Compositional Abduction and Scientific Interpretation: A Granular Approach
Abductive reasoning is a form of inference that infers some hypothesis because of what that hypothesis explains. Unlike deductive reasoning, it yields a plausible conclusion but does not definitively verify it. The theory of compositional abduction developed in this book provides a novel theory of confirmation. Aizawa uses case studies to analyse how scientists interpret the results of experiments to support compositional hypotheses (hypotheses about what things are composed of) and suggests that they use a kind of abduction. His theory is offered as an alternative account of scientific reasoning that the logical empiricists would have interpreted as hypothetico-deductive confirmation. It is also an alternative to the Peircean interpretation of the role of abduction in science. It will be valuable to philosophers of science, those working on hypothetico-deductive confirmation, Peirce's view of abduction, inference to the best explanation, and the New Mechanism. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
1147116652
Compositional Abduction and Scientific Interpretation: A Granular Approach
Abductive reasoning is a form of inference that infers some hypothesis because of what that hypothesis explains. Unlike deductive reasoning, it yields a plausible conclusion but does not definitively verify it. The theory of compositional abduction developed in this book provides a novel theory of confirmation. Aizawa uses case studies to analyse how scientists interpret the results of experiments to support compositional hypotheses (hypotheses about what things are composed of) and suggests that they use a kind of abduction. His theory is offered as an alternative account of scientific reasoning that the logical empiricists would have interpreted as hypothetico-deductive confirmation. It is also an alternative to the Peircean interpretation of the role of abduction in science. It will be valuable to philosophers of science, those working on hypothetico-deductive confirmation, Peirce's view of abduction, inference to the best explanation, and the New Mechanism. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
120.0 Pre Order
Compositional Abduction and Scientific Interpretation: A Granular Approach

Compositional Abduction and Scientific Interpretation: A Granular Approach

by Kenneth Aizawa
Compositional Abduction and Scientific Interpretation: A Granular Approach

Compositional Abduction and Scientific Interpretation: A Granular Approach

by Kenneth Aizawa

Hardcover

$120.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Available for Pre-Order. This item will be released on August 31, 2025

Related collections and offers


Overview

Abductive reasoning is a form of inference that infers some hypothesis because of what that hypothesis explains. Unlike deductive reasoning, it yields a plausible conclusion but does not definitively verify it. The theory of compositional abduction developed in this book provides a novel theory of confirmation. Aizawa uses case studies to analyse how scientists interpret the results of experiments to support compositional hypotheses (hypotheses about what things are composed of) and suggests that they use a kind of abduction. His theory is offered as an alternative account of scientific reasoning that the logical empiricists would have interpreted as hypothetico-deductive confirmation. It is also an alternative to the Peircean interpretation of the role of abduction in science. It will be valuable to philosophers of science, those working on hypothetico-deductive confirmation, Peirce's view of abduction, inference to the best explanation, and the New Mechanism. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781009435697
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publication date: 08/31/2025
Pages: 254
Product dimensions: 6.50(w) x 1.50(h) x 9.50(d)

About the Author

Kenneth Aizawa is Professor of Philosophy at Rutgers University, Newark. He is co-editor (with Carl Gillett) of Scientific Composition and Metaphysical Ground (2016), co-author (with Fred Adams) of The Bounds of Cognition (2008), and author of The Systematicity Arguments (2003).

Table of Contents

1. The metatheory of the project; 2. Singular compositional explanations; 3. Singular compositional explanations: special cases; 4. Singular compositional abduction; 5. The compositional basis of resting and action potentials; 6. The hermann grid illusion; 7. Peirce and the neo-peirceans; 8. Harman and inference to the best explanation; 9. Lipton and inference to the best explanation; 10. Manipulationist new mechanism; 11. Conclusion.
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews