Appropriating Theory: Angel Rama's Critical Work

by Jose Eduardo Gonzalez

Overview

Angel Rama (1926-1983) is a major figure in Latin American literary and cultural studies, but little has been published on his critical work. In this study, José Eduardo González focuses on Rama’s response to and appropriation of European critics like Walter Benjamin, Theodor Adorno, and Georg Lukács. González argues that Rama realized the inapplicability of many of their theories and descriptions of cultural modernization to Latin America, and thus reworked them to produce his own discourse that challenged prevailing notions of social and cultural modernization.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9780822964889
Publisher:	University of Pittsburgh Press
Publication date:	08/11/2017
Series:	Pitt Illuminations Series
Edition description:	1
Pages:	240
Product dimensions:	6.00(w) x 8.90(h) x 0.60(d)

About the Author

Jose Eduardo Gonzalez is associate professor of Spanish at the University of Nebraska. He is the author of Borges and the Politics of Form and coeditor of Primitivism and Identity in Latin America: Essays on Art, Literature and Culture, and New Trends in Contemporary Latin American Narrative: Post-National Literatures and the Canon.
 

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments ix

Introduction 1

1 Debates, Dreams, and Fears 11

2 Nature and Interior 35

3 Origins of Transculturation 61

4 Mediations 85

5 Technique and Technology 121

6 The Burden of Exile 140

7 Misunderstanding Foucault 165

Conclusion 178

Notes 187

Works Cited 217

Index 229

Editorial Reviews

“A fascinating and innovative study of Angel Rama’s silent and open dialogue with his intellectual interlocutors and the effects this dialogue had on Rama’s notion of ‘cultural modernization.’  It follows Rama’s evolution chronologically as a thinker who reflects on and writes about the impact of economics, politics, and society on literary matters in Latin America from colonial times to the late twentieth century.”
—Greg Dawes, North Carolina State University


“A comprehensive account of the development of Rama’s thought. It traces the numerous revisions that Rama made of key concepts and insights, in the context of a series of debates and concerns that are by turns theoretical, regional, political, and biographical. It shows how the Uruguayan critic’s work was forever informed by a voracious if skeptical appetite for European theory.”
—Jon Beasley-Murray, University of British Columbia

From the Publisher