Why the World Needs China: Development, Environmentalism, Conflict Resolution & Common Prosperity
312Why the World Needs China: Development, Environmentalism, Conflict Resolution & Common Prosperity
312Paperback
-
SHIP THIS ITEMAvailable for Pre-Order. This item will be available on July 1, 2024PICK UP IN STORE
Store Pickup available after publication date.
Available within 2 business hours
Related collections and offers
Overview
Product Details
ISBN-13: | 9781949762877 |
---|---|
Publisher: | Clarity Press, Incorporated |
Publication date: | 07/01/2024 |
Pages: | 312 |
Product dimensions: | 6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x 0.75(d) |
About the Author
Read an Excerpt
That Africa is presently the least wealthy continent on Earth is undisputed, and foreign banks encounter few obstacles and plentiful opportunities to take unfair advantage of most countries within it. An actual debt trap is profoundly easy both to set and to spring, and nearly impossible to escape; for example, according to financial records released recently, Sudan received loans totaling scarcely more than a few hundred million pounds from the United Kingdom during the twentieth century, which by 2021 had ballooned to nearly a billion pounds through the accrual of interest alone. In order to obtain relief from the IMF, the Sudanese government was compelled to end fuel subsidies, devalue its currency, and normalize relations with Israel. When dealing with Western lenders, even the forgiveness of debt is conditional upon enacting harsh austerity measures, as the IMF and the World Bank made clear in their initiative to cancel loans to countries it classified as “Heavily-Indebted Poor Countries” (HIPC), who must show willingness to “manage public finances and monetary policy” before being considered. Chinese lenders, however, are not loan sharks; they do not take opportunities to exploit a foreign debtor’s inability to pay, require no structural adjustments, and instead of exploiting decades-old debt, they are often likely to forgive it unconditionally. Though Chinese lending to foreign countries was relatively marginal before the twenty-first century, and consisted mainly of interest-free aid loans, scarcely any of that debt still exists. Brautigam writes: At first, when many of its aid loans started to come due in the early 1980s, China rescheduled them, sometimes just for a year or two. Repayments for the Tan-Zam railway were put off for ten years. Payments in Ghana and Niger were stretched out over twenty years instead of fifteen. Other countries simply did not pay... Later, in parallel with the HIPC initiative, the PRC began forgiving debt as well—but unconditionally: Most of China’s public pledges were consciously couched as debt relief for “highly indebted” and “least developed” countries. This does not mean, however, that China followed all the rules of the HIPC debt relief regime negotiated in Washington and Paris. Chinese debt cancellation was non-conditional. They did not require governments to prove their ability to manage their economies or to develop strategies to use the canceled debt for poverty reduction.