In Violent Manhood J. E. Sumerau provides a critical and updated look into what it means to be a man in the United States. Through interviews with young, white, straight, cisgender, middle- and upper-class, college men, she provides a disturbing look into how manhood remains closely linked to violence. Sumerau provides strong evidence that if the goal is violence reduction, society must focus on why violence is a key component for defining and achieving manhood.
Sumerau weaves sociological theory, empirical findings, and pointed interviews and anecdotes to bring her core arguments to life. Simultaneously comprehensible and complex, this book shines in its integration of social psychological theory on gender and identity, criminological perspectives on violence, and a deep yet succinct understanding of the meaning of manhood--as good, as white, as sexual, and as potentially violent by definition.
By centering the justifications, excuses, and perspectives of those located most closely to the hegemonic ideal--white, cisgender, heterosexual men from the middle- to upper-class--Sumerau adds depth to quantitative renderings of masculinity and violence that may drop the jaw of even seasoned gender and crime scholars.
In particular, I am struck by the normalness with which the participants deny the existence of sexual and domestic violence and their selective framing of "real violence" as the acts of "other" types of men (e.g., poor men) from whom they must protect women and girls. How they navigate the tension between accepting that to be a man is to be dominant and aggressive, and that ("real") violence is a serious social problem, seems to land them in a place of apathy, where gender roles and dynamics are "just the way things are" due to either biology or divine creation.
The dismissal of their need to confront violence in themselves and in society provides a window into the indifference and selective silence (particularly around "women's" issues) that perpetuates some of the most pressing social problems of the day. Sumerau digs to the root of violence for those who identify as men, and for those who bear the brunt of the consequences of its enactment (e.g., women, LGBTQ+ individuals). I strongly recommend this text to researchers and instructors in the areas of gender and violence, masculinities, and beyond.
This is a book that ought to be widely read and taught. In Violent Manhood, Sumerau's study of the relationship between masculinity and violence is timely and deeply important. Speaking with young collegiate men, Violent Manhood, offers new perspectives on how young men make sense of this relationship alongside enduring forms of inequality. Sumerau's approach is equal parts compassionate and critical, helping us to understand how men learn to be violent and how violence figures into how they learn to be men. Addressing an impressive collection of issues related to violence, Violent Manhood is engagingly written, carefully argued, and presented with care and critique.
Violent Manhood by J. E. Sumerau is an accessible monograph that details hegemonic definitions of what it means to be a man in contemporary US society. The book is particularly compelling as Sumerau includes discussions of #Metoo and Black Lives Matter in their analysis of violent manhood, making the manuscript important for instructors and students alike.... [T]he book will be useful for scholars of sexuality, gender, masculinity studies, criminology, and family studies. Moreover, the accessibility of the book makes it an invaluable tool for instructors to use in their undergraduate classes.
In 2000, pioneering anti-violence educator and cultural theorist Jackson Katz produced the now-classic educational film Tough Guise, in which he asserted that violence in the US was rooted in sociocultural and historical ideals of masculinity. Twenty years later, author Sumerau (Univ. of Tampa) presents to readers what Katz provided his viewers: a concise, accessible, and well-researched offering that focuses on the ways in which contemporary masculinity is integrally entwined with the performance of violence. Through the use of autoethnography and in-depth interviews with 50 people who identify as white, cisgender, heterosexual, middle- or upper-class men, the author demonstrates how males are systematically taught to be violent as they socially construct their identities as men in American society; how males routinely oppose efforts to reduce violence; and how male violence is often in reaction to attempts by others to challenge gender, racial, and sexual inequalities. Accordingly, if violence in the US has any chance whatsoever of being significantly ameliorated, a wholesale redefinition of masculinity must be a major part of the equation. Though slender in length, this book is a substantial addition to the expanding library of men and masculinity studies. Summing Up: Highly recommended. General readers through faculty; professionals.
In 2000, pioneering anti-violence educator and cultural theorist Jackson Katz produced the now-classic educational film Tough Guise, in which he asserted that violence in the US was rooted in sociocultural and historical ideals of masculinity. Twenty years later, author Sumerau (Univ. of Tampa) presents to readers what Katz provided his viewers: a concise, accessible, and well-researched offering that focuses on the ways in which contemporary masculinity is integrally entwined with the performance of violence. Through the use of autoethnography and in-depth interviews with 50 people who identify as white, cisgender, heterosexual, middle- or upper-class men, the author demonstrates how males are systematically taught to be violent as they socially construct their identities as men in American society; how males routinely oppose efforts to reduce violence; and how male violence is often in reaction to attempts by others to challenge gender, racial, and sexual inequalities. Accordingly, if violence in the US has any chance whatsoever of being significantly ameliorated, a wholesale redefinition of masculinity must be a major part of the equation. Though slender in length, this book is a substantial addition to the expanding library of men and masculinity studies. Summing Up: Highly recommended. General readers through faculty; professionals.
In Violent Manhood J. E. Sumerau provides a critical and updated look into what it means to be a man in the United States. Through interviews with young, white, straight, cisgender, middle- and upper-class, college men, she provides a disturbing look into how manhood remains closely linked to violence. Sumerau provides strong evidence that if the goal is violence reduction, society must focus on why violence is a key component for defining and achieving manhood.
This is a book that ought to be widely read and taught. In Violent Manhood, Sumerau's study of the relationship between masculinity and violence is timely and deeply important. Speaking with young collegiate men, Violent Manhood, offers new perspectives on how young men make sense of this relationship alongside enduring forms of inequality. Sumerau's approach is equal parts compassionate and critical, helping us to understand how men learn to be violent and how violence figures into how they learn to be men. Addressing an impressive collection of issues related to violence, Violent Manhood is engagingly written, carefully argued, and presented with care and critique.
In 2000, pioneering anti-violence educator and cultural theorist Jackson Katz produced the now-classic educational film Tough Guise, in which he asserted that violence in the US was rooted in sociocultural and historical ideals of masculinity. Twenty years later, author Sumerau (Univ. of Tampa) presents to readers what Katz provided his viewers: a concise, accessible, and well-researched offering that focuses on the ways in which contemporary masculinity is integrally entwined with the performance of violence. Through the use of autoethnography and in-depth interviews with 50 people who identify as white, cisgender, heterosexual, middle- or upper-class men, the author demonstrates how males are systematically taught to be violent as they socially construct their identities as men in American society; how males routinely oppose efforts to reduce violence; and how male violence is often in reaction to attempts by others to challenge gender, racial, and sexual inequalities. Accordingly, if violence in the US has any chance whatsoever of being significantly ameliorated, a wholesale redefinition of masculinity must be a major part of the equation. Though slender in length, this book is a substantial addition to the expanding library of men and masculinity studies. Summing Up: Highly recommended. General readers through faculty; professionals.
Sumerau weaves sociological theory, empirical findings, and pointed interviews and anecdotes to bring her core arguments to life. Simultaneously comprehensible and complex, this book shines in its integration of social psychological theory on gender and identity, criminological perspectives on violence, and a deep yet succinct understanding of the meaning of manhood—as good, as white, as sexual, and as potentially violent by definition.
By centering the justifications, excuses, and perspectives of those located most closely to the hegemonic ideal—white, cisgender, heterosexual men from the middle- to upper-class—Sumerau adds depth to quantitative renderings of masculinity and violence that may drop the jaw of even seasoned gender and crime scholars.
In particular, I am struck by the normalness with which the participants deny the existence of sexual and domestic violence and their selective framing of “real violence” as the acts of “other” types of men (e.g., poor men) from whom they must protect women and girls. How they navigate the tension between accepting that to be a man is to be dominant and aggressive, and that (“real”) violence is a serious social problem, seems to land them in a place of apathy, where gender roles and dynamics are “just the way things are” due to either biology or divine creation.
The dismissal of their need to confront violence in themselves and in society provides a window into the indifference and selective silence (particularly around “women’s” issues) that perpetuates some of the most pressing social problems of the day. Sumerau digs to the root of violence for those who identify as men, and for those who bear the brunt of the consequences of its enactment (e.g., women, LGBTQ+ individuals). I strongly recommend this text to researchers and instructors in the areas of gender and violence, masculinities, and beyond.
Violent Manhood by J. E. Sumerau is an accessible monograph that details hegemonic definitions of what it means to be a man in contemporary US society. The book is particularly compelling as Sumerau includes discussions of #Metoo and Black Lives Matter in their analysis of violent manhood, making the manuscript important for instructors and students alike…. [T]he book will be useful for scholars of sexuality, gender, masculinity studies, criminology, and family studies. Moreover, the accessibility of the book makes it an invaluable tool for instructors to use in their undergraduate classes.
In 2000, pioneering anti-violence educator and cultural theorist Jackson Katz produced the now-classic educational film Tough Guise, in which he asserted that violence in the US was rooted in sociocultural and historical ideals of masculinity. Twenty years later, author Sumerau (Univ. of Tampa) presents to readers what Katz provided his viewers: a concise, accessible, and well-researched offering that focuses on the ways in which contemporary masculinity is integrally entwined with the performance of violence. Through the use of autoethnography and in-depth interviews with 50 people who identify as white, cisgender, heterosexual, middle- or upper-class men, the author demonstrates how males are systematically taught to be violent as they socially construct their identities as men in American society; how males routinely oppose efforts to reduce violence; and how male violence is often in reaction to attempts by others to challenge gender, racial, and sexual inequalities. Accordingly, if violence in the US has any chance whatsoever of being significantly ameliorated, a wholesale redefinition of masculinity must be a major part of the equation. Though slender in length, this book is a substantial addition to the expanding library of men and masculinity studies. Summing Up: Highly recommended. General readers through faculty; professionals.
