The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today
Enlightenment thinkers of the eighteenth century were committed to the ideal of reflective autonomy—the principle that each of us should think for ourselves, particularly when determining moral and political standards. In keeping with that era's reputation as "the age of reason," many interpreted autonomy in a distinctively rationalist way—privileging reflective reason over all other mental faculties.

However, other leading philosophers of the era—such as David Hume, Adam Smith, and J.G. Herder—placed greater emphasis on feeling, seeing moral and political reflection as the proper work of the mind as a whole. They argued that without emotion, imagination, and sympathy we would be incapable of developing the moral sentiments that form the basis of our commitment to justice and virtue.

The Enlightenment of Sympathy reclaims the sentimentalist theory of reflective autonomy as a resource for enriching social science, normative theory, and political practice today. The sentimentalist description of the reflective process is more empirically accurate than the competing rationalist description, and can guide scientists investigating the processes by which the mind formulates moral and political principles.

Yet the theory is much more than merely descriptive, and can also contribute to the philosophical project of finding principles—including principles of justice—that wield genuine normative authority. Enlightenment sentimentalism demonstrates that emotion is necessarily central to our civic life, and shows how our reflective sentiments can counterbalance the unreflective feelings that might otherwise lead our political principles astray.
1116930653
The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today
Enlightenment thinkers of the eighteenth century were committed to the ideal of reflective autonomy—the principle that each of us should think for ourselves, particularly when determining moral and political standards. In keeping with that era's reputation as "the age of reason," many interpreted autonomy in a distinctively rationalist way—privileging reflective reason over all other mental faculties.

However, other leading philosophers of the era—such as David Hume, Adam Smith, and J.G. Herder—placed greater emphasis on feeling, seeing moral and political reflection as the proper work of the mind as a whole. They argued that without emotion, imagination, and sympathy we would be incapable of developing the moral sentiments that form the basis of our commitment to justice and virtue.

The Enlightenment of Sympathy reclaims the sentimentalist theory of reflective autonomy as a resource for enriching social science, normative theory, and political practice today. The sentimentalist description of the reflective process is more empirically accurate than the competing rationalist description, and can guide scientists investigating the processes by which the mind formulates moral and political principles.

Yet the theory is much more than merely descriptive, and can also contribute to the philosophical project of finding principles—including principles of justice—that wield genuine normative authority. Enlightenment sentimentalism demonstrates that emotion is necessarily central to our civic life, and shows how our reflective sentiments can counterbalance the unreflective feelings that might otherwise lead our political principles astray.
47.99 In Stock
The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today

The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today

by Michael L. Frazer
The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today

The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today

by Michael L. Frazer

Paperback

$47.99 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    In stock. Ships in 1-2 days.
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

Related collections and offers


Overview

Enlightenment thinkers of the eighteenth century were committed to the ideal of reflective autonomy—the principle that each of us should think for ourselves, particularly when determining moral and political standards. In keeping with that era's reputation as "the age of reason," many interpreted autonomy in a distinctively rationalist way—privileging reflective reason over all other mental faculties.

However, other leading philosophers of the era—such as David Hume, Adam Smith, and J.G. Herder—placed greater emphasis on feeling, seeing moral and political reflection as the proper work of the mind as a whole. They argued that without emotion, imagination, and sympathy we would be incapable of developing the moral sentiments that form the basis of our commitment to justice and virtue.

The Enlightenment of Sympathy reclaims the sentimentalist theory of reflective autonomy as a resource for enriching social science, normative theory, and political practice today. The sentimentalist description of the reflective process is more empirically accurate than the competing rationalist description, and can guide scientists investigating the processes by which the mind formulates moral and political principles.

Yet the theory is much more than merely descriptive, and can also contribute to the philosophical project of finding principles—including principles of justice—that wield genuine normative authority. Enlightenment sentimentalism demonstrates that emotion is necessarily central to our civic life, and shows how our reflective sentiments can counterbalance the unreflective feelings that might otherwise lead our political principles astray.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780199920235
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication date: 07/01/2012
Pages: 246
Product dimensions: 6.10(w) x 9.10(h) x 0.60(d)

About the Author

Michael L. Frazer is an Assistant Professor of Government and Social Studies at Harvard University. His research focuses on Enlightenment political philosophy and its relevance for contemporary political theory. Professor Frazer has also published articles on Maimonides, Nietzsche, John Rawls and Leo Strauss in such journals as Political Theory and The Review of Politics. Before arriving at Harvard, he studied at Yale and Princeton Universities, and received a postdoctoral appointment in the Political Theory Project at Brown University. He lives in Somerville, MA with his wife Coral and son Oren.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgements
Introduction: A Tale of Two Enlightenments
Chapter 1: Sentimentalism Before Hume
I. The New Science of Human Nature
II. Religious and Metaphysical Foundations
III. Theories of Justice
Chapter 2: Hume's Free-Standing Sentimentalism
I. Sympathy and the Moral Sentiments
II. Moral Development
III. Hume's Normative Theory
Chapter 3: Hume's Conservative Sentimentalism
I. Hume's Theory of Justice
II. The Sentimentalist Case Against Hume's Theory
Chapter 4: Adam Smith's Liberal Sentimentalism
I. The Alleged Incompatibility of Sentimentalism with Individualism
II. The Space Between Actor and Spectator: Sympathy and Moral Judgment
III. The Space Between Actors: Justice and Natural Jurisprudence
Chapter 5: Kant's Abandonment of Sentimentalism
I. The Critical-Period Position on the Foundations of Morals
II. The Critical-Period Normative Evaluation of Sympathy
III. The Critical-Period Theory of Affects and Passions
IV. A Contrasting Pre-Critical Position
Chapter 6: Herder's Pluralist Sentimentalism
I. Sentimentalism and the Problem of Diversity
II. From Sympathy to Diversity
III. From Diversity to Empathetic Understanding
IV. From Empathetic Understanding to Justice
Chapter 7: Sentimentalism Today
I. Sentimentalism and Social Science
II. Sentimentalism and Normative Theory
III. Sentimentalism and Political Practice
Bibliography
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews