The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform
Throughout the contest for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, politicians and voters alike worried that the outcome might depend on the preferences of unelected superdelegates. This concern threw into relief the prevailing notion that--such unusually competitive cases notwithstanding--people, rather than parties, should and do control presidential nominations. But for the past several decades, The Party Decides shows, unelected insiders in both major parties have effectively selected candidates long before citizens reached the ballot box.

Tracing the evolution of presidential nominations since the 1790s, this volume demonstrates how party insiders have sought since America's founding to control nominations as a means of getting what they want from government. Contrary to the common view that the party reforms of the 1970s gave voters more power, the authors contend that the most consequential contests remain the candidates' fights for prominent endorsements and the support of various interest groups and state party leaders. These invisible primaries produce frontrunners long before most voters start paying attention, profoundly influencing final election outcomes and investing parties with far more nominating power than is generally recognized.
1116802260
The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform
Throughout the contest for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, politicians and voters alike worried that the outcome might depend on the preferences of unelected superdelegates. This concern threw into relief the prevailing notion that--such unusually competitive cases notwithstanding--people, rather than parties, should and do control presidential nominations. But for the past several decades, The Party Decides shows, unelected insiders in both major parties have effectively selected candidates long before citizens reached the ballot box.

Tracing the evolution of presidential nominations since the 1790s, this volume demonstrates how party insiders have sought since America's founding to control nominations as a means of getting what they want from government. Contrary to the common view that the party reforms of the 1970s gave voters more power, the authors contend that the most consequential contests remain the candidates' fights for prominent endorsements and the support of various interest groups and state party leaders. These invisible primaries produce frontrunners long before most voters start paying attention, profoundly influencing final election outcomes and investing parties with far more nominating power than is generally recognized.
30.0 Out Of Stock
The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform

The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform

The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform

The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform

Paperback

$30.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Temporarily Out of Stock Online
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

Related collections and offers


Overview

Throughout the contest for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, politicians and voters alike worried that the outcome might depend on the preferences of unelected superdelegates. This concern threw into relief the prevailing notion that--such unusually competitive cases notwithstanding--people, rather than parties, should and do control presidential nominations. But for the past several decades, The Party Decides shows, unelected insiders in both major parties have effectively selected candidates long before citizens reached the ballot box.

Tracing the evolution of presidential nominations since the 1790s, this volume demonstrates how party insiders have sought since America's founding to control nominations as a means of getting what they want from government. Contrary to the common view that the party reforms of the 1970s gave voters more power, the authors contend that the most consequential contests remain the candidates' fights for prominent endorsements and the support of various interest groups and state party leaders. These invisible primaries produce frontrunners long before most voters start paying attention, profoundly influencing final election outcomes and investing parties with far more nominating power than is generally recognized.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780226112374
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication date: 10/01/2008
Series: Chicago Studies in American Politics
Pages: 416
Product dimensions: 5.90(w) x 8.90(h) x 1.00(d)

About the Author

Marty Cohen is assistant professor of political science at James Madison University. David Karol is assistant professor of political science at the University of California, Berkeley. Hans Noel is assistant professor of government at Georgetown University. John Zaller is professor of political science at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments
 
1    The Outrageous Nomination of Hubert Humphrey
 
2    Whose Parties?
 
3    The Creation of New Parties
 
4    Weak Structures, Strong Parties
 
5    Last Hurrahs of the Old System
Appendix to Chapter 5: State Parties in 1952
 
6    Mastering the Postreform System
Appendix to Chapter 6: A Closer Look at the Endorsement Data      
 
7    The Invisible Primary: Theory and Evidence
 
8    Anatomy of a Conversation
Appendix to Chapter 8: Models of the Invisible Primary      
 
9    The Voters Weigh In
Appendix to Chapter 9: Models of Delegate Share      
 
10    Political Parties Today

Notes
References
Index
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews