What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights Decision / Edition 1

What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights Decision / Edition 1

by Jack Balkin
5.0 1
ISBN-10:
081479890X
ISBN-13:
9780814798904
Pub. Date:
09/01/2002
Publisher:
New York University Press

Paperback

View All Available Formats & Editions
Current price is , Original price is $26.0. You
Select a Purchase Option
  • purchase options
    $20.80 $26.00 Save 20% Current price is $20.8, Original price is $26. You Save 20%.
  • purchase options
    $14.28 $26.00 Save 45% Current price is $14.28, Original price is $26. You Save 45%.
    icon-error
    Note: Access code and/or supplemental material are not guaranteed to be included with textbook rental or used textbook.
  • purchase options

Overview

What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights Decision / Edition 1

Brown v. Board of Education , the Supreme Court's landmark 1954 decision ordering the desegregation of America's public schools, is perhaps the most famous case in American constitutional law. Criticized and even openly defied when first handed down, in half a century Brown has become a venerated symbol of equality and civil rights.

Its meaning, however, remains as contested as the case is celebrated. In the decades since the original decision, constitutional interpreters of all stripes have found within it different meanings. Both supporters and opponents of affirmative action have claimed the mantle of Brown , criticizing the other side for betraying its spirit. Meanwhile, the opinion itself has often been criticized as bland and uninspiring, carefully written to avoid controversy and maintain unanimity among the Justices.

As the 50th anniversary of Brown approaches, America's schools are increasingly divided by race and class. Liberals and conservatives alike harbor profound regrets about the development of race relations since Brown, while disagreeing heatedly about the proper role of the courts in promoting civil equality and civil rights.

In this volume, nine of America's top constitutional and civil rights experts have been challenged to rewrite the Brown decision as they would like it to have been written, incorporating what they now know about the subsequent history of the United States but making use of only those sources available at the time of the original decision. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed introduction to the case, chronicling the history of the litigation in Brown , and explaining the current debates over its legacy.

Contributors include: Bruce Ackerman, Jack M Balkin, Derrick A. Bell, Drew S. Days, John Hart Ely, Catharine A. MacKinnon, Michael W. McConnell, Frank I Michelman, and Cass R. Sunstein.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780814798904
Publisher: New York University Press
Publication date: 09/01/2002
Pages: 257
Product dimensions: 6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x 0.61(d)

About the Author

Jack M. Balkin is Knight Professor of Constitutional Law and the First Amendment at Yale Law School, and the Founder and Director of Yale’s Information Society Project. He is the author of numerous books and the editor of What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said (NYU Press, 2002). He lives in New Haven, CT.

Table of Contents

part i : Brown v. Board of Education—ACritical Introduction

1 Brown as Icon

2 The History of the Brown Litigation

3 Rewriting Brown: A Guide to the Opinions

part ii : Revised Opinions in Brown v. Board of Education

• Jack M. Balkin (judgment of the Court)

• Drew S. Days III (concurring)

• Bruce Ackerman (concurring)

• Frank I. Michelman (concurring in part and concurring

in the judgment)

• John Hart Ely (concurring in the judgment except as to

the remedy)

• Catharine A. MacKinnon (concurring in the judgment)

• Michael W. McConnell (concurring in the judgment)

• Cass R. Sunstein (concurring in the judgment)

• Derrick A. Bell (dissenting)

What People are Saying About This

From the Publisher

-,

"In this thought-provoking volume, the academically distinguished 'justices' of the 'Balkin Court' offer competing thoughts about the role of the Supreme Court and the Constitution in overcoming racial discrimination. Complete with helpful introductory material, commentary on their opinions by each 'justice,' and the texts of the original Brown decisions, What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said is a valuable source of ideas, commentary, and insights into the challenges of racial discrimination, both historical and present."

-Gerald Rosenberg,Northwestern University School of Law

"This intriguing collection provides unique insights into the way today's constitutional theorists would go about deciding Brown v. Board of Education, and into contemporary constitutional theory more generally. It also illuminates Brown v. Board of Education itself, by bringing the insights of nearly fifty years of experience to bear on the problem the Court faced in 1954. Those interested in Brown and in constitutional theory will all benefit from thinking about what these authors have to say."

-Mark Tushnet,Georgetown University Law Center

"A remarkable collection of writings. The eminent scholars it features articulate with insight and passion a wide range of views. No other book better relates the Supreme Court's landmark decision of 1954 to the debates and anxieties of our own time."

-Randall Kennedy,Harvard Law School

"Balkan offers his own assessment in a critical introduction and the iconic impact of Brown."

-Black Issues Book Review

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights Decision 5 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 1 reviews.
Guest More than 1 year ago
Did you include the true facts of the case and how MacKinley Burnett who was serving as the NAACP President and was on the fore- front of this case.