Want it by Thursday, September 27?
Order by 12:00 PM Eastern and choose Expedited Shipping at checkout.
Same Day shipping in Manhattan. See Details
With The Rosie Project, “Graeme Simsion achieved the impossible and created an entirely new kind of romantic hero,” Jojo Moyes, author of Me Before You said. Now Don Tillman returns in the hilarious and charming sequel to the international sensation. Get ready to fall in love all over again.
Don sets about learning the protocols of becoming a father, but his unusual research style gets him into trouble with the law. Fortunately his best friend Gene is on hand to offer advice: he’s left Claudia and moved in with Don and Rosie.
Picking up where The Rosie Project left off, The Rosie Effect is a fun, hilarious, and poignant read. “Don Tillman helps us believe in possibility, makes us proud to be human beings, and the bonus is this: he keeps us laughing like hell” (Matthew Quick, author of The Silver Linings Playbook).
|Publisher:||Simon & Schuster|
|Product dimensions:||5.40(w) x 8.40(h) x 1.00(d)|
About the Author
Graeme Simsion is a former IT consultant and the author of two nonfiction books on database design who decided, at the age of fifty, to turn his hand to fiction. His first novel, The Rosie Project, was published in 2013 and translation rights have been sold in over thirty-five languages. Graeme lives in Australia with his wife, Anne, and their two children.
Read an Excerpt
The Rosie Effect
Orange juice was not scheduled for Fridays. Although Rosie and I had abandoned the Standardized Meal System, resulting in an improvement in “spontaneity” at the expense of shopping time, food inventory, and wastage, we had agreed that each week should include three alcohol-free days. Without formal scheduling, this target proved difficult to achieve, as I had predicted. Rosie eventually saw the logic of my solution.
Fridays and Saturdays were obvious days on which to consume alcohol. Neither of us had classes on the weekend. We could sleep late and possibly have sex.
Sex was absolutely not allowed to be scheduled, at least not by explicit discussion, but I had become familiar with the sequence of events likely to precipitate it: a blueberry muffin from Blue Sky Bakery, a triple shot of espresso from Otha’s, removal of my shirt, and my impersonation of Gregory Peck in the role of Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird. I had learned not to do all four in the same sequence on every occasion, as my intention would then be obvious. To provide an element of unpredictability, I settled on tossing a coin twice to select a component of the routine to delete.
I had placed a bottle of Elk Cove pinot gris in the refrigerator to accompany the divers’ scallops purchased that morning at Chelsea Market, but when I returned after retrieving our laundry from the basement, there were two glasses of orange juice on the table. Orange juice was not compatible with the wine. Drinking it first would desensitize our taste buds to the slight residual sugar that was a feature of the pinot gris, thus creating an impression of sourness. Waiting until after we had finished the wine would also be unacceptable. Orange juice deteriorates rapidly—hence the emphasis placed by breakfast establishments on “freshly squeezed.”
Rosie was in the bedroom, so not immediately available for discussion. In our apartment, there were nine possible combinations of locations for two people, of which six involved us being in different rooms. In our ideal apartment, as jointly specified prior to our arrival in New York, there would have been thirty-six possible combinations, arising from the bedroom, two studies, two bathrooms, and a living-room-kitchen. This reference apartment would have been located in Manhattan, close to the 1 or A train for access to Columbia University medical school, with water views and a balcony or rooftop barbecue area.
As our income consisted of one academic’s salary, supplemented by two part-time cocktail-making jobs but reduced by Rosie’s tuition fees, some compromise was required, and our apartment offered none of the specified features. We had given excessive weight to the Williamsburg location because our friends Isaac and Judy Esler lived there and had recommended it. There was no logical reason why a (then) forty-year-old professor of genetics and a thirty-year-old postgraduate medical student would be suited to the same neighborhood as a fifty-four-year-old psychiatrist and a fifty-two-year-old potter who had acquired their dwelling before prices escalated. The rent was high and the apartment had a number of faults that the management was reluctant to rectify. Currently the air-conditioning was failing to compensate for the exterior temperature of thirty-four degrees Celsius, which was within the expected range for Brooklyn in late June.
The reduction in room numbers, combined with marriage, meant I had been thrown into closer sustained proximity with another human being than ever before. Rosie’s physical presence was a hugely positive outcome of the Wife Project, but after ten months and ten days of marriage I was still adapting to being a component of a couple. I sometimes spent longer in the bathroom than was strictly necessary.
I checked the date on my phone—definitely Friday, June 21. This was a better outcome than the scenario in which my brain had developed a fault that caused it to identify days incorrectly. But it confirmed a violation of the alcohol protocol.
My reflections were interrupted by Rosie emerging from the bedroom wearing only a towel. This was my favorite costume, assuming “no costume” did not qualify as a costume. Once again, I was struck by her extraordinary beauty and inexplicable decision to select me as her partner. And, as always, that thought was followed by an unwanted emotion: an intense moment of fear that she would one day realize her error.
“What’s cooking?” she asked.
“Nothing. Cooking has not commenced. I’m in the ingredient-assembly phase.”
She laughed, in the tone that indicated I had misinterpreted her question. Of course, the question would not have been required at all had the Standardized Meal System been in place. I provided the information that I guessed Rosie was seeking.
“Sustainable scallops with a mirepoix of carrots, celeriac, shallots, and bell peppers and a sesame oil dressing. The recommended accompanying beverage is pinot gris.”
“Do you need me to do anything?”
“We all need to get some sleep tonight. Tomorrow we go to Navarone.”
The content of the Gregory Peck line was irrelevant. The effect came entirely from the delivery and the impression it conveyed of leadership and confidence in the preparation of sautéed scallops.
“And what if I can’t sleep, Captain?” said Rosie. She smiled and disappeared into the bathroom. I did not raise the towel-location issue: I had long ago accepted that hers would be stored randomly in the bathroom or bedroom, effectively occupying two spaces.
Our preferences for order are at different ends of the scale. When we moved from Australia to New York, Rosie packed three maximum-size suitcases. The quantity of clothes alone was incredible. My own personal items fitted into two carry-on bags. I took advantage of the move to upgrade my living equipment and gave my stereo and desktop computer to my brother, Trevor, returned the bed, linen, and kitchen utensils to the family home in Shepparton, and sold my bike.
In contrast, Rosie added to her vast collection of possessions by purchasing decorative objects within weeks of our arrival. The result was evident in the chaotic condition of our apartment: potted plants, surplus chairs, and an impractical wine rack.
It was not merely the quantity of items: there was also a problem of organization. The refrigerator was crowded with half-empty containers of bread toppings, dips, and decaying dairy products. Rosie had even suggested sourcing a second refrigerator from my friend Dave. One fridge each! Never had the advantages of the Standardized Meal System, with its fully specified meal for each day of the week, standard shopping list, and optimized inventory, been so obvious.
There was exactly one exception to Rosie’s disorganized approach. That exception was a variable. By default it was her medical studies, but currently it was her PhD thesis on environmental risks for the early onset of bipolar disorder. She had been granted advanced status in the Columbia MD program on the proviso that her thesis would be completed during the summer vacation. The deadline was now only two months and five days away.
“How can you be so organized at one thing and so disorganized at everything else?” I’d asked Rosie, following her installation of the incorrect driver for her printer.
“It’s because I’m concentrating on my thesis, I don’t worry about other stuff. Nobody asks if Freud checked the use-by date on the milk.”
“They didn’t have use-by dates in the early twentieth century.”
It was incredible that two such dissimilar people had become a successful couple.
Reading Group Guide
This reading group guide for The Rosie Effect includes an introduction, discussion questions, ideas for enhancing your book club, and a Q&A with author Graeme Simsion. The suggested questions are intended to help your reading group find new and interesting angles and topics for your discussion. We hope that these ideas will enrich your conversation and increase your enjoyment of the book.
In this highly anticipated sequel to the New York Times bestselling novel The Rosie Project, Don Tillman and his new wife, Rosie, find themselves with a new and unexpected “project”—a baby on the way.
When he and Rosie moved to New York City, Don was willing to make a few adjustments to his rigidly structured lifestyle. But nothing could have prepared him for the arrival of Bud (baby under development). Soon Rosie is overwhelmed by Don’s overzealous research and retreats into her thesis studies. Luckily, Gene moves in to provide his trademark advice, but not all goes according to plan.
As Don evades arrest, joins a research project on lesbian moms, battles an intrusive social worker, and attempts to invent a soundproof crib, he completely loses track of the most important project of all: Rosie. And when Rosie threatens to move back to Australia without him, Don must enlist all of his exceptional brain capacity to win her, and Bud, back for good.
Topics & Questions for Discussion
1. At the beginning of The Rosie Effect, we see that Don has made significant progress in allowing more flexibility in his life. What do you think is the most impressive change?
2. Don notes that Rosie is able to compartmentalize her organization skills. She is completely in control of her thesis research materials, but can’t keep her bath towel in the same place. What do you compartmentalize in your life? How are you different at work versus home?
3. Gene’s theories about relationships are heavily influenced by his job as the head of the psychology department in Australia. Do you agree that there is always an inequality of social capital in marriages? How does Don’s genetic research filter into his approach to love?
4. Discuss the scene in which Rosie tells Don that she is pregnant. How does Rosie want Don to react? How do you think his sister’s fatal ectopic pregnancy affects his feelings about her pregnancy?
5. Don has multiple mechanisms in place to maintain order. He meticulously plans meals and knows exactly how to deploy his Gregory Peck impression for optimal results. Do you have any similar systems or habits that you rely on to help your life stay organized?
6. While tending bar, Don is offended when a patron compares him to Dustin Hoffman’s character, Raymond, in Rain Man. Discuss the differences between Don and Raymond, and the pros and cons of using the word “autistic” as an umbrella term.
7. Discuss Don’s ability to sympathize versus his ability to empathize. He is able to excuse his former landlord’s unpleasantness by recognizing that his life is unrewarding. However, he finds it incredibly difficult to step into Phil’s shoes and imagine how he felt when Rosie’s mother died. Do you think this problem is exclusive to Don?
8. Gene tells Don not to fetishize parenthood; that children are just like little adults who don’t yet know the rules. Do you agree with this advice? Discuss the rules that children must learn and the rules that they shouldn’t.
9. As he and Rosie hurdle toward her due date, Don realizes that change is unstoppable. He thinks change is necessarily a bad thing. Do you think change can be good? Discuss examples of good changes.
10. Discuss the symbolism of the eternity ring that belonged to Rosie’s mother. What does it mean to Phil, and now to Don? Do you think it’s significant that it is stuck on Rosie’s finger as she considers ending her marriage?
11. Lydia ends up being a huge obstacle to Don as he tries to prepare for the baby. Discuss how her past experiences bias her against Don. Who else in the novel is unfairly biased? Is Don?
12. After failing to reunite Gene and Claudia, and providing lovely advice to a bullied Eugenie, Don must accept that Gene’s lies went so far that he couldn’t turn back. At what point did Don’s lies become too deep? What about Rosie’s? What would you have done differently?
13. Discuss the relationship between George and his son, who both abused drugs. How much can a parent blame themselves for their child’s shortcomings? At what point must that child be held responsible for their own actions?
14. Has Rosie changed in this book? Some readers have suggested that Rosie is unreasonably intolerant of Don: “She knew what she was getting herself into.” Do you agree?
15. Rosie tells Don that the things that she loves about him as a husband are precisely the things that will make him an incompetent father. Why do you think she changes her mind?
16. Discuss Don’s comment in the New York Post: “Of course lesbian parents are not average. Hence we should not expect average outcomes. But it would seem un-American to seek averageness.” What is the distinction between averageness and tradition? How are Don and Rosie exceptional? Do you think Hudson will be exceptional?
Enhance Your Book Club
1. In honor of Don and Rosie’s little inside joke, host a Gregory Peck movie night and rent To Kill a Mockingbird and Roman Holiday. Try out your best Gregory Peck impressions on one another.
2. Not everyone can be as adept in the kitchen as Don, but there’s no harm in trying. The first meal he cooks Rosie is “scallops with a mirepoix of carrots, celeriac, shallots, and bell peppers and a sesame oil dressing.” Here’s a recipe that comes close: http://frenchfood.about.com/od/maindishes/r/Seared-Scallops-In-Sage-Cream-Recipe.htm And don’t forget to pair with a nice pinot gris.
3. The Dead Kings isn’t a real band, but Café Wha? is a real place in Manhattan. Read up on its incredible music history and then plan a night to visit your local music club to support bands, new and old!
A Conversation with Graeme Simsion
How was writing the sequel different than writing The Rosie Project? Do you feel as though you’ve changed as an author?
Two things made writing The Rosie Effect much easier (which is not to say easy!). First, I already had my central characters in place. Don’s voice and Rosie’s character were the two biggest challenges in writing The Rosie Project. Second, I was experienced. The Rosie Project was my first novel, and it’s always tough doing something for the first time, whether it’s making a complicated dish or overhauling an engine. The second time, you know what you’re doing.
I’ve improved as an author and I’m more confident in what I’m doing, but I haven’t changed in any qualitative way. Yet.
Did you feel any pressure returning to these characters, knowing that they had amassed such a loyal readership? What were you most worried about?
Not for long. I wrote a couple of chapters to ensure I still had Don’s voice and was confident that my readers would stay with him as long as he remained true to himself. I was a little worried that readers who were looking for another romance/romantic comedy would not be so comfortable with a “honeymoon is over” domestic relationship. And I wanted to take those readers with me on the journey.
You appear to be very familiar with New York City. What are your favorite things to do when you’re in town? Any favorite museums or restaurants?
I’ve visited New York many times, going back to the 1980s, and lived there for six months in 2010. Like Don, I enjoy the Museum of Natural History. And we routinely visit the Met and MoMA. My wife and I are both keen diners, so we hit the restaurants and bars—and not just the upscale ones. We usually have a pizza at Arturo’s, try to get a table at Momofuku Ko, got to a few Mexican restaurants (Suenos in Chelsea is a good choice at happy hour), maybe a steak at Strip House, plus a few tapas bars—especially around West Nineteenth Street in the Flatiron district, where Don’s fictional bar is located (it’s a cross between Boqueria and Flatiron Lounge, with the addition of the incompetent manager). And we try to catch some stand-up: the Comedy Cellar is full of tourists, but still good.
Don is not quite an unreliable narrator, but he misses social cues that the reader does not. Talk a little more about this narrative device. Do you ever find it limiting?
On the contrary, it’s a very effective device for conveying Don’s character at the same time as telling the story. And it’s one of the key sources of comedy: the disconnect between what Don describes and what we think is really happening. I don’t feel a desire to take over as narrator and insert my own direct observations into the text. I know that for some readers, the fact that the story is told exclusively from Don’s point of view is disconcerting. I think the majority of relationship stories are told from a female point of view—this is certainly true of the chick lit genre. Someone accustomed to having the woman on the page at all times is going to miss Rosie!
Don, Dave, George, and Gene form quite the boys club. Do you have a similarly close group of guy friends?
I have a two or three such groups, but many of our social activities involve our (female) partners as well. There’s a bunch of guys from my previous profession (business/IT consulting) who get together regularly for a long lunch; and even though I don’t know these guys so well, a lot of important things get shared. Men (of my age and nationality at least) are often prepared to disclose more in an all-male setting.
It’s a Wonderful Life figures prominently in the end of the novel. Can you identify with George Bailey? What would your world be like without you in it?
Not really! I’m not nearly as saintly, and I’m sure there are a few people who think the world would be a better place without me. But in addition to my family role, I’m proud of having run a business that gave a start or otherwise played an important part in the careers and lives of many people who worked in it.
Do you think Gene has grown or reformed at all since the first book? Do you see a future for him and his children? What about him and Lydia?
We see Gene in a bit more depth in the second book. I think it’s more a case of understanding him better than any significant change. Many/most people have such a strong reaction to infidelity that it’s hard to see past it. I think he’s always wanted to help Don; he’s always wanted to be liked; and he’s wanted to play around. These aims have not always been compatible. I think he’ll stay in touch with his children, but geography and new relationships will get in the way of him being a close parent. If he’s able to make an impression as a professor in New York, I think he’ll stay. As for Lydia, it’s perhaps a bit soon—but I got together with my partner only a little while after a breakup and we’ve been together twenty-five years. It’s dangerous to make predictions about love.
Dave has a lot of trouble standing his ground. Have you ever been in a tough situation that you felt was difficult to confront?
Many, many times. I think my background as a consultant (and perhaps my life before that) inclines me to look for win-win solutions or compromises rather than putting too high a value on holding my position per se. You only have to spend an hour browsing Twitter to see the downside of standing your ground. I still try to confront the issue but not in a confrontational way!
In which direction do you think Rosie will take her career? Talk about a time when you and your wife had to support each other in pursuit of a career goal.
I think Rosie will end up as a researcher rather than a clinician. She’s not that much of a people person, and perhaps not a great listener! My wife and I have had lots of opportunities to support each other—in particular in our writing careers, which are second careers for both of us. When my wife won a big research grant to study postnatal depression, I’d just sold my business, and took over as primary carer for our kids. My wife was fantastic about me going back to college to study writing, and she is my sounding board for everything I write. And I do the same for her.
Will there be another book about Rosie and Don? Can you give us any hints?
Give me a few years. Let’s take another look at the family when Hudson is about seven, and see if he’s following in anyone’s footsteps. And what his parents think about that. And, remember, as the late Syd Field would say, without conflict you have no drama, and without drama you have no story. . . .
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
I love this series! The pile up of secrets and social misjudgements were a bit much. I hope that with the birth of BUD/HUDSON, we will be able to see some softer sides from both the Rosie and Don characters in the future. Their ridgid cold science personalities are thawing a bit which makes them more personable, but yet keeps the reader interested as to how these personalities try to take average every day life and analyze, track and formalize their data into some thing the average Joe on the street will laugh at. With all that said, I finished the book with a smile.
I received this book from NetGalley in return for an honest review. I loved The Rosie Project and recommended it to several people. Those who read it also loved it. I was thrilled to find out there was a sequel, although I didn’t think one was necessary. It was a great stand alone book. Having said that, I am so glad I got to read The Rosie Effect. It is another great book and I enjoyed seeing Don and Rose as their relationship progressed. However, it is not as light a book as the first. Rose has gotten pregnant on purpose without discussing it with Don. She is dealing with her own emotional problems which are exacerbated by pregnancy hormones. Mostly, she is terrified that Don won’t be able to emotionally connect with the baby. Don tries to manage as he has always done . . . by learning as much about pregnancy and small children as he can. This leads to numerous problems involving giving nutritional advice to Rose (not well received), encounters with the law, and court ordered therapy. Since Don knows from his research that Rose should not be stressed, he hides the last two from her. Actually, I think he would have been safer to have withheld the nutritional advice and told her about his run in with the law. In a way, this book was heartbreaking. Don tries so hard. He loves Rose and does everything he is capable of doing to keep her happy. It just doesn’t work. This statement from Don which comes near the end of the book explains so much about his difficulties dealing with others. “I was suddenly angry. I wanted to shake not just Lydia but the whole world of people who do not understand the difference between control of emotion and lack of it, and who make a totally illogical connection between inability to read others’ emotions and inability to experience their own.” Make no mistake. The Rosie Effect is a great book. It’s just not as lighthearted as The Rosie Project. Read it. You won't regret it.
Couldnt stop readin so amazin
***Spoiler alert*** I received a copy of this book from the publisher through Net Galley for a honest review. Warning-minor spoiler. I enjoyed this book, not as much as the first one, but still I’m glad I read it. Part of the problem for me, I think, is my disinterest in children and therefore not able to connect with the story line. Much of the book I found myself looking at the chaos the prospective change the baby was bringing to their lives as reason to validate my decision to abstain from reproducing. This book was also less fun than previous one. I spent much of the book worried over the state of Don and Rosie’s relationship and did not find much humor in what was going on. Again it was a good story, but more of a serious sitting-on-edge-of-seat kind of read then a funny outrageous crazy drama filled ride. The characters where much the same from the previous book, we have a few new faces, most of them I liked, a couple of them I wanted to smack. The character of Lydia was a particularly unpleasant character that I took an instant dislike to and never found reason to change my opinion of her throughout the entire book. Rosie also got on my nerves a little bit in this book. In my opinion the character is in need of some serious counselling and I place all of the drama squarely on her shoulders for introducing a child into their marriage without consulting all parties involved. What she did was not fair to Don or the baby, and unfortunately she never really has to answer for her transgressions in the story. Also for as much drama that she incited she was notably absent from much of the story. I was sad to see the state of Gene and Claudia’s relationship in this book, but think the outcome was probably unavoidable. It was also interesting to see Don interact with his father and I can kind of see where he gets his quirks from. I think the character of Don is under appreciated by his friends, and it isn’t until after the fact that they see all the ways he has contributed to their lives. The book was also a great example of the need to be honest and open with those we care about. Much of these character’s problems would have been moot if they had just communicated honestly with each other and been upfront with their needs. I think there is much we could learn from Don. Like I said I enjoyed the book. It was a fun read, but not quite what I was expecting. The characters are growing, and I found myself worried for much of the book that things would not end well for this unconventional couple. I hope the author continues the series. I would like to see what happen’s next in Don’s world.
Loved it. Read it in one day,,,,couldn't put it down. Am looking forward to the newest one.....j
Clever and light i laughed out loud at the ending
This was a very enjoyable read. If you liked the first, you should reads this sequel.
You've heard comparisons to certain characters in movies or books to be "like Sheldon Cooper", the leading male character on " The Big Bang Theory". Although all humans with Aspergers Syndrome are not identical, there are strong similarities to the literal Don't in the Rosie books when compared to Sheldon. If you enjoy the comic relief and dialogue of the situation comedy because of the personality nuances between characters, then you will love The Rosie Effect. Very cleverly written and laugh out loud funny, with all the soft edges of caring relationships and honesty mixed in. High recommendations for this book, as well as "The Rosie Project".
I found the book easy to read funny and touching.
The best books (IMO) are about great characters, and this book offers great characters. Loved it!
Thanks to Netgalley and Simon & Schuster for providing a copy for an unbiased review. Sequels can be tricky, but Graeme Simsion didn’t disappoint with this sequel to The Rosie Project. He’s moved Don and Rosie from Australia to New York, where they’ve been figuring out the compromises required to live together as a married couple. But when Rosie tells Don he’s going to be a father, he goes into full Don mode in an attempt to make sure everything is optimal to ensure a healthy Rosie and baby, and it’s unclear whether they’ll be able to find a compromise that will work for them both. Like The Rosie Project, this story is sweet and funny and endearing. I especially enjoyed listening to the audiobook for parts of it, the narrator’s Australian accent lent a bit of additional charm. I probably enjoyed The Rosie Project just a bit more, simply because it was a bit less predictable. Still, The Rosie Effect was a worthy successor.
This is the sequel to The Rosie Project. Now Don and Rosie are married, living in New Year, and pregnant. Don has many unusual ways to learn about pregnancy and how he'll be as a father. Unfortunately he and Rosie are not communicating well with each other and havoc ensues. I love this couple! Don is so literal about everything and Rosie does not want to hear it. She's studying and working on her thesis and does not want to be distracted. Don wants to make sure Rosie is not stressed so he keeps secrets which he has not done before. It blows up in Don's face and he almost loses all that is important to him. There are the returning characters--Gene, Claudia, and their children. There are new characters--Sonia, Dave, George, the 3 B's, Lydia, and others--that Don has to learn to work with or around. I had to laugh as Don plows right through. I'm going to miss these characters. Don and Rosie were fun!
I thought it was amazing how the author was able to create such a lovable character in Don while keeping true to his personality, rather than attempting to "fix" him.
This sequel paled in comparison to the first. Perhaps the characters were more entertaining in the first book as the reader got to know them. Even with the setting change from Australia to New York City, this book became too patterned with the main character's missteps.
The Rosie Effect is the second installment in the Don Tillman series written by author Graeme Simsion. I adored the first book The Rosie Project, so imagine my disappointment when The Rosie Effect failed to live up to it's predecessor. That is my opinion at least. Please note though that three stars isn't horrible! It was still a good read, but when compared to the endearing, sweet, and funny story that came before it, there's just no comparison. The Rosie Effect was a bit more serious, as the theme of falling in love has now transitioned into making a marriage work and preparing for the logistics of a traditional family. So naturally, it's not going to be all butterflies and rainbows this time around. But even so, the writing felt much dryer. I didn't laugh much at all, or smile really. I just felt sad for most of the characters much of the time, even when the crises Don got himself into were likely intended to add humor. However, the ending had the same urgency and fast pace as the first book did, with our hero Don finally concluding the perfect way to connect with his love Rosie, which I appreciated. It just wasn't enough for me to bump up my personal rating. If you're a fan of The Rosie Project and have been looking forward to this one, please don't let this review stop you! Sometimes, one's expectations get in the way of overall enjoyment, and I'm realistic enough to accept that this may have been my situation. If you do check it out, let me know what you think! Happy Reading!!! My favorite quote: “Watch some kids, watch them play. You’ll see they’re just little adults, only they don’t know all the rules and tricks yet.” The Don Tillman series includes the following installments as of January 2015: #1-The Rosie Project #2-The Rosie Effect
Rating 3.5 My review for The Rosie Project can be read on my blog. One of the things that I enjoyed so much about the first book was how Don and Rosie interacted with one another. However, that magic isn't present in this book. The lack of communication between Rosie and Don not only contributed to their issues in the book, but also my lack of enjoyment in the story. Another issue I had was things felt very inauthentic. Sometimes it's harder for me to suspend disbelief than others. This time I had a bit of trouble as some of the situations (Lydia as a whole, Sonia as Rosie, etc.) just didn't work at all for me. The Rosie Effect didn't live up to the first book (which often happens to sequels, unfortunately). And while I'd read a third book if one were to happen to come about, I wouldn't go out of my way to read it. You can read all of my reviews on my blog, KDH Reviews.
I was so eager to read the second book. however, from the beginning, there were something missing. Don kind of lost his innocence and his spontaneity. He became a different person, more . Kind of fake Don. analyzing his acts , calculating , lying and deceiving, despite all the justifications. somehow, I could not feel it the same way. As for Rosie, the writer just put her aside, she was not there, always away and does not have much presence in the story. Except in the mind of Don. He was giving a lot but Rosie did not appreciate anything he is doing. No communication. The unnecessary complication of the police interaction. well, I just could not push myself to finish the book.Don't know if I will.
I totally love Don, his character is growing, he has friends and thriving. Rosie on the other hand is horrible in this book, dislike her so much. This book is darker than the first, but Don is really trying. Loved Gene, George, Dave and Sonia.
Excellent book! I hope there is a third in the series.
It was a great followup to the Rosie Project, although I disagree with one of his theories. As long as there are 2 different partners-1 fun and 1 nuturing- I don't think sex matters. Hope there is another project in the works.
The Rosie Effect is the second novel by Australian author and playwright, Graeme Simsion, and the sequel to his highly popular novel, The Rosie Project. Now married, Don and Rosie are living in a cramped New York apartment while, as a visiting professor at Columbia, Don continues his research on alcoholic mice and Rosie studies to gain her MD qualification. Don’s friend, Gene, a geneticist and serial adulterer, has finally exhausted his wife’s tolerance for philandering and been thrown out, so Don invites him to stay with them, unwisely neglecting to check with Rosie first. And before he gets a chance to do so, Rosie announces that they are having a baby. Don’s solution to multiple problems (accommodation deficit with respect to the imminent arrival of an overseas guest and an eventual addition to the family; a laundry confrontation with a neighbour; a twice-daily beer-related commitment; financial stress due to the (Don-induced) loss of employment at a cocktail bar; the need to keep Rosie’s stress levels at a minimum) is a wonderfully elegant example of lateral thinking that only someone of his extraordinary talents could manage. Gene’s advice on fatherhood is mostly sound, but unfortunately rather too vague for Don, who manages to get himself into trouble involving police, counsellors and support groups. Mindful of the results of Rosie’s own research into the effects of stress during pregnancy, Don wants to spare her any anxiety and eventually tangles himself (and several others) in a web of deceit. His eccentric manner of dealing with Rosie’s pregnancy and his own impending fatherhood ends up threatening their happiness together. Luckily, he has friends (six, now!) who care and his boy’s night out group (recently expanded to include a rock star, and a psychology professor in addition to a refrigeration engineer) provide unique support. In Don, Simsion has created a character who is easy to love: he cares about his friends, is completely guileless, somewhat innocent and totally without malice. He has wholehearted enthusiasm for, and dedication to, any project he decides to take on. Simsion introduces a few new characters and expands on characters that readers will remember from The Rosie Project, so there are a few sub-plots keeping Don busy. This novel is filled with an abundance of hilarious situations that will have the reader snickering, groaning and laughing out loud as Don navigates his way through dinners (the Bluefin Tuna Incident), toddler observation (the Playground Incident), counselling sessions (the Good Fathers Project), research projects (the Lesbian Mothers Project), errors in judgement (the Second Ultrasound Misunderstanding), encounters with Loud Woman, Bubonic Plague Woman and an opinionated social worker, and tries to reinstate the Standardised Meal System (pregnancy version). Don’s instinctive solution to any problem is a spreadsheet, and his Baby Project bathroom-tile spreadsheet sounds fascinating. Ditto Jim’s soundproof crib. There are Gregory Peck impersonations, Rosie impersonations, men sharing their deepest secrets, a perfect anniversary celebration engineered for Don by Rosie, and, of course, bouts of morning sickness which elicit Don’s logical (if unsympathetic-sounding) response: “Feeling unwell is normal in pregnancy. It’s almost certainly a good sign.…..Your body is probably assembling some critical component, such as an arm, and is minimising the possibility of toxins disrupting the process.” Simsion’s latest novel takes a light-hearted look at medical research projects, sustainable meal choices, social workers, pregnancy and of course, fatherhood. Apart from the many laughs, there are also a few lump-in-the-throat moments and readers who loved The Rosie Project will not be disappointed. A funny, moving and sometimes thought-provoking read.