Where in the World is Percy Fawcett?
The real star of 'Lost City of Z' is the 'counterfeit paradise' of the Amazon. This vast region, almost as large as the continental U.S., is a mysterious and extensive repository of all kinds of flora and fauna--much hostile to humans. There are anacondas which could eat a small cow, poisonous snakes and plants for which there are no remedies, weird insects of all sorts like tiny bees that try to get into your eyeballs. The canopy of the jungle has all kinds of plants riotously struggling for the 'fight for light', leaving dark, thick, almost impassable underbrush below. It was in this environment that Percy Fawcett--one of the last great individualistic explorers (before exploration became expensive, institutionalized, and specialized)--disappeared in 1925 with his son and his son's friend, while searching for a civilization he called 'Z', and the first conquistadores in the area called 'El Dorado'. It was a sensational story at the time, and hundreds more perished, or were lost in subsequent decades, in efforts to find him.
I found the author's device of shifting from the past to the present, where he mounts his own little 'expedition', to be jarring. I could imagine some old explorer curmudgeon intoning 'I knew Percy Fawcett. I explored with Percy Fawcett. Sir, you are no Percy Fawcett!' On the other hand, this technique does highlight the vast differences in 'exploring' the Amazon versus almost a hundred years ago. For example, the huge amount of clear-cutting for grazing land (difference), and the continued devastation of indigenous civilization which began with the initial contact of European conquerors.
The general gist of scholarship is that a civilization of any magnitude would be impossible in the Amazon because it is so hostile a place for humans, and the difficulty of cultivation would consign it to limited inhabitation, much like the Arctic 'wastes'. Apparently, this was false, as 'Z' does exist--after a fashion. The most cutting edge anthropological research has found cities in the middle of the Amazon, and roads, which supported a large population. Percy Fawcett, who tried to locate Z based on legends and historical chronicles, was probably walking right through it but didn't recognize it as such in 1925.
The cities, such as those of 'El Dorado', existed when the first chroniclers recorded them hundreds of years ago. What probably happened was that European diseases wiped out the population, much as it did further north. The much smaller population could not help the jungle 'repossessing' the land very quickly, and much of the well-developed culture was lost. Unlike the groups farther north, the Amazonians did not build in stone, so no permanent structures persisted.
In a way, this reminds me of 'One Second After', another book I recently reviewed--we can only imagine the skills, experience, and expertise, that would be lost as the American population is reduced to 30 million from a former population of 300 million. After a few hundred years, anthropologists might likewise say 'I can't believe these fractious little tribes living their substinence lifestyle built these skyscrapers!'
As for what happened to Fawcett...well, I don't want to spoil everything for you!
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.