The Original Compromise: What the Constitution's Framers Were Really Thinking

The Original Compromise: What the Constitution's Framers Were Really Thinking

by David Robertson
4.0 1


$32.93 $33.95 Save 3% Current price is $32.93, Original price is $33.95. You Save 3%.
View All Available Formats & Editions
Eligible for FREE SHIPPING
  • Get it by Monday, October 23 , Order now and choose Expedited Delivery during checkout.
    Same Day delivery in Manhattan. 


The Original Compromise: What the Constitution's Framers Were Really Thinking by David Robertson

The eighty-five famous essays by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay—known collectively as the Federalist Papers—comprise the lens through which we typically view the ideas behind the U.S. Constitution. But we are wrong to do so, writes David Brian Robertson, if we really want to know what the Founders were thinking.

In this provocative new account of the framing of the Constitution, Robertson observes that the Federalist Papers represented only one side in a fierce argument that was settled by compromise—in fact, multiple compromises. Drawing on numerous primary sources, Robertson unravels the highly political dynamics that shaped the document. Hamilton and Madison, who hailed from two of the larger states, pursued an ambitious vision of a robust government with broad power. Leaders from smaller states envisioned only a few added powers, sufficient to correct the disastrous weakness of the Articles of Confederation, but not so strong as to threaten the governing systems within their own states. The two sides battled for three arduous months; the Constitution emerged piece by piece, the product of an evolving web of agreements. Robertson examines each contentious debate, including arguments over the balance between the federal government and the states, slavery, war and peace, and much more. In nearly every case, a fractious, piecemeal, and very political process prevailed. In this way, the convention produced a government of separate institutions, each with the will and ability to defend its independence. Majorities would rule, but the Constitution made it very difficult to assemble majorities large enough to let the government act.

Brilliantly argued and deeply researched, this book will change the way we think of "original intent." With a bracing willingness to challenge old pieties, Robertson rescues the political realities that created the government we know today.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780199796298
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication date: 01/02/2013
Pages: 344
Product dimensions: 8.40(w) x 10.80(h) x 0.10(d)

About the Author

David Brian Robertson is Curator's Distinguished Teaching Professor of Political Science at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. He is the author of The Constitution and America's Destiny and Federalism and the Making of America.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

The Original Compromise: What the Constitution's Framers were Really Thinking 4 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 1 reviews.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
This is a fascinating look at what the founding fathers ( no women or we would have an even a better constitution) were thinking, debating and bargaining over behind the scenes and sometimes out in the open. Many of the topics will be familiar to those who know about making of the constitution as discussed in the Federalist Papers. But this book gives a more in depth look at the debates and personalities involved in the Philadelphia convention of 1787. And unless you are a real constitutional scholar there will be plenty of surprises. For example the effort by some delegates to give permanent voting advantage to the original 13 states, as opposed to anticipated new "western" states, may seem odd to us today but was real then. The author also relates how prior decisions impact governing issues today.