Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought

Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought

by Pascal Boyer
3.5 2

NOOK Book(eBook)

View All Available Formats & Editions
Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
Want a NOOK ? Explore Now


Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought by Pascal Boyer

Many of our questions about religion, says renowned anthropologist Pascal Boyer, are no longer mysteries. We are beginning to know how to answer questions such as "Why do people have religion?" Using findings from anthropology, cognitive science, linguistics, and evolutionary biology, Religion Explained shows how this aspect of human consciousness is increasingly admissible to coherent, naturalistic explanation. This brilliant and controversial book gives readers the first scientific explanation for what religious feeling is really about, what it consists of, and where it comes from.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780465004614
Publisher: Basic Books
Publication date: 03/21/2007
Sold by: Hachette Digital, Inc.
Format: NOOK Book
Pages: 384
Sales rank: 973,109
File size: 974 KB

About the Author

Pascal Boyer is Luce Professor of Collective and Individual Memory at Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

Religion Explained 3.5 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 2 reviews.
tryagain More than 1 year ago
If you base your buying decision on Anonymous' review, you will deprive yourself of some fascinating reading. Far from being "rligion trivialized an nauseum" (sic), it is an attempt to ask the crucial question of what compels people to believe what they believe, and whether there are any biological and psychological reasons for it. This has nothing to do with whether religion was a force for good or bad. "Flight from profundity in postmodern academia today ..." Oh, please ! We are not talking here about postmodern interpretations of Shakespeare. What we do (art, religion, politics etc) has to be somewhat anchored in biology and psychology. Not too long ago we dealt with schizophrenics by either locking them up or believing they were divinely inspired. Today we medicate them so they can live more productive lives. Whether we want it or not, science will scrutinize everything, and nothing is off the table. Once again, this is _not_ an attack on religion, or the study of whether religion is ultimately useful or detrimental, but a look at why we believe what we believe - an examination of belief. I don't see how this trivializes religion.
Guest More than 1 year ago
I am a psychologist with a lifelong interest in religion. I never cease to be struck by its tremendous psychological power in producing group solidarity, healing, overcoming hardship, even facing death itself. Evolutionary psychologists are yet to realize its full significance in early human survival. Equally significant is religion's horrendous power for malevolent destruction: e.g. the ancient Hebrew 'ban' allowing total mass murder of women and children in war, the medieval Christian slaughter of witches and heritics, the thousands of young Muslims being indoctrinated as suicidal mass murders today.... Yet 'religion Explained' blithly dismisses all of the above, citing ad hoc reasons unsupported by hard evidence. Instead it chooses to utilize the still undeveloped method of cognitive science to 'explain' all of religion. It does so by citing imagined mini-systems of the mind inferred from computer simulations and the like (e.g. social inclinations, linguistic tendencies, confirmation bias,dissonance reduction, mental decoupling, etc. etc.). these supposed mental systems are expounded with no matching correlates in the human brain. Moreover, they are not specifically related to religion at all, but to human behavior in general. 'Explaining' religion by citing trivial, mental mini-systems is tantamount to 'explaining' Einstein's relativity equations by citing the ways he made chalk marks on the blackboard. Apparently the new cognitive science as presented here is so far merely an unwitting offshoot from the postmodern emphasis on mental fragmentation and its centerless lack of depth in all modes of thought. A more appropriate title for the book might be 'Rligion Trivialized Ad Nausium'. However, I do recommend this book to shcolars and educatid laypersons alike if only to scrutinize the studied flight from profundity in postmodern academia today.