The Constitution's Text in Foreign Affairs
This book describes the constitutional law of foreign affairs, derived from the historical understanding of the Constitution's text. It examines timeless and recurring foreign affairs controversies—such as the role of the president and Congress, the power to enter armed conflict, and the power to make and break treaties—and shows how the words, structure, and context of the Constitution can resolve pivotal court cases and leading modern disputes. The book provides a counterpoint to much conventional discussion of constitutional foreign affairs law, which tends to assume that the Constitution's text and history cannot give much guidance, and which rests many of its arguments upon modern practice and policy considerations.

Using a close focus on the text and a wide array of historical sources, Michael Ramsey argues that the Constitution's original design gives the president substantial independent powers in foreign affairs. But, contrary to what many presidents and presidential advisors contend, these powers are balanced by the independent powers given to Congress, the Senate, the states, and the courts. The Constitution, Ramsey concludes, does not make any branch of government the ultimate decision maker in foreign affairs, but rather divides authority among multiple independent power centers.

1101976201
The Constitution's Text in Foreign Affairs
This book describes the constitutional law of foreign affairs, derived from the historical understanding of the Constitution's text. It examines timeless and recurring foreign affairs controversies—such as the role of the president and Congress, the power to enter armed conflict, and the power to make and break treaties—and shows how the words, structure, and context of the Constitution can resolve pivotal court cases and leading modern disputes. The book provides a counterpoint to much conventional discussion of constitutional foreign affairs law, which tends to assume that the Constitution's text and history cannot give much guidance, and which rests many of its arguments upon modern practice and policy considerations.

Using a close focus on the text and a wide array of historical sources, Michael Ramsey argues that the Constitution's original design gives the president substantial independent powers in foreign affairs. But, contrary to what many presidents and presidential advisors contend, these powers are balanced by the independent powers given to Congress, the Senate, the states, and the courts. The Constitution, Ramsey concludes, does not make any branch of government the ultimate decision maker in foreign affairs, but rather divides authority among multiple independent power centers.

99.0 In Stock
The Constitution's Text in Foreign Affairs

The Constitution's Text in Foreign Affairs

by Michael D. Ramsey
The Constitution's Text in Foreign Affairs

The Constitution's Text in Foreign Affairs

by Michael D. Ramsey

Hardcover

$99.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    In stock. Ships in 3-7 days. Typically arrives in 3 weeks.
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

Related collections and offers


Overview

This book describes the constitutional law of foreign affairs, derived from the historical understanding of the Constitution's text. It examines timeless and recurring foreign affairs controversies—such as the role of the president and Congress, the power to enter armed conflict, and the power to make and break treaties—and shows how the words, structure, and context of the Constitution can resolve pivotal court cases and leading modern disputes. The book provides a counterpoint to much conventional discussion of constitutional foreign affairs law, which tends to assume that the Constitution's text and history cannot give much guidance, and which rests many of its arguments upon modern practice and policy considerations.

Using a close focus on the text and a wide array of historical sources, Michael Ramsey argues that the Constitution's original design gives the president substantial independent powers in foreign affairs. But, contrary to what many presidents and presidential advisors contend, these powers are balanced by the independent powers given to Congress, the Senate, the states, and the courts. The Constitution, Ramsey concludes, does not make any branch of government the ultimate decision maker in foreign affairs, but rather divides authority among multiple independent power centers.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780674024908
Publisher: Harvard University Press
Publication date: 06/01/2007
Pages: 504
Product dimensions: 6.38(w) x 9.25(h) x 1.25(d)

About the Author

Michael D. Ramsey is Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments

Introduction: A Textual Theory of Foreign Affairs Law

Part I: Sources of National Power

1. Do Foreign Affairs Powers Come from the Constitution? Curtiss—Wright and the Myth of Inherent Powers

2. Foreign Affairs and the Articles of Confederation: The Constitution in Context

Part II: Presidential Power in Foreign Affairs

3. The Steel Seizure Case and the Executive Power over Foreign Affairs

4. Executive Foreign Affairs Power and the Washington Administration

5. Steel Seizure Revisited: The Limits of Executive Power

6. Executive Power and Its Critics

Part III: Shared Powers of the Senate

7. The Executive Senate: Treaties and Appointments

8. Goldwater v. Carter: Do Treaties Bind the President?

9. The Non-Treaty Power: Executive Agreements and United States v. Belmont

Part IV: Congress's Foreign Affairs Powers

10. Legislative Power in Foreign Affairs: Why NAFTA Is (Sort of) Unconstitutional

11. The Meanings of Declaring War

12. Beyond Declaring War: War Powers of Congress and the President

Part V: States and Foreign Affairs

13. Can States Have Foreign Policies? Zschernig v. Miller and the Limits of Framers' Intent

14. States versus the President: The Holocaust Insurance Case

15. Missouri v. Holland and the Seventeenth Amendment

Part VI: Courts and Foreign Affairs

16. Judging Foreign Affairs: Goldwater v. Carter Revisited

17. The Paquete Habana: Is International Law Part of Our Law?

18. Courts and Presidents in Foreign Affairs

Conclusion: Text as Law in Foreign Affairs

Notes

Index

What People are Saying About This

The Constitution's Text in Foreign Affairs is impressive. Ramsey defies conventional wisdom that the words of the Constitution do not speak to most contemporary foreign relations law problems, showing instead how these words, as originally understood, can provide a nearly complete answer to fundamental modern questions of foreign relations law. This book is a real contribution to the field.

Jack Goldsmith

The Constitution's Text in Foreign Affairs is impressive. Ramsey defies conventional wisdom that the words of the Constitution do not speak to most contemporary foreign relations law problems, showing instead how these words, as originally understood, can provide a nearly complete answer to fundamental modern questions of foreign relations law. This book is a real contribution to the field.
Jack Goldsmith, Harvard Law School

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews