Grace and Justice on Death Row: The Race against Time and Texas to Free an Innocent Man
228
Grace and Justice on Death Row: The Race against Time and Texas to Free an Innocent Man
228eBookProprietary (Proprietary)
Related collections and offers
Overview
A chilling and compassionate look at how close an innocent man was to being put death with a foreword by Sister Helen Prejean, author of Dead Man Walking.
What is worse than having a client on Death Row in Texas? Having a client on Death Row in Texas who is innocent and not knowing if you will be able to stop his execution in time.
Grace and Justice on Death Row: A Race Against Time to Free an Innocent Man tells the story of Alfred Dewayne Brown, a man who spent over twelve years in prison (ten of them on Texas’ infamous Death Row) for a high-profile crime he did not commit, and his lawyer, Brian Stolarz, who dedicated his career and life to secure his freedom. The book chronicles Brown’s extraordinary journey to freedom against very long odds, overcoming unscrupulous prosecutors, corrupt police, inadequate defense counsel, and a broken criminal justice system. The book examines how a lawyer-client relationship turned into one of brotherhood.
Grace And Justice On Death Row also addresses many issues facing the criminal justice system and the death penalty – race, class, adequate defense counsel, and intellectual disability, and proposes reforms.
Told from Stolarz’s perspective, this raw, fast-paced look into what it took to save one man’s life will leave you questioning the criminal justice system in this country. It is a story of injustice and redemption that must be told.
Product Details
| ISBN-13: | 9781510715127 |
|---|---|
| Publisher: | Skyhorse |
| Publication date: | 10/04/2016 |
| Sold by: | SIMON & SCHUSTER |
| Format: | eBook |
| Pages: | 228 |
| File size: | 3 MB |
About the Author
Stolarz has received several awards for his dedication to pro bono service, including the Pro Bono Legal Service Award from the John Carroll Society and the 2014 Caritas Award, the highest honor awarded by Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Washington in recognition of work for the indigent and oppressed.
Stolarz is a member of the Criminal Justice Act Felony Panel in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the District of Maryland, a member of the Alumni Council of the Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law, and a member of the Board of Directors of Texas Defender Service.
Currently a partner with LeClair Ryan in Alexandria, Virginia, Stolarz is the head of the Compliance, Investigations, and White Collar Practice Team. This is his first book. He lives in Alexandria with his wife, a former prosecutor, and their three children.
Read an Excerpt
CHAPTER 1
Brooklyn "BS Meter"
I knew Alfred Dewayne Brown was stone-cold innocent the moment I met him. He was a 25-year-old, soft-spoken gentle giant with a sixty-nine IQ living in the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice in Livingston, Texas, north of Houston. Polunsky is where Texas houses people before it kills them. In 2005 he had been sentenced to die for the murder of a police officer, and he had been living on death row pretty much ever since. I was working for K&L Gates, a high-powered mega-firm in Washington, D.C., longing for a case I could be passionate about. I had worked for a couple of years as a public defender for the Legal Aid Society in Brooklyn, New York. It was a steady parade of fallible, devious, and occasionally innocent people, most of whom were short on money and shorter on luck. I felt something at Legal Aid — passion for my work.
In and out of the precinct houses, holding cells, and courtrooms I developed a more than functional "bullshit meter" about people accused of breaking the law. I can usually spot a lie or a liar better than a polygraph operator. I don't mean to brag, but just this one time I'll quote the late Muhammad Ali, who said, "It ain't bragging if you can back it up." I'm not bragging, I'm just saying after one look, I had absolutely no doubt — none — that Alfred Dewayne Brown had not committed the heinous crime for which he had been convicted and for which Texas was going to kill him.
When I left the Polunsky Unit an hour later, I promised Dewayne I would do my best to get him out of there. I also tried both to fight back tears and to keep from being sick to my stomach. I was grateful for the chance to save his life but scared it might be too late. The gravity of the situation set in instantly. I did not go to graduate school to save lives — that is what doctors do. But now I was given the opportunity to save one, and I was determined to do it. In fact, it became my legal, personal, and religious mission to do so.
But I could not ward off the thought that I might one day travel to Texas, stand behind a glass window, and watch a group of my fellow citizens carry out a medical procedure to end his life against his will. I was sick thinking I might have to watch. I vowed to my wife that if I watched him die I would hang up my law license forever and go start a pizza parlor. I am from New Jersey, after all.
I had a lot of work to do. At the Houston airport a few hours later, I was waiting for my flight, lost in thought about just how much work it would be, when I was accosted by a friendly, toothpick-wielding woman offering free samples of her cuisine around the food court. Unable to resist, I ordered and devoured some of her best General Tso's chicken. I cracked open my fortune cookie. "You love challenge," it said. I laughed and looked up to a ceiling painted with fake clouds. Was this some kind of divine-but-sick joke? I put the fortune in my wallet, where it remains to this day next to a picture of my three kids.
I know your initial reaction to all of this is to say, "Yeah, sure, all the people in prison say they are innocent." Hell, even members of my own family didn't believe me when I came home from Texas and said he was innocent. Believe me, I would be the first one to tell you if he were guilty. Many of my current and former clients were, in fact, guilty of what they were charged with. But, in that one moment, that first time I met him, something rocketed through to the deepest part of me: he didn't commit this crime. I understand your hesitation. Maybe you have your own BS meter. Come along with me on this ride and you, too, will see what I saw and felt, what I feel. This man is what I believed him to be from the very second I saw him — innocent. And he would have died if there were no one to stand up for him.
CHAPTER 2Against Scaliaism
"For me, one executed innocent man is too many."
As my fortune cookie said, I do indeed love a challenge, but I didn't know then what I know now — that Houston, Texas, is one of the worst, if not the worst, places in the United States of America to be charged with a crime. If you are African-American and poor, you might as well just get fitted for your none-too-stylish orange prison jumpsuit as you enter the courthouse, because prison is where you are going to be very soon. And for a long time.
And if you've been accused of killing somebody in Houston, you are headed for that sweepstakes of the damned known as the death penalty lottery. In the death penalty lottery, people convicted of capital crimes are chosen for execution by agents of the state who have their own personal and political agendas for seeking the death penalty.
As of the time this was written, 1,436 people have been executed in this country since 1976. However, according to Amnesty International, approximately 2 percent of those convicted for crimes that are eligible for a death sentence actually receive a death sentence.
Now put yourself in Dewayne's shoes. He was an African-American man with limited intellectual functioning from a dirt-poor, marginalized family in Houston who didn't kill anybody, but was fingered by shady characters and the Houston Police Department for killing a white police officer in a very high-profile case. He was in a very dangerous place. He landed, without money or competent legal advice, in the death penalty lottery for something he didn't do.
The conviction of the innocent is less uncommon than the defenders of capital punishment care to admit. According to a 2014 study published by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, an estimated 4 percent of all inmates who have been scheduled to die are in fact innocent. And the authors stated that this figure was a conservative estimate. Some of the folks in the Texas death penalty abolition movement estimate that the number is much higher, even near 25 percent.
There have been 156 exonerations from death row since 1976, when the death penalty was reinstituted in America. Dewayne was number 154. Texas has had thirteen exonerees (Dewayne was lucky number thirteen) walk out of death row. They were sent to die and they walked out. When you analyze exonerations, including offenses beyond death row cases, a frightening portrait of Harris County emerges. According to the National Registry of Exonerations at the University of Michigan Law School and a BBC Magazine report, in 2015, there were 149 people exonerated from twenty-nine states after serving an average of fourteen and a half years in prison. Fifty-four were from Texas and a staggering forty-two of them came from Harris County. In 2014, there were 125 exonerations and Harris County had thirty-one of them (Texas had thirty-nine). And 52 percent of the Harris County exonerees were African-American, even though they make up less than 20 percent of the Harris County population.
Five hundred and thirty-seven people were executed by the state of Texas since 1976. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, an excellent resource for death penalty-related information, there is "strong evidence of innocence" for ten people who were executed; of those ten, six came from Texas. For example, it is without much debate now that Cameron Todd Willingham, who was convicted of setting fire to his own house while his three children were inside, was actually innocent and, thus, murdered by the state of Texas. There is also a strong indication that Troy Davis of Georgia was innocent, but he was executed.
I realize that ten out of 1,436 in the country and six out of 537 in Texas are small percentages, but we are talking about individual lives in each case and not numbers on a spreadsheet. Six people, or maybe more, may have been innocent, but the state of Texas killed them anyway. We will never know if they actually were innocent. They lay there on the gurneys with the drugs coursing through their veins, with the pain of a failed criminal justice system and country killing them. And even if they are posthumously exonerated, that obviously does not bring them back from the dead.
For me, one executed innocent man is too many.
So if you are a criminal defendant of any race who can't afford a good lawyer, and you are brought to justice in Houston, Texas, you may well wind up in line for a needle in your arm, containing a questionable drug cocktail that may cause you pain as you die. Pretty soon your mother will be crying over your pine-box casket as they lower your corpse into the soil of the Lone Star State.
But here is the catch, the dirty little secret that is no secret to anyone who works in the criminal justice system in Houston. You could also be innocent of a capital crime and looking at a doubly-damned fate: the end of your opportunity to prove your innocence in an American court of law and the simultaneous end of your life.
That's what Alfred Dewayne Brown and his family had been looking at for years when I met him in March 2007. Eight years and three months later, Dewayne would walk out of prison, giddy with the relief and joy we all felt.
"I went in an innocent man," he grinned on his first night of freedom in twelve years and sixty-two days, "and I came out an innocent man." And in a moment of pure grace and humility, Dewayne said that he had no hate in his heart about his time in jail, and he encouraged everyone to love each other and forgive.
It took a heroic effort from a small team of dedicated people, and some good old-fashioned luck (or the grace of God), to give Dewayne the last word in a story that might have been a terrible injustice.
I tell his story for a larger purpose: to show why the death penalty is dying in America. Dewayne's story is one of justice betrayed and justice vindicated, but it is only one of hundreds — if not thousands — of such cases, which have discredited our system of capital punishment as unfair and unfixable. As these cases accumulate, even those who do not reject the execution of criminals on moral grounds are rejecting the death penalty for practical reasons.
In 2015, conservative Nebraska (referendum vote scheduled for November 2016 after the Nebraska Legislature voted to abolish the death penalty) followed liberal Maryland as the latest state to abandon capital punishment. Nineteen states have abolished the death penalty. And in the states that still perform executions, the practice is receding. In 2012, just fifty-nine counties (fewer than 2 percent of counties in the country) accounted for all death sentences imposed nationwide. Since 1976, 82 percent of the executions in this country occurred in the south, and 37 percent of those in Texas. Only 1 percent of executions occurred in the Northeast.
In 1999, 70 percent of Americans lived in states that had carried out an execution in the past three years. In 2014, the figure was 33 percent. Executions have dropped dramatically since 2000, with only thirty-five in 2014, twenty-eight in 2015, and fourteen midway through 2016. In 1999, there were ninety-eight executions.
In other words, the places in America where capital punishment holds sway have been steadily shrinking. I will explain why the capital punishment system will almost certainly continue to contract until the day, not far off I believe, when it is no longer inflicted on the innocent or the guilty in America.
This is not a book about why the death penalty is unconstitutional (though I will explain why I think it is). It is not about why capital punishment is immoral (ditto). It is not a legal brief against an arbitrary process (because it is indisputable that the process is arbitrary). This is a book about why the death penalty is doomed for all of these reasons, and for several more.
My argument will no doubt strike some as premature, but I believe it is an argument whose time has come. The Supreme Court again upheld the practice of the death penalty in the Glossip v. Gross decision in June 2015. A group of prisoners on death row in Oklahoma appealed their death sentences, arguing the state's new method of execution — lethal injection of a drug cocktail using a sedative, not a barbiturate — would cause pain and thus violate the Eighth Amendment's injunction against cruel and unusual punishment.
"Because capital punishment is constitutional, there must be a constitutional means of carrying it out," wrote Justice Samuel Alito for the majority. "Challenges to lethal injection protocols test the boundaries of the authority and competency of federal courts," Alito went on. The courts, he opined, "should not embroil themselves in ongoing scientific controversies beyond their expertise."
The court's 5-4 decision preserved lethal injection as a constitutional way to kill Americans convicted of capital crimes. There are dozens of inmates scheduled to be killed for their crimes over the next three years, and there is no constitutional obstacle to their legally administered death. Texas executed two people in October 2015, and one in November 2015. Perhaps as a nod to the religious, Texas doesn't schedule any executions in December. The New Year brought four executions in January 2016, with more scheduled throughout the year.
What's more, the court's most prominent and arguably most influential jurist, former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, issued a separate concurring opinion. At this juncture I want to note that I wrote the majority of this book while Justice Scalia was still alive. When he died in February 2016, as a Catholic, I of course mourned his passing. I did not, however, mourn the fact that he is no longer serving on the Supreme Court, due to the part he played in damaging the same Constitution he is praised by most for defending, especially concerning the death penalty. It is not my intention to criticize someone who is deceased, but because many spoke of his legacy after his passing, I feel compelled to state that part of his legacy most likely contributed to the execution of innocent people in this country.
In Glossip, he scorned the arguments made by Justice Stephen Breyer in his dissent, wherein he claimed that the injustices inherent to the capital punishment system require its abolition in the name of American decency.
"Welcome to Groundhog Day." Scalia began with majestic, sarcastic scorn. "The scene is familiar: Petitioners, sentenced to die for the crimes they committed (including, in the case of one petitioner since put to death, raping and murdering an eleven-month-old baby), come before this Court asking us to nullify their sentences as 'cruel and unusual' under the Eighth Amendment."
The scope of Scalia's indignation elevated him so far above the practice of capital punishment in America that he could not — or did not want to — see what is actually happening in the jails, prisons, and courts of America. Four percent of the men and women on death row are innocent. Justice Scalia could not seem to acknowledge a story like Dewayne's. It would have distracted him from his lectures to a group of convicted criminals about their temerity to think the Constitution might apply to them. He even said that the Constitution does not preclude the execution of an innocent man. If he were alive to read this, he would likely dispatch of me and my words with another Scaliaism, as he did Justice Breyer in his Glossip decision. But he was wrong.
How dare the Oklahoma plaintiffs, men convicted of despicable and heinous crimes, assert their constitutional rights? How dare they ask for the protection of the Eighth Amendment?
"They rely on this provision because it is the only provision they can rely on," Scalia thundered on. "They were charged by a sovereign State with murder. They were afforded counsel and tried before a jury of their peers — tried twice, once to determine whether they were guilty and once to determine whether death was the appropriate sentence. They were duly convicted and sentenced. They were granted the right to appeal and to seek post-conviction relief, first in state and then in federal court. And now, acknowledging that their convictions are unassailable, they ask us for clemency, as though clemency were ours to give."
As I read Scalia's rant with mounting disbelief, I had to ask myself, "This man calls himself a Catholic?"
I grew up in circumstances not unlike Scalia: an extended Catholic family in the northeastern United States (Scalia in a multi-ethnic neighborhood of Queens in New York City, me in northern New Jersey). He attended a public elementary school and Catholic high school. So did I. He was self-described as "not a cool kid," who spent much of his time absorbed in his schoolwork. Same for me, until I grew taller than everyone else and figured out how to shoot a jumper on the basketball court. But I am a "law dork" at heart and, in truth, I love the law probably as much as Scalia did. That is why I am so upset about the criminal justice system in this country and why I believe Dewayne's story needs to be told.
(Continues…)
Excerpted from "Grace and Justice on Death Row"
by .
Copyright © 2016 Brian W. Stolarz.
Excerpted by permission of Skyhorse Publishing.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Table of Contents
Foreword,
PART I: INTRODUCTION,
Chapter 1: Brooklyn "BS Meter",
Chapter 2: Against Scaliaism,
PART II: THE ARREST,
Chapter 3: Two Senseless Murders,
Chapter 4: Manhunt,
Chapter 5: Family and Faith and Growth,
Chapter 6: Interrogations,
Chapter 7: "What y'all want me to say?",
Chapter 8: Dewayne's Alibi,
Chapter 9: "Doing Justice" at the DA's Office,
Chapter 10: Pressuring the Witnesses,
Chapter 11: Indictment,
PART III: THE TRIAL,
Chapter 12: Gideon Betrayed,
Chapter 13: The Defense Bar,
Chapter 14: Defense Fail,
Chapter 15: Prosecutorial Misconduct,
Chapter 16: Ericka's Story,
Chapter 17: The Accomplice's Story,
Chapter 18: Closing Arguments,
Chapter 19: The Verdict,
Chapter 20: Ratifying Injustice,
Chapter 21: In the Tradition of Dr. Death,
Chapter 22: The Four Issues,
PART IV: THE FIGHT FOR DEWAYNE'S LIFE,
Chapter 23: In Praise of NOBs,
Chapter 24: Life-Changing Phone Call,
Chapter 25: The Appeal Process,
Chapter 26: The Writ,
Chapter 27: The Team,
Chapter 28: Meeting Dewayne,
Chapter 29: The Third Guy,
Chapter 30: Lost Letter,
Chapter 31: Protecting E.W.,
Chapter 32: Witnesses Recant,
Chapter 33: The Brief,
Chapter 34: Another Letter,
Chapter 35: Ghetto Comes Clean,
Chapter 36: Uncle Mo,
Chapter 37: The Problem of Elected Judges,
Chapter 38: The Trouble with NOBs,
Chapter 39: Death Row,
Chapter 40: Unringing the Bell,
Chapter 41: Code of the Streets,
Chapter 42: The Case Restated,
Chapter 43: Anthony Graves to the Rescue,
Chapter 44: "I Am Troy Davis",
Chapter 45: Ericka's True Story,
Chapter 46: The Affidavit,
Chapter 47: Leaving the NOBs,
Chapter 48: Walk On,
PART V: JUSTICE, AT LAST,
Chapter 49: Convergence,
Chapter 50: The "Expert" Witness,
Chapter 51: The Conflicted Judge,
Chapter 52: Grace from a Garage,
Chapter 53: The Inadequate Counsel,
Chapter 54: Elected Judges Dither,
Chapter 55: Exoneration,
Chapter 56: A Prayer for Dewayne,
Chapter 57: Freedom,
Chapter 58: Oysters and a Road Trip,
Chapter 59: "Live your life. Live it.",
Chapter 60: What Can Be Done?,
Chapter 61: Scalia Was Wrong,
Chapter 62: "It don't come down to nothing except love in the end.",
Acknowledgments,
Bibliography,
Index,
Photo Insert,
Related Subjects
Customer Reviews
Explore More Items
