by Victoria Redel


by Victoria Redel

Paperback(First Edition)

    Qualifies for Free Shipping
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


In Victoria Redel's mesmerizing first novel, the question of what happens when a mother loves her child too much is deeply and darkly explored. Left with a small fortune by her parents and the cryptic advice, "it would do to find a passion," Redel's narrator sets out to become a mother—a task she feels she can be adequately passionate about. She conceives her son Paul through a loveless one-night stand, surrounds him with a wonderful, magical world for two—a world filled with books, music, endless games, and bottomless devotion—and calls him pet names like Birdie, Cookie, Puppy, and Loverboy. She wonders, "Has ever a mother loved a child more?" But as life outside their lace curtains begins to beckon the school-age Paul, his mother's efforts to keep him content in their small world become increasingly frantic and ultimately extreme by all definitions.
In this exquisite debut novel, Victoria Redel takes us deep into the mind of a very singular mother, exposing the dangerously whisper-thin line between selfless and selfish motivation that exists in all types of devotion.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780156007245
Publisher: HarperCollins
Publication date: 07/25/2002
Edition description: First Edition
Pages: 224
Sales rank: 586,922
Product dimensions: 5.31(w) x 8.00(h) x (d)

About the Author

About The Author
Victoria Redel is an award winning author of three books of poetry and five books of fiction. She has taught in the Graduate Writing Programs of Columbia University and Vermont College. She has received numerous fellowships and her works have been widely anthologized and translated.

Read an Excerpt

Chapter One

What Did I Call Him?

After he had been alive exactly nine months, I watched him in his twitching, clutchy infant sleep. "Now you have been theirs," I thought, his hand bunching around my finger, "for as long as you were safe inside and only mine."

Now I wake and think I hear him speaking to me, the musical insistence at the edge of his words.

    "I am here," I try to say, but then I open my eyes and see people, too many people in this white room. And none of them is him.

    Someone leans in over me, "She's trying to speak."

    They parade in by twos and fours. Or, they enter alone, pause stiff-legged at the door. There is one with a blue tattoo spiraling up her freckled arm, an inked tail snaked under her white uniform. There is one who carries papers. One with a sterile cloth. Others I barely see, or see only pieces of them, bulky calves, a brown hand fumbling with a knob. I see a scar quarter mooned on a brown cheek. Clipboards. How much deprivation has been sustained? they wonder. They point. The hippocampus has been involved. They worry over my basal ganglia. They calculate my damage. Has there been paralysis, a visual fixation?

    Many Clipboards scuff in and out of the room.

    I am attached. Things drip and measure, machines pump, clean my blood, regulate air, trying to bring me all the way back to life.

    "Expect seizures," says a White Coat going out the door.

    In comes the doctor. In comes the nurse. In comes the lady with thealligatorpurse.

    I hear him, somewhere, clapping and singing. I try to join his patty-cake.

    "Hey! Quick! She's calling for the nurse," someone says.

    But I am gone. Past the Clipboards. Swerve past the orderlies. Back to find wherever he is, lost on our trip, trying to find his way to me, his mother.

Yes, I named him Paul, but until he insisted, I never called him Paul.

    I called him Pussycat and Sweetheart and Button and Sweetiepie and Sweetpea and Honeypie and Cutie and Babydoll and Sprinkle and Kiddo and Buck. I called him Cookie and Bear and Angel and Gooseboy and Ace and Spunk and Rabbit. I called him Pablo and Pablito. I called him Lovey and Love.

    But most of the time I just called him Loverboy.

    "Loverboy," I said when he was little, his mouth just a perfect tiny pucker, "You, Loverboy, are the loveliest thing on this earth."

    What if he had not said it, not said that night without so much as a glance up at me from where he stacked his Legos, "Call me Paul." We might have just stayed there, inside our house with its milky, early evening light.

    We might have locked the door and called it a holiday.

    We might have snuggled on the couch just as Sybil and Marty taught me to do.

    I gave everyone all the chances I could to give him back to me.

    I would not have pressed on down the stairs into the garage.

Let me start with his teeth.

    First there was the fretting agony of the first teeth coming in. Nights rubbing analgesics, an ice pack to press against his raw baby gums, a finger dipped in brandy, anything it took to stop the desperate bleating. Of course, there is always a mother who claims that for her baby it was uneventful. No spiking fever. No crankiness for her child, "Heavens," she wrinkles her nose, "no runny bowels."

    But I was not that mother.

    It was for my boy an agony.

    Nothing is uneventful.

    And then, just a few years later—hardly any time at all—the tooth falls out. And the child, look at him, ready for big teeth, he tries to speed it up. All that twisting, that horrible pressing, rocking, playing the tongue against the little chiclet, working the tip into the crevasses, feeling, perhaps, the point of the incoming tooth. Hours with fingers in the mouth. The constant wobbling of the tooth. As if a reward, a coin beneath the pillow, a measly token from a night fairy, could measure the agony of bone growing through bone.

    But he could not remember that.

    No, for my Pablito it was a delight, this promise of something grown-up, his permanent teeth.

    It did not upset me. It broke my heart.

I am barely breathing now. I am almost there, far away, safe, with him. The IV, a vein of blind turns. My body rolls, a slow-motion spin toward the smash of light. I veer, my heart skids and the machine snaps on.

    But what are they doing here? The aqua woman with messy kisses, none for the girl-child, all for the man, for this child's father who opens the front door each night and swings the mother, freshly showered, up in his arms, saying, "Sybil, I could not bear to be away from you another moment."

    No other mothers now.

    Not that non-mother, my mother, Sybil, and not these neighborhood mothers scolding, "No baby-sitter? Come on, don't you ever get a minute away from that child?" No fathers. Not even the one that, despite myself, I remember sometimes when I am holding my son, touching his sweep of black hair, the leafy night of forested places on his body.

    No, only the child. My child.

    It would do well to find a passion, Sybil said when she thought to dispense some motherly advice.

    What I needed in the end was only to love the child.

Afternoons, when he was still little, I mounted him in a child's pack and with him riding high against my back, I walked. Out of our neighborhood, into the city where there were streets where shirts were hung on frayed lines between freight buildings. All the time I talked to him. Laurel tree. Bench. Shop. Wheel. Brick. I taught him the names of what we saw. Once, remarkably, on a narrow city block, we saw the carcass of a deer hanging by a rope from a window. More words. There was a word for everything. Even words invented for the pleasure of sound. We never got lost, we got smoshkabibbled. There were afternoons we friddled. As though we were the first, my darling and I, naming our very own world into being. We were gods then, together, those afternoons.

    Later, when he could walk, he walked next to me. Hours walking, especially in rain, walking on puddled streets. "It is only water," I laughed. The few people we passed were hunched under umbrellas or had coats yanked pitifully over their turtled heads. For us there were never umbrellas. As if rain was something from which gods and heroes needed protection!

    We waited under a railway trestle. A sudden waterfall cascaded over the sawed-off ends of the metal ties. We stepped out into the rain. While everyone else crowded under shop awnings, we skipped from one restaurant to the next, ordering a steaming bowl of noodle soup, a cup of warm almond milk. Then we cut holes in plastic bags and frogaciously jumped puddles all our way home.

    Or we walked in a November mist, watched golden light brighten houses where we saw women in quilted mitts opening oven doors.

Mostly here, I hear women. Women talking, the cluck of their calibrated tongues. "Can she hear us?" "Look at this chart." The poke and probe of fingers and needles. Someone straps something against my chest. Next my arms are strapped.

    "It's unbelievable, we're in another convulsion."

    This motor of women and machines, they claim me.

    "It's under control. I think we've got her stabilized now."

    "Is she going to make it? Can she do it?"

Here is what I did.

    I ate him when he was my powdery and juicy sweet boy who wanted to be eaten. He was my morsel. He was delicious in his rodeo pajamas and corduroy slippers squealing, "Tickle me more!" He bucked and kicked. I lassoed him close and tickled more. I rubbed his back as he fidgeted and thrashed his way to sleep. I wiped his nose. I put my pinkie into his tiny nostril when the mucus was hard, crusted into a tight pebble, and I worked to pick it out. I kneaded his stomach when he was crampy with gas. I cut out the knotted hair matted at the back of his head. I tilted his head to keep the shampoo from running into his eyes. I munched on his thick legs. I chewed on his buttocks. I kissed his lips. I let him suck the dried sticky jam off my finger. I put him—once he was so small!—on the changing pad. I cleaned an eye and, with a new cotton, the other eye and with more fresh cotton, the wrinkled skin under his neck and under his arms and, with a little alcohol, I cleaned around the stubby umbilical clamp. And when his penis was still crusty with blood from the doctor's cut, I used a Q-tip to dab salve to that. Then I lifted his feet the way you would lift a trussed chicken and wiped Chickieboy's lightly haired back and his bony behind. Or when he was sick, I held his head while he vomited into the metal mixing bowl or I caught his vomit in my hands when he could not get to the toilet on time. I wiped shit from him and put a little cream on the puckered anus skin when it was raw and red from whatever in his diarrhea made him itch and sting. I touched him all the time. His cheeks, the lids of his eyes, the palms of his hands. I should have touched him more.

    "My eyes," he said, "you have not kissed my eyes."

    Every part of him I kissed. My hair trailed above my kisses so that in the high heat of August when my hair was clipped off my damp neck, he would say, "No, I need your hair with the kisses." But when he said, "Kiss me there," pushing my head toward his perfect miniature cock, I stopped. I shook my head, my hair shaking in a tickley way on his chest and said, "No way, Loverboy, there will be no kisses like that."

There is no falling in love like the falling in love with a child.

    What a thing it is, love! How love amazes us, at first turning us ever deeper into love. How it thrills, and thrilled, dizzy, descending, we imagine there is no end to the depth. And how, finally so deep in love, we panic. How did we get here? How long will it be until our circumstances exhaust our love? Or will our circumstances outlive the love?

    Either way, how will we survive?

    There is no falling in love like the falling in love with a child.

    His breath, that sweet dazzle, the thousands of tiny exhalations. Or a night he is ill, his body a damp burning against my chest and I do not sleep listening to each wheezy thick breath as he sleeps sitting up in my arms.

    Who has ever wanted to share a love? I had done everything to make this child. I refused to share.

    I listened to the smiles that said, "He is ours now, lady."

    I packed us up. It was as easy, as quick as leaving all the rental rooms I had ever left. A few boxes loaded into the backseat, that is all we would need. This time we would roam farther than the city or the island with its washed-out bridge. We needed to speed very far away. That is why Mrs. Yarkin came back all these years later, why she appeared, whispering to follow her. We would find a road not on any map. She would show me where she had driven off to in the middle of the night.

    I was never going to be ready to give him up.

Reading Group Guide

1. Names and naming, pet names and real names figure prominently throughout Loverboy. The mother calls her son by every loving nickname-Cookie, Honey, Loverboy-but never by his given name, Paul. Paul's sudden insistence on being called by his real name is significant and upsetting for the mother. What do names signify for both of them?

2. The narrator is an anonymous narrator who awakes in a hospital. We know her only as Paul's mother and by the names they have invented for her in their enclosed and magical games. Why has Redel chosen to keep the narrator unnamed?

3. As the narrator's obsessive relationship to her son and to mothering becomes more obvious, Redel maintains the reader's empathy toward the mother. Do you believe the character remains simultaneously both a disturbing and sympathetic figure? How does Redel manage this?

4.Unlike much contemporary literature, Loverboy does not have a happy ending. Nor even one in which redemption is a genuine possibility. Instead, Loverboy falls into the realm of tragedy as it seems to draw from the literature of classical tragedy. Can you think about ways in which the protagonist is and is not a typical tragic hero?

5. Redel takes on many taboo subjects regarding mothering. In what ways does she do this and does she manage through an extreme example to say something larger about love and separation?

6. Loverboy is told in many short chapters, some even less than a page. Is this short vignette form effective? How does it help create a tone to the novel?

7. Magic and magical worlds figure highly in the invented world created by Paul and his mother. On the night before he leaves for school Paulannounces, "Magically I will cover my eyes and when I open them, I will be gone." How has the very rich world the mother has created with her son ultimately backfired on her?

8.The bird box, the spy game, and the fenced schoolyard are examples of the imagery Redel uses to indicate a potent internal and external world. These images are compounded by things lost and things found-for example, the hide and seek game. Even Paul himself seems lost to his mother in the neighborhood playground. What is the effect of this imagery and what does it indicate about the mother's psychology?

9. In short flashbacks, the narrator reveals moments in her own childhood where she pretended to limp or displayed exorbitant knowledge in order to be noticed and seen by her self-enraptured parents. How has this childhood affected her? What do these glimpses tell us about the mother's relationship with her son, even about her decision to have and how to have a child?

10.The narrator's equation, "Many men equal no father" is the subject of the center section "The City of Fathers." She backs up her equation with facts about the mating practices of other cultures and even other animal species. How and why does she ultimately revise that equation?

11."It would do well to have a passion" is a repeated phrase throughout the novel. What does this mean to the narrator and how does it inform and justify her actions throughout the novel?

12.Throughout the novel there are odd characters-Mrs. Yarkin, Jacob, even Emerson-that have a brief but enduringly powerful impact on the narrator. Why do these characters figure in the novel? Is their role largely symbolic or do they represent certain options that the narrator accepts or rejects?

13. At the end of the book the mother says, "I am saving my son from the ordinary. I am saving him from an obvious life." What does "the exceptional" and "the ordinary" mean within this novel? And is the mother's judgment or wish for her son entirely wrong for a parent?

14. The obsession of the mother is clearly outside the realm of most parenting. But do her beliefs or behaviors represent ways many parents feel or behave? What is the line she crosses? Does Redel lead us to believe that the mother had a choice?

Copyright (c) 2002. Published by Harcourt, Inc.

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews