Harvard Law Review: Volume 126, Number 5 - March 2013

Harvard Law Review: Volume 126, Number 5 - March 2013

Harvard Law Review: Volume 126, Number 5 - March 2013

Harvard Law Review: Volume 126, Number 5 - March 2013

eBook

$3.99 

Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers

LEND ME® See Details

Overview

The Harvard Law Review is offered in a digital edition, featuring active Contents, linked notes, and proper ebook formatting. The contents of Issue 5 include:

• Article, "Multistage Adjudication," by Louis Kaplow
• Book Review, "Humanizing the Criminal Justice Machine: Re-Animated Justice or Frankenstein's Monster?," by Nicola Lacey
• Note, "Importing a Trade or Business Limitation into § 2036: Toward a Regulatory Solution to FLP-Driven Transfer Tax Avoidance"
• Note, "The Benefits of Unequal Protection"
• Note, "Diagnostic Method Patents and Harms to Follow-On Innovation"
• Note, "Three Formulations of the Nexus Requirement in Reasonable Accommodations Law"

In addition, student research explores Recent Cases on the intersection of age discrimination claims and § 1983 claims, the First Amendment implications of restricting airline ads and of compelled speech in suicide advisories, whether transactions in unlisted securities are "domestic," whether employee misuse of computers violates the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and prudential standing in environmental cases. Finally, the issue includes a Recent Book essay and two book notes of Recent Publications.

This issue of the Review is March 2013, the fifth issue of academic year 2012-2013 (Volume 126).

Product Details

BN ID: 2940016324838
Publisher: Quid Pro, LLC
Publication date: 03/07/2013
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
Pages: 297
File size: 793 KB

About the Author

The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2000 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions. Articles are contributed by leading scholars, along with student contributions.
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews