Using the Project Management Maturity Model: Strategic Planning for Project Management / Edition 3 available in Paperback, eBook
Using the Project Management Maturity Model: Strategic Planning for Project Management / Edition 3
- ISBN-10:
- 1119530822
- ISBN-13:
- 9781119530824
- Pub. Date:
- 03/19/2019
- Publisher:
- Wiley
Using the Project Management Maturity Model: Strategic Planning for Project Management / Edition 3
Buy New
$97.95Buy Used
$76.18-
$76.18
$97.95Save 22% Current price is $76.18, Original price is $97.95. You Save 22%.-
SHIP THIS ITEM
Temporarily Out of Stock Online
Please check back later for updated availability.
-
Overview
Using the Project Management Maturity Model offers assessment tools for organizations of all sizes to evaluate their progress in effectively integrating project management along the maturity curve. This Third Edition includes maturity metrics, examples of Project Management Maturity Model (PMMM) reports, a new chapter on the characteristics of effective PMMM, assessment questions that align with the PMBOK® Guide—Sixth Edition, all-new illustrations that define advanced levels of maturity, assessment tools for organizations using traditional PM methods, and detailed guidance for organizations using Agile and Scrum.
Using the Project Management Maturity Model: Strategic Planning for Project Management, Third Edition is broken down into three major parts. The first part discusses the principles of strategic planning and how it relates to project management, the definition of project management maturity, and the need for customization. The second part details the Project Management Maturity Model (PMMM), which provides organizations with general guidance on how to perform strategic planning for project management. The third part of the book looks at some relatively new concepts in project management such as how assessments can be made to measure the firm’s growth using PM 2.0 and PM 3.0.
- Features customizable maturity model assessment tools for organizations of all sizes
- Includes assessment questions updated to line up with PMBOK® Guide—6th Edition
- Offers detailed guidance on applying the maturity model for Agile and Scrum
- Includes PowerPoint decks to aid in teaching the maturity model
Using the Project Management Maturity Model: Strategic Planning for Project Management, Third Edition is an ideal book for senior level and middle level corporate managers, project and team managers, engineers, project team members, and business consultants. It also benefits both business and engineering students in courses on advanced project management.
Product Details
ISBN-13: | 9781119530824 |
---|---|
Publisher: | Wiley |
Publication date: | 03/19/2019 |
Edition description: | 3rd ed. |
Pages: | 320 |
Product dimensions: | 8.50(w) x 10.80(h) x 1.00(d) |
About the Author
Read an Excerpt
Using the Project Management Maturity Model
By Harold Kerzner
John Wiley & Sons
ISBN: 0-471-69161-5Chapter One
The Need for Strategic Planning for Project Management
INTRODUCTION
For more than 40 years, American companies have been using the principles of project management to get work accomplished. Yet, for more than 30 of these years, very few attempts were made to recognize project management as a core competency for the company. There were three reasons for this resistance to project management. First, project management was viewed as simply a scheduling tool for the workers. Second, since this scheduling tool was thought to belong at the worker level, executives saw no reason to look more closely at project management, and thus failed to recognize the true benefits it could bring. Third, executives were fearful that project management, if viewed as a core competency, would require them to decentralize authority, to delegate decision-making to the project managers, and thus to diminish the executives' power and authority base.
MISCONCEPTIONS
As the 1990s approached, project management began to mature in virtually all types of organizations, including those firms that were project-driven, those that were non-project-driven, and hybrids. Knowledge concerning the benefits project management offered now permeated all levels of management. Project management came to be recognized as a process that would increase shareholder value.
This newknowledge on the benefits of project management allowed us to dispel the illusions and misconceptions that we had believed in for over 30 years. These misconceptions or past views are detailed below, together with current views.
Cost of Project Management
Misconception: Project management will require more people and increase our overhead costs.
Present view: Project management allows us to lower our cost of operations by accomplishing more work in less time and with fewer resources without any sacrifice in quality.
Profitability
Misconception: Profitability may decrease.
Present view: Profitability will increase.
Scope Changes
Misconception: Project management will increase the number of scope changes on projects, perhaps due to the project manager's desire for creativity.
Present view: Project management provides us with better control of scope changes. Good project managers try to avoid scope changes.
Organizational Performance
Misconception: Because of multiple-boss reporting, project management will create organizational instability and increase the potential for conflicts.
Present view: Project management makes the organization more efficient and effective through better organizational behavior principles.
Customer Contact
Misconception: Project management is really "eyewash" for the customer's benefit.
Present view: Project management allows us to develop a closer working relationship with our customers.
Problems
Misconception: Project management will end up creating more problems than usual.
Present view: Project management provides us with a structured process for effectively solving problems.
Applicability
Misconception: Project management is applicable only to large, long-term projects such as in aerospace, defense, and construction.
Present view: Virtually all projects in all industries can benefit from the principles of project management.
Quality
Misconception: Project management will increase the potential for quality problems.
Present view: Project management will increase the quality of our products and services.
Power/Authority
Misconception: Multiple-boss reporting will increase power and authority problems.
Present view: Project management will reduce the majority of the power/authority problems.
Focus
Misconception: Project management focuses on suboptimization by looking at the project only.
Present view: Project management allows us to make better decisions for the best interest of the company.
End Result
Misconception: Project management delivers products to a customer. Present view: Project management delivers solutions to a customer.
Competitiveness
Misconception: The cost of project management may make us noncompetitive. Present view: Project management will increase our business (and even enhance our reputation).
WALL STREET BENEFITS
The benefits recognized by the present views of project management are now seen to be strategic initiatives designed to enhance shareholder value. Perhaps one of the best examples showing this is the effect on stock price illustrated in Figure 1-1. An executive who wishes to remain anonymous believes that the difference between the target selling price of his company's stock and the actual selling price can be attributed to the quality of the company's project management system and management's ability to execute projects within time, cost, and quality constraints and to the customer's satisfaction. If the actual selling price was below the target selling price, it might indicate that the company, especially if it were project-driven, was having fundamental problems with project execution, which would affect competitiveness and profitability.
The concept behind Figure 1-1 may seem plausible from a theoretical point of view. In reality, other forces may exist that can have a significant impact on the stock price, such as recessions, lack of new products, competitor's activities, legal problems, and ratings by financial institutions.
It may take years for a company just beginning to adopt project management to reap the potential benefits shown in Figure 1-1. Some of the organizations that believe they are achieving the benefits of Figure 1-1 are in these fields:
Automotive subcontractors, some of whom are now treated as "partners" by their customers due to the quality of their project management systems.
Financial institutions, especially those that are aggressively acquiring and assimilating other organizations and rapidly integrating both cultures into one without any appreciable negative effect on earnings.
High technology companies who have beaten their competitors to the marketplace with new products.
Not all companies have the ability to reap the benefits of project management. Some do not yet recognize the benefits of or need for strategic planning for project management. Others recognize its importance but simply lack expertise in how to do it. In either event, strategic planning for project management is a necessity.
STAKEHOLDERS
Given the fact that project management is no longer seen as just a quantitative tool for the employees, but is recognized as a source of benefits to the whole corporation, project management must satisfy the needs of its stakeholders. Stakeholders are individuals or groups that either directly or indirectly are affected by the performance of the organization. These individuals are not only affected by the organization's performance, but may even have a claim on its performance. As an example, unions can have a strong influence on how a project management methodology is executed. The general public and government agencies may be affected through health, safety, and ethical issues in the way projects are executed.
Although there are several ways to classify stakeholders, the most common method is as follows:
Financial Stakeholders
Stockholders
Financial institutions (suppliers of capital)
Creditors
The Product/Market Stakeholders
Primary customers
Primary suppliers
Competitors
Unions
Government agencies
Local government committees
Organizational Stakeholders
Executive officers
Board of Directors
Employees in general
Managers
Any strategic planning efforts must focus on the best interests of all of an organization's stakeholders, not merely a few.
GAP ANALYSIS
There are two primary reasons for wanting to perform strategic planning for project management. First and foremost is the desire to secure a competitive advantage. The second reason is to minimize the competition's competitive advantage or to strengthen your own competitive advantage.
The key to reducing any disadvantage that may exist between you and your competitors is the process known as gap analysis. Figure 1-2 illustrates the basic concept behind gap analysis. You can compare your firm either to the industry average or to another company. Both comparisons are shown in Figure 1-2.
Just for an example, using Figure 1-2, we can compare the gaps in total sales. According to Figure 1-2, the gap between your firm and your major competitor is significant and appears to be increasing. The gap between your organization and the industry average is also increasing, but not as greatly as the gap between you and your major competitor.
For a company aspiring to perform strategic planning for project management, there are three critical gaps to analyze:
Speed to market
Competitiveness on cost
Competitiveness on quality
Figure 1-3 shows the gap on speed to market or new product development times. If the gap is large between you and either the industry average or your major competitor, then to win the battle you must develop a project management methodology that allows for the overlapping of life cycle phases combined with appreciable risk-taking. The larger the gap, the greater the risks to be taken. If the gap cannot be closed, then your organization must decide if its future should rest on the shoulders of a "first-to-market" approach or if a less critical "me-too" product approach is best. Another unfavorable result would be the firm's inability to compete on full product lines. The latter could impact the firm's revenue stream.
Another critical aspect of the schedule gap analysis shown in Figure 1-3 is customer's future expectations. Consider, for example, the auto manufacturers and their tier one suppliers. Today, these organizations operate on a three-year life cycle from concept to first production run. If you were a tier one supplier, however, and you found out that your primary customers were experimenting with a 24-month car, then you would need to perform strategic planning, not only to be competitive but also to be able to react quickly should your customers mandate schedule compression.
A gap on cost is an even more serious situation. Figure 1-4 illustrates the cost or pricing gap. Strategic planning for project management can include for provisions in the methodology for better estimating techniques, the creation of lessons learned files on previous costing, and possibly the purchasing of historical databases for cost estimating.
Good project management methodologies allow work to be accomplished in less time, at lower cost, with fewer resources, and without any sacrifice in quality. But if a cost/pricing gap still persists despite good project management, then the organization may either have to be more selective about which projects it accepts or choose to compete on quality rather than on cost. The latter assumes that your customers would be willing to pay a higher price for added quality or added value features.
Gaps on time and cost may not necessarily limit the markets in which you compete. However, gaps on quality, as shown in Figure 1-5, can severely hinder your firm's ability to compete. The critical gap in Figure 1-5 is the difference between the customer's expectations of quality and what you can deliver. Good project management methodologies can include policies, procedures, and guidelines for improving quality. However, the gap on quality takes a lot longer to compress than the gaps on time and cost.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Strategic planning for project management, combined with a good project management methodology, can compress the gaps on time, cost, and quality. However, there are still critical decisions that must be made. Marketing must decide what products to offer and which markets to serve. The information systems people must assist in the design, development, and/or selection of support systems. And senior management must provide sufficient and qualified resources.
Strategic planning for excellence in project management needs to consider all aspects of the company: from the working relationships among employees and managers and between staff and management, to the roles of the various players (especially the role of executive project sponsors), to the company's corporate structure and culture. Other aspects of project management must also be planned. Strategic planning is vital for every company's health. Effective strategic planning can mean the difference between long-term success and failure. Even career planning for individual project managers ultimately plays a part in a company's excellence, or its mediocrity, in project management. All of these subjects are discussed in the following chapters.
(Continues...)
Excerpted from Using the Project Management Maturity Model by Harold Kerzner Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Table of Contents
Preface xiIntroduction xiii
Chapter 1 The Need for Strategic Planning for Project Management 1
Introduction 1
Misconceptions 1
Project Management Becomes a Strategic Competency 3
General Strategic Planning 4
Participation by the Project Manager in Strategic Planning 5
What Is Strategic Planning for Project Management? 7
Executive Involvement 13
Critical Success Factors for Strategic Planning 13
Identifying Strategic Resources 14
Why Does Strategic Planning for Project Management Sometimes Fail? 17
Concluding Remarks 19
Chapter 2 The Need to Plan for Project Management Maturity 21
Introduction 21
The Need for a PMMM 21
Other Purposes for the PMMM 23
Defining Project Management Maturity 24
Advantages of Using a PMMM 25
Disadvantages of Using a PMMM 26
Selecting a PMMM 27
Changing the Strategic Direction 27
Maturity and Core Competencies 28
Maturity and Assessment Timing 28
The Importance of Intangible Maturity Metrics 29
Chapter 3 Customizing the PMMM 31
The Need for PMMM Customization 31
Understanding Customization 31
Issues with Public-Sector Project Management Maturity 32
Olympic Games Project Management Maturity 35
Capturing Olympic Games Lessons Learned 36
Chapter 4 An Introduction to the Project Management Maturity Model (PMMM) 39
Introduction 39
The Foundation for Excellence 40
Overlap of Levels 41
Risks 43
Assessment Instruments 44
Chapter 5 Level 1: Common Language 45
Introduction 45
Roadblocks 46
Advancement Criteria 47
Risk 47
Assessment Instrument for Level 1 48
Questions 48
Answer Key 61
Explanation of Points for Level 1 63
Opportunities for Customizing Level 1 63
Chapter 6 Level 2: Common Processes 65
Introduction 65
Life Cycles for Level 2 66
Roadblocks 68
Advancement Criteria 69
Risk 69
Overlapping Levels 70
Assessment Instrument for Level 2 70
Questions 71
Explanation of Points for Level 2 74
Opportunities for Customizing Level 2 74
Chapter 7 Level 3: Singular Methodology 75
Introduction 75
Integrated Processes 76
Culture 78
Management Support 79
Informal Project Management 80
Training and Education 80
Behavioral Excellence 82
Roadblocks 83
Advancement Criteria 83
Risk 83
Overlapping Levels 84
Assessment Instrument for Level 3 84
Questions 84
Answer Key 92
Explanation of Points for Level 3 94
Opportunities for Customizing Level 3 95
Chapter 8 Level 4: Benchmarking 97
Introduction 97
Characteristics 98
The Project Office or Center of Excellence 99
Benchmarking Opportunities 100
Roadblocks 102
Advancement Criteria 103
Assessment Instrument for Level 4 103
Questions 103
Explanation of Points for Level 4 106
Opportunities for Customizing Level 4 107
Chapter 9 Level 5: Continuous Improvement 109
Characteristics 109
Continuous Improvement Areas 110
The Never-Ending Cycle 112
Examples of Continuous Improvement 113
Developing Effective Procedural Documentation 113
Project Management Methodologies 119
Continuous Improvement 120
Capacity Planning 121
Competency Models 122
Managing Multiple Projects 124
End-of-Phase Review Meetings 125
Strategic Selection of Projects 126
Portfolio Selection of Projects 129
Horizontal or Project Accounting 131
Organizational Restructuring 133
Career Planning 134
Assessment Instrument for Level 5 135
Questions 135
Explanation of Points for Level 5 137
Opportunities for Customizing Level 5 137
Chapter 10 Sustainable Competitive Advantage 139
Introduction 139
Strategic Thrusts 140
The Need for Continuous Improvement 143
Project Management Competitiveness 143
Products versus Solutions 144
Enterprise Project Management 145
Engagement Project Management 146
Chapter 11 Advanced Project Management Maturity Assessments 147
Introduction: Changing Times 147
Redefining Maturity from PM 1.0 to PM 2.0/3.0 147
Some Critical Issues with PM 1.0 149
The Need for PM 2.0 150
The Need for PM 3.0 153
Criticisms of PM 2.0 and PM 3.0 154
Implementing Continuous Improvement Changes 155
How to Update the Assessment Instruments 157
Changing Definitions for PM 2.0 and PM 3.0 158
Assessing Maturity for PM 2.0 and PM 3.0 159
Statements 159
Measuring Intangible Benefits and Value 164
Customizing PM 2.0 and PM 3.0 Assessments 165
PMMM and the Agile Environment 171
Chapter 12 How to Conduct a Project Management Maturity Assessment 173
Introduction 173
Find Ways to Bypass the Corporate Immune System 173
Explain Why You Are Doing This 174
Pick the Model that Is Best for Your Organization 175
Maturity Models: How Do They Compare? 176
Create the Right Fit 176
Choose an Appropriate Delivery Method 177
Establish Responsibility 180
Decide Who Should Participate 181
Turn the Results into an Action Plan 182
Develop a Remedial Training Curriculum 183
Keep Top Management Informed 183
Virtual Reporting 184
Benchmark Your Results to Others 184
Do It Again 185
Chapter 13 Using the PMMM to Extract Best Practices 187
Introduction 187
The Best Practices Process 188
Step 1: Definition of a Best Practice 189
Step 2: Seeking Out Best Practices 190
Step 3: Validating the Best Practice 191
Step 4: Levels of Best Practices 192
Step 5: Management of Best Practices 193
Step 6: Revalidating Best Practices 194
Step 7: What to Do with a Best Practice 194
Step 8: Communicating Best Practices Across the Company 195
Step 9: Ensuring Usage of the Best Practices 196
Common Beliefs 196
Best Practices Library 197
Best Practices and the PMMM 199
Chapter 14 Case Studies 201
Case 1: Simone Engineering Company 201
Case 2: NorthStar Software Company 202
Case 3: Colmar Automotive 203
Case 4: Ferris HealthCare, Inc. 204
Case 5: Clark Faucet Company 205
Case 6: Macon, Inc. 207
Case 7: The Blue Spider Project 209
Case 8: Corwin Corporation 221
Case 9: The Trophy Project 230
Appendix The Kerzner Project Management Maturity Model 235
XXXX KPMMM 235
Introduction 237
Respondents by Project Roles and Countries Represented 241
Executive Overview of the Assessment Results 242
Level 1: Common Language (Max 800) 244
Level 2: Common Processes (Max 60) 251
Level 3: Singular Methodology (Max 210) 256
Level 4: Benchmarking (Max 75) 260
Level 5: Continuous Improvement (Max 48) 262
A Study of Level 1 Performance 263
A Study of Level 2 Performance 267
A Study of Level 3 Performance 271
A Study of Level 4 Performance 275
A Study of Level 5 Performance 279
Suggested Actions 283
Index 285