Linking Strategic Gains to the 'Responsibility to Protect' (R2P) doctrine
Essay from the year 2014 in the subject Politics - General and Theories of International Politics, grade: 71/100, University of Leicester, language: English, abstract: The 'Responsibility to Protect'-Doctrine (R2P) is not as much an obstacle to ending human suffering in war-torn countries as its detractors maintain. Originally conceived as a UN-sponsored attempt to provide the international community with a more efficient instrument for preventing or halting mass violence and human rights violations, it was hoped that R2P would overcome the controversies frequently associated with humanitarian interventions. Yet ever since its conception, R2P has likewise met with extensive criticism in regard to some of its key tenets. In particular it is argued that a potential military intervention in governments' internal affairs not only constitutes an encroachment upon state sovereignty, but also merely serves as a pretext of stronger states to impose their will upon weaker ones.
1120854419
Linking Strategic Gains to the 'Responsibility to Protect' (R2P) doctrine
Essay from the year 2014 in the subject Politics - General and Theories of International Politics, grade: 71/100, University of Leicester, language: English, abstract: The 'Responsibility to Protect'-Doctrine (R2P) is not as much an obstacle to ending human suffering in war-torn countries as its detractors maintain. Originally conceived as a UN-sponsored attempt to provide the international community with a more efficient instrument for preventing or halting mass violence and human rights violations, it was hoped that R2P would overcome the controversies frequently associated with humanitarian interventions. Yet ever since its conception, R2P has likewise met with extensive criticism in regard to some of its key tenets. In particular it is argued that a potential military intervention in governments' internal affairs not only constitutes an encroachment upon state sovereignty, but also merely serves as a pretext of stronger states to impose their will upon weaker ones.
20.47 In Stock
Linking Strategic Gains to the 'Responsibility to Protect' (R2P) doctrine

Linking Strategic Gains to the 'Responsibility to Protect' (R2P) doctrine

by Joe Majerus
Linking Strategic Gains to the 'Responsibility to Protect' (R2P) doctrine

Linking Strategic Gains to the 'Responsibility to Protect' (R2P) doctrine

by Joe Majerus

eBook

$20.47 

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers


Overview

Essay from the year 2014 in the subject Politics - General and Theories of International Politics, grade: 71/100, University of Leicester, language: English, abstract: The 'Responsibility to Protect'-Doctrine (R2P) is not as much an obstacle to ending human suffering in war-torn countries as its detractors maintain. Originally conceived as a UN-sponsored attempt to provide the international community with a more efficient instrument for preventing or halting mass violence and human rights violations, it was hoped that R2P would overcome the controversies frequently associated with humanitarian interventions. Yet ever since its conception, R2P has likewise met with extensive criticism in regard to some of its key tenets. In particular it is argued that a potential military intervention in governments' internal affairs not only constitutes an encroachment upon state sovereignty, but also merely serves as a pretext of stronger states to impose their will upon weaker ones.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9783656844945
Publisher: GRIN Verlag GmbH
Publication date: 01/01/2014
Sold by: CIANDO
Format: eBook
Pages: 31
File size: 277 KB
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews