Read an Excerpt
Chapter 1 to SIX POPES: A Son of the Church Remembers by MSGR. HILARY C. FRANCO
Bronx Kid
The last day of non-Leap Year Februarys is the 28th. In 2013, it was last in another, historically significant way: it was last day Joseph Ratzinger served the Catholic Church as Pope Benedict XVI. For on that day he took the unprecedented step of resigning his papacy. Not two weeks later, on March 13, a conclave chose his successor, Jorge Mario Bergoglio who, as an Argentinian and Jesuit, also made history. Not in over five hundred years have two popes been living contemporaries.
That spring, I reached the milestone age of 80. I was serving as pastor St. Augustine’s in Ossining, New York, about which more in due course. My “retirement” was around the corner, but still a season away. A papal transition after a papal retirement moved thoughts of my own possible transition to my mind’s back burner.
I was born in an historic era. (So are we all, but some are more historic than others.) As the administrations of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, New York Mayor Fiorello La Guardia, and Pope Pius XI overlapped each other, I entered the world on July 16, 1932. For this kid, there was one president, one mayor, one pope.
My neighborhood was Belmont, near 187th Street and Crotona and Arthur Avenues in the Bronx. This locale was home to one of the leading Doo-Wop groups , the Belmonts, two of whom having grown up on Belmont Avenue.
The Italian immigrants who dominated Belmont made for great lore, the stuff of movies like Scorsese’s Goodfellas and Raging Bull. Hollywood myths aside, however, Belmont was populated by hard-working Italian-Americans who loved their families, their country, and their Church.
We shopped in the Arthur Avenue Market when it was new, one of many vendor consolidations created by Mayor La Guardia in the Thirties and Forties to replace the myriads of street-clogging pushcarts and liberate the pedestrian sidewalks.
The first wave of Italian immigration hit America’s shores in the 1880s; the second, around the turn of the 20th century, booming just after World War I. Many of them settled in Belmont and gave Arthur Avenue the Italian identity it has to this day. Among them, my parents.
My mother, Maria Catalina Scali, a primary school teacher for 41 years, was always after us—especially after me!—to get an education. An immigrant from Italy’s Calabria region, she loved her Italian culture and didn’t let us speak English at home. And we had to speak “real” Italian, not a dialect. Anyone who speaks with me can hear its echoes in my voice.
My father, also a native Calabrese, arrived in America as a young man. Coming from a well-to-do family, he had been under no economic pressure to emigrate. He did, however, imbibe socialist ideas from the old country. An old-school socialist, but no communist, he wanted to help new immigrants “make it” in their adopted homeland. Before settling in the Bronx, he had a mind to start a newspaper in Clarksburg, West Virginia, whose coal mining jobs had attracted so many of them.
He did not find immigrant life easy, coming as he did from a well-groomed Catholic family that, in the course of a century, had given the Church at least three priests: my great-uncle Don Ilario Franco, a well-known 19th-century professor of classics; his brother, Archpriest Tommaso Franco; and my uncle Father Ilario Franco who had come to the United States to serve Italian immigrants and had been incardinated in the Archdiocese of New York.
One Sunday an Irish priest barred his entrance to a church where he had intended to go for Sunday Mass. He was told to go to church in the basement. A handsome and powerful young man, Dad didn’t take kindly to disrespect. “I had a choice,” he told me many years later. “Push the priest aside (which would have only angered and hurt his people) or leave. I left.” He never set foot in a church until the day of my ordination to the priesthood.
Dad was all about taking care of people, a trait of his I wanted to emulate. When as a teenager I shared inklings of my vocation with him, he wasn’t thrilled. At my ordination, however, he presented to me a parchment on which his own “ten commandments” were inscribed. The first? “Take care of the people.” That directive has never been far from my thoughts during the past nearly seven decades. And so, my goal as a priest was always to be with the people of God. Not serve them at a distance (although sometimes I had no choice), but to be with them. I attribute this attitude to Dad’s social-minded, if not socialist, sensibilities and their influence on me.
As a youngster, I aspired to be, not a policeman, fireman, or soldier, but an actor. Mother encouraged my proclivity to declaim at the drop of a hat, which I did with any poetry I memorized. It’s interesting to note that when directing the liturgy, the priest is center-stage on the altar—facing the tabernacle in the traditional Mass—re-enacting the drama of the Sacrifice on Calvary. That suited me to a T.
Father having “unchurched” himself, Mom assumed responsibility for her children’s religious education. As a boy, I accepted the Catholic faith more or less passively. I thought no more about it than my chums did. But one day the sight of an elderly priest in the Manhattan neighborhood where I was working provoked me to ask: “What plans does the good Lord have for me?” I was barely 18; no vocation entered my mind until that time.
Upon my return from Rome as a priest—much more on that later—I was assigned for three months to Our Lady of Mount Carmel, a Bronx church, then Saint Dominic’s on Unionport Road, also in the Bronx, was home for me for almost two years (while I attended Fordham Universityto earn a master’s in sociology). From the Bronx I was transferred to Assumption Parish in New Brighton, Staten Island, a borough of New York, but connected only by ferry to the rest of the city. (The Verrazzano Bridge opened in 1964.) I served there for three years. As there was no shortage of pastoral outlets for my energy, I enjoyed every minute of these assignments. My paternally inspired wish to be with the people was fulfilled in abundance. But God had other plans for me.
When the Fifties began, and before I voyaged to Rome, I was but one of Fulton J. Sheen’s millions of fans. An American Catholic bishop, Sheen was a renown philosopher, prolific writer and television star whose ratings rivaled those of Milton Berle (“Mr. Television”) and Frank Sinatra (“The Voice”). An admirer of Sheen’s based on what I had read—pretty much every word he’d ever published—I eagerly looked forward to his TV show Life Is Worth Living, which aired on the Dumont network Tuesday nights at 8:00 P.M (EST). With as many as ten million viewers hanging on his every word, the show’s success rivaled that of Berle’s Texaco Star Theater to his every word.
As a Roman university student in 1954, the year Pope Pius X was canonized, I had caught a view of Sheen at a distance. During the canonization ceremony, in which the saintly Pope’s casketed body was carried, Sheen struck a handsome, statuesque figure. His head of neatly combed black hair was revealed only at the Mass’s consecration, when prelates had their mitres removed.
I could not then imagine that by the decade’s close, Sheen would promote me from fan to friend to trusted assistant and confidante. The last surviving member of his houseful, I have had the privilege of receiving over one hundred handwritten letters from him, the last one coming a little over a month before he died in 1979.
My earlier book, Bishop Fulton J. Sheen: Mentor and Friend, tells that story, some steps of which I’ll retrace here while adding a few more details. Both as a friend and witness to his saintliness, I’ve been devoted to the cause of Sheen’s beatification, which proceeds at a snail’s pace as I write. It’s usually a slow process, and Sheen’s is no exception. There have been ups and downs. Here are a few.
Sheen’s beatification had been set for December 21, 2019, but the diocese of Rochester, New York, where he had served as bishop for three years in the late Sixties, wants to examine how he handled clerical abuse accusations against priests under his authority. The Vatican has suspended the cause indefinitely.
In the meanwhile, a scandalous tug-of-war over his mortal remains unfortunately transpired between Catholic dioceses. On many occasions he made it clear to me that he wished to be buried in New York. Yes, Peoria, Illinois, was his hometown and city of his priestly ordination, but there’s no evidence he wanted to be buried there. All the evidence we have goes the other way.
The rope-pulling contest began when Mrs. Joan Cunningham, a niece of Bishop Sheen’s who had been happy with the interment of her uncle’s remains under the main altar of St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s, requested that they be translated to Peoria. Justice Arlene Bluth of the Supreme Court’s New York County Petition Court granted the request on November 17, 2016. On February 6, 2018, the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court reversed Justice Bluth’s decision. The court ruled that disinterment couldn’t occur until an evidentiary hearing was held, and so it was. The original decision to translate Sheen’s remains to Peoria was reinstated. On June 9, 2019, the Archdiocese of New York gave up the effort to keep Sheen's remains. They traveled a few weeks later to St. Mary's Cathedral in Peoria.
To say I’m disappointed by this outcome is to understate things. As I recorded at the time:
“. . . the appellate justices recognized that in Justice Bluth’s 2016 decision, she “failed to give appropriate consideration to the affidavit of Monsignor Franco and too narrowly defined the inquiry into Archbishop Sheen’s wishes.” It added, “Monsignor Franco stated that Archbishop Sheen had repeatedly expressed his ‘desire to remain in New York even after his death.’ Contrary to the motion court's conclusion, a fair reading of this alleged exchange, if it is true, is that Archbishop Sheen wished his body to remain somewhere in New York.” . . . The petition court . . . improperly deferred to the family's wishes, merely because Archbishop Sheen's remains did not end up in Calvary Cemetery [where he had bought a plot for his burial], and without a full exploration of Archbishop Sheen's desires.”
Unambiguously, Sheen wished to be buried in New York. But this wish was not to be granted. May ours for his beatification receive a favorable answer. In my lifetime, God willing!