In this bestselling classic of financial management, G. Bennett Stewart, III, raises and answers these provocative questions:
- Do dividends matter?
- Are earnings per share really accurate measures of corporate performance?
- What is the engine that really drives share prices?
More than that, Stewart lays the foundation for EVAr, the financial management and incentive system now in place at nearly 300 companies around the world, and which is rapidly becoming the global standard for corporate governance.
Managers, confused about what investors really want, often find it difficult to reach informed decisions regarding business strategy, acquisitions and divestitures, financial structure, dividend policy, and executive compensation. But now an EVAr -based revolution is providing a practical framework that managers can use to build a premium-valued company. At the forefront of this revolution is the consulting firm of Stern Stewart & Co., of which G. Bennett Stewart, III, author of The Quest for Value, is senior partner and cofounder.
The Quest for Value is written for senior management, key operating people, and planning and financial staff. This bible of financial management will assist managers in goal setting, resource allocation, strategy development, valuation of acquisitions, financial policy setting, incentive compensation planning, and building shareholder value.
The Quest for Value cuts sharply through the myths that to this day misinform corporate strategists in their pursuit of shareholder value. Laying waste to inaccurate yet widely used methods of performance, Stewart demonstrates how the Stern Stewart EVAr approach not only creates greater shareholder value but also provides a powerful framework for the broadest range of corporate decision making.
|Product dimensions:||6.12(w) x 9.25(h) x 2.11(d)|
About the Author
Read an Excerpt
It is easy to forget why senior management's most important job must be to maximize its firm's current market value. If nothing else, a greater value rewards the shareholders who, after all, are the owners of the enterprise. But, and this really is much more important, society at large benefits too. A quest for value directs scarce resources to their most promising uses and most productive users. The more effectively resources are deployed and managed, the more robust economic growth and the rate of improvement in our standard of living will be. Adam Smith's invisible hand is at work when the investor's private gain turns into a public virtue. Although there are exceptions to this rule, most of the time there is a happy harmony between creating stock market value and enhancing the quality of life.
In many companies the all-important quest for value is being confounded by a hopelessly obsolete financial management system. The wrong financial goals, performance measures, and valuation procedures are emphasized. Managers are improperly and in many cases inadequately rewarded for their efforts. Balance sheets are but dully structured when surgical sharpness often is needed. These shortcomings cry out for approaches to financial management so profoundly different from current ones that nothing less than a revolution in thinking is called for.
Abandon Earnings Per Share
First of all, the myth that increasing earnings, earnings per share, or return on equity is the way to attract Wall Street must be abandoned. Many senior executives believe that the market wants earnings, and wants them now, despite the fact that not one shred of convincing evidence tosubstantiate that outlandish claim has ever been produced. To satisfy Wall Street's alleged craving for reported profits, many top managers feel compelled to conjure up earnings through time-consuming and ethics-corroding accounting legerdemain. Expenses that should be deducted to save taxes are deferred. Valuable acquisitions are avoided if a large amount of goodwill must be amortized. R&D and market-building outlays get short shrift. The execution of dying businesses is postponed. And perhaps worst of all, lusty earnings growth is sustained by overinvesting in mature businesses.
Arrayed against the earnings myth and these harmful practices is an overwhelming body of established academic research. It shows that accounting measures of performance are only coincidentally related to stock prices and are not the primary movers and shakers. What truly determines stock prices, the evidence proves, is the cash, adjusted for time and risk, that investors can expect to get back over the life of the business. What the market wants is not earnings now, but value now. The question is: How can discounted cash flow, which truly is at the heart of market valuation, become the driving and integrating force behind the financial management system?
Economic Value Added: A True
Measure of Corporate Success
The answer, for the most part, is actually quite straightforward: Management should focus on maximizing a measure called eco-nomic value added (EVA), which is operating profits less the cost of all of the capital employed to produce those earnings. EVA will increase if operating profits can be made to grow without tying up any more capital, if new capital can be invested in projects that will earn more than the full cost of the capital and if capital can be diverted or liquidated from business activities that do not provide adequate returns. It will be reduced if management fritters away funds on projects that earn less than the cost of capital or passes over projects likely to earn more than the cost of capital. It just so happens that EVA is the only performance measure that is entirely consistent with the standard capital budgeting rule: Accept all positive and reject all negative net present value investments. (Earnings per share, on the other hand, will increase so long as new capital investments earn anything more than the after-tax cost of borrowing, which is hardly an acceptable re-turn.)
The most important reason to adopt EVA as the main corporate financial goal, however, is that it is the only measure to tie directly to intrinsic market value. Discounting the EVA to be generated by an individual capital project, for instance, automatically results in its net present value. (The cost of the new capital employed to finance the project is explicitly subtracted in the very calculation of EVA.) The capital budgeting prescription to accept positive NPV projects can be restated as follows: Accept all investment opportunities which will produce a positive discounted EVA. It is one and the same thing.
Carrying this concept to a higher level, projecting and discounting EVA for an entire company automatically sums the net present value of all of the firm's past and projected capital investement projects. The sum accounts for the company s market value premium to capital employed (which is simply the total of all investments the company has made to date). A company for which projected EVA discounts to, say, $100 million, and which currently employs $500 million of capital, has an intrinsic market value of $600 million. This relation tells us that if its EVA is expected to be positive, a company has added value to the out-of-pocket cost of the resources drawn into the firm; if EVA is projected to be negative, value has been destroyed. EVA, in short, is the fuel that fires up a premium in the stock market value of any company or accounts for its discount.
What People are Saying About This
"A notable example of what we at Chicago have always believed: nothing is more practical than good theory. His neatly chosen, real-world illustrations bring the basic concepts of finance vividly to life. The book can be read with profit (and enjoyment) by anyone with an interest in corporate finance, from beginning student to senior executive."
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
The "boring" technical stuff is very educational. However, two aspects are very bothersome: first of all, the book is preachy and almost makes you think the best way to produce value is by leveraging the company to the hilt. Although the author seem to be a big fan of traditional efficient-market theories, he to turns the leverage argument into a "make the management efficient by scrambling for cash flow", and also talks of the "lead steers" that lead the market herds. Secondly, the attempt to turn EVA into a revolutionary idea is simply monumental, and - to a finance professional - unwarranted as well as out of context historically. Simply put, it is an old idea repackaged in a new way; perhaps, and with good marketing, it might be easier to sell than the traditional ideas.