Dan Ariely, behavioral economist and the New York Times bestselling author of The Upside of Irrationality and Predictably Irrational, examines the contradictory forces that drive us to cheat and keep us honest, in this groundbreaking look at the way we behave: The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty.
From ticket-fixing in our police departments to test-score scandals in our schools, from our elected leaders’ extra-marital affairs to the Ponzi schemes undermining our economy, cheating and dishonesty are ubiquitous parts of our national news cycle—and inescapable parts of the human condition.
Drawing on original experiments and research, in the vein of Freakonomics, The Tipping Point, and Survival of the Sickest, Ariely reveals—honestly—what motivates these irrational, but entirely human, behaviors.
|Product dimensions:||6.26(w) x 9.12(h) x 1.06(d)|
About the Author
Dan Ariely is the bestselling author of Predictably Irrational, The Upside of Irrationality, and The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty. He is the James B. Duke Professor of Psychology and Behavioral Economics at Duke University and is the founder of the Center for Advanced Hindsight. His work has been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, the Boston Globe, and elsewhere. He lives in North Carolina with his family.
Table of Contents
Introduction Why Is Dishonesty So Interesting?
From Enron to our own misbehaviors
A fascination with cheating
Becker's parking problem and the birth of rational crime
Elderly volunteers and petty thieves
"Why behavioral economics and dishonesty? 1
Chapter 1 Testing the Simple Model of Rational Crime (SMORC)
Get rich cheating
Tempting people to cheat, the measure of dishonesty
What we know versus what we think we know about dishonesty
Cheating when we can't get caught
Market vendors, cab drivers, and cheating the blind
Fishing and tall tales
Striking a balance between truth and cheating 11
Chapter 2 Fun with the Fudge Factor
Why some things are easier to steal than others
How companies pave the way for dishonesty
How pledges, commandments, honor codes, and paying with cash can support honesty
But lock your doors just the same
And a bit about religion, the IRS, and insurance companies 31
Chapter 2B Golf
Man versus himself
A four-inch lie
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to take the mulligan
Schrödinger's scorecard. 55
Chapter 3 Blinded by Our Own Motivations
Craze lines, tattoos, and how conflicts of interest distort our perception
How favors affect our choices
Why full disclosure and other policies aren't fully effective
Imagining less conflicted compensation
Disclosure and regulation are the answers-or not. 67
Chapter 4 Why We Blow It When We're Tired
Why we don't binge in the morning
Willpower: another limited resource
Judgment on an empty stomach
How flexing our cognitive and moral muscles can make us more dishonest
Self-depletion and a rational theory of temptation 97
Chapter 5 Why Wearing Fakes Makes Us Cheat More
The secret language of shoes
From ermine to Armani and the importance of signaling
Do knockoffs knock down our standards of honesty?
Can gateway fibs lead to monster lies?
When "what the hell" wreaks havoc
There's no such thing as one little white lie
Halting the downward spiral 117
Chapter 6 Cheating Ourselves
Claws and peacock tails
When answer keys tell us what we already knew
Overly optimistic IQ scores
The Center for Advanced Hindsight
War heroes and sports heroes who let us down
Helping ourselves to a better self-image 141
Chapter 7 Creativity and Dishonesty: We Are All Storytellers
The tales we tell ourselves and how we create stories we can believe
Why creative people are better liars
Redrawing the lines until we see what we want
When irritation spurs us onward
How thinking creatively can get us into trouble 163
Chapter 8 Cheating as an Infection: How We Catch the Dishonesty Germ
Catching the cheating bug
One bad apple really does spoil the barrel (unless that apple goes to the University of Pittsburgh)
How ambiguous rules + group dynamics = cultures of cheating
A possible road to ethical health 191
Chapter 9 Collaborative Cheating: Why Two Heads Aren't Necessarily Better than One
Lessons from an ambiguous boss
All eyes are on you: observation and cheating
Working together to cheat more?
Or keeping one another in line
Building trust and taking liberties
Playing well with others 217
Chapter 10 A Semioptimistic Ending: People Don't Cheat Enough!
Cheer up! Why we should not be too depressed by this book
Cultural differences in dishonesty
Politicians or bankers, who cheats more?
How can we improve our moral health? 237
List of Collaborators 257
Bibliography and Additional Readings 267
What People are Saying About This
“I was shocked at how prevalent mild cheating was and how much more harmful it can be, cumulatively, compared to outright fraud. This is Dan Ariely’s most interesting and most useful book.”
“I thought [Ariely’s] book was an outstanding encapsulation of the good hearted and easygoing moral climate of the age.”
“Anyone who lies should read this book. And those who claim not to tell lies are liars. So they sould read this book too. This is a fascinating, learned, and funny book that will make you a better person.”
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
I love books that make me think. This highly entertaining and easy to understand book challenged my thinking all the way through. I told everyone about it everywhere I went since the studies were so fascinating and the documentation was so clear. I learned much from the book especially about how my creativity has served me so well all my life!
PROS Informative and eye opening. After reading this book you cant help but look at your everyday life a little differently. Dan Ariely takes his time in explaining why we "fudge" the facts just enough so that we can get what we want... but still believe that we are not doing anything wrong. He does this in many creative ways, including fun anecdotes and interesting studies. At the end he quickly sums it all up and offers suggestions to society for the overall improvement of our moral compass. Quick read, not hard to follow for the most part. CONS Many of the issues in this book are similar, and after 5 or six of them it can get a little repetitive. While some of the experiments hold very valid points, a great deal of the others feel as though they were thrown together on a whim. Many of the conclusions that Ariely draws from these haphazard experiments feel as though he somehow reached an EPIC LIFE CHANGING discovery... but the reader is not always sure how they got to such a SPECIFIC statement. BOTTOM LINE If you are looking for an eye opening weekend book that you can discuss for a few hours with friends, this is the book for you. Using studies and social experiments (both industrial-strength and diluted) Dan Ariely shows us how we all have a little bit of the "fudge factor." FAVORITE QUOTE "Facts are for people who lack the imagination to create their own truth." - Anonymous
There is certainly no shortage of lying, cheating and corruption in our society today. At their worst, these phenomena do substantial damage to our communities and the people in them. Picking on the corporate world for just a moment, consider a few high-profile examples from the last decade: the scandals at Enron, WorldCom, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, Haliburton, Kmart, Tyco, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and a host of banks in the financial crisis of 2008. If you are a particularly pessimistic person, you may think that people are fundamentally self-interested, and will engage in dishonest and corrupt behaviour so long as the potential benefits of this behaviour outweigh the possibility of being caught multiplied by the punishment involved (known as the Simple Model of Rational Crime or SMORC). On the other hand, if you are a particularly optimistic person, you may think that the lying and cheating that we see in our society is largely the result of a few bad apples in the bunch. Given that the way we attempt to curb cheating and corruption depends largely on which view we think is correct, we would do well if we could come up with a proper understanding of these tendencies, and under what circumstances they are either heightened or diminished. Over the past several years, the behavioural economist Dan Ariely, together with a few colleagues, has attempted to do just this--by way of bringing dishonesty into the science lab. Ariely reveals his findings in his new book, The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone--Especially Ourselves. In order to get at the truth, Ariely invited subjects into his lab and gave them tasks with monetary rewards, and where cheating was a very real and clear possibility. As you can tell from the title of the book, Ariely found that cheating was not in fact confined to a few bad apples, but was in fact very widespread. On the bright side, though, Ariely also found that the vast majority of his subjects did not cheat nearly as much as they could have, but instead confined themselves to just a little bit of cheating. Given his findings, Ariely concludes that most of us are torn between two conflicting impulses. On the one hand is the desire to get ahead by way of dishonesty, and on the other hand is the desire to nevertheless think of ourselves as genuinely honest and good people. Getting the best of the both worlds can be tricky, but we manage to do so by way of resorting to our trusty capacities of rationalization and self-deception. Of course, different people show different powers of rationalization and self-deception, and also different circumstances can alter the terms of the negotiation significantly for each of us, thus leading to more or less cheating. For instance, Ariely found that those who are especially creative are particularly good at rationalization and self-deception, and therefore tend to cheat more so than others. In addition, he also found that several factors influence the amount that people cheat in general. These factors included being reminded of one's morals; having one's resolve broken down by will-power depletion; having one's self-confidence artificially inflated; witnessing other people cheating; cheating to benefit others etc. A full and comprehensive summary of the main argument in the book, as well as many of the juicier details and anecdotes to be found therein, will be available at newbooksinbrief dot wordpress dot com, on or before Monday, Jul
Entertaining, eye-opening, disturbingThis funny, fascinating, personal paradigm shattering book is in a genre I love, books that make me examine my thinking process, but this one caused me more soul searching than any other I¿ve read. According to the Simple Model of Rational Crime (SMORC) we decide whether or not to be dishonest based on a logical, mathematically calibrated cost-benefit analysis, and we¿d all be as dishonest as we could be as long as it brought us a benefit greater than the likely cost. Fortunately, author Dan Ariely discovered that people aren¿t as cold-bloodedly calculating as that. Unfortunately, the news about human morality isn¿t all good.Ariely is very skilled at conceiving, conducting and describing experiments that tease apart the tangle of human motivations. According to what he¿s discovered, we¿ll cheat, lie and steal, but only as much as we can rationalize because we want to be able to feel good about ourselves. We¿re all capable of dishonesty, and being natural story tellers we¿re extremely adept at creating perfectly logical seeming explanations justifying our less than moral actions, though we rarely understand exactly why we make the choices we do. We invariably underestimate how much we are influenced by a myriad of circumstances ranging from conflict of interest to how tired we are feeling.Since we want to see ourselves as good, most of us never stray far from the straight and narrow path, but small frequent transgressions can create bigger problems than the egregious acts of a few bad apples. Our collective peccadilloes can wreck havoc, but with an improved understanding of the situations that increase dishonest behavior Arliey hopes his book can be a guide for corrective actions and legislation.
I definitely thought the ideas were interesting...too many case studies drew the book out too much for my liking.