Judicial Objectivity:: Limits, Merits and Beyond
The book poses the fundamental question of what objectivity means in practical legal discourse and what is its role. By applying critical discourse analysis to the applications of the term “objectivity” in judicial discourse – based on cases from Poland – the book identifies a rich taxonomy of objectivity’s uses that judges make of the concept of objectivity. The main results are that objectivity has a special meaning in the legal discourse based on legal authority, and that a case can be made for a stronger interconnection between objectivity and intersubjectivity. These results challenge the theoretical foundations of the debate on objectivity in the legal discourse and open new perspectives for the justification of this concept in modern societies.

1138500743
Judicial Objectivity:: Limits, Merits and Beyond
The book poses the fundamental question of what objectivity means in practical legal discourse and what is its role. By applying critical discourse analysis to the applications of the term “objectivity” in judicial discourse – based on cases from Poland – the book identifies a rich taxonomy of objectivity’s uses that judges make of the concept of objectivity. The main results are that objectivity has a special meaning in the legal discourse based on legal authority, and that a case can be made for a stronger interconnection between objectivity and intersubjectivity. These results challenge the theoretical foundations of the debate on objectivity in the legal discourse and open new perspectives for the justification of this concept in modern societies.

64.5 Out Of Stock
Judicial Objectivity:: Limits, Merits and Beyond

Judicial Objectivity:: Limits, Merits and Beyond

Judicial Objectivity:: Limits, Merits and Beyond

Judicial Objectivity:: Limits, Merits and Beyond

Hardcover(New)

$64.50 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Temporarily Out of Stock Online
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

Related collections and offers


Overview

The book poses the fundamental question of what objectivity means in practical legal discourse and what is its role. By applying critical discourse analysis to the applications of the term “objectivity” in judicial discourse – based on cases from Poland – the book identifies a rich taxonomy of objectivity’s uses that judges make of the concept of objectivity. The main results are that objectivity has a special meaning in the legal discourse based on legal authority, and that a case can be made for a stronger interconnection between objectivity and intersubjectivity. These results challenge the theoretical foundations of the debate on objectivity in the legal discourse and open new perspectives for the justification of this concept in modern societies.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9783631652145
Publisher: Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
Publication date: 01/27/2021
Series: Dia-Logos , #28
Edition description: New
Pages: 234
Product dimensions: 5.83(w) x 8.27(h) x (d)

About the Author

Lidia Rodak is a Lecturer of Sociology and Philosophy of Law at the University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland. Her main research interests are objectivity and subjectivity in the socio-legal discourse and feminist jurisprudence. She published her works in The Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Studi sulla Questione Criminale, and Peter Lang.

Table of Contents

objectivity – legal objectivity – critical discourse analysis – judicial discourse – intersubjectivity – Polish jurisprudence

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews