'Read this book for the first truly comprehensive and persuasive account of why Joe Biden won the 2020 Democratic primary. Masket also deftly explains how political parties are adapting to the modern media landscape, and how they can sometimes overreact based on stylized interpretations of the facts (‘narratives’) that may not match the more complicated reality. Masket shows why Biden's comeback win wasn't nearly as surprising as the conventional wisdom seemed to hold.' Nate Silver, editor-in-chief, FiveThirtyEight
'Combining the sophistication of a political scientist with the readability of a political journalist, Seth Masket sets out to explore the stories Democrats have told themselves about their catastrophic loss to Donald Trump. He returns with a vividly detailed MRI scan of the Democratic mind. The party, he finds, is vexed less by ideological disagreements than by persistent tensions over identity politics, class, and race. If you want to understand what Democrats thought they learned in 2016, and why they bet everything on an old white guy in 2020, you need to read this book.' Jonathan Rauch, Brookings Institution
'Seth Masket has written an engaging, illuminating and thought-provoking book, one that adeptly combines broad theoretical sweep with fine granular detail. This rigorous and original study sheds valuable light on timely - and timeless - debates in American politics.' Molly Ball, TIME national political correspondent and author of Pelosi
'Seth Masket revisits The Party Decides with a fascinating and persuasive analysis of the 2016 and 2020 presidential nominations. This book will quickly become the go-to source for understanding when and how parties succeed or fail in choosing their presidential nominees.' Thomas E. Mann, Brookings Institution, co-author of One Nation After Trump and It’s Even Worse Than It Looks
'This book is a must-read for anyone interested in the long-term impact of the 2016 election on American party politics. Masket takes us into the heads of state party activists, showing how their perceptions of the 2016 result shaped nomination politics in 2020.' Julia R. Azari, Marquette University
'Seth Masket has written a timely and important book on what was perhaps the most central question of the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination: Why did 2016 turn out the way that it did? That question has dominated commentary for four years, but Masket focuses on it from a particularly important perspective: Why do Democrats think that Democrats lost a race that they thought they could win?' Hans Noel, Georgetown University
'There’s no better guide to the 2020 Democratic Party nomination process than Seth Masket. Learning from Loss shows how explanations for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 loss - accurate or not - set the stage for activists’ judgments of the 2020 candidates, paving the way for Joe Biden’s nomination.' Matt Grossmann, Michigan State University
'Catnip for election watchers and politics junkies, who will want to reread the book when the dust of 2020 settles.' Kirkus
'Masket … delivers a meticulous and lucidly written analysis of how Democratic insiders came to believe Joe Biden should be the party’s candidate in the 2020 presidential election.' Publishers Weekly
'Seth Masket’s masterful Learning From Loss: The Democrats, 2016–2020 provides a wealth of useful insights for understanding the Democrats’ likely trajectory over the coming years, as well as the strategic decisions progressives must grapple with as they seek to expand their influence on Democratic Party politics.' Jared Abbott, Jacobin
‘… Learning from Loss offers a compelling, highly readable account of recent Democratic Party history … will continue to interest scholars and students for many years to come.' Frances E. Lee, American Politics
‘Learning from Loss bridges multiple audiences … Packed with pithy quotations, the book will appeal to general-interest audiences beyond academia.' Perspectives on Politics
‘Learning from Loss makes an important contribution to the study of nomination politics, expertly weaving together existing research on parties and campaigns with Masket’s own insights.’ Daniel J. Lee, Political Science Quarterly
2020-07-07
Why did Hillary Clinton lose the 2016 presidential election? This book deconstructs the many competing explanations—and shows why they matter in 2020.
Early on, political scientist Masket writes that the book was supposed to be about the Republicans’ shattering loss in the 2016 election, asking “how a patently unelectable candidate like Donald Trump somehow got the nomination and cost them an election that was obviously theirs to win.” It didn’t work out that way, leaving the Democrats to wonder how their eminently well-suited candidate failed to capture the White House. Many narratives were offered: The American public is sexist at the core. Clinton was out of touch with ordinary people. Voters rejected insider politics. Trump’s victory was a fluke. Then—though Masket doesn’t belabor the point—there were Comey, WikiLeaks, and the Russians. All these competing narratives have merited serious conversation. Analyzing them—while saying that the narratives themselves are less important than the interpretations—Masket examines how party politics work: The candidate is usually decided on well before the primaries ever begin, the polity is so polarized that landslides no longer occur, and campaigns are steadily less important than other vehicles of messaging. One critique is that Clinton should have campaigned harder in swing states, but, the author counters, she went all out in Pennsylvania and wound up losing by about a point all the same. “If all that campaign effort couldn’t save her in Pennsylvania, why would we think it would matter in Wisconsin?” he asks. In short, he notes, “there was no consensus explanation of 2016.” Looking at identity politics, messaging, coalition-building, the representation of minority and women voters, and the power of party elites, Masket concludes that by all measures, the Democratic Party is “actually a stronger party than the GOP.”
Catnip for election watchers and politics junkies, who will want to reread the book when the dust of 2020 settles.
