Liability Law for Failed Contract Negotiations: A Comparative, Structural, and Historical Analysis
This book provides the European structure of liability for failed contract negotiations through a comparative lens, with wider lessons for an international context.

The book demonstrates that all the analyzed legal systems, in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands, can be best understood through a binary structure in their approach to pre-contractual liability, or culpa in contrahendo. This structure consists of two key elements: first, a general liability framework that allows for compensation of pure economic loss based on certain qualified conduct, such as negligence; and second, an implicit obligation to contract, which, though not explicitly recognized, is presumed in most systems. The book argues that this dual framework provides valuable insights into ongoing scholarly debates and the challenges practitioners face in cases of failed contract negotiations. Drawing on these insights, it proposes a more effective approach to the obligation to contract: one that encourages parties to collaborate in reaching an agreement voluntarily rather than imposing one upon them.

This book will be of interest to researchers in the field of comparative contract and tort law, European private law, and private law theory.

1147138570
Liability Law for Failed Contract Negotiations: A Comparative, Structural, and Historical Analysis
This book provides the European structure of liability for failed contract negotiations through a comparative lens, with wider lessons for an international context.

The book demonstrates that all the analyzed legal systems, in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands, can be best understood through a binary structure in their approach to pre-contractual liability, or culpa in contrahendo. This structure consists of two key elements: first, a general liability framework that allows for compensation of pure economic loss based on certain qualified conduct, such as negligence; and second, an implicit obligation to contract, which, though not explicitly recognized, is presumed in most systems. The book argues that this dual framework provides valuable insights into ongoing scholarly debates and the challenges practitioners face in cases of failed contract negotiations. Drawing on these insights, it proposes a more effective approach to the obligation to contract: one that encourages parties to collaborate in reaching an agreement voluntarily rather than imposing one upon them.

This book will be of interest to researchers in the field of comparative contract and tort law, European private law, and private law theory.

190.0 In Stock
Liability Law for Failed Contract Negotiations: A Comparative, Structural, and Historical Analysis

Liability Law for Failed Contract Negotiations: A Comparative, Structural, and Historical Analysis

by Tom Hick
Liability Law for Failed Contract Negotiations: A Comparative, Structural, and Historical Analysis

Liability Law for Failed Contract Negotiations: A Comparative, Structural, and Historical Analysis

by Tom Hick

Hardcover

$190.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    In stock. Ships in 3-7 days. Typically arrives in 3 weeks.
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

Related collections and offers


Overview

This book provides the European structure of liability for failed contract negotiations through a comparative lens, with wider lessons for an international context.

The book demonstrates that all the analyzed legal systems, in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands, can be best understood through a binary structure in their approach to pre-contractual liability, or culpa in contrahendo. This structure consists of two key elements: first, a general liability framework that allows for compensation of pure economic loss based on certain qualified conduct, such as negligence; and second, an implicit obligation to contract, which, though not explicitly recognized, is presumed in most systems. The book argues that this dual framework provides valuable insights into ongoing scholarly debates and the challenges practitioners face in cases of failed contract negotiations. Drawing on these insights, it proposes a more effective approach to the obligation to contract: one that encourages parties to collaborate in reaching an agreement voluntarily rather than imposing one upon them.

This book will be of interest to researchers in the field of comparative contract and tort law, European private law, and private law theory.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781032956688
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Publication date: 08/28/2025
Pages: 230
Product dimensions: 6.12(w) x 9.19(h) x (d)

About the Author

Tom Hick is Senior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for comparative and international private law in Hamburg. He conducts research on comparative law of obligations, comparative succession law, and private law theory with a focus on questions relating to social justice and sustainability. Previously, he has been a research and teaching assistant at the Institute for the Law of Obligations at the KU Leuven, Belgium, where he defended his doctoral dissertation in 2024. He also is a member of various international research groups and of the Friday Group, a Belgian think-tank striving to integrate young Belgian citizens into the public debate on important societal issues.

Table of Contents

Introduction

Part I: Structure Of Liability for Contract Negotiations and Obligations to Contract

1. Function of Pre-Contractual Liability

2. Structure of Pre-Contractual Liability

Part II: Liability for Contract Negotiations

3. Structure and Functionning of Liability for Contract Negotiations

4. Sanctions

5. Findings

Part III: Obligation to Negotiate or to Contract

6. Circumventing Causal Uncertainty

7. The Obligation to Negotiate or to Contract

8. Alternative: Obliegenheit to Contract

9. Summary

Conclusion

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews