The UK government has identified Faith communities as important sources of 'social capital' in community development and regeneration. But religion is also associated with conflict and division. How far is this faith in 'Faith' justified? And how far should Faith communities comply?This report assesses the debate and the evidence and summarises the controversies surrounding the idea of 'social capital' and the place of 'Faith' in community policy. It assesses the contribution of Faith communities to social capital that extends beyond bonding to build bridges and links with others in civil society; and identifies policy and practice implications for secular and Faith organisations and networks.The research in the report encompasses five major Faith traditions across four English regions. It explores the nature and the quality of social capital stemming from Faith buildings, association; engagement with governance, and participation in the wider public domain.This exploration of Faith communities and social capital is important for all who work to achieve well-connected communities. It will interest policy makers and researchers, those working in community development, regeneration and related fields, national and local Faith leaders and their communities, and all in the voluntary and community sectors.
|Publisher:||Policy Press at the Univ of Bristol|
About the Author
Robert Furbey, School of Environment and Development, Sheffield Hallam University, Adam Dinham, Director, Faiths and Civil Society Unit, Anglia Ruskin University, Richard Farnell, Centre for Local Economic Development, Coventry University, Doreen Finneron, Faith Based Regeneration Network UK, Guy Wilkinson, Archbishops' Council of the Church of England, with, Catherine Howarth, London Citizens, Dilwar Hussain, Islamic Foundation, Leicester and Sharon Palmer, Regional Action West Midlands
Table of Contents
Exploring 'social capital' and 'Faith'
Frameworks for Faith
People in places
People in spaces
Participation in local governance
Participation in the 'public domain'
Conclusion and policy implications