"It is... well researched, drawing on both a sizeable secondary literature and numerous Russian language sources.... his arguments are convincing and any who believe that Russia under Putin is still on a reform path or moving towards democracy must engage with the points raised in this work, as the war in Chechnya remains central to the development of post-communist Russia." Paul Kubicek, Oakland University, International Affairs, 1/1/2004
"... provides a fascinating and well structured picture of the background for and events leading up to the two wars. Evangelista's work should be required reading for anyone with an interest in Russia and its relationships with its federal partners.... This is an important book, and makes a significant contribution to the limited library of literature on Chechnya.... It is not only for experts, even those who have a very limited knowledge of the situation will be enlightened by it." Graham Dyson, Centre for Peacebuilding and Conflict, International Journal on World Peace, 12/1/2003
"[letter to editor]" Matthew Evangelista, Foreign Affairs, 5/1/2003
"[Evangelista] offers one of the few original, systematic discussions of a question that has attracted mostly sloganeering from both supporters and opponents of Chechen independence." Lawrence A. Uzzell, Chechnya Weekly, 2/20/2003
"A close, meticulous study of the root causes of the Chechen Wars of 1994 and 1999, and an informative, scholarly examination of the impact these conflicts had on both Chechnya and Russia." The Bookwatch, 4/1/2003
"Evangelista provides a clear, focused analysis of Russia's ongoing war in Chechnya -- why the two wars were launched (in 1994 and 1999) and what they imply for the Russian political system as a whole." P. Rutland, Wesleyan University, Choice
"[An] impressive new book.... a compelling synthesis of new insights from Russian soldiers, scholars, and policymakers." Charles King, Georgetown University, Foreign Affairs, 3/1/2003
It is hard to think of a more likely pair of candidates for historical enmity than the Russian government and the Chechens. In the nineteenth century, Russia's expansion into the Caucasus was slowed by the opposition of local mountain peoples, of whom the Chechens were among the most fierce. Vicious frontier wars raged for much of the century and ended with the death or forced migration of hundreds of thousands of highlanders. The Chechens were targeted again in 1944, when the Soviet government packed off the entire nation, as many as half a million people, to Central Asia for allegedly collaborating with the Nazis. They were "rehabilitated" only in 1957, when they were allowed to return in diminished numbers to their autonomous republic in the northeastern Caucasus.
It is no surprise, then, that the loosening of Soviet control allowed this history to come to the fore yet again, fueling two new rounds of warfare: from 1994 to 1996 and from 1999 to the present. But as Matthew Evangelista shows in his impressive new book, predicting violence in Chechnya was easy. Explaining why it erupted when it did, and why the conflict now appears intractable, is far trickier.