The Ethnic Struggle for Political Supremacy in South Africa 1850-1994

The Ethnic Struggle for Political Supremacy in South Africa 1850-1994

by David Haasbroek
The Ethnic Struggle for Political Supremacy in South Africa 1850-1994

The Ethnic Struggle for Political Supremacy in South Africa 1850-1994

by David Haasbroek

eBook

$4.99 

Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers

LEND ME® See Details

Overview

There are so many misapprehensions about the origins of the policy of ethnic differentiation (apartheid) that this summary has become necessary. In a TV programme, e.g. the Secretary-General of the SA Council Churches still thought that apartheid was a policy which was based on racial superiority. Misunderstanding of the motives of politicians and misconception of state policies create unnecessary racial tensions, and they prevent reconciliation about past events. These misconceptions have been deliberately propagated after 1948 to generate opposition to the referendum for a South African republic. That happened at a time when numerous rebellions were waged against British colonisation in several parts of the world. The matter has also been confused and aggravated by imperialistic church policies. Yet few people realise that Christianity, Western civilisation and racial superiority were propagated to promote the imperialistic policies of colonising powers such as Britain, America, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Portugal and Spain.


Product Details

BN ID: 2940164240721
Publisher: Erica de Kok
Publication date: 09/06/2020
Sold by: Smashwords
Format: eBook
File size: 748 KB

About the Author

Professor Haasbroek (1920 - 2003), was educated at the Universities of Potchefstroom and Stellenbosch and was on the staff of the University of Zululand1962 - 1983. There he has lectured on the struggle of a British minority for political dominance in multi-ethnic South Africa through a variety of constitutional safeguards, checks and balances. Because of that struggle, which has led to party political conflicts, and to the Wars of 1880-1881 and 1899-1902 he has also explained the rise of a policy of ethnic segregation (apartheid) which envisaged devolution of political power to overcome ethnic conflict. (1841-1994)

Since the S. A. Council of Churches, supported by atheist Communists has also been politically involved in the struggle, he has also investigated the political and mythological pagan origins of Christianity to determine the true nature of the conflict. This research is recorded in the bibliography, and it explains how the struggle of monotheistic Jews for self- determination has been confronted by pagan Hellenist and Roman worshippers of heads of state, heroes and martyrs after the crucifixion. Evangelists shifted the Jewish conflicts against Stephen and Paul AFTER the crucifixion to Jesus personally BEFORE the crucifixion and thus made Jesus, the anointed orthodox candidate for the crown, a pagan Son of God. Such a son of god would be contrary to the provisions of the Ten Commandments. The object was to blame the Jews for the crucifixion. The outcome, despite vehement Jewish opposition to the deification of Jesus, has been: the deification of their monotheistic anointed crucified king by Hellenists and subsequently by the Romans; and the destruction of the Jewish state in 138CE. After 325CE, Jews were severely persecuted for refusing to worship the Roman emperor and the deified Jesus. This shows us how dangerous it is when different ethnics struggle for political dominance in the same country.

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews