Hardcover
-
PICK UP IN STORECheck Availability at Nearby Stores
Available within 2 business hours
Related collections and offers
Overview
One is too small a number to achieve greatness, so don't settle for what you can accomplish alone. New York Times best-selling author and leadership expert Dr. John C. Maxwell shows you how to build and equip a team.
In Equipping 101, Maxwell offers valuable insight and practical tools on topics such as:
- The power of teamwork
- Why equipping is essential to a leader's success
- The qualities to look for in potential leader
- Ten steps for investing in others
- How to become an "enlarger" of people
- Investing in your team for the future
- Leaders with an equipped team possess an edge that will take them to the next level.
Equipping 101 will help you fulfill your vision by equipping other leaders to make it happen!
Product Details
| ISBN-13: | 9780785263524 |
|---|---|
| Publisher: | HarperCollins Leadership |
| Publication date: | 01/13/2004 |
| Pages: | 112 |
| Sales rank: | 556,467 |
| Product dimensions: | 4.70(w) x 6.55(h) x 0.60(d) |
About the Author
Read an Excerpt
EQUIPPING 101
What Every Leader Needs to KnowBy John C. Maxwell
Thomas Nelson Publishers
Copyright © 2003 Maxwell Motivation, Inc., a Georgia CorporationAll right reserved.
ISBN: 0-7852-6352-7
Chapter One
Why Do I Need to Equip Others?
One is too small a number to achieve greatness.
Who are your personal heroes? Okay, maybe you don't have heroes exactly. Then let me ask you this: Which people do you admire most? Who do you wish you were more like? What people fire you up and get your juices flowing? Do you admire ...
Business innovators, such as Sam Walton, Fred Smith, or Bill Gates? Great athletes, such as Michael Jordan, Tiger Woods, or Mark McGwire? Creative geniuses, such as Pablo Picasso, Buckminster Fuller, or Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart? Pop culture icons, such as Marilyn Monroe, Andy Warhol, or Elvis Presley? Spiritual leaders, such as John Wesley, Billy Graham, or Mother Teresa? Political leaders, such as Alexander the Great, Charlemagne, or Winston Churchill? Film industry giants, such as D. W. Griffith, Charlie Chaplin, or Steven Spielberg? Architects and engineers, such as Frank Lloyd Wright, the Starrett brothers, or Joseph Strauss? Revolutionary thinkers, such as Marie Curie, ThomasEdison, or Albert Einstein?
Or maybe your list includes people in a field I didn't mention.
It's safe to say that we all admire achievers. And we Americans especially love pioneers and bold individualists, people who fight alone, despite the odds or opposition: the settler who carves a place for himself in the wilds of the frontier, the Old West sheriff who resolutely faces an enemy in a gunfight, the pilot who bravely flies solo across the Atlantic Ocean, and the scientist who changes the world through the power of his mind.
The Myth of the Lone Ranger As much as we admire solo achievement, the truth is that no lone individual has done anything of value. The belief that one person can do something great is a myth. There are no real Rambos who can take on a hostile army by themselves. Even the Lone Ranger wasn't really a loner. Everywhere he went he rode with Tonto!
Nothing of significance was ever achieved by an individual acting alone. Look below the surface and you will find that all seemingly solo acts are really team efforts. Frontiersman Daniel Boone had companions from the Transylvania Company as he blazed the Wilderness Road. Sheriff Wyatt Earp had his two brothers and Doc Holliday looking out for him. Aviator Charles Lindbergh had the backing of nine businessmen from St. Louis and the services of the Ryan Aeronautical Company, which built his plane. Even Albert Einstein, the scientist who revolutionized the world with his theory of relativity, didn't work in a vacuum. Of the debt he owed to others for his work, Einstein once remarked, "Many times a day I realize how much my own outer and inner life is built upon the labors of my fellow men, both living and dead, and how earnestly I must exert myself in order to give in return as much as I have received." It's true that the history of our country is marked by the accomplishments of many strong leaders and innovative individuals who took considerable risks. But those people always were part of teams.
Economist Lester C. Thurow commented on the subject:
There is nothing antithetical in American history, culture, or traditions to teamwork. Teams were important in America's history-wagon trains conquered the West, men working together on the assembly line in American industry conquered the world, a successful national strategy and a lot of teamwork put an American on the moon first (and thus far, last). But American mythology extols only the individual ... In America, halls of fame exist for almost every conceivable activity, but nowhere do Americans raise monuments in praise of teamwork.
I must say that I don't agree with all of Thurow's conclusions. After all, I've seen the U.S. Marine Corps war memorial in Washington, D.C., commemorating the raising of the flag on Iwo Jima. But he is right about something. Teamwork is and always has been essential to building this country. And that statement can be made about every country around the world.
A Chinese proverb states, "Behind an able man there are always other able men." And the truth is that teamwork is at the heart of great achievement. The question isn't whether teams have value. The question is whether we acknowledge that fact and become better team players. That's why I assert that one is too small a number to achieve greatness. You cannot do anything of real value alone. If you truly take this to heart, you will begin to see the value of developing and equipping your team players.
I challenge you to think of one act of genuine significance in the history of humankind that was performed by a lone human being. No matter what you name, you will find that a team of people was involved. That is why President Lyndon Johnson said, "There are no problems we cannot solve together, and very few that we can solve by ourselves."
C. Gene Wilkes, in his book, Jesus on Leadership, observed that the power of teams not only is evident in today's modern business world, but it also has a deep history that is evident even in biblical times. Wilkes asserts:
Teams involve more people, thus affording more resources, ideas, and energy than would an individual. Teams maximize a leader's potential and minimize her weaknesses. Strengths and weaknesses are more exposed in individuals. Teams provide multiple perspectives on how to meet a need or reach a goal, thus devising several alternatives for each situation. Teams share the credit for victories and the blame for losses. This fosters genuine humility and authentic community. Teams keep leaders accountable for the goal. Teams can simply do more than an individual.
If you want to reach your potential or strive for the seemingly impossible-such as communicating your message two thousand years after you are gone-you need to become a team player. It may be a cliche, but it is nonetheless true: Individuals play the game, but teams win championships.
Why Do We Stand Alone?
Knowing all that we do about the potential of teams, why do some people still want to do things by themselves? I believe there are a number of reasons.
1. Ego
Few people are fond of admitting that they can't do everything, yet that is a reality of life. There are no supermen or superwomen. So the question is not whether you can do everything by yourself; it's how soon you're going to realize that you can't.
Philanthropist Andrew Carnegie declared, "It marks a big step in your development when you come to realize that other people can help you do a better job than you could do alone." To do something really big, let go of your ego, and get ready to be part of a team.
2. Insecurity
In my work with leaders, I've found that some individuals fail to promote teamwork and fail to equip their team members for leadership because they feel threatened by other people. Sixteenth-century Florentine statesman Niccolo Machiavelli probably made similar observations, prompting him to write, "The first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to look at the men he has around him."
I believe that insecurity, rather than poor judgment or lack of intelligence, most often causes leaders to surround themselves with weak people. Only secure leaders give power to others. On the other hand, insecure leaders usually fail to build teams because of one of two reasons: Either they want to maintain control over everything for which they are responsible, or they fear being replaced by someone more capable. In either case, leaders who fail to promote teamwork undermine their own potential and erode the best efforts of the people with whom they work. They would benefit from the advice of President Woodrow Wilson: "We should not only use all the brains we have, but all that we can borrow."
3. Naivete
Consultant John Ghegan keeps a sign on his desk that says, "If I had it to do all over again, I'd get help." That remark accurately represents the feelings of the third type of people who fail to become team builders. They naively underestimate the difficulty of achieving big things. As a result, they try to go it alone.
Some people who start out in this group turn out okay in the end. They discover that their dreams are bigger than their capabilities, they realize they won't accomplish their goals solo, and they adjust. They make team building their approach to achievement. But some others learn the truth too late, and as a result, they never accomplish their goals. And that's a shame.
4. Temperament
Some people aren't very outgoing and simply don't think in terms of team building and equipping. As they face challenges, it never occurs to them to enlist others to achieve something.
As a people person, I find that hard to relate to. Whenever I face any kind of challenge, the very first thing I do is to think about the people I want on the team to help with it. I've been that way since I was a kid. I've always thought, Why take the journey alone when you can invite others along with you?
I understand that not everyone operates that way. But whether or not you are naturally inclined to be part of a team is really irrelevant. If you do everything alone and never partner with other people, you create huge barriers to your own potential. Dr. Allan Fromme quipped, "People have been known to achieve more as a result of working with others than against them." What an understatement! It takes a team to do anything of lasting value. Besides, even the most introverted person in the world can learn to enjoy the benefits of being on a team. (That's true even if someone isn't trying to accomplish something great.)
A few years ago my friend Chuck Swindoll wrote a piece in The Finishing Touch that sums up the importance of teamwork. He said,
Nobody is a whole team ... We need each other. You need someone and someone needs you. Isolated islands we're not. To make this thing called life work, we gotta lean and support. And relate and respond. And give and take. And confess and forgive. And reach out and embrace and rely ... Since none of us is a whole, independent, self-sufficient, super-capable, all-powerful hotshot, let's quit acting like we are. Life's lonely enough without our playing that silly role. The game is over. Let's link up.
For the person trying to do everything alone, the game really is over. If you want to do something big, you must link up with others. One is too small a number to achieve greatness.
(Continues...)
Excerpted from EQUIPPING 101 by John C. Maxwell Copyright © 2003 by Maxwell Motivation, Inc., a Georgia Corporation. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.