"Sternglass displays a thorough knowledge of other student writing and often presents useful reviews of the scholarship for less well-read readerrs. She also provides useful advice both for instructors and for researchers interested in doing their own longitudinal studies."
—Basic Writing e-Journal
"The volume leaves one in awe of how much a dedicated faculty can accomplish, dismayed at the circumstances that brought such poorly prepared students to college classrooms, and aware of how much more could have been accomplished during those seven years..."
—CHOICE
"Not only has Sternglass made a contribution here to pedagogy and research, but her analysis should also illumine social policy."
—IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
"...required reading for policy makers who make the overarching decisions about who gets educated and how....Sternglass gives us considerable new knowledge about the development of writing and learning in college..."
—Journal of Adolescent and Adult Learning
"Sternglass's work is a landmark of sorts, as it is the first longitudinal study of writing and learning at a college level that takes into account not only students' academic lives but also their personal lives....Time to Know Them is an important book, and its poignant and sincere presentation of students' academic and non-academic lives is commendable."
—Journal of Basic Writing
"...book is clear and significant, and she offers us compelling documentary. This capable, caring, and eloquent practitioner/researcher explicates a concept too often forgotten in the daily 'processing' of students through our classes: students' growing abilities to reason, solve problems, think critically, and express social concern."
—Teaching English in the Two-Year College.
"At a time when institutions of higher education are closing their doors to students who are labeled underprepared or remedial, when decontextualized forms of assessment are being used to either place students into courses or limit their instruction, and when students' academic potential is undermined by preconceptions about their abilities, Sternglass's impressive study makes clear that such efforts are wrongheaded, that the lives of students (and of those who work with them) will be impoverished if we as teachers and researchers do not take the 'time to know them.'"
—TESOL Quarterly
"...one of the few scholarly discussions of writing pedagogy that tells and documents the full truth about how people learn to write....Sternglass, more than anyone else I have read, gives us the full picture of the effects of writing pedagogies on undergraduate students. She discusses their backgrounds, their development as students, as people, and as respondents to the bureaucracies of writing assessment. The book relates the struggles and achievements of the students to financial situations in the university and in the city and state of New York. Every aspect of writing developmentindividual, social, political, and psychologicalis covered in this book. It should be required reading for graduate students in English, Rhetoric, and Composition faculty members, writing program administrators, and especially, deans and faculty members in non-English departments who think they know what 'the teaching of writing' entails. Sternglass should be congratulated for helping us bring realism to the understanding of writing pedagogy."
—David Bleich
University of Rochester
"...takes the study of student writing into new and ferociously important territory. Through a patient, longitudinal lens, Marilyn Sternglass shows how her students at City College gathered the inner and outer resources to pursue higher education in a system that was working as often against them as with them. Throughout we see the crucial role that writing plays in securing for these students their just inheritance of knowledge, self-illumination, and dignity. This is a rare chronicle of City College twenty years after Shaughnessy. It shows what public higher education really means and why it must be protected."
—Deborah Brandt
University of Wisconsin-Madison and the National Research Center for Learning an