Debating Franklin D. Roosevelt's Foreign Policies, 1933-1945

by Justus D. Doenecke, Mark A. Stoler

Overview

Elected an unprecedented four times to the presidency, Franklin D. Roosevelt led the United States through some of the most dramatic and trying foreign and domestic episodes in its history. Coming to power in the throws of a crippling depression, Roosevelt quickly found himself having to juggle the need for tremendous domestic revitalization in a world menaced by burgeoning aggressor states. In Debating Franklin D. Roosevelt's Foreign Policies, noted historians Justus D. Doenecke and Mark A. Stoler offer differing perspectives on the Roosevelt years, finding disparate meanings from common data.

Finding Roosevelt astute at choosing the most effective option of those available, Stoler generally defends FDR's policies against their traditional critics. Conversely, Doenecke emphasizes a dangerous shallowness and superficiality in FDR's approach to foreign affairs, particularly in his first two terms. The contrary viewpoints of the authors, supplemented by carefully chosen documents, provide an ideal introduction allowing readers to examine the issues and draw their own conclusions about Franklin Roosevelt's foreign policy.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9780742576353
Publisher:	Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Publication date:	06/22/2005
Series:	Debating Twentieth-Century America
Sold by:	Barnes & Noble
Format:	eBook
Pages:	248
File size:	1 MB

About the Author

Justus D. Doenecke is professor of history at the New College of Florida. Mark A. Stoler is professor of history at the University of Vermont.

Table of Contents

Introduction
Part I: The Roosevelt Foreign Policy: An Ambiguous Legacy, by Justus D. Doenecke
1: Roosevelt to William Phillips, Acting Secretary of State
2: Memorandum on Neutrality by R. Walton Moore, Assistant Secretary of State, August 27, 1935
3: President Franklin D. Roosevelt's "Quarantine" Speech, October 5, 1937
4: The Atlantic Charter, August 14, 1941 (White House News Release)
5: War on Submarines, Radio Address by President Roosevelt, September 11, 1941
6: Transcription of Press Conference at Casablanca, January 24, 1943
Part II: The Roosevelt Foreign Policy: Flawed, but Superior to the Competition, by Mark A. Stoler
1: The Neutrality Acts, 1935–1939
2: President Franklin D. Roosevelt's Proposal for Lend-Lease Aid to Great Britain, December 17 and 29, 1940
3: President Roosevelt's War Message, December 8, 1941
4: The Teheran Conference Minutes, November 29–30, 1943
5: The Churchill-Roosevelt Agreement on Atomic Energy, September 18, 1944
6: The Yalta Protocol of Proceedings
7: Roosevelt's Messages to Stalin and Churchill, 1945
Bibliography

What People are Saying About This

Garry Clifford

Both scholars cover the whole of FDR's foreign policies in a concise yet nuanced fashion, they present intellectually consistent arguments that gibe with their own previous scholarship, and they bring authority to their different perspectives with objectivity and without any 'Cross-Fire' hype.

Walter LaFeber

Among our best, and most provocative scholars who are writing on the FDR years, Justus Doenecke and Mark Stoler are also distinguished teachers. In this book their scholarship and teaching skills mesh to provide alternative overviews of Roosevelt—accompanied by well-chosen, revealing documents—that will trigger debates inside and outside of the classroom.

David Reynolds

Opens up the issues and sources for one of the critical periods of 20th-century history in a novel, interesting, and useful way.

Warren F. Kimball

There is no better way to become familiar with the fascinating journey made by FDR from inexperienced new president to an architect of victory and of the postwar world. Doenecke and Stoler neatly lay out the arguments over Roosevelt's policies, debates that are surprisingly relevant to the world of the early 21st century.

Editorial Reviews

In this provocative volume, two distinguished historians reappraise Franklin Roosevelt's highly controversial foreign policies from divergent perspectives. Roosevelt's record, they agree, was neither black nor white but mottled. But how mottled, and why, and compared to what alternatives? Roosevelt's defenders and detractors—and the still uncommitted—will profit from pondering the differing answers that Doenecke and Stoler offer.

George H. Nash

Among our best, and most provocative scholars who are writing on the FDR years, Justus Doenecke and Mark Stoler are also distinguished teachers. In this book their scholarship and teaching skills mesh to provide alternative overviews of Roosevelt—accompanied by well-chosen, revealing documents—that will trigger debates inside and outside of the classroom.

Walter LaFeber

Opens up the issues and sources for one of the critical periods of 20th-century history in a novel, interesting, and useful way.

David Reynolds

Debating Frankline D. Roosevelt's Foreign Policies illustrates how events and policies are open to differing interpretations. As a result, it is an outstanding book for those embarking on the study of history in general and U.S. diplomatic history in particular.

The Journal Of Military History - Mary Glantz

There is no better way to become familiar with the fascinating journey made by FDR from inexperienced new president to an architect of victory and of the postwar world. Doenecke and Stoler neatly lay out the arguments over Roosevelt's policies, debates that are surprisingly relevant to the world of the early 21st century.

Warren F. Kimball

Both scholars cover the whole of FDR's foreign policies in a concise yet nuanced fashion, they present intellectually consistent arguments that gibe with their own previous scholarship, and they bring authority to their different perspectives with objectivity and without any 'Cross-Fire' hype.

Garry Clifford

Debating Frankline D. Roosevelt's Foreign Policies illustrates how events and policies are open to differing interpretations. As a result, it is an outstanding book for those embarking on the study of history in general and U.S. diplomatic history in particular.
— Mary Glantz

The Journal of Military History