannot power the cars in an effective or affordable manner. Tying up our property and our economy at large with a fleeting car culture is perhaps the biggest mistake in recent American history. In order to get ourselves out of this mess we're going to have to fundamentally revise our lifestyles and large parts of our economy. I can't help but think that the coming metamorphosis will be a painful process.
sallysvenson on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
An old (1993) but still important book decrying our suburban mall culture and the consequent loss of community, and advocating for new thinking about zoning and land-use laws.
eduscapes on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
This book is both serious and hilarious while tracing the evolution of the American city and suburb.
TheTwoDs on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
Driving around our country, a feeling of malaise comes over me when I pass through towns, villages and small cities. The boarded up business distracts, the dilapidated houses, they lend an air of sadness to these settings. Kunstler hits it right on the head when he blames the entire concept of suburbia and defines it to include not only the suburban tract housing and McMansions, but the "easy motoring" highways clogged with their strip malls and fast food joints. Everywhere in America now looks like everywhere else in America. After reading this, I've been convinced that our living arrangement needs to change, not just for sanity and aesthetics, but to survive a post-oil economy.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Guest More than 1 year ago
I read this book for a class I'm taking. This is the thesis statement I came up with. The ruinous pattern of demolishing small towns, consequent communities and main streets with replacing them with hidious urban sprawls, superhighways, and parking lots has caused many problems over time.