U-vacharta Ba-chayim
In one of his most famous poems, Robert Frost imagines himself standing at a crossroads in a "yellow wood" and having to decide which path forward to choose. The poem turns on the fact that neither path clearly recommends itself as the "better" one to choose: both are covered in yellow autumnal leaves, one is "just as fair" as the other, and both lead to destinations that Frost cannot see.1 In just twenty lines, the poet thus suggests the plight of moderns who must make decisions in life that may eventually be perceived as matters of great importance, but that feel hardly even to matter much when they are actually being made. That is surely a challenge we all face, but how exactly to deal with it is challenging to say. It surely seems exaggerated to conclude from the poet's reverie that our decisions in life don't really matter at all simply because we cannot say at the outset where they may ultimately lead us—much less that they have no real importance because we will end up in the same place anyway. Those conclusions both feel just a bit irrational, but neither should we read the poem's famous conclusion—that the poet's decision to travel the path less taken has ended up making all the difference in his life—as suggesting that the wisest choices in life are invariably those spurned by the majority. Surely, for all the oylem may be a goylem, it can't always be unwise to make some specific decision in life merely because many others have previously chosen to make it! (The Yiddish aphorism, one of my own father's favorites, conveys the same message as the one attributed, possibly spuriously, to Alexander Hamilton according to which "the masses are asses.")
1129968836
U-vacharta Ba-chayim
In one of his most famous poems, Robert Frost imagines himself standing at a crossroads in a "yellow wood" and having to decide which path forward to choose. The poem turns on the fact that neither path clearly recommends itself as the "better" one to choose: both are covered in yellow autumnal leaves, one is "just as fair" as the other, and both lead to destinations that Frost cannot see.1 In just twenty lines, the poet thus suggests the plight of moderns who must make decisions in life that may eventually be perceived as matters of great importance, but that feel hardly even to matter much when they are actually being made. That is surely a challenge we all face, but how exactly to deal with it is challenging to say. It surely seems exaggerated to conclude from the poet's reverie that our decisions in life don't really matter at all simply because we cannot say at the outset where they may ultimately lead us—much less that they have no real importance because we will end up in the same place anyway. Those conclusions both feel just a bit irrational, but neither should we read the poem's famous conclusion—that the poet's decision to travel the path less taken has ended up making all the difference in his life—as suggesting that the wisest choices in life are invariably those spurned by the majority. Surely, for all the oylem may be a goylem, it can't always be unwise to make some specific decision in life merely because many others have previously chosen to make it! (The Yiddish aphorism, one of my own father's favorites, conveys the same message as the one attributed, possibly spuriously, to Alexander Hamilton according to which "the masses are asses.")
2.99 In Stock
U-vacharta Ba-chayim

U-vacharta Ba-chayim

U-vacharta Ba-chayim

U-vacharta Ba-chayim

eBook

$2.99 

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers

LEND ME® See Details

Overview

In one of his most famous poems, Robert Frost imagines himself standing at a crossroads in a "yellow wood" and having to decide which path forward to choose. The poem turns on the fact that neither path clearly recommends itself as the "better" one to choose: both are covered in yellow autumnal leaves, one is "just as fair" as the other, and both lead to destinations that Frost cannot see.1 In just twenty lines, the poet thus suggests the plight of moderns who must make decisions in life that may eventually be perceived as matters of great importance, but that feel hardly even to matter much when they are actually being made. That is surely a challenge we all face, but how exactly to deal with it is challenging to say. It surely seems exaggerated to conclude from the poet's reverie that our decisions in life don't really matter at all simply because we cannot say at the outset where they may ultimately lead us—much less that they have no real importance because we will end up in the same place anyway. Those conclusions both feel just a bit irrational, but neither should we read the poem's famous conclusion—that the poet's decision to travel the path less taken has ended up making all the difference in his life—as suggesting that the wisest choices in life are invariably those spurned by the majority. Surely, for all the oylem may be a goylem, it can't always be unwise to make some specific decision in life merely because many others have previously chosen to make it! (The Yiddish aphorism, one of my own father's favorites, conveys the same message as the one attributed, possibly spuriously, to Alexander Hamilton according to which "the masses are asses.")

Product Details

BN ID: 2940161493045
Publisher: New Paradigm Matrix
Publication date: 12/03/2018
Series: Mesorah Matrix Series , #8
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
File size: 13 MB
Note: This product may take a few minutes to download.

About the Author

David Birnbaum is a philosophical writer, historical chronicler and conceptual theorist. His first work God and Evil (KTAV, 1988) is considered by many to be a breakthrough modern day classic in the field of theodicy. See God-And-Evil.com.

Editor-in-Chief Birnbaum is known globally as “the architect of Potentialism Theory” – a unified philosophy/cosmology/metaphysics. The paradigm-challenging theory (see ParadigmChallenge.com) is delineated in Birnbaum’s 3-volume Summa Metaphysica series (1988, 2005, 2014). See Philosophy1000.com.

A riposte to Summa Theologica of (St.) Thomas Aquinas, the Birnbaum treatise challenges both the mainstream Western philosophy of Aristotelianism and the well propped-up British/atheistic cosmology of Randomness. See Potentialism Theory.com.

The focus of 150+ reviews/articles, Summa Metaphysica has been an assigned Course Text at over 15 institutions of higher learning globally. See SummaCoverage.com.

Summa Metaphysica was the focus of an international academic conference on Science & Religion in April 16-19 2012 (see Conference1000.com). The work has been very widely covered globally. See RewindSumma.com.

David Birnbaum is the Editor-in-Chief of the Mesorah Matrix series on Jewish thought and spirituality. The sui generis series spans 10-volumes and 10 themes. The entire series is comprised of 200+ specially commissioned original pieces from 150-180 global Jewish thought leader essayists. See Mesorah1000.com.

In the history realm, David Birnbaum is the author/chronicler of the 2-volume The Crucifixion – of the Jews, and of the 7-volume Jews, Church & Civilization. His Crucifixion series, in particular, traces a direct trajectory from the Canonical Gospels in the First Century to Auschwitz in the Twentieth. See History1000.com.

David Birnbaum has served on the faculty of the New School for Social Research in Manhattan. He is a graduate of Yeshiva University High School (Manhattan), CCNY (City College of New York) and Harvard. His commentary blog is www.ManhattanObserver.com.
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews