Piott provides short essays about 19th-century reformers that focus on their careers as social critics. Most US historians should recognize the 13 individuals in the 12 chapters as important social critics, but many other readers will not. Piott selected them because they have become underappreciated as reformers or mostly forgotten as such. 'The individuals featured in the volume,' Piott argues, 'existed apart from the mainstream of dissent in the nineteenth century.' The selected reformers are Sarah G. Bagley, Thomas Skidmore and George Henry Evans, William H. Sylvis, Oliver Hudson Kelley, George Perkins Marsh, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Frances Willard, Helen Hunt Jackson, T. Thomas Fortune, Thomas Nast, Jacob Riis, and Edward Bellamy. Piott explains that 'romantic' reformers were the norm during the early 19th century, but by mid-century, reformers emerged who were 'realists.' What is revealing is that there was a lack of sustained cooperation between like-minded reformers. A good supplement for undergraduate history collections on the 19th-century US and as background for classes covering the Progressive Era. Summing Up: Recommended. Most levels/libraries.
Piott provides short essays about 19th-century reformers that focus on their careers as social critics. Most US historians should recognize the 13 individuals in the 12 chapters as important social critics, but many other readers will not. Piott selected them because they have become underappreciated as reformers or mostly forgotten as such. 'The individuals featured in the volume,' Piott argues, 'existed apart from the mainstream of dissent in the nineteenth century.' The selected reformers are Sarah G. Bagley, Thomas Skidmore and George Henry Evans, William H. Sylvis, Oliver Hudson Kelley, George Perkins Marsh, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Frances Willard, Helen Hunt Jackson, T. Thomas Fortune, Thomas Nast, Jacob Riis, and Edward Bellamy. Piott explains that 'romantic' reformers were the norm during the early 19th century, but by mid-century, reformers emerged who were 'realists.' What is revealing is that there was a lack of sustained cooperation between like-minded reformers. A good supplement for undergraduate history collections on the 19th-century US and as background for classes covering the Progressive Era. Summing Up: Recommended. Most levels/libraries.
Americans in Dissent: Thirteen Influential Social Critics of the Nineteenth Century is a fine, accessible survey of leading ideas and people in nineteenth-century America. This book is indispensable for students new to American reform.
Despite the tiresome conservative injunction 'America: Love It or Leave It,' a venerable American tradition has sought to change the country precisely out of love for it. Americans in Dissent reminds us of the many-sidedness of nineteenth-century lives devoted to American social reform, including labor, women's, black, Indian, environmental, and other causes that burn with present-day urgency. What is most striking is the common concern for political economy and equality prominent in this ensemble drawn together by Steven L. Piott.
Piott provides short essays about 19th-century reformers that focus on their careers as social critics. Most US historians should recognize the 13 individuals in the 12 chapters as important social critics, but many other readers will not. Piott selected them because they have become underappreciated as reformers or mostly forgotten as such. 'The individuals featured in the volume,' Piott argues, 'existed apart from the mainstream of dissent in the nineteenth century.' The selected reformers are Sarah G. Bagley, Thomas Skidmore and George Henry Evans, William H. Sylvis, Oliver Hudson Kelley, George Perkins Marsh, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Frances Willard, Helen Hunt Jackson, T. Thomas Fortune, Thomas Nast, Jacob Riis, and Edward Bellamy. Piott explains that 'romantic' reformers were the norm during the early 19th century, but by mid-century, reformers emerged who were 'realists.' What is revealing is that there was a lack of sustained cooperation between like-minded reformers. A good supplement for undergraduate history collections on the 19th-century US and as background for classes covering the Progressive Era. Summing Up: Recommended. Most levels/libraries.
