Defining Art, Creating the Canon: Artistic Value in an Era of Doubt
What is art; why should we value it; and what allows us to say that one work is better than another? Traditional answers have emphasized aesthetic form. But this has been challenged by institutional definitions of art and postmodern critique. The idea of distinctively artistic value based on aesthetic criteria is at best doubted, and at worst, rejected. This book, however, champions these notions in a new way. It does so through a rethink of the mimetic definition of art on the basis of factors which traditional answers neglect, namely the conceptual link between art's aesthetic value and 'non-exhibited' epistemological and historical relations. These factors converge on an expanded notion of the artistic image (a notion which can even encompass music, abstract art, and some conceptual idioms). The image's style serves to interpret its subject-matter. If this style is original (in comparative historical terms) it can manifest that special kind of aesthetic unity which we call art. Appreciation of this involves a heightened interaction of capacities (such as imagination and understanding) which are basic to knowledge and personal identity. By negotiating these factors, it is possible to define art and its canonic dimensions objectively, and to show that aforementioned sceptical alternatives are incomplete and self-contradictory.
1101391314
Defining Art, Creating the Canon: Artistic Value in an Era of Doubt
What is art; why should we value it; and what allows us to say that one work is better than another? Traditional answers have emphasized aesthetic form. But this has been challenged by institutional definitions of art and postmodern critique. The idea of distinctively artistic value based on aesthetic criteria is at best doubted, and at worst, rejected. This book, however, champions these notions in a new way. It does so through a rethink of the mimetic definition of art on the basis of factors which traditional answers neglect, namely the conceptual link between art's aesthetic value and 'non-exhibited' epistemological and historical relations. These factors converge on an expanded notion of the artistic image (a notion which can even encompass music, abstract art, and some conceptual idioms). The image's style serves to interpret its subject-matter. If this style is original (in comparative historical terms) it can manifest that special kind of aesthetic unity which we call art. Appreciation of this involves a heightened interaction of capacities (such as imagination and understanding) which are basic to knowledge and personal identity. By negotiating these factors, it is possible to define art and its canonic dimensions objectively, and to show that aforementioned sceptical alternatives are incomplete and self-contradictory.
19.59 In Stock
Defining Art, Creating the Canon: Artistic Value in an Era of Doubt

Defining Art, Creating the Canon: Artistic Value in an Era of Doubt

by Paul Crowther
Defining Art, Creating the Canon: Artistic Value in an Era of Doubt

Defining Art, Creating the Canon: Artistic Value in an Era of Doubt

by Paul Crowther

eBook

$19.59 

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers

LEND ME® See Details

Overview

What is art; why should we value it; and what allows us to say that one work is better than another? Traditional answers have emphasized aesthetic form. But this has been challenged by institutional definitions of art and postmodern critique. The idea of distinctively artistic value based on aesthetic criteria is at best doubted, and at worst, rejected. This book, however, champions these notions in a new way. It does so through a rethink of the mimetic definition of art on the basis of factors which traditional answers neglect, namely the conceptual link between art's aesthetic value and 'non-exhibited' epistemological and historical relations. These factors converge on an expanded notion of the artistic image (a notion which can even encompass music, abstract art, and some conceptual idioms). The image's style serves to interpret its subject-matter. If this style is original (in comparative historical terms) it can manifest that special kind of aesthetic unity which we call art. Appreciation of this involves a heightened interaction of capacities (such as imagination and understanding) which are basic to knowledge and personal identity. By negotiating these factors, it is possible to define art and its canonic dimensions objectively, and to show that aforementioned sceptical alternatives are incomplete and self-contradictory.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780191526206
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication date: 03/15/2007
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
File size: 429 KB

About the Author

Paul Crowther is Professor of Philosophy and the Visual Arts at Jacobs University Bremen in Germany.

Table of Contents

  • Introduction: Normative Aesthetics and Artistic Value
  • Part One: Culture and Artistic Value
  • 1: Cultural Exclusion and the Definition of Art
  • 2: Defining Art, Defending the Canon, Contesting Culture
  • Part Two: The Aesthetic and the Artistic
  • 3: From Beauty to Art; Developing Kant's Aesthetics
  • 4: The Scope and Value of the Artistic Image
  • Part Three: Distinctive Modes of Imaging
  • 5: Twofoldness: Pictorial Art and the Imagination
  • 6: Between Language and Perception: Literary Metaphor
  • 7: Musical Meaning and Value
  • 8: Eternalizing the Moment: Artistic Projections of Time
  • Conclusion - The Status and Future of Art
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews