Perturbation Techniques for Flexible Manipulators
A manipulator, or 'robot', consists of a series of bodies (links) connected by joints to form a spatial mechanism. Usually the links are connected serially to form an open chain. The joints are either revolute (rotary) or prismatic (telescopic), various combinations of the two giving a wide variety of possible configurations. Motive power is provided by pneumatic, hydraulic or electrical actuation of the joints. The robot arm is distinguished from other active spatial mechanisms by its reprogrammability. Therefore, the controller is integral to any description of the arm. In contrast with many other controlled processes (e. g. batch reactors), it is possible to model the dynamics of a manipulator very accurately. Unfortunately, for practical arm designs, the resulting models are complex and a considerable amount of research effort has gone into improving their numerical efficiency with a view to real time solution [32,41,51,61,77,87,91]. In recent years, improvements in electric motor technology coupled with new designs, such as direct-drive arms, have led to a rapid increase in the speed and load-carrying capabilities of manipulators. However, this has meant that the flexibility of the nominally rigid links has become increasingly significant. Present generation manipulators are limited to a load-carrying capacity of typically 5-10% of their own weight by the requirement of rigidity. For example, the Cincinatti-Milicron T3R3 robot weighs more than 1800 kg but has a maximum payload capacity of 23 kg.
1100756609
Perturbation Techniques for Flexible Manipulators
A manipulator, or 'robot', consists of a series of bodies (links) connected by joints to form a spatial mechanism. Usually the links are connected serially to form an open chain. The joints are either revolute (rotary) or prismatic (telescopic), various combinations of the two giving a wide variety of possible configurations. Motive power is provided by pneumatic, hydraulic or electrical actuation of the joints. The robot arm is distinguished from other active spatial mechanisms by its reprogrammability. Therefore, the controller is integral to any description of the arm. In contrast with many other controlled processes (e. g. batch reactors), it is possible to model the dynamics of a manipulator very accurately. Unfortunately, for practical arm designs, the resulting models are complex and a considerable amount of research effort has gone into improving their numerical efficiency with a view to real time solution [32,41,51,61,77,87,91]. In recent years, improvements in electric motor technology coupled with new designs, such as direct-drive arms, have led to a rapid increase in the speed and load-carrying capabilities of manipulators. However, this has meant that the flexibility of the nominally rigid links has become increasingly significant. Present generation manipulators are limited to a load-carrying capacity of typically 5-10% of their own weight by the requirement of rigidity. For example, the Cincinatti-Milicron T3R3 robot weighs more than 1800 kg but has a maximum payload capacity of 23 kg.
169.99 In Stock
Perturbation Techniques for Flexible Manipulators

Perturbation Techniques for Flexible Manipulators

by Anthony R. Fraser, Ron W. Daniel
Perturbation Techniques for Flexible Manipulators

Perturbation Techniques for Flexible Manipulators

by Anthony R. Fraser, Ron W. Daniel

Hardcover(1991)

$169.99 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    In stock. Ships in 1-2 days.
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

Related collections and offers


Overview

A manipulator, or 'robot', consists of a series of bodies (links) connected by joints to form a spatial mechanism. Usually the links are connected serially to form an open chain. The joints are either revolute (rotary) or prismatic (telescopic), various combinations of the two giving a wide variety of possible configurations. Motive power is provided by pneumatic, hydraulic or electrical actuation of the joints. The robot arm is distinguished from other active spatial mechanisms by its reprogrammability. Therefore, the controller is integral to any description of the arm. In contrast with many other controlled processes (e. g. batch reactors), it is possible to model the dynamics of a manipulator very accurately. Unfortunately, for practical arm designs, the resulting models are complex and a considerable amount of research effort has gone into improving their numerical efficiency with a view to real time solution [32,41,51,61,77,87,91]. In recent years, improvements in electric motor technology coupled with new designs, such as direct-drive arms, have led to a rapid increase in the speed and load-carrying capabilities of manipulators. However, this has meant that the flexibility of the nominally rigid links has become increasingly significant. Present generation manipulators are limited to a load-carrying capacity of typically 5-10% of their own weight by the requirement of rigidity. For example, the Cincinatti-Milicron T3R3 robot weighs more than 1800 kg but has a maximum payload capacity of 23 kg.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780792391623
Publisher: Springer US
Publication date: 06/30/1991
Series: The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science , #138
Edition description: 1991
Pages: 275
Product dimensions: 6.10(w) x 9.25(h) x 0.24(d)

Table of Contents

1 Introduction.- 1.1 Objectives.- 1.2 Book outline.- 2 Present trends in the dynamics and control of flexible manipulators.- 2.1 Introduction.- 2.2 Space Structures.- 2.3 Dynamics of flexible manipulators.- 2.4 Control of flexible manipulators.- 2.5 Conclusions.- 3 Dynamic model of a single-link flexible manipulator.- 3.1 Introduction.- 3.2 Analytic model of a single-link arm.- 3.3 Dynamic model based on natural modes.- 3.4 Dynamic models based on assumed modes.- 3.5 Models for control design.- 3.6 Conclusions.- 4 An experimental single-link flexible arm.- 4.1 Introduction.- 4.2 Experimental apparatus.- 4.3 Experimental identification of the system model.- 4.4 Verification of the arm model.- 4.5 Conclusions.- 5 Control design for the single-link arm.- 5.1 Introduction.- 5.2 Digital control design.- 5.3 Experimental flexible arm control.- 5.4 Conclusions.- 6 Multi-link flexible arm dynamics.- 6.1 Introduction.- 6.2 Dynamic model of a planar two-link flexible arm.- 6.3 Linearisation of the dynamic model.- 6.4 Properties of the linearised model.- 6.5 Variation of the linearised model with loading and configuration.- 6.6 Gravitational effects.- 6.7 Control of multi-link manipulators.- 6.8 Conclusions.- 7 A perturbation approach to changing dynamics.- 7.1 Introduction.- 7.2 Canonical perturbation theory.- 7.3 Extension of canonical perturbation theory to flexible systems.- 7.4 Perturbation analysis based on orthogonality of modes.- 7.5 Assumed modes formulation.- 7.6 Conclusions.- 8 Extended perturbation techniques.- 8.1 Introduction.- 8.2 Extended perturbation analysis.- 8.3 Discrete-time perturbation analysis.- 8.4 Corrective control design.- 8.5 Explicit control correction.- 8.6 Direct update of controller gains.- 8.7 Investigation of corrective control on the two-link arm model.- 8.8 A general perturbation-based control scheme.- 8.9 Conclusions.- 9 Looking to the future - high performance control.- 9.1 Introduction.- 9.2 Controller Design.- 9.3 The Provision of Feedforward.- 9.4 Feedback control.- A Symbols and Nomenclature.- B Experimental determination of arm parameters.- C Modal model of the single-link arm.- D Mass and stiffness terms for the two-link arm.- E Derivation of the assumed modes perturbation analysis.- F Transformation from a state-space to an input/output model.
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews