Computer Vision - ECCV 2008: 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, October 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part IV
Welcome to the 2008EuropeanConference onComputer Vision. These proce- ings are the result of a great deal of hard work by many people. To produce them, a total of 871 papers were reviewed. Forty were selected for oral pres- tation and 203 were selected for poster presentation, yielding acceptance rates of 4.6% for oral, 23.3% for poster, and 27.9% in total. We applied three principles. First, since we had a strong group of Area Chairs, the final decisions to accept or reject a paper rested with the Area Chair, who would be informed by reviews and could act only in consensus with an other Area Chair. Second, we felt that authors were entitled to a summary that explained how the Area Chair reached a decision for a paper. Third, we were very careful to avoid conflicts of interest. Each paper was assigned to an Area Chair by the Program Chairs, and each Area Chair received a pool of about 25 papers. The Area Chairs then identified and rankedappropriatereviewers for eachpaper in their pool, and a constrained optimizationallocated three reviewers to each paper. We are very proud that every paper received at least three reviews. At this point, authors were able to respond to reviews. The Area Chairs then needed to reach a decision. We used a series of procedures to ensure careful review and to avoid conflicts of interest. ProgramChairs did not submit papers. The Area Chairs were divided into three groups so that no Area Chair in the group was in conflict with any paper assigned to any Area Chair in the group.
1111356485
Computer Vision - ECCV 2008: 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, October 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part IV
Welcome to the 2008EuropeanConference onComputer Vision. These proce- ings are the result of a great deal of hard work by many people. To produce them, a total of 871 papers were reviewed. Forty were selected for oral pres- tation and 203 were selected for poster presentation, yielding acceptance rates of 4.6% for oral, 23.3% for poster, and 27.9% in total. We applied three principles. First, since we had a strong group of Area Chairs, the final decisions to accept or reject a paper rested with the Area Chair, who would be informed by reviews and could act only in consensus with an other Area Chair. Second, we felt that authors were entitled to a summary that explained how the Area Chair reached a decision for a paper. Third, we were very careful to avoid conflicts of interest. Each paper was assigned to an Area Chair by the Program Chairs, and each Area Chair received a pool of about 25 papers. The Area Chairs then identified and rankedappropriatereviewers for eachpaper in their pool, and a constrained optimizationallocated three reviewers to each paper. We are very proud that every paper received at least three reviews. At this point, authors were able to respond to reviews. The Area Chairs then needed to reach a decision. We used a series of procedures to ensure careful review and to avoid conflicts of interest. ProgramChairs did not submit papers. The Area Chairs were divided into three groups so that no Area Chair in the group was in conflict with any paper assigned to any Area Chair in the group.
109.99
In Stock
5
1
Computer Vision - ECCV 2008: 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, October 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part IV
891
Computer Vision - ECCV 2008: 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, October 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part IV
891Paperback(2008)
$109.99
109.99
In Stock
Product Details
| ISBN-13: | 9783540886921 |
|---|---|
| Publisher: | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
| Publication date: | 10/07/2008 |
| Series: | Lecture Notes in Computer Science , #5305 |
| Edition description: | 2008 |
| Pages: | 891 |
| Product dimensions: | 6.10(w) x 9.30(h) x 1.30(d) |
From the B&N Reads Blog