The Turn of the Screw

The Turn of the Screw

by Henry James

NOOK Book(eBook)

FREE View All Available Formats & Editions

Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now
LEND ME® See Details

Product Details

BN ID: 2940161950821
Publisher: Top Five Books
Publication date: 11/01/2018
Series: Top Five Classics , #29
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: NOOK Book
Sales rank: 69,917
File size: 3 MB

About the Author

Date of Birth:

April 15, 1843

Date of Death:

February 28, 1916

Place of Birth:

New York, New York

Place of Death:

London, England

Education:

Attended school in France and Switzerland; Harvard Law School, 1862-63

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

The Turn of the Screw 3.4 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 76 reviews.
Guest More than 1 year ago
James' prose wasn't spun out on a word processor for reading in an airport or bus station. It takes effort to follow the tightly constructed sentences. But those who do will be rewarded with a great read. No disembodied hands, moving furniture or gore, just spine-tingling horror. Having seen the film actually helps, since it was so well cast you can picture the actors as you read the story.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I liked it BUT it was a hard read. The writing and trying to "read between the lines" of what the teacher and maid are saying. But I did and I loved the gothic air.
Guest More than 1 year ago
I find Henry James' writing to be a bit dry but regarless, I still enjoyed this book. James does an excellent job of alluding to a controversial topic that was not openly talked about in Victorian England. He cleverly goes around the topic to avoid strict criticism, and does it in exquisite prose. It takes a little time to interpret but is worth it.
Guest More than 1 year ago
To fully understand this book, a lot of outside-source comprehension is needed. I bought it for a quick read, but found out I made a mistake. It's power and complete insanity was too much to handle for a one-night-read. So I threw it on the ground and went to bed. Upon waking up I stepped off the bed only to slip on the book and end up with a bed headache. When trying to read the rest, I found the pain was too unbearable. I guess it was just bad luck. If you want a classic horror story, this is a good read. . . I guess.
anya_b on LibraryThing 19 days ago
maybe it was because i had to read it for class, but i really did not like this book...at all.
jackkane on LibraryThing 19 days ago
'The Turn of the Screw' isn't really about ghosts. James explores the debilitating effects of the sexual repression pervasive under the absurd 'morals' of the Victorian age. The governess is clearly unstable - the 'turn of the screw' is a reference to her insanity. The spooks in the novel are pedophilia and patriarchal repression, both the direct product of Victorian mores.I found James's style too heavy. Between his long, tortuous sentences, and the subject matter, the novel is a tough read - despite its brevity. To James's credit, his execution of the unreliable narrator technique is impressive.The most remarkable aspect of the book is the sensitive subject matter, and James's success in avoiding censorship.'The Innocents' (1960) with Deborah Kerr is a great screen adaptation of 'Turn of the Screw.' Look it up, it's well worth watching!
Well-ReadNeck on LibraryThing 19 days ago
Read with Shutter Island.
amerynth on LibraryThing 19 days ago
Terrific and short little ghost story -- ends with lots of unanswered questions. As I was reading, the tone really reminded me of the movie "The Others." After finishing the book I found out that the movie is in fact very loosely based on the book. This is one of the books referenced on "Lost" as well.
Cecrow on LibraryThing 19 days ago
At the start I was having 'Jane Eyre' flashbacks - a governess, a pleasant young girl as her charge, a housekeeper for her primary company, a love interest in the handsome but absent landowner, an isolated manor in the English countryside. Henry James knows this; he is winking at us when the narrator begins to wonder whether there could be "an insane, an unmentionable relative kept in unsuspected confinement?" In short order though (and with benefit of the prologue), this tale resolves into a ghost story rather than a romance. The author aimed to build suspense through that prologue's promise of a horrific tale to follow, etc. Maybe this worked at the time but now it leads to false expectations of something schlocky. Encountering an unexplained stranger in my own house at the dead of the night would be deeply chilling, even more so if it had a mysterious influence on my children; but today's reader of modern horror is spoiled by the likes of Stephen King¿s in-your-face approach. TotS's relatively mild scenes won¿t incite the same horror ... unless you read slowly, absorbing every turn of the narrator's thoughts, placing yourself in her shoes and opening your mind to its widest expanse of empathy for her. Then you can still find at least a wisp of its carefully crafted spell.Henry James has a style all his own that I admire, but it does require an extra level of patience. I've long confused this work with 'The Taming of the Shrew' for being similarly named, but now that I've read one I think I can keep them straight.
beidlerp on LibraryThing 19 days ago
A great edition of the FIRST edition of Henry James's most popular story.
Sandydog1 on LibraryThing 20 days ago
A little novel about a dear little boy and a dear little girl, who are plagued by ghosts of of their previous caretakers, who may or may not have taken part in little perversions. The little children live in a mansion full of little rooms, run by a governess who may be a little crazy. The plot suffers from a little bit of ambiguity. I guess it's time to read a dozen critical essays on this classic. Until then, 3 - more than a little generous - stars.
hemlokgang on LibraryThing 21 days ago
A suspense novel........a thriller..........and eloquent writing! A spectacular ending which left me speechless (a rare occurrence!)! Great book!
kronos999 on LibraryThing 24 days ago
Very interesting gothic ghost (maybe?) story. Wonderful unreliable narrator who may be mad and imagining the whole thing. Or maybe the ghosts are real. Or perhaps she is mad, but isn't imagining it at all.
laytonwoman3rd on LibraryThing 24 days ago
OK, if they made you re-instate your English Major status every few years by reading something revered yet wretched, this one would qualify me to keep my badge. My husband was on a gothic/horror/ghost story kick, and as an old English Major himself, he decided he ought to read this "masterpiece of the supernatural". He struggled through the 87 pages of the Dover Thrift Edition, moaning like a lost soul himself, and then suggested I read it and tell him what the hell he was missing. I'd already had about enough of it, from listening to him grouse, but I agreed to give it a go. James' prose is overwrought; he could have dropped a handful of words from every page and they'd not have been missed. Short as it is, I heartily wish an editor had tossed the manuscript back to him with the terse directive, "Again. Half as long." I don't like his style, he didn't scare me a bit, and I have no idea what to make of the ending. So why do I have this ridiculous desire to see a good film version of the story?
christinelstanley on LibraryThing 24 days ago
The actual plot was good, but the narrative dragged on tediously. I am used to this style of writing/language since I read a lot of old classics so it was not that to put me off! I continued to the end since I really did want to see what what happened, but this was not an enjoyable read for me!
bderby on LibraryThing 24 days ago
James explores both the supernatural and the psychological in this ghost story. It would do well to teach this text to students who are familiar with Jane Eyre as there are parallels between Jane Eyre and the governess in this novella. This is a good James text to cover with secondary students because of its short length. Since it is so short, James's notoriously dense prose will be easier to delve into. Don't expect to be finished with this text quickly just because it is short; it will take just as long to unpack the details (and sometimes the plot) from this James work than it would to explore a longer text by an author with an easier writing style.
joririchardson on LibraryThing 24 days ago
I chose this chilling short story by Henry James as the 2nd of my three annual Halloween choices. It is the story of a young governess who is hired to take care of two orphaned children, Miles and Flora, at a large manor house in the Essex countryside. The children have been handed over to their estranged uncle, who wants little to do with them or any contact with them. The governess whom he hires is more than happy to adopt the two innocent youngsters as her own, and grows to love them dearly. However, she begins to see strange things happening about the house where she now lives, and continually sees a mysterious man and woman lingering about the estate. Both the man and woman have a horrifying, terrible expression and atmosphere to them, and when she describes them to her friend Mrs. Grose, the woman recognizes them instantly. They were lovers who once lived at the house, but they both died a few years ago, even though no one knows how. The governess becomes convinced that the ghost couple is after little Flora and Miles, though she can't understand why. The children insist that they do not to see the ghosts, but the governess is convinced that they are lying due to how frightened they appear whenever she questions they about it. The harder that the governess tries to protect her charges, the farther distanced from her they become.I very much enjoyed this brief, chilly tale, and I loved the antiquated way that it was written, which really gave it a cold, "ghost story" air that more modern writing simply cannot capture.In the beginning of the story, it didn't occur to me that the governess' ghosts may not be real, but by the middle of the book, I was convinced that they were simply figments of her imagination. However, at the very end, I didn't know what to think.I love stories that end just when the plot isn't quite closed out yet, leaving the reader to wonder - what happened? This story was certainly one of those, and I still can't decide if the heroine was crazy, or if the "horrors," as she called them, were really there. Perhaps they were, only they were real flesh and blood people who she wanted to think of as ghosts. Miles and Flora play their part well as the innocent, helpless little children who are very in need of protection as they drift obliviously toward horrific danger.Nowadays, every horror movie seems to cast an obligatory child, but when Henry James wrote "The Turn of the Screw," such themes weren't yet common.I especially loved Miles, who is a more filled out character than his younger sister Flora. He is a charming boy, who wants very badly to be "bad," in spite of how good he is. He even stages an event where he goes outdoors at night, and schemes at how to get the governess to witness his little crime, in an attempt to show her how "bad" he is.However, Miles is also a very wise character. Even though he never exactly tells his governess anything - he is always frustratingly vague - his little hints at deep, perceptive topics make him even more interesting.The unnamed main character was a bit annoying, and I felt that she was at times contradictory. She is normally terrified of the ghosts she is seeing (which is understandable), while at other times she speaks of them lightly and does things that make it seem as if she doesn't fear them at all.Her fierce protection of Miles and Flora was touching, and I couldn't help but wonder what made her care for them so much and so quickly, as if they really are her own family. Was she abandoned as a child? Did she always want children, but never got married? Speaking of speculation - there is much of it to be done within James' short story. There is, of course, the matter of the alleged ghosts. Are they imaginary? Real people mistaken as spirits? Or are they ghosts, after all? I think that everyone will ask these questions, but there are so many more to wondered about, if you look deeper.For instance, it seems apparent by the end that Miles and Flora are extremely a
dreamingtereza on LibraryThing 25 days ago
The only thing more fun than reading this enthralling (though somewhat confusticating) novella is reading ABOUT it. The critical articles included in this volume (as well as those in the first edition) represent much of the best and most entertaining thoughts on what James is up to here. My favorite is the one which suggests that Mrs. Grose, the illiterate housekeeper, is the mastermind behind all of the messy ghost business. Clever!
FeidhlimM on LibraryThing 25 days ago
A difficult book to read, in that the prose is of a peculiar style. James is inclined towards lengthy sentences that are not the norm for the casual reader. At times you find yourself re-reading sentences to grasp the full meaning and at times, whilst doing this, you recognise the purpose of his method. It's subtle and it can be difficult but it is effective if the reader takes his time. I'm still not entirely sure of the entire plot and I feel I need to read it again but I still enjoyed it and know that once I conquer it completely it will be all the better. The tale is of a governess, or nanny, who goes to look after two children out in the country. They have no parents and their guardian is a disaffected uncle who has little to do with them. There is mystery in the house; the children are haunted and yet perfect. An enigma. Our heroine unravels and she is blinded simultaneously and alternatively as the story proceeds. The ending I am not yet sure about but the overall effect of the novel was one of success. It's a haunting book. James intended on creating a piece that would filln the void of 'really scarey and heart-shaking ghost-stories,' I believe - certainly for his time - he did not fail.
sturlington on LibraryThing 27 days ago
The Turn of the Screw may be the first entry in the very specific sub-genre of the ambiguous ghost story, a sub-genre with includes the much better The Haunting of Hill House and The Little Stranger. Here, an unnamed governess takes on a suspicious job caring for two orphans on a remote estate. Her employer, the children's uncle, leaves specific instructions not to trouble him with any decisions, so she is basically on her own. Once the governess arrives at the house, she soon starts seeing apparitions, whom she identifies as the ghosts of the previous governess and her employer's valet, both of whom died under mysterious circumstances. She perceives that the children know of the ghosts and determines that the four of them have some sinister relationship.The governess's account is suspect for many reasons. For one, she describes her charges as beautiful, perfect, angelic creatures, praises which they clearly don't deserve; in fact, they are hardly characters in their own right, and seem merely to exist for the governess to lavish unwarranted praise upon. Clearly, she is subject to emotional excesses, as she has accepted this ludicrous position and developed a bizarre crush on her employer with absolutely no prompting. Finally, no one seems to see these "ghosts" but her, and the reader has no proof that the children are aware of them other than her say-so.Henry James would rather not write a simple, straightforward sentence if he could compose one that twists and turns and wanders off to nowhere instead -- or perhaps this is yet another example of the governess/narrator's instability. It's a short book, though, so the overwrought writing style is bearable. The ending, however, comes across as melodramatic to a 21st-century reader. Still, The Turn of the Screw is worth reading for its part in developing this unique sub-genre, which marries the haunting of houses and the haunting of minds.
zinkel101 on LibraryThing 5 months ago
Turn of the Screw is the classic story of the unreliable narrator. A governess is given charge of two children on a rather isolated estate in England. She has taken the job because it was offered by a man she has romanticized, a man she wants to impress, a man who is conspicuously absent at the estate. The two precocious children are mysterious in their beauty, their behavior, and their background. They have a bond with each other, as well as with one staffmember that borders on collusion. They have secrets, revealed in bits about their previous governess and a licentious groundskeeper who had inappropriate relationships, implied in a Victorian manner. The two predecessors, though dead, figure prominently in the story as the heroine must protect the children from their ghosts. James's method of relating the story through a third generation narrator brings into question whether the ghosts are "real" or the illusion of the governess, who, throughout the story, is defending herself. The opening chapter may be overlooked for its importance as it only introduces the thrilling tale, but much has been speculated on James's intent in using a narrator who is the friend of a man who once loved the governess, who may edit the story to defend him who may have edited the story that came from the governess herself. Love may make you do crazy things, which is why the governess's great threat is questionable in the first place. The story may be my favorite of James's works because it is different from his longer novels. He uses the unreliable narrator, in a style like Poe's, and implied psychology, leaving ambiguity for the reader to interpret.
timsreadinglist on LibraryThing 5 months ago
Against my better judgment, I read this, my second Henry James story. So tedious! The exquisite sensitivities of his protagonist are absurd and prevent her from achieving a simple solution on every page. The protagonist and James' prose were exasperating enough to overwhelm the psychological tension and creepiness that this story is supposed to exhibit so well. William remains my favorite of the James brothers, for sure. I'll do my best to avoid Henry in the future.
KTPrymus on LibraryThing 5 months ago
Be prepared to be a bit muddled by the language of Henry James¿ seminal ghost story. The Victorian rhetoric is quite genuine and while certainly not Chaucer it prevents the modern reader from zipping along to follow the plot. While some may find this frustrating I feel this actually adds to the story. Firstly Turn of the Screw is decidedly not plot driven. The language itself is crucial to understanding the narrator whose journal comprises the bulk of the story. Secondly the language adds an element of authenticity to the story that is lacking in most modern period pieces. Thirdly the elongated sentence structure and archaic terminology add a tangible atmosphere to the story that envelopes you and forces you to look very closely at the words, which make the occasional creepy, gothic parts all that more effective.The story is a retelling of the experiences of a certain governess, hired to see to the upbringing and education of two siblings in 19th century England. The governess soon realizes that the children are being hounded by the ghosts of pervious servants and embarks upon a plan to free them from their tormentors. What gives the story its continued longevity is the ambiguous nature of the phenomenon witnessed. Is this a genuine ghost story, or the diary of a woman going mad? That is left for the reader to decide.While I can certainly see the origins of many modern ghost stories here I found the narrative a bit dull. The governess has the sort of psychological awareness of others usually reserved for third person narratives and while this adds to the mystique surrounding her own understandings and motives, it makes for somewhat repetitive reading. Still it can be read in a couple of sittings and should probably be required reading for anyone interested in ghost stories or horror in general.
saskreader on LibraryThing 5 months ago
I know this is supposed to be a classic psychological gothic-type mystery, but I just didn't find it very effective. Yes, there is a big scary secret revealed, but from my point of view (as a reader and movie-watcher in the 21st century), it just wasn't as unnerving as it was meant to be. Perhaps it should be viewed as the predecessor of all the psychological thrillers around today.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
This is a turn of the century ghost story(maybe) Its very creepy and atmospheric. I loved this story. It kept you constantly turning pages. You also had to think while reading. It was very deep. Now huge spoiler alert! Stop reading now! You have been warned! I cant give this story more stars because there is no real end. You have to decide what you think the end is. I DONT WANT TO! I really just like a good story wrapped up with a nice bow. Pack all the nightmares possible in but tell me what freaking happens! It might be a ghost story, it might be a suspenseful murder mystery, or everyone might be crazy! Uuugh!